« first day (1530 days earlier)      last day (2296 days later) » 

10:02 AM
@Glorfindel The main point, IMO, is: if the post is useful, then it should be kept.
 
Yes, I don't want to delete helpful content posted by experts.
If we're going to do that, we might as well shut up shop now.
 
Android mod!
 
We don't mark spam to punish the user, we mark it to keep the site clean. So someone who takes the time to repeat content that they have written elsewhere, and just also includes a link to their blog, is helping the site, not harming it.
4
 
A J
Got 3 flags declined on Android.SE. :/ @DanHulme
 
hello
 
10:03 AM
And yes, hello soot-covered folks!
2
 
@iBug Thanks for adding the disclosure so that he got the idea.
 
@terdon That's why I retracted my spam flags and edited disclosure in.
 
@iBug Nice one!
 
terdon made it right.
 
@AJ Yes. Please don't flag helpful answers as spam.
 
A J
10:04 AM
It had the promotional links
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +3 more: nutrasunnaturalgreencleanseblog.com/garcinia-ultra-pure/ by AariaAarcia on graphicdesign.SE
 
@AJ But was it useful? If so, why not remove the links for example?
 
tpu- by A J
 
Who benefits from a useful post deleted as spam?
 
@AJ See terdon's message.
 
A J
10:05 AM
@terdon Ah! Okay.
 
We only benefit if noise and garbage is removed. Not malformed but potentially useful answers.
 
Also, because this can't be said enough, and just to be clear: you people ROCK! You do great work 99% of the time. It's just that we only ever notice the 1% you miss, and that's when we come and whine at you. :P
 
If a user keeps adding promotional link (but helpful), add the disclosure for them and flag for mod attention.
 
If it's useful content, why not edit out the links? Because I'm worried this might set a precedent.
 
If it's totally garbage, then flag-nuking is fine.
 
10:07 AM
@Glorfindel Of what?
 
The reason this was so shocking to me is that we had an expert user, which our site is really short of. He made some mistakes, and was corrected, and learned to do the right thing. But he was nearly permanently banned from the site because of spam flags.
 
of people posting less valuable content with promotional links.
 
@Glorfindel I still prefer a case-by-case judging for link removal VS addition of affiliation.
 
@Glorfindel Why "less valuable"?
 
less valuable than the content we're currently discussing.
 
10:08 AM
And if the answer is bad, then flag as VLQ, downvote etc. No need to bring out the big guns (spam flags) immediately.
 
@DanHulme If you could, please dispute the flags next time. I believe people here don't meant offense.
 
@iBug No? Why?
 
@iBug I have already done this.
 
Thanks!
 
CI on fa5c050 succeeded.
 
10:09 AM
We shouldn't get special treatment because we're Charcoal...
 
!!/pull
 
If they're not helpful treat them like any other user.
 
That's true but...
 
uhhh I think that raiditem is MY fault
 
10:10 AM
Restart: API quota is 13290.
 
wait, does "dispute the flags" mean dismiss as "helpful"?
 
Dismiss as "disputed
 
That isn't a thing.
 
yeah
 
10:10 AM
It means mark them as "disputed", neither helpful or declined.
 
So neither the flagger nor the flaggee gets punished.
 
That's what "clear spam flags" does.
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad NS for domain in body, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body, +4 more: There are at variance testosterone celuraid extremes by Whort rear on drupal.SE
tpu- by Glorfindel
 
its actually a 100% copy paste of article.. wouldnt it count as plagiarism if we couldnt prove affiliation?
 
@iBug The flager is not punished. How would that happen?
 
10:11 AM
I dismissed them with a custom message explaining that helpful content that also includes a link for more information isn't spam.
 
@terdon If a red flag is marked as helpful, I believe the flaggee will receive some kind of punishment sooner or later.
I don't know much about that. You mods should know.
 
@iBug Yes, sorry, I meant the flagger. The flagee is punished immediately, which is precisely why spam flags should be used with caution.
Marking non-spam as spam is far, far worse than allowing borderline spam to pass.
 
Flagger gets banned from flagging for up to a week if they have raised too many declined flags.
 
I don't know if we're all on the same page with what "dispute" means here...
 
That's kinda punishment.
 
10:13 AM
Anyway, now I have to go write a mod message to this guy explaining what happened and that what he's doing now is OK.
 
@Mithrandir It's their fault. "disputed" is a special term on SE.
 
@iBug That isn't much of a punishment. Especially when compared to what happens to people whose posts are marked as spam incorrectly. They get a -100 and can be banned.
 
@DanHulme What? Why? That's not really what mod messages are for...
 
@iBug it's not a punishment for the flagger - it's a relief for the mods who have to handle the flags :-)
 
That should IMO be a comment.
 
10:13 AM
Wait for me to get quotation from MSE.
 
A J
@DanHulme I hope this doesn't result in flag ban.
 
@Mithrandir Of course it is. When someone has been punished with no warning and unfairly, we have to go and apologize.
 
@iBug it counts against flagger when it is rejected not disputed
 
I've had to do this too.
 
@terdon Sure, but why a mod message?
 
10:14 AM
@Mithrandir How else?
 
A comment?
A mod message leaves a permanent mark.
 
@Mithrandir Not a mark. Not all mod messages are bad.
 
This is probably better suited for the TL though
 
Found it
 
10:15 AM
From this answer: Note: For spam and "rude or abusive" flags, do not mark the flag as helpful, as this may cause the post author to be penalized. Instead, clear the flag, which will mark it as "disputed".
 
That will mark them as "disputed", not helpful or declined.
 
@AJ Would that be a problem? I don't believe you're very active on Android Enthusiasts.
 
A J
@DanHulme I do flagging from here. But that's not much too.
 
@iBug That talks about the author of the post being penalized, not the person who cast the flag.
 
13 flags ever
 
10:16 AM
@terdon Same for both sides.
See the prior part of the same paragraph.
 
@iBug No! Not at all!
 
If the user flagged it in good faith, but you don't think anything should be done, dismiss the flag as "helpful."
 
One gets a loss of reputation, a permanent mark on their record and a possible ban.The other has a flag rejected and might eventually have to take a break from flagging. That's not a big deal.
 
JAD
@AJ a single declined red flag doesn't get you flag banned
 
Keyword: good faith.
 
10:17 AM
@iBug That doesn't apply to spam flags though
spam flags are different
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Misleading link: Notify-send ignores timeout? by NiMa Thr on askubuntu.com
 
So that's why I say disputed.
 
fp- by iBug
 
A J
@JAD No. That's 3 actually.
 
@iBug We can't do that for spam flags, dismissing as "helpful" causes the post to be deleted, and all the other spam penalties.
 
JAD
10:18 AM
@AJ ah
didn't read that far up
;)
 
Spam flags, if raised in good faith, should be dismissed as "disputed"
That's what I meant.
Sorry if some of my words aren't quite clear.
@terdon I meant the whole paragraph.
 
That isn't really an option.
 
Yes it is, actually...
 
A J
@DanHulme The ones posted in here. All spams and R/As
 
If you press that button it'll mark as "disputed".
 
10:19 AM
That would require us to open the page, go to the mod menu, and then choose the clear flags thing. When handling dozens (or hundreds) of flags, that's frankly too much effort.
And for no benefit other than protecting someone's flag record which isn't an important metric anywhere.
 
So my opinion is, if a flag is raised in good faith, it shouldn't be declined. If it's a red flag, mark it as disputed so that no one gets punished. Otherwise mark as helpful.
 
@AJ Is it any real loss to you if you can't do that for a site where you hardly ever do it and have no other participation?
 
@iBug They're all raised in good faith, and I want people to think before casting spam flags.
 
A J
@DanHulme Hmm. Never mind.
 
@terdon Well that's another valid reason.
 
10:21 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +3 more: bettercoloncleansingguide.com/garcinia-ultra-pure/ by user380964 on meta.SE (@iBug)
tpu- by A J
 
I wonder if you can leave a message for a disputed flag.
you = any mod.
 
nope
 
We can decline with a message, as @DanHulme did.
 
oops...
 
A J
They can mark helpful with a message too.
 
10:22 AM
Can't leave message on disputed flags?
 
No, because "dispute" isn't a normal flag action.
 
Fine.
 
ack
someone point me at the post in question
 
...why does he start to get upvotes???
 
10:24 AM
oh hey ArtOfCode
 
@iBug why not
 
I had to upvote to clear an automatic answer ban
 
@iBug Because i) they were useful answers and ii) it was the only way to remove the ban that the flags caused.
 
Only android.stackexchange.com/questions/105197/… seems VLQ to me of this user, others were useful (TBH I'm not active in that site so never mind)
 
Ooookay. So I tend to agree with the "is spam" decision here, but I also agree with a mod decision to override that and go for helping the user instead.
The original posts were the definition of undisclosed self-promotion; that's spam, and it gets flagged.
 
10:27 AM
@paper1111 That's not even NAA, either.
@paper1111 The real answer is as short as it currently is, so it's not link-only.
 
If mods think the user will be receptive to being guided and are willing to do that, then declining (preferably disputing, but it's not like that matters a huge amount) is the right decision.
 
@ArtOfCode Who benefits from that? Personally, I will first inform the user of our rules and only flag as spam if they don't adapt. When the answer is more than just a link, of course. When they've repeated the content from their blog and just linked to it, I will simply ask them to always include their affiliation.
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Manually reported answer: How to communicate to coworkers that I am not comfortable with celebratory hugs? by Sam Post on interpersonal.SE (@HenryWHHackv2.1.1)
tpu- by iBug
 
Deleting as spam helps nobody and actively harms the site by removing useful content.
 
10:28 AM
That's what "disputed" is meant for.
 
@iBug No. Sorry, but no. Spam flags are the nuclear option. They should be used with care and the only way I have of educating flaggers is to reject the flag.
 
Yep, and we do the same even when the post is advertising a product. It's common for people to post a link to their own app without disclosure, and we always give them a fair chance to disclose (and the benefit of the doubt if we're not sure whether it's their own app) before we spam-flag.
 
@terdon In cases like this, yeah, you're right. In a majority of self-promotion cases, though, the user is just there to promote their blog, not to contribute helpfully. You can tell those users to include disclosure all you like and they won't - that's why they get flagged and deleted.
 
I am a mod on 3 sites and deal with dozens of flags a day. I very simply don't have the time to open each flagged post separately and go through 3 sub menus only to protect someone's flag ratio.
@ArtOfCode First you tell them though. You can't blame people for following rules they don't know. If you've told them and they insist, then it's a clear cut case, yes.
 
@terdon Meet halfway. Dispute the flags for the 1st time, and decline them ever since.
 
10:31 AM
@ArtOfCode I don't think that attitude fits the SE ethos. AIUI, the reason we have suspensions and not permanent bans is because we approach each user with the default expectation that if we give them a chance, they can improve their behaviour and become valued members of the community.
 
@iBug How would I know if this is the first time? It isn't as simple as you seem to think. All I see is a wrong flag, so I treat it accordingly.
 
@terdon ah, but here I echo your own argument back to you: we see hundreds of spam posts a day and we simply don't have time to do that in every case. So we go with the majority case. And yeah, sometimes, like now, that means we get it wrong.
 
@ArtOfCode Which is fine. As I said above, you guys do great work 99% of the time. The remaining 1% means that flags will be rejected. No big deal.
 
looks up AIUI...
 
(As I Understand It)
 
10:32 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Blacklisted website in body: This can bring about extraordinary V Tight Gel by lonagpacheco on graphicdesign.SE
 
@terdon yeah, declined flags ain't the end of the world. If mods are willing and have time to dispute instead of decline, great. If not... eh.
 
tpu- by A J
 
@SmokeDetector k
 
@ArtOfCode Exactly.
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad NS for domain in body, bad NS for domain in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, +2 more: click for more info.<<@>>www.supervision4health.com/alpha-primal-xl/ by chadqjerry on superuser.com (@iBug)
tpu- by Henders
 
A J
10:33 AM
@Henders User Interface of Artificial Intelligence. :P
 
With the number of flags flying around this place a decline here and there isn't gonna get anyone flag-banned
 
@Henders Agricultural Innovation Under Investment
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL in title, bad NS for domain in body, bad NS for domain in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, +5 more: newsupplements2017.com/regal-forskolin/ by peggy gilmore on astronomy.SE
 
!!/blacklist-keyword v\W?tight\W?gel
 
10:33 AM
tpu- by A J
@Mithrandir Blacklisted v\W?tight\W?gel
 
Gee, thanks guys :P
 
Maybe you mods can have a better discussion in Teacher's Lounge...
 
Nah, this is applicable here - it relates to us & spam flags, after all
 
And when arguments start, a CM can hit everyone with hammers.
 
CI on a69701c succeeded. Message contains 'autopull', pulling...
 
10:35 AM
@iBug Basically what @terdon said. We're good, but we're not perfect. We're all going to get a decline here and there, but it's not about to get anyone flag-banned, so no big deal.
 
Restart: API quota is 13043.
 
@ArtOfCode That's true. We need education, too.
So go on, parse HTML with regex, if you must. It's only broken code, not life and death.
 
@ArtOfCode And, admittedly, you're as close to perfect as makes almost no difference.
 
It's only declined flags, not life and death.
 
It's just that given the volume of posts, that 1% amounts to a large number. It;s still a teeny tiny percentage though :)
@iBug hey, it's perfectly possible to parse html with regular expressions:
652
A: Regular expression pattern not matching anywhere in string

tchristOh Yes You Can Use Regexes to Parse HTML! For the task you are attempting, regexes are perfectly fine! It is true that most people underestimate the difficulty of parsing HTML with regular expressions and therefore do so poorly. But this is not some fundamental flaw related to computational th...

You just have to be tchrist or someone else with that level of knowledge and more time than sense of self preservation :P
 
10:40 AM
@terdon HE COMES (less aggressive)
 
heh
 
All I wanted to say was please don't spam-flag helpful content. If it's useful but there's something wrong with it (such as lack of disclosure), alert us with an "in need of moderator intervention" flag. We can interact with the user, get it fixed, and turn them into a good contributor.
6
 
@DanHulme Starred.
38 mins ago, by terdon
We don't mark spam to punish the user, we mark it to keep the site clean. So someone who takes the time to repeat content that they have written elsewhere, and just also includes a link to their blog, is helping the site, not harming it.
 
Anyway, I have to get back to work. Happy flagging everyone!
 
\o/
 
10:43 AM
@terdon Special thanks, terdon.
 
@iBug I've got 167 declined flags, never been banned yet ;)
 
@Mithrandir 167 declined... How long is the time span?
 
4 years
No, 3 and a bit
I've been a member since... October '14?
 
Member of SO since Feb '16, but wasn't active at all.
I got 88 in a year.
I used to flag very aggressively on Android, which makes up half of my declined flags.
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL-only title, bad NS for domain in body, bad NS for domain in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, +4 more: www.weightloss-spot.com/brute-gains/ by Wimen1965 on askubuntu.com
 
10:47 AM
We don't mark spam to punish the user, we mark it to keep the site clean.
 
tpu- by iBug
 
I'm getting that on a T-Shirt
 
don't we wish
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL-only title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, blacklisted website in title, +5 more: buysupplementsreview.com/alpha-primal-xl/ by user787256 on askubuntu.com
tpu- by ArtOfCode
 
oh, AU is approaching the 7-character post ID
 
10:51 AM
@ArtOfCode What do you think about whitelisting .py, .htm and .java as TLD?
@Mithrandir They did it even slower than Jon approached 7-digit reputation :)
 
@iBug yes on SO. Leave 'em not-whitelisted on other sites, they shouldn't really be showing up there
 
@ArtOfCode How do I implement that?
 
@iBug the check method gets passed a site parameter that you can use
 
What's the content of site?
i.e. what should I compare it to?
 
good question :)
 
10:54 AM
if site == 'stackoverflow.com':
if site == 1:
if site == whateer:
 
the former
 
Great. I'm going for it.
 
Conflicting feedback across revisions: current, #1
Conflicting feedback across revisions: current, #1
Conflicting feedback across revisions: current, #1
 
I added .sh as well.
It was previously forgotten.
 
Conflicting feedback across revisions: current, #1
Conflicting feedback across revisions: current, #1
Conflicting feedback across revisions: current, #1
Conflicting feedback across revisions: current, #1
 
10:57 AM
shush smokey
 
A J
@Henders Keep the one you like. :P
 
7 declined on SO, 1394 helpful
Probably because I usually just flag NAAs by Natty
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body, link following arrow in body, pattern-matching website in body, +1 more: Makes the skin’s overall look better and improved by Oblem chutter on drupal.SE
tpu- by Henders
 
sd - k
 
I wonder if it's good to have syntax like
`sd 4(- k)`
Which will evaluate to sd - k - k - k - k
And then we will have developed a new language: SmokeDetectorLang
sd 3(- 4(- k) - 2(2- k)) - 2k 2(- k)
 
11:05 AM
Ha, until the instances start talking to each other and flag everything as spam :P
 
@ArtOfCode CI done
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with email in answer: Delay in transaction confirmation by Admin BTCTXAccelerator on bitcoin.SE
naa- by iBug
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad NS for domain in body, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body, +2 more: Supreme Boostr is works? by toladasha on askubuntu.com
tpu- by iBug
tpu- by ByteCommander on Delay in transaction confirmation [MS]
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] URL in title, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, link at end of body, potentially bad keyword in body, +2 more: www.circlehealthclub.com/dermiva-cream/ by Panakasuyi on drupal.SE
tpu- by iBug
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body, repeated URL at end of long post: BUy Brute Gains powder by adzwqyeze on drupal.SE
tpu- by iBug
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer: How to find a domain based on the IP address? by kamal on superuser.com (@iBug)
tpu- by iBug
 
@ArtOfCode Sorry I wrote the code in a hurry. It's fixed now.
 
!!/blacklist-keyword brute/W?gains
 
@Mithrandir Blacklisted brute/W?gains
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with email in body: Get Estimated Daily Reach using Facebook API by Wojciech Golczyk on stackoverflow.com (@iBug)
 
fp- by iBug
 
@SmokeDetector why
 
@iBug Post - Keyword interested with email -Ad-Estimate-Daily-Reach.png
Restart: API quota is 12638.
 
The email is becoming ridiculously amusing.
 
Merged SmokeDetector #1562.
 
11:18 AM
@SmokeDetector Post - Keyword interested with ridiculous email -Ad-Estimate-Daily-Reach.png
 
That's... going to need some refinement, isn't it.
 
!!/test interested -Ad-Estimate-Daily-Reach.png
 
> Bad keyword with email in body, bad keyword with email in title
----------
Title - Keyword *interested* with email Ad-Estimate-Daily-Reach.png
Post - Keyword *interested* with email Ad-Estimate-Daily-Reach.png
 
Actually, the problem is that the AT in the email can be replaced by anything (except dot)
!!/test interested a-b-c-d.png
 
> Would not be caught as a post, title or username.
:42482967 > Would not be caught as a post, title or username.
> Would not be caught as a post, title or username.
> Bad keyword with email in body, bad keyword with email in title
----------
Title - Keyword *interested* with email Ad-Estimate-Daily-Reach.png
Post - Keyword *interested* with email Ad-Estimate-Daily-Reach.png
CI on 0f651bb succeeded. Message contains 'autopull', pulling...
Restart: API quota is 12602.
> Would not be caught as a post, title or username.
:42482967 > Would not be caught as a post, title or username.
 
11:21 AM
@SmokeDetector what's up with that?
 
@Mithrandir I'm going to inspect the HTML regex.
OK I got it.
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Few unique characters in answer, no whitespace in answer: How to select a date range of current month in mysql table? by ads on stackoverflow.com (@iBug)
 
estimate -> estim@e
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad NS for domain in body, bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching website in body, +1 more: Supreme Boostr@Where to BUy? by krnatara on graphicdesign.SE
tpu- by iBug
 
!!/test interested aatt.png
 
11:23 AM
> Bad keyword with email in body, bad keyword with email in title
----------
Title - Keyword *interested* with email aatt.png
Post - Keyword *interested* with email aatt.png
 
Sadly it doesn't seem to be something easy to solve :(
 
!!/test interested estimate
 
> Would not be caught as a post, title or username.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with email in answer: Merging PDF files by Peter on sharepoint.SE
 
@Mithrandir You need an AT and a DOT.
!!/test interested xxxatxxxdotxxx
 
> Bad keyword with email in body, bad keyword with email in title
----------
Title - Keyword *interested* with email xxxatxxxdotxxx
Post - Keyword *interested* with email xxxatxxxdotxxx
 
11:24 AM
So you can think the RegEx is this:
[Anything] (text AT or symbol @) [Anything] (text DOT or symbol .) [Anything]
The problem is, the words AT and DOT aren't separated from anything else.
 
Did someone say email regex?
(?:[a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~-]+(?:\.[a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~-]+)*|"(?:[\x01-\x08\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x1f\x21\x23-\x5b\x5d-\x7f]|\\[\x01-\x09\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x7f])*")@(?:(?:[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?\.)+[a-z0-9](?:[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?|\[(?:(?:25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)\.){3}(?:25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?|[a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9]:(?:[\x01-\x08\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x1f\x21-\x5a\x53-\x7f]|\\[\x01-\x09\x0b\x0c\x0e-\x7f])+)\])
^ standards-compliant email regex
 
@ArtOfCode It wasn't me :)
!!/blame
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad NS for domain in body, bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body: You must tackle Brute gains yield for some weeks by Heing19 00 on graphicdesign.SE
@iBug It's Magisch's fault.
tpu- by J F
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in answer, pattern-matching website in answer, blacklisted user: Python + Selenium: fill text input in the modal form by Renith Harsan on stackoverflow.com (@iBug)
tpu- by iBug
tpu by iBug on Merging PDF files [MS]
 
So any word matching the wildcard *at*dot* (where * means 1 or more instead of 0 or more) would be caught as "email".
!!/test You guys may be interested in Aviation.SE
 
> Bad keyword with email in body, bad keyword with email in title
----------
Title - Keyword *interested* with email Aviation.SE
Post - Keyword *interested* with email Aviation.SE
 
11:32 AM
😂😂😂
@SmokeDetector Can't you be more ridiculous! Hahaha......
@SmokeDetector For the record, the "email" Avation.SE is parsed as Ava-at-ion-dot-SE.
 
JAD
lol
 
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword with email in answer: PDF and sharepoint integration by PDF Wizard on stackoverflow.com (@iBug)
tpu- by iBug
 
@SmokeDetector TP but not because of email.
 
@iBug Registered answer as true positive. If you want to blacklist the poster, use trueu or tpu.
 
!!/watch sharepointpdfwizard\.com
 
11:41 AM
@paper1111 Added sharepointpdfwizard\.com to watchlist
 
@paper1111 Beat me to it.
 
"features.Very" Yeah that's an email </sarcasm>
 
Avation.SE
Math.SE
Stats.SE
 
The regex should be changed to catch stuff like
Av at ion dot SE (ie with the spaces)
 
CI on 3d466df succeeded. Message contains 'autopull', pulling...
Restart: API quota is 12368.
 
11:46 AM
A famous software, Mathemaica, is going to attract some friendly fire.
 
Only if it includes a . or dot in the wording
 
@CalvT븃 Are you interested in Math.SE?
Title - Keyword *interested* with email Math.SE
@CalvT븃 A dot can be very common.
 
A J
!!/blame
 
@AJ It's JoErNanO's fault.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad NS for domain in body, bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body, repeated URL at end of long post: you will surely impress mutually the results by Heing19 00 on superuser.com (@iBug)
tpu- by iBug
 

« first day (1530 days earlier)      last day (2296 days later) »