@bummi hmm, it'd be really hard to implement, and I don't really think it's that necessary anyway. These checks are just to make sure that someone doesn't report a person by mistake. If they're trying to abuse the system, our standard threat of 'don't do it or we'll drop a (metaphorical) pile of bricks on you' will suffice
I did not get the limit until now, let's assume 10 bad posts are found, anyway every single of let it be hundreds post will have to be reviewed manual .... or are you talking about engaging only if there are less then 10 posts?
@bummi the allspam command would error out if there are more than 10 posts, yes. The idea is that you'd then resort to manually reporting. Alternatively, we could add a !!/allspam-force command, similar to what we have for the blacklists currently
If someone's spam is disguised or unclear enough that they survived to post 100 of them without getting post banned or ip banned
then imo there should be a moderator or CM looking into that its actually spam and needs destroying
last thing we want is that we as charcoal decide to completly and utterly flag bomb someone who may not have been a spammer according to others all along
Urgh, redoing this command is going to be harder than I thought. There's so much pre-MS legacy code related to allspam users :/ And I need to remember to handle API backoffs etc
@Magisch Once it exists, anyone will be able to help. While we're building it, to help you need to know rails or do front end development to help Art and I. But if you want to help CrowdRescue generally, let me know. There's probably a non-technical way you can help.
@Magisch Do you know rails and/or front end web development? If not, I'll check in and probably will have something you can do by the end of the day (eastern time).
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, link at end of body, pattern-matching product name in body, pattern-matching website in body, +2 more: Does Lycopene Increase Size? by jimenirhea on askubuntu.com
@Magisch I need an email to invite you to the slack where this is happening. If you don't want to put it in chat, you can email me at thesecretmaster@stackexchange.developingtechnician.com
@Tinkeringbell Actually I probably should have put it as a SD report first, now there's no way for me to see the user. But a lot of YouTube spam seems to be pretty much one-off.
Does someone know if there is there a mod chat on android? Looks if I would have to retract a spam flag otherwise and raise an individual to report a suspected voting fraude
@NobodyNada btw not sure if you were aware (since I forgot) but the PPCG FireAlarm is still running and seems to be doing a decent job, have you retrained it recently?
@quartata I think the biggest thing is that I fixed the duplicate report bug
Because a bad challenge or question would be asked and then closed and deleted, but a good challenge would get answered and edited, repeatedly bumping it
and there was a bug that caused it to re-report those, to Mego's annoyance
And there was another bug that made unnotify not work, to Mego's even greater annoyance
i'm not sure we're all on the same page. let me clarify. i'm asking whether or not my normal flag on a post on a site will push it to smokey regardless of it being spam flag or rude flag.
@NVZ Body - Position 1-284: <p>If I understand your request correctly, you want to debit card directly by only providing the user's card details like Stripe's mobile SDK. Unfortunately, you cannot do that with current Rave Android SDK. To get access to this feature, send an email to hi@flutterwavego.com </p>
