The only time I've only come close to being spoken to by a mod was when I sorta misunderstood the point of accepted answers ("I will give the accept to the first person to combine these two answers even though the question has only been up for 5 mins"). That was on my first question which I think was a HNQ.
Yeah, okay. That kind of thing is where we need to be really careful. There are more than enough of us in this room to unilaterally 6-flag nuke a post. As it is, we came very close to doing so (4 of 6 flags at least, possibly 5).
So: for the love of all that is good and fluffy, please please please be careful what you're flagging. I really don't want us to start getting a rep as a flagging ring.
in the general case, is that the usual response? I'd like for the feedback to be clean because that also helps the machine learning etc, but if "(needs admin)" is likely to be ignored or only tolerated with a groan, I'm not going to push it
Don't worry @Mag, it's been dealt with. All we need to do is realise that it was a mistake and use that to... not do it again, which I'm sure you will.
@ArtOfCode I flagged it in good faith, it recommends a practice that is not safe for Android phone owners. I stand by that and said that to the mods, but also in good faith accept and respect their decisions. It's possible that the app may not be able to be removed and most users don't realise that. As the usual system protections of the phone are being broken before installing the app. A practice that most developers on SO cringe at. Very dangerous.
That's my opinion as an android developer. I would never follow that guidance or install that app
At the same time I do not wish to draw problems for the room. Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea.
@ArtOfCode talking to mod here android.stackexchange.com/questions/149805/… if you see my reasoning, you'll understand. It really doesn't matter that much, as I say, many consumers will not even realise they can't get rid of it. People can be quite oblivious to what happens on their phones. I'm a bit strict about it
@YvetteColomb I do see your reasoning, and I totally get that ending up with an app you can't remove isn't a great situation. But... unless you've tried it yourself, or there's overwhelming agreement that that's the case... I don't think there's any certainty that it can't be removed. One review isn't something to rely on; as Dan said, it could just be a confused Android user who had their apps automatically restored after reset.
@ArtOfCode maybe. I don't agree with rooting the phones to begin with, but then if people don't worry, I guess I shouldn't worry. I wouldn't want to be using internet banking or email etc on the device. I rooted one phone, once, and never used that phone for any personal purpose after that.
anyway must go to bed. Late here. Sorry to cause a problem. Night guys \o :)
Translates to "Our Istanbul transportation company serves customers as Istanbul transportation. You can have more detailed information by visiting the web address."
The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later. Apache/2.4.7 (Ubuntu) Server at metasmoke.erwaysoftware.com Port 443
File "/home/ubuntu/ws/SmokeDetector/ChatExchange/chatexchange/_utils.py", line 78, in __get__
method()
File "/home/ubuntu/ws/SmokeDetector/ChatExchange/chatexchange/messages.py", line 32, in scrape_history
data = self._client._br.get_history(self.id)
File "/home/ubuntu/ws/SmokeDetector/ChatExchange/chatexchange/browser.py", line 315, in get_history
'messages/%s/history' % (message_id,))
File "/home/ubuntu/ws/SmokeDetector/ChatExchange/chatexchange/browser.py", line 110, in get_soup
