« first day (3437 days earlier)      last day (1533 days later) » 
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

8:18 PM
@goodguy5 so now I have to look up bento box .... aha, that's an interesting tool
 
@KorvinStarmast very crudely, it's a Japanese lunch box
 
@goodguy5 the one I looked up seems to have had a 'reheating' feature
 
@KorvinStarmast Yeah, they make all kinds of fancy ones.
There's an entire industry based around them
 
woah! I was just referring to when you go to a Japanese restaurant for lunch, you can get a "bento box", which (in my experience) is just a compartmentalized tray for various foods.
 
@RevenantBacon taking one's lunch with them is a way to economize. I remembe as a kid there being metal lunch boxes (we took to school) that were roughly square, and yet the construction workers all had ones that were oval at the top that carried their thermos bottles ... so a cottage industry in lunch boxes was once a thing here.
Now it's all "cool packs" and canvas covered insulated bags ... all very effective.
 
8:28 PM
キャラ弁 (charben/character bento) are often quite impressive and elaborate.
 
@Rubiksmoose I looked up some ads and examples of bento for sale. Yeah, some were more tricked out than others.
 
Policy question: I have a current question that suffers a bit of an XY problem, although I think the current answers address what I'm looking for. Another user suggested I ask the "real" problem separately, but I suspect it would be closed as a dupe of my current post. Do I ask anyway?
 
Okay, is bota an actual Japanese word? because Google Translate says it means dookie. That has to be wrong.
 
@MikeQ I think explaining the "real" and "XY" problems will help us know what is best to do
 
8:36 PM
Correct. I tried to generalize the problem, but a user has suggested that the actual intended problem involves some technical details that could affect the answers.
 
One of the biggest things I've seen in the past is that non-XY problems tends to get XY answers anyways even when they're XX questions.
 
@MikeQ don't understand the PF system well enough to advise. sorry
 
@MikeQ So I've looked at the question, and it seems fairly straightforward to me. You want to know if you can use Shadow Evocation do do, say, Shocking Grasp and have it count as Shocking Grasp rather than Shadow Evocation. Clear enough. Also, the answer by Hey I Can Chan is very correct.
 
@MikeQ Having a general question on something and a more specific question on the same with (when it has critical specifics) is fine. The specific should probably include a link to the general clarifying why it isn't a dupe (why you think it is, or might be different).
But I also don't know PF well enough to judge for myself, so I'm going of your description here
 
GcL
I'm highly entertained by the existence of the necromancer badge.
 
8:47 PM
@GcL Honestly, I'd be insulted if there wasn't one
 
I'm hoping I get enough upvotes to be net-zero on that haste-concentration answer I just posted....
 
GcL
@goodguy5 Which of your answers do you need me to downvote to get you to the balance?
 
I think we need to shut down this survey question as too broad - happy to be wrong if there is documented research on it, though.
 
haha, well this one, but for now it's sitting at 0-0, so I'll take it
@KorvinStarmast agreed
thanks @Someone_Evil
 
GcL
@goodguy5 Okay. I'll do my best, but no promises.
Is that another case of thing that interrupts it's own trigger?
E.g. shield.
 
8:51 PM
in my opinion, yes
 
@goodguy5 I like your reasoning better than Rykara's on the haste question.
 
GcL
@goodguy5 Very well... I'm marking you as a duplicate of your own opinion. /S
 
@GcL thanks!
@KorvinStarmast I thought about it a little bit and that's all I could come back to.
 
@goodguy5 I was about to post basically the same answer. Had it drafted and everything XD
 
rip
 
8:56 PM
Still looking for that question on Extra-Attack while you can't take actions..
 
@Medix2 I think you're looking for this:
20
Q: If a character is stunned but still has attacks remaining, can they still make those attacks?

MarqSuppose Alex is a fighter with the Extra Attacks feature, so each time they take the Attack action they can make two attacks. Alex attacks Sam, a Fighter/Monk with access to the Riposte Battle Master maneuver and the Stunning Strike monk feature. Here's what happens: Alex takes Attack as thei...

 
Hmmm yeah... seems to go against your answer actually. Well, time to ignore it I guess
 
"incapacitated" is a condition, while "lethargy" isn't
 
I don't know how different those really are, but sure
Now I want to and don't want to link it under your answer, well, you know it exists, so I'll leave it at that.
 
It does not change my mechanical opinion
 
9:01 PM
And just like that, @goodguy5 admitted to being a robot
 
GcL
@Medix2 automata actually... it would be an electrical or in-silico opinion if he were a robot.
 
 
goodguy5 is actually a triad of interconnected gears, since his opinion will not budge.
 
That 2d rendition of gears does not provide the necessary information to verify whether or not those gears can move.
 
Wait, in what way could all three of those gears (in the 2D thing) be moving? A gear requires that all adjacent gears move in the opposite "direction"
 
9:10 PM
@Medix2 We know nothing about their z-axis values.
 
@goodguy5 The 2nd gear moves out of the page and then those other two gears move into the fourth dimension.
 
No, see, it's a metaphor for there being no innovation anymore
 
But it has 5 stars, surely that means good things.
 
@Axoren those are the stars of shame
 
let us suppose that gear A ranges z-values 0-1 and interlocks with Gear B, which ranges z-values 0-3.

Gear C can also interlock with Gear B (and the whole system work) if it exists anywhere between the ranges z 1-3.

And when viewed from the side, will display the silhouette above.
 
9:19 PM
(The chat's official unofficial Star of Shame.)
It also comes in eye-searing.
 
Hmm...
I think I'm really deep down a rabbit hole, here.
Classes that don't get Extra Attack that would benefit from a Double-Bladed Scimitar.
The more I look at it, the more I find that these classes kits are either incompatible with a DBS or they have better options than attacking with a DBS.
 
@goodguy5 Yes yes, true. Curse the third dimension!
 
Though, I will admit that the intent is clearly to show that the gears don't work.
 
@Axoren Is that just because they would rather use Scimitars or two Longswords?
 
@Medix2 For example, Clerics that get Potent Cantrips will have 2d8+5 (14) or 2d12+5 (18) damage vs. 3d4+10 (17.5) damage at Level 8. At 11, all their cantrips out-pace DBS.
It seems like Cantrip scaling eventually just wins out over using the weapon.
To make up for it for Clerics, they would need to cast things like Holy Weapon to beat their standard cantrip progression with the weapon.
That's the only case I've found so far where it's worth it over the alternative kits
Factoring multiclassing makes things more complicated
 
9:30 PM
DBS+GWF?
 
How are you calculating the 2d8 damage? I assume sacred flame but that's a Dex Save which is completely different from an attack roll in terms of damage
 
Sacred Flame becomes 2d8 at 5th level
 
Except you can't crit with sacred flame
 
And yes, if you factor in chance to hit, you're gonna find that only things like dragons are more succeptible to Dex saves than to Attack rolls
An extra 5% dice damage doesn't tip the scales
5% chance to crit adding onto the 20th roll = 5% more dice damage
Besides, you're doubling either 2d4 or 1d4 across two hits
it's a 2.5% chance to crit with both
 
I suppose... just don't know that comparing saving throws with ACs is the best idea (advantage, disadvantage, critical hits, all come from very different sources). But that's a fair point
Would two longswords not be strictly better?
 
9:34 PM
2d8+5? Or 2d8+10? The real question is does the character dip into a fighting style class that gives Stat on offhand.
While also having a feat for TWF Longswords
 
I'm about to slide into all y'all's DMs. =3
 
Even without the stat
2d8+5 Attack > 2d8+5 Saving Throw (because crits)
 
You're right, by a small margin
 
and it's actually split up with the attack option so you have a lower chance of dealing zero damage (you'd have to miss/fail twice instead of once)
 
But such a character will see their heavily-invested-into Dual Longswords drop off at 11th level
 
9:36 PM
Also these might help: this and this
Yeah I'm just unsure how "mathy" you want to get with this. Do you want to look at AC values and Dexterity Save bonuses and so forth...
 
The biggest issue is that a Cleric has access to Toll the Dead
Which is 2d12+5 at that level
 
Since, well, any truly optimal character will just have both options available and use the one that works best against X enemy at Y time
 
Effectively dual-wielding Greataxes.
 
Just throw in enough levels of Sorcerer for Twinned Spell or Quickened Spell XD
 
From what I've seen, having an against Dex option, an against Wis option, and an Against AC option gives you full coverage over the entire bestiary.
And in most cases, even if you're missing Dex, having Wis and AC you get close enough to the best attack style versus a targets weakest defense
 
9:40 PM
So *obviously*, it varies depending on the creature and the type of saving throw being invoked, but as a general rule of thumb, attacks tend to land more often than saving throws will fail. This boils down to a couple of factors:

- Ties always go to the person performing the action. So Attack Rolls will succeed when the roll matches the AC, but Saving Throws will succeed (meaning the effect fails) when the roll matches the DC.
- Methods of gaining advantage on attack rolls tend to be more common than methods of conferring disadvantage on saving throws
 
So, if you can get an attack spell on a Cleric, like through Arcana, you have really solid enemy defense coverage
 
For what it's worth, TWF breaks about even at level 5 (when anyone who can gets second attack) and falls behind after level 11 when fighters get third attack. I'ts actually pretty much the worst combat style
 
@Xirema I think a major thing left out there is that attacks cannot "half-hit" whereas saving throws can do "half-damage"
 
@RevenantBacon That's where an item like the DBS shines, given that it gives a Bonus Action attack which already has its Stat added without an extra feature
But it's dice damage are pretty low
 
@Medix2 Well we're mostly talking about cantrips.
 
9:43 PM
It's a no-investment TWF style item that beats out Dual Shortswords WITH TWF
 
@Axoren where is this weapon coming from btw?
 
A fireball is always going to be better than a Fighter making two attack rolls, no matter how you try to rearrange the odds.
 
@RevenantBacon Eberron
 
@RevenantBacon An Ebberon book
 
@Xirema Yeah, but then again, so is Word of Radiance if you're fully surrounded.
 
Ah, the one book I don't actually have yet, lol
 
We're talking about in the same situations, where you're gonna be using single target options, which is the only case where the DBS could come out on top at all
 
Also, are we sure that it allows you to add your stat to damage on the second roll?
 
@Axoren Counterpoint: if you're a spellcaster getting maximum damage from word of radiance, chances are very good you're going to be making Death Saving Throws on your next turn. 😋
 
9:45 PM
because that seems... suspect to me at best
 
@RevenantBacon It is an attack made with a weapon not part of "attacking with two weapons"
 
14
Q: Does the double-bladed scimitar's special attack let you use your ability modifier for the damage of the attack?

ForsytheI am using the double-bladed scimitar with the Revenant Blade feat from Wayfinder's Guide to Eberron. The double-bladed scimitar's special feature (p. 74): Special. When you take the attack action and make a two-handed attack with a double-bladed scimitar, you can use a bonus action to make ...

 
@Xirema You can pick up Word of Radiance as a Barbarian Half-Elf using their racial feature :D
Wait, no. You pick up SWORD BURST in that case
My mistake.
 
What version of the half-elf gets a cantrip?
 
So what I'm hearing is that Wizards introduced an item that makes the entire two-weapon fighting style obsolete, by itself. Well, guess it's more power creep
 
9:48 PM
what
 
Double-bladed scimitar should really be regarded as a magic item. It is not generally available at character creation
 
@Yuuki be more specific with your vauge exclamations of surprise
 
@Axoren As a Barbarian, I think I'd rather just be a Storm [Desert] Herald Barbarian, who gets to deal AOE damage each turn as a Bonus Action while they're raging, no Saving Throw or Attack Roll involved.
 
@Someone_Evil why, is it particularly exspensive?
 
> Each scimitar is a masterpiece, and as a result the double-bladed scimitar is an expensive weapon (100 gp) — few though ever have the opportunity to purchase one.
 
9:50 PM
@Someone_Evil Ah, so it's "rare".
although, I would like to say that 100G for that weapon is very cheap
 
@RevenantBacon Yeah, it's at least 101G or more.
 
Hmmm, does anything in 5e not simply cost X copper, Y silver, or Z gold? As in, is anything something like "2 silver AND 6 copper" or "2 gold AND 5 silver"?
 
Technically, something could cost 1 silver and 10 copper.
Normally we'd just call that 2 silver but technically...
 
Well, considering that it's basically a Scimitar of Speed without the attack bonus, it should be a lot more than just 100 G. It's still equivalent to an Uncommon magic weapon.
 
@Medix2 My guess, detailed pricing like that is more clutter (and math) than it adds to believably or story, so it wasn't used in the setting of prices
 
9:59 PM
@Medix2 No, they keep everything at whole denominations of a single currency. The design goal was to make things simpler, after all.
Simplify and streamline
 
10:17 PM
@RevenantBacon Considering that it only barely beats Fighting with Two Weapons at early levels, it's not that big of a deal at those levels
@Xirema But then you can't be Totem Barbarian.
 
 
1 hour later…
11:24 PM
6
Q: Do creatures on both sides of Blade Barrier benefit from 3/4 cover?

Max ColledgeI was looking at the Blade Barrier spell, and I was wondering does the spell have a 'front' and a 'back'? The spell description states: The wall provides three-quarters cover to creatures behind it Does this refer to creatures who are behind the 'back' of the blade barrier, or does this app...

 
"Hot RPG Questions in your area."
 
get out
 
11:56 PM
mostly because I already made that joke when the feed was created
 
Yeah you owe royalties now XD
 
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

« first day (3437 days earlier)      last day (1533 days later) »