18:57
Someone's argument against covid vaccine-"The tests fro these vaccines have been done in relatively less number of people and also the people selected for these tests aren't from all over the world. Also, errors may have occurred due to these vaccines being made in a short span of time. So, I will wait another year to take the vaccine."
2 hours later…
21:38
The funny thing here is:
Just like Covid-deaths are always listed as 'with' 'and therefore of' Coronavirus, co-morbitites ignored, emphasizing that every single last one life counts and needs to be saved…
Vaccine deaths are always 'after vaccination' but 'surely unrelated', as co-morbitites are always strongly emphasiszed, and those now numbering thousands of deaths are somehow acceptable.
Just like Covid-deaths are always listed as 'with' 'and therefore of' Coronavirus, co-morbitites ignored, emphasizing that every single last one life counts and needs to be saved…
Vaccine deaths are always 'after vaccination' but 'surely unrelated', as co-morbitites are always strongly emphasiszed, and those now numbering thousands of deaths are somehow acceptable.
From the still ongoing phase3 trial data, supplemented with the hnman experimentation results by mass-rollout, we get the effectiveness numbers of. like, '95%' (Pfizer), 94, 79 etc.
For the same data you can read the same calculations, but for absolute risk reduction, and arrive at a very pitty 0.7% absolute risk reduction in case of the Pfizer product.
The prevalence is overall low and the mortality in the usual ILI/flu ballpark. That's bad enough already, but nowhere nearly as bad as the panic producers and fear pornographers make it out to be (and we probably all thought/expected 13 months ago)
Now look at the phrasing for vaccine complications.
Those have *very* high adverse events numbers. Much higher than previously thought acceptable for any other vaccine.
Those blood clots for exampe are "rare".
Which they are indeed in absolute terms.
But what about the analogous case for 'vaccine effectiveness' – the *relative* risk increase?
Those have *very* high adverse events numbers. Much higher than previously thought acceptable for any other vaccine.
Those blood clots for exampe are "rare".
Which they are indeed in absolute terms.
But what about the analogous case for 'vaccine effectiveness' – the *relative* risk increase?
Vaccines are no magic bullet either and unfounded blind belief in phamra products is just naively dangerous.
All current vaccines have very high side effects ratios. Compared to other vaccinbes. And compared to the illness. WHere we need to differentiate between virus-contact, and getting ill.
We know the risk from the jabs for very young people is quite high for a iatrogneic action, *and they are all suposed to get jabbed.
The Norwegian Health authorities have already correctly concluded: the risk for the young from the vaccine is already bigger than from any illness.
In short: demands for any 'herd immunity' for this remporarry at best protection through current vaccines to mean to include younf people, pregnat women, children are horrendously primitive calls from believers without any real base to argue for.
« first day (401 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (135 days later) »
