Too many books don't want to use their fancy theories on a dumb example

I believe in dumb examples

How dumb do you have to be

I'm not even sure what a typical dumb electron shot from a cathode ray tube is supposed to look like as a wavefunction

My go to dumb thing to do when I'm a bit sick of GR is to do flat Earth physics :p

Poster boy for dumb science

Once in a while I do a dumb one to have a break

I'm gonna do a dumb article

let's say the dumb one

IIRC the basic polarization leads to the dumb old L² one while the complex one leads to the Bargmann one

greek mathematicians were wont to slander each other for their dumb ideas

It is either very powerful or we are very dumb

@ACuriousMind Here's a dumb question

But then here's a terrible and dumb question

"spacetime" is such a dumb lazy word

@ACuriousMind Another dumb question, is the "trivial" Cartan connection $\mathrm{GL}(n) \hookrightarrow \mathrm{GL}(n)$ a $G$-structure?

It's the first dumb idea that comes to mind as an algorithm for least action problems

It's probably doable for some dumb Hilbert space like for spin states but I want to see it for a real particle

also there was dumb stuff like pomerons or whatever

One thing most QFT books lack are dumb examples

But antigravity in GR is pretty obviously a dumb idea because you can tell right from the start

Because it is the dumb child of GR

I will work on any dumb idea even if I don't think it has any use

Dumb physicists thinking the time of the day doesn't matter

By doing something dumb like $t \to t^{-1}$

A dumb argument, but I assume that if you do subsets of the configuration space, the Z2 symmetry will be something like $$\int_{C} = \int_{+C} + \int_{-C}$$

there's just dumb mappings with slightly non-trivial transition maps

If you want a simple case to consider, take the spacetime defined by doing a dumb coordinate transform on Minkowski space

Let me check some other book just in case I'm being dumb

It has a dumb name because as far as I can tell, nobody ever named it

A dumb proof for this : take $a$ to be all possible basis vector

Here's a dumb argument :

I am dumb

Have a dumb proof

@ACuriousMind Dumb question

and apparently classical mechanics is computable for non-dumb cases

He only proved it for a really dumb case

Duffield isn't a quack, he's just as dumb as Einstein

It was apparently so bad that I have never seen it outside of the context of "Why did Einstein try this dumb tensor?"

But it was dumb and not covariant

We all know that PSE is a terrible site with really dumb rules

I'm not sure if anyone ever did a dumb old thin shell but I'd say probably?

Very dumb

I am dumb

I've got a dumb idea

I'm trying to come up with really dumb actions with weird symmetries but it's hard to think of ones that are continuous

@SirCumference I am very dumb

plz help I am very dumb

Well a dumb argument for it is that $\delta(x) = 0$ outside of its support $\text{supp}(\delta) = \{ 0 \}$, and $x = 0$ on that support

We're going to have fights over this dumb question now