« first day (2003 days earlier)      last day (2913 days later) » 
01:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

7:00 PM
blah
 
user174558
The same applies to bah.
 
I'm not sure how marriage would improve our relationship.
 
user174558
Hmm, OK. I guess I have overrated marriage.
 
Maybe, maybe not.
 
user174558
I wonder who invented marriage and when.
 
7:04 PM
Some religious figure a long time ago.
 
user174558
And the same goes for divorce.
 
user174558
Hollywood stars seem to marry and divorce multiple times, lol.
 
user174558
It's like a mass orgy.
 
Two chances for attention.
 
user174558
7:06 PM
I am very proud that I have never broken up with someone before.
 
user174558
Mother's Day is this Sunday.
 
user174558
Vesak Day is next next Saturday.
 
user174558
Celebrating Buddha's enlightenment.
 
user174558
7:12 PM
Unfortunately, when a holiday falls on Saturday here in Antarctica, the following Monday is still a work day.
 
user174558
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 I recommend you to watch the trilogy Before Sunrise, Before Sunset, and Before Midnight. It's so romantic.
 
7:25 PM
Is "assignability" a word?
"I was told to notify you about assignability of your status"
 
Anonymous
@terdon Since people learn and repeat it as a unit, I'm not sure they're really using it as a grammatical structure. That is, there might not be any specific compositional meaning or particular grammar intended by most of the people who say it. And if people do break it down mentally, there's no guarantee that people do so the same way.
 
Anonymous
I'd be inclined to parse it as inchoative get taking the slang adjectival complement hype (meaning something like 'very excited about something'?).
 
That makes sense, I guess.
 
Anonymous
It could be reduced from get hyped [about something].
 
Anonymous
But I don't really know.
 
Anonymous
7:33 PM
It could be intentionally ungrammatical.
 
@snailplane Yes, that was my first thought, a missing d.
Woah, hang on, who's snailplane? Do I know you?
Moving up in the world, are we?
 
wow, hierarchical view of transportation modes much??
 
@question_asker Planes do tend to be higher up than boats, yes.
 
@MattE.Эллен #totalljerks
 
Anonymous
7:43 PM
Sometimes when I watch snails crawl on flat surfaces (say, a sidewalk), they seem to me like miniature land zeppelins, their shell holding them afloat as they slowly make their way forward.
 
as opposed to full-size land zeppelins.
OK I apologize that was the low-effortest thing I could have said there.
 
@Demisemihemidemisemiquaver Do you mean one time zone per ... latitude?
 
Anonymous
@question_asker Hey, nice nonce compound adjective :-)
 
thank you, I made it myself
 
@WillHunting where else do kids come from?
those from under a cabbage leaf have this funky ... aura.
@question_asker 'that snail went over like a led zeppelin'
@terdon jefferson snailship is next
4
@WillHunting Yay!
Or is 'meh' more appropriate?
'meh' captures all of buddhism in a single word. Unlike 'om' which is just breathing funny.
 
Anonymous
7:52 PM
@YannikK. English has both types: "I'm not uninterested." Here we have two negators, not and un-, and the result is a positive assertion (along the lines of "I am interested", although the meaning might not be exactly the same).
 
@WillHunting ?? the last one isn't that romantic, given that the couple isn't getting along that great.
 
What about these?
 
Anonymous
In other words, that example has two grammatical negations, and two semantic negations.
 
Anonymous
But English also has examples where two grammatical negations represent only one semantic negation.
 
Anonymous
Negative concord (multiple marking of a single semantic negation) is largely limited to non-standard varieties of English, though.
 
Anonymous
7:55 PM
There are exceptions:
 
Anonymous
> Not in my car, you're not.
 
@WillHunting Be even prouder that you haven't broken up somebody before.
It's a big mess and the parts never fit right again.
 
Negative concord is sour grapes.
 
Anonymous
> They aren't here, I don't think.
 
That doesn't count, those are two separate entities
 
Anonymous
7:56 PM
The negation in the parenthetical is optional:
 
Anonymous
> They aren't here, I think.
 
Anonymous
Either way, it's a single semantic negation.
 
Anonymous
Some examples are possible with both interpretations, depending on whether they're taken as Standard English or not:
 
Anonymous
> He didn't say nothin'.
 
Anonymous
This is a non-standard version of "He didn't say anything".
 
Anonymous
7:59 PM
But:
 
Anonymous
> He didn't say nothing. = 'He did say something; it's not true that he said nothing.'
 
Anonymous
Further reading: The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language starting on page 845.
 
Anonymous
I have to go for now.
 
@WillHunting there are a number of cultural universals among all human societies, from very organized to just running around the woods: music, fire, language, burial. Marriage is one of them (with some variations). So if someone invented it, a whole bunch of people in every society invented it.
@terdon Fringe is considered crap?
 
8:17 PM
@Mitch by me, absolutely. Opinions may differ, of course.
@Mitch ha, yes, snail Slick, perhaps.
 
@SvenYargs ... +1500 for any SWR question answered using a thesaurus. — Mitch 15 secs ago
@terdon i overheard the first couple seasons (like X-files with a little extra science), but then all the one offs started to be wrapped into one big plot line, which I then started to watch. so it redeemed itself eventually. I remember the acting was wooden, but the plot really picked up.
 
I agree about the acting but found the plot absurd. The science was ridiculous and, most egregious of offenses, not even internally consistent. But the overarching plot idea was what really broke it for me. Time travelers who need to change the future instead of simply settling in the past?
 
8:50 PM
@WillHunting My avatar photo?
That was ten years ago or more, I must have been just the high side of 40.
@cornbreadninja麵包忍者 Yes, I'd like one please, thank you.
 
9:10 PM
@terdon oh... ha ha..totally forgot about that. I don't think any fiction has ever gotten time travel right. it's all dumb
 
9:38 PM
@Mitch What would it mean to get time travel right?
Limit it to relativistic effects?
 
Anonymous
9:58 PM
I don't know about getting it "right", but there's an awful lot of time travel in fiction that I've enjoyed.
 
Anonymous
Have you ever read The Man Who Folded Himself?
 
[ SmokeDetector ] Offensive answer detected: The correct usage of "too" and "also" by righteousman on english.stackexchange.com
 
user174558
10:26 PM
Amazon is very good to refund me 20 USD for shipping each time I return a damaged item.
 
11:17 PM
@terdon Damn it, it isn't just English. See 4:24 here:
 
11:33 PM
@MετάEd you have no idea!
Well, maybe you do. An excess of chronotron particles here, an anomaly in the space-time continuum there.
 
01:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

« first day (2003 days earlier)      last day (2913 days later) »