« first day (1352 days earlier)      last day (3565 days later) » 

10:00 PM
@MattЭллен I don’t recall Dante describing a special punishment for the same.
Perhaps it was in Aristophanes.
Or whoever wrote about the Titanomachia.
Er, not TinTin.
 
Herge wrote Tintin
 
Hesiod.
@AndrewLeach But that is just wrong. It says it supports 1DD8!
Me confusoed.
 
This is Firefox on Win7, with the OTF font.
It copes with Matt's Cyrillic.
 
Could it be that Firefox doesn’t do combining marks? I find that really tough to countenance.
 
10:05 PM
It's possible What about the small Xs in that screenshot?
 
@AndrewLeach Those are supposed to be there.
In the Unicode database, they represent "SEE ALSO" type thingies.
A simplistic approach to confusibles or related characters.
 
Right. So it's only the combining letter which is the issue.
 
It really is an "x (latin small ...)"/
Yes, I think so.
 
It does seem to be combining with something.
 
10:07 PM
Or at least, being interpreted as combining and then got wrong.
 
looks like a circle throwing a boomerang
 
\N{DOTTED CIRCLE}\N{COMBINING LATIN SMALL LETTER INSULAR D} 1DD8 COMBINING LATIN SMALL LETTER INSULAR D
 
It is just the display: it uses a dotted circle as the base character for combining marks, to show you where they go.
\x{25CC}\x{1DD8} 1DD8 COMBINING LATIN SMALL LETTER INSULAR D
 
10:09 PM
So I get the dotted circle, and then it combines with the 1.
Feels like a Firefox bug.
 
@AndrewLeach Yes: I have seen that bug before. It combines with the following instead of the preceding one.
Which is a no-no.
 
◌ᷘ
 
That looks nice.
Oh, interesting. Its CCC is not where I had thunk.
 
I did the circle then the insulard
 
It has the Canonical_Combining_Class=Above property.
 
10:11 PM
fat of the (is)land
 
That means it should be centered above the glyph, not used like a superscript to the top right. Hadn’t known that. You see that in palaeography.
 
@AndrewLeach It works perfectly for me in FF.
 
Guess what? This is Chrome. slinks off into corner ashamed
 
Haha, shame on you for using Chrome.
 
@AndrewLeach that explains everything! (not really :D)
 
10:13 PM
U+0363 ‭ ○ͣ COMBINING LATIN SMALL LETTER A
U+0364 ‭ ○ͤ COMBINING LATIN SMALL LETTER E
U+0365 ‭ ○ͥ COMBINING LATIN SMALL LETTER I
U+0366 ‭ ○ͦ COMBINING LATIN SMALL LETTER O
U+0367 ‭ ○ͧ COMBINING LATIN SMALL LETTER U
U+0368 ‭ ○ͨ COMBINING LATIN SMALL LETTER C
U+0369 ‭ ○ͩ COMBINING LATIN SMALL LETTER D
U+036A ‭ ○ͪ COMBINING LATIN SMALL LETTER H
U+036B ‭ ○ͫ COMBINING LATIN SMALL LETTER M
U+036C ‭ ○ͬ COMBINING LATIN SMALL LETTER R
U+036D ‭ ○ͭ COMBINING LATIN SMALL LETTER T
U+036E ‭ ○ͮ COMBINING LATIN SMALL LETTER V
There are others, but those are the Latins.
They all have the CCC=Above prop.
So should be right atop, centered.
 
Those are not centered, they are somewhat to the right.
 
◌ᷞ
 
So those should be right atop.
 
Looks as though I can't be logged into two SE sessions in two different browsers on the same machine. Oh well; it'll have to wait.
 
10:17 PM
None of us but Cerb is likely to need those code points.
If he.
If him?
None but him, none but he. Hate those.
 
I'd go with him
if them
yeah
 
I think it is supposed to be oblique, because it is a preposition there not a conjunction.
 
Depends on whether but is best considered a preposition or a conjunction there.
 
jynx
 
If I would always treat as a conjunction.
 
10:19 PM
No one but I am going to tell you the straight truth here.
Is in theory “wrong”.
Easy to roll out of your mouth though.
 
Many people seem to be afflicted by terror nominativi these days.
 
No-one but me am must be wronger.
 
I would say no one but I/me is going to be...
 
No one but me is going to tell the straight truth here.
Urg.
Little old me is going to tell you.
 
@tchrist I'd probably go with I, but I would consult my betters, i.e. good style books.
They should have good arguments one way or the other.
 
10:21 PM
Surely Noone but me is is right. You can take but me out.
 
They’d probably say not to do something that makes people question it.
 
?
 
@AndrewLeach Yeah. There was a question on this.
 
@AndrewLeach Exactly.
 
JBJ has a curious answer.
 
10:22 PM
@tchrist You don't mean the more than one man one?
 
No, it was with but me/I.
 
Somehow, I tend towards nöne but I.
 
butt me no butts
 
He did too, but couldn’t justify it.
I mean, not by rules, just by ear.
 
10:23 PM
Neither by rules nor by ear.
 
> His ransom there is none but I shall pay: I'll hale the Dauphin headlong from his throne, — His crown shall be the ransom of my friend; Four of their lords I'll change for one of ours.
No, wait, that is right.
 
there are no ngram results for "none butter"
 
There is none but I who shall pay his ransom is what that means, isn't it?
 
so it must be subject
 
But means but for or except for: it must be a preposition there.
 
10:25 PM
Or does it mean there is no his ransom, but I shall pay?
 
Mustn’t it? I’m blurbrained.
I need to find JBJ’s posting.
 
I would probably classify but like than, which never counts as a preposition, traditionally.
Never than me, ceteris paribus.
> And would you have her too? that must not be: For none but I must have her.
 
Poetry weirds case. EModE poetry even more so.
 
If but I was good enough for Shakespeare, so it must be for us.
> Have not I the Lord done it: without whom there is none other God? the true God and Saviour, and there is else none but I :
 
Note that but I in those examples is always followed by a modal verb.
 
10:28 PM
but I thought it wasn't
 
Not I/me am/is going to...
 
ain't I a stinker :D
 
Guthrie's translation of Aeschylus.
 
As one of the people who use subject case after but, I can say that I at least think of but more as a conjunction than as a preposition. As such, the subject becomes whatever comes after but and agrees with that “Nobody but I am going to tell you this”, for example). Switching to an unambiguous preposition, except, I also switch to oblique case and no agreement with the ‘second subject’: “Nobody except me is going to tell you this”. — Janus Bahs Jacquet Jul 3 at 23:23
It was that one.
 
I don't like that, his nobody but I am.
 
10:31 PM
I shouldn’t’ve imagined you would. :)
 
How can but be a conjunction and except a preposition in that sentence?
 
I still think he’s a native speaker of English.
 
And, indeed, I do not.
@AndrewLeach How do you mean, why can't it?
If you use a different word, you may change the construction.
 
Because they fulfil the same function.
 
Perhaps not syntactically.
Semantics is not necessarily related to syntax.
 
10:32 PM
@JanusBahsJacquet Great example, nice and short. Collocations in COCA for nobody but <PERS-PRONOUN> <VERB> are all over the map. These fragments show the issue: Nobody but Britany and I knew. nobody but me has the fight; So nobody but me has stayed; Nobody but us knows what's going to happen; where nobody but us ever goes; Nobody but you was ever good to me; nobody but he knows what anybody; a void that nobody but him knows about; to something nobody but her seemed to her; arguing laws nobody but they cared about; Nobody but the scientists were ever interested; nobody but slaves were.tchrist Jul 4 at 0:06
 
Just because that hurts! and ouch! fulfil the same function, that doesn't mean they are the same syntactic construction.
 
There is simply no consistency in COCA about this.
 
Pragmatics > semantics > syntax > morphology.
Locution and illocution may point in different directions.
 
If but and except are different, then everything else changes with them, surely?
 
@tchrist Many of those examples are not of the desired register. Besides, surely you wouldn't let random people in a corpus lead you, style-wise?
@AndrewLeach How do you mean?
 
10:34 PM
This is part of why I think he’s a native speaker. He’s doing the same things that native speakers do whether they make sense or not.
 
What is Nobody if it's followed immediately by a conjunction?
 
Except was no doubt originally a participle, not a preposition; but we have come to treat it as the latter.
 
@Cerberus You’re right that I did not make a distinction between spoken, fiction, newspapers, journal articles, etc.
 
@AndrewLeach The subject? The conjunction but, if that it is*, is followed by an elliptical clause, then.
 
@AndrewLeach Nobody and me are going.
That won’t work.
Nobody but me is going.
Nobody and I are going.
Blech.
 
10:36 PM
@tchrist Even if you had, surely you criticise the sloppy language of young journalists these days, etc. etc. <grumpy voice> ?
 
Nobody or I am going.
Not getting better.
Either I am going, or nobody is.
 
@tchrist That may be because Nobody is <Not-a-person> and you need a real corporeal something there.
 
I think you have a semantic problem there.
 
@Cerberus I’m just reporting the findings, Your Honor.
 
<hammers> Very well, you may continue.
 
10:38 PM
It’s Your job to pass judgement.
Or to pass on passing judgement.
All I know is that these are gnarly.
 
I have so far suspended judgement.
 
And native speakers do random things here.
 
Don't make me adjourn the session.
 
nobody but me is real
nobody but I am real
nobody but me is right
nobody but I am right
 
Nobody but I is right or real.
 
10:39 PM
ha!
fie, I say!
 
@Cerberus butbutbutbut
 
Foe!
 
Fum!
 
<rehammers>
Order!
Politesse!
 
Bailiff!
 
10:40 PM
I need to go and lie down in a darkened room.
 
If it feels good, say it.
If it doesn’t feel good, don’t say it.
@AndrewLeach You have been up too long.
 
Aww migraine?
 
@AndrewLeach a conjunction of confusing prepostions
 
@Cerberus Night-time. I'm several hours ahead.
 
@tchrist It's not that simple.
@AndrewLeach Oh, that thing.
We must always strive to hone our language.
 
10:42 PM
I shall enjoy reading the transcript. Night all!
 
Night!
 
good night!
 
11:17 PM
looks like Andrew will be disappointed :D
 
No darkness?
Oh, the transcript.
 
11:44 PM
-1
Q: Is there a term for 'Disregarding a persons opinion/argument because they haven't experienced it.'?

Cameron W.So today I was talking to some people at work about the health issues surrounding cigarettes and marijuana. I have no problem with either of those things but when people say there are absolutely no dangers from smoking marijuana I can't help but speak out and say that can't be true. Without a se...

Why is this not closed yet?
 
Because nobody listens to me.
Or rather, not enough people do.
 
Correct. I ain't nobody.
What about you, @Cerb?
One more vote required to send that one to the oubliette.
 
Of course I hate that question.
But I think it must be on topic.
 
I don’t understand Cerb’s starred need. He lives in the hot red-light district of Europe’s capital of iniquity of all forms. Surely he need but lean out his window to procure a random fag.
 
Iniquity?
 
11:50 PM
Equity?
 
That would be closer to the truth?
But I don't know what you meant.
 
It’s a teetertotter.
 
What?
 
What floor do you live on?
 
The first.
 
11:51 PM
Is that zero based or one based?
 
Which I seem to remember is the second floor in your country?
My window sill is about 6 metres above street level.
 
You have a zero based count.
 
Yes.
 
So the ground floor is floor zero.
 
Indeed.
 
11:53 PM
@Cerberus That seems high for a first (second) floor.
 
I cleaned my windows this evening. I climbed on the scaffolding that is there now.
 
You might have to lean further out.
Spiderman!
 
@Robusto It is. But many first floors are that high here.
 
I actually like the European way of numbering floors. I've always been partial to zero-based arrays.
 
@Robusto I think it is because all houses used to have a belle-étage as their "primary" floor.
 
11:53 PM
I’m sure my second-story windows are not so crazy high.
 
@Robusto I remember finding it confusing as a child.
 
@Cerberus This time in English?
 
A belle-étage is like the 0.5th floor, zero-based.
 
@Cerberus Erdgeschoss in German?
 
Underneath it will be a souterrain.
 
11:54 PM
@Cerberus Or even in French, SVP.
 
@Robusto Erdgeschoss is just the ground floor?
 
Ground floor in America, except the elevator buttons are numbered G - 2 - 3 ...
 
@tchrist Why is that not French?
 
Parce que c’est un étage, pas *une étage.
 
@Cerberus Oh, is the bell stage really a mezzanine?
 
11:55 PM
Huh. The term is really and positively belle-étage in Dutch...
 
C’est pour ça qu’on dirait bel étage.
 
Oh, wait, maybe it's bel-étage.
Right, I misspole.
 
But the sound is right.
 
Merde.
Dumb ass thingie.
 
11:56 PM
Stop arguing punctilios of orthography and answer me question.
 
Still fucked.
 
@Robusto Hmm no, a mezzanine or entresol is really in between floors, so on top of a regular ground floor, for example. A bel-étage you enter by climbing steps ca. 1.5 metres high.
 
@Cerberus Steps for giants?
 
Haha.
 
What’s so pretty about it, and how does that have anything to do with stratospheric ceilings?
 
11:58 PM
A flight of steps that is half a floor in height.
 
That is not a flight of steps.
That is a half-flight.
More of a puddle jumper, really.
 
@tchrist Usually, the "good" rooms were on the bel-étage. It was safe from flooding and other unpleasantness.
 
And there is a similar half-rack going down?
 
A flight of stairs is always a full story up.
Or down.
 
11:59 PM
Smaller amounts than a whole floor aren’t flighty.
 

« first day (1352 days earlier)      last day (3565 days later) »