This is just a rehash of the whole
“free software” demi-duplicity of Richard Stallman’s, which gave rise to Tim O’Reilly’s
“open software” as a less-dishonest formulation for what boils down to virtually the same thing. Richard should have used something like
unencumbered or
unfettered, but he wanted to be cute, and perhaps even tricksy, so much so that it borders on being intentionally deceptive. Bottom line is that it confuses people, and this is bad. Tim used a nice simple little word, which works much better, and doesn’t make people think the wrong thing. —
tchrist 4 mins ago