« first day (634 days earlier)      last day (4305 days later) » 

3:00 PM
@Robusto But it is usually both?
Cryptic being a euphemism for vague, rather.
 
@Cerberus Simplicity is a virtue almost everywhere.
 
@MattЭллен I'm impressed by their coverage. I want real time footage so I can see who is looking in my window. also racoons.
 
@Mitch yeah, same with satellite view. I want to be able to see myself waving
 
@Cerberus no, though in the same camp, 'cryptic' is not 'vague'
 
@Mitch Matt suffers no coons.
 
3:01 PM
@MattЭллен I can.
 
@Cerberus Also, there is no such thing as synonyms, as we have learned from our pineapples. Two words that are spelled the same and mean the same thing would be the same word! What you not understand!!!
 
just two years later.
 
@Robusto Agreed.
 
I -always- wave when I see a security camera. I'm guessing the people watching can get pretty bored, with no crimes and stuff.
 
3:02 PM
@Mitch you could go commit some crimes instead!
they would probably find that very entertaining
 
@Robusto even the same word is not a synonym with itself.
Also people are liars.
 
@Mitch You would not interpret "this question is rather cryptic" as a euphemism for vague or unclear or something?
 
@JSBձոգչ Why not make them pay, then? Hold up a sign, "will commit crime for $10".
 
@JSBձոգչ I'll do it just for them
 
sounds like a plan
 
3:03 PM
@Robusto Synonyms? Who said they were that?
 
@Mitch is an altruist, though. he commits crimes for free.
 
That's criminally stupid.
 
@Cerberus it's close but not a euphemism, in fact I would think 'cryptic' is a littel stronger than vague. almost like you're -trying- to hide something.
 
The NYT mobile website is somewhat better, but still disorganised compared to other newspapers.
 
@Cerberus See? Even you agree they cannot be sonograms.
 
3:04 PM
@Mitch Yes. I wasn't trying to be exact.
 
@JSBձոգչ not for free..the joy of making someone else's life more interesting. as an entertainer.
 
@Robusto You lost me several lines ago...
 
depends on the crime.
car theft is totally out. cripes, the parking, who wants to deal with that.
 
The computer is your friend.
 
@Mitch Yes, I can just see Raskalnikov getting all in a dither about a crime like that.
 
3:06 PM
Computor on the other hand, is a super villain
 
@Cerberus I agree, but unfortunately the things I care to read are paywalled.
(that's not specifc to the mobile version, but jsut another tniy barrier)
 
@Cerberus He looks right through her?
 
the other barrier is automatic transpositions of letters.
 
@Mitch Yes, Dr House.
 
Oh, never mind. Didn't read the context.
 
3:07 PM
@Robusto exactly. "whoa, dude, what's with the 'tude? I smashed her head in you."
@tchrist He said that? clever guy, copying me. from the future.
 
@Mitch I rarely read it: do they lock up certain articles?
@Vitaly Better. Perhaps that's what my subconscious was thinking of.
 
@Vitaly No, it is not bad.
 
@Cerberus You're just not trying. Keep up!
 
Oh, this is kiamlaluno. I mixed him up with Kosmonut.
 
3:10 PM
@Cerberus mostly the opinion articles (those are the ones I notice).
 
@Robusto Did you read the picture Kit posted?
@Gigili Hahaha.
@Mitch Ah, I see.
 
@Cerberus Yes. The indefinite article is always in and out of jail.
@Cerberus Kit posts a lot of pictures.
 
@Cerberus and the comics.
 
@Cerberus Ah, yes. *The quick red fox jumps over the lazy brown dog." Famous line used for typists to have to reach the entire alphabet on the keyboard. I'm guessing you didn't know why that was really funny.
 
3:13 PM
@Mitch My newspaper has summaries of all articles on their mobile site. If the article is short, it will be an exact copy. If not, it will be a few paragraphs edited to become a readable whole.
 
Mar 14 at 22:58, by Vitaly
user image
 
@Robusto eyes bulging
 
@Vitaly What, you couldn't find a similar video with spiders?
 
@Mitch Cryptic is an obscurantist term for something occulted from casual inspection. Like this sentence.
 
What is your IQ?
Read, man, read!
 
3:15 PM
@Cerberus yeah mobile NYT on actual news works that way too and is sufficient, I just don't bother.
 
@Vitaly Yes, that one's nice too.
 
@tchrist no, I will not like that sentence.
 
@Robusto The five boxing wizards jump quickly. Grumpy wizards make toxic brew for the evil Queen and Jack.
 
@Cerberus I read, I have read, I had read, I did read, I do read, I will read, I will have read.
 
Then buy new eyes.
 
3:16 PM
@RegDwightАΑA That was an order, like it or else I shoot.
 
@tchrist my point exactly. 'vague' or 'unclear' are not as fault filed or accusatory.
 
Which have somewhat different but closely related goals.
 
@Cerberus New I's? Anyway, I never read comment chains under blogs.
 
You always think I'm stupid when there are very clear clues that I understand everything.
 
@Mitch I am not wholly convinced of that. I’d have to troll the specimen books.
 
3:17 PM
@Cerberus Oh yeah? Then understand this.
 
@Robusto well, in the words of Gandalf the Gray, "throw yourself in next time, and read us of your stupidity".
 
@Cerberus No, I don't always think you're stupid. I just love the reaction you make when you think I think that. Wins!
 
Which leaves one to wonder about someone else's mental skills...
@Robusto I don't just think it, I believe it.
 
@RegDwightАΑA I am not a fish to be so easily hooked.
 
@Mitch Where do you read your news?
 
3:18 PM
cryptic is '_you_ are being cryptic'.
'unclear'..it could be your fault or mine.
 
@Mitch pondering your sentence
 
@tchrist you are a ghoti?
 
@Cerberus Well, you have to admit you didn't get my earlier joke. What am I to think?
 
Which one?
 
14 mins ago, by Cerberus
@Robusto You lost me several lines ago...
 
3:19 PM
@Robusto You were being cryptic.
obviously.
 
@Mitch Cryptic to people who can't follow along, yeah.
 
@RegDwightАΑA I’m a piscivorous ichthyophage, except in jurisdictions where prohibited by law.
 
@Cerberus most news heard from radio (NPR). reading, occasional (when it's laying around free) copies of NYT.
 
@Robusto You are to pay attention to clues. When I say something that clearly shows I got it, nay, ever refer to it directly, you are to notice the difference between that and "you lost me".
 
@tchrist I smell something fishy here.
 
3:20 PM
@Cerberus you lost me.
 
@Cerberus You've got it wrong. Dogs don't tell humans what to do. Cats do.
 
@Mitch Most free eggs are oblate spheroids, not round.
@Robusto You hound dog, you.
 
@tchrist to get them round, you really have to pay.
 
@Mitch I actually prefer my paper's website, it is quite good for news. Quick to update too.
 
I wonder if you should cook eggs in Ovaltine. Hmm ...
 
3:22 PM
@Cerberus If ever I want more details to something I hear about, I won't go to anything other than NYT (just to get somewhat reasonably trustworthy facts).
@Robusto Stop wondering. You shouldn't.
 
Why do you only trust the NYT?
 
Hold on...dry or mixed?
 
Dry, one olive, shaken.
 
@Cerberus I'm not so deep or complex to understand all the intricacies of journalistic bias or toeing the government line, it's just that when I read other US sources, they just seem ... stupid?
 
@ΜετάEd Not stirred?
 
3:24 PM
like not actually attempting to answer the questions inspired by the headline?
 
@Cerberus Right. I like to bruise the gin.
 
Hmm OK.
How about foreign newspapers?
Or websites?
 
@Cerberus You're not taking this seriously. Eggs (or olives) do not go with Ovaltine (not mixed).
 
@Cerberus I like to bruise them also.
 
@RegDwightАΑA ‘What's that?’ cried Gandalf. He was relieved when Pippin confessed what he had done; but he was angry, and Pippin could see his eye glinting. ‘Fool of a Took!’ he growled. ‘This is a serious journey, not a hobbit walking-party. Throw yourself in next time, and then you will be no further nuisance. Now be quiet!’ Nothing more was heard for several minutes; but then there came out of the depths faint knocks: tom-tap, tap-tom.
 
3:25 PM
@ΜετάEd Bruise...*pondering*
 
Tom taps impatiently.
 
@Mitch My apologies. We do not have this foreign broth.
 
Ovaltine is like liquid Nutella. If you say bad or wrong things about either, you're only hurting yourselves.
 
Ah, I see.
 
ovaltine and nutella aren't very nice. they should be banned forthwith
 
3:27 PM
!
What have you done??
 
@tchrist yes, and your point is?
 
Now the gods of Nutelland will come to get you!
 
@Cerberus That's a peeve of mine...it's is -very- difficult to find paper copies of foreign newspapers in the US. any train station in Europe, you can find a couple US papers (in addition to the full range of European ones)
 
I have set the pigeons amongst the cat
 
@MattЭллен Ovaltine + Nutella ⋙ Vegemite + Marmite
 
3:27 PM
of course the web doesn't have those limitation.
@MattЭллен that cat is screwed.
 
@Mitch Really? That is weird? Then what do foreigners read in train stations? Here every village "tabac" will have foreign newspapers.
 
@tchrist sounds horrible
 
@tchrist study record: nausea inducer
 
(Using the French word because it is hard to explain otherwise.)
 
@Cerberus we don't have foreigners here. only hearty red-blooded Americans
also, foreign newspapers are for snobs
 
3:29 PM
But anyway, you can read foreign newspapers' websites.
 
also, tabac is just newsstand, right?
 
Sort of.
More like a shop that sells various things that passers-by would require.
 
@MattЭллен You say that in the full knowledge that you live in a nation of Weetabix eaters? For shame!
 
It is normally not a stand, as far as I know.
 
@MattЭллен You've brought this on yourself. If you happen to have bread today and notice there's not even butter for it, well, you taunted the wrong spirits.
 
3:30 PM
@Robusto don't remind me. I still don't understand how half the people here like marmite.
 
Here small book shops would sell most of those things.
 
Oh, and BTW best regards.
 
Magazines, cigarettes, stamps, newspapers, pens, paperclips, I don't know—I rarely enter such shops.
 
@Mitch apparently they went back in time to Thursday and made my bread mouldy
 
@Cerberus tabac?
Is that related to tobacco?
 
3:32 PM
@Vitaly I think they're just friends.
 
@Cerberus exactly. your regular tabac visitor will still only get Das Bild (or die Bild (help me out here @RegDwightАΑA)) but at leat they have the opportunity to read Corriera della Sierra (or whatever it is (help me out here @tchrist))
 
Die Bild, naturally.
 
@MattЭллен have you ever taken a bite out of moldy bread? It's not bad until you notice it.
 
@Cerberus Zeitungskiosk?
 
@Robusto I have a picture of a Soviet tobacco-selling kiosk in mind. Those would have ТАБАК written in huge letters on them. They would sell newspapers, matchboxes, and stuff like that, too.
 
3:33 PM
@Vitaly it's a tobacco shop.
 
@Mitch I don't know.
 
@Gigili No, Tabakladen.
 
@Vitaly Yes. It is related to selling tobacco, although the main function of such shops is usually not considered to be that, but rather the stuff mentioned above. They will still sell lots of cigarettes, of course, but it's not like a fancy shop where they sell various kinds of good cigars or pipes or anything.
@Gigili It is normally no kiosk.
 
@Cerberus indeed, what else are footmen for?
 
@Cerberus a back to the non-"marmite vs peanut butter" subject, namely news.
 
3:35 PM
 
yes everything is on the web, but I only know what I like from the paper ones.
 
@Vitaly It's a small walk-in shop where you can get smokes, printed media, a bottle of water perhaps, or even a sandwich, play lottery, buy concert tickets, pick up a parcel that couldn't be delivered because you were not at home.
 
@Mitch I don't think so: the three good Dutch newspapers are normally available across France. I will walk past a few tabacs in my street in a minute to check, but I am sure they have the good newspapers too.
 
I used to liek the economist..but...
1- too expensive!
 
@Vitaly Right, but that's not like a French tabac.
@Mitch Right, they would certainly have the economist.
@MattЭллен Exactly. Stepping out of one's carriage is such a bother.
 
3:37 PM
what you describe, Cerberus, seems to me like a British News Agents
 
2- people who actually know about things have said that 'the economist' is wrong/misguided/biased/etc.
 
@MattЭллен Oh?
I've only been to England once. I don't remember.
@Mitch All newspapers are inferior to really specialised sources.
 
@Cerberus yes, they sell all these things (although tobacco is on the out)
 
OK.
 
and they probably don't have many foreign papers, if any, depending on the area
 
3:38 PM
Noted.
 
@Mitch am on $job call. Need to review coupla screens to get context.
 
@Cerberus I am being overly cynical, but even though all those internatinoal papers are available there (for what ever nation), it's not like Europeans are all some wordly intellectuals and Americans blithering idiots. The popular papers in Europe are stil the Daily Mail and Bild (no article) because of page 3 girl the sports, and the latest front page scandal
 
@MattЭллен Nice.
 
3:40 PM
 
@Mitch Of course. I was just replying to your suggestion that you would only read the NYT.
 
in the US, because we're puritans (which is really not the case, don't start me), we only get sports and USAToday (pardon me I have to spit), which is not news, just stupid headlines, stretched to slightly more than two sentences.
 
And English papers are notorious.
 
@Mitch eh. the Daily Mail has no page 3 girls any more. That's The Sun's domain
 
@Mitch The Economist is wrong/misguided/biased about what thing, exactly? Can't find the ref chain.
 
3:41 PM
Throwee (also spelled throwie) in urban slang means a type of graffiti art, simple in form but more complex than a tag. Many of the Google results may have to do with this usage. Take the same search to Google Image Search for examples. — ΜετάEd 42 secs ago
 
but the daily mail is a terrible paper IMO
 
The Financial Times and the Economist are perhaps the most respectable English newspapers these days?
 
@MattЭллен _stops subscription _
 
How about the Guardian?
 
@Mitch lol
 
3:42 PM
I have read some bad articles and some good.
 
The Guardian is the leading liberal paper
 
Is it OK?
 
in the UK
 
@tchrist no refs. just what I hear. like scientific american...if you actually know something about the subject, the articles sound totally misleading. I have no substantive basis for any of this .
 
@Cerberus I guess. I don't read it a lot. I'm a New Scientist type.
 
3:43 PM
Ah OK.
 
I have an Economist paper subscription. I have NPR on the radio whenever I drive, and often at home. I have no television.
 
although that can be very dry at times
 
@Mitch That I can comment on definitively.
 
Their interview with Peter Higgs was good
 
But after my $job call.
 
3:44 PM
@Cerberus yeah, I'll look at that (in paper or online). Some of their opinions seem so... like an aunt scolding you for wearing the wrong colored tie to dinner.
 
I believe there are several good German newspapers (Die Zeit, the Frankfurter Algemeine, der Spiegel). Le Monde and Le Figaro I am not sure, they are probably not too bad.
@Mitch Heh. A grievous error.
 
@Cerberus Or grievious, even.
 
@Mitch I think that is the case with every newspaper whenever you really know a lot about the subject. But then you are a bit biased: it is usually that some details are off, while the general conclusion still stands.
 
I like Die Zeit (the paper one). I can't read it hardly (all those big words), but I feel important having it in my hands. Also, the map quiz!
 
The NYT is generally of high quality, although parts can be remarkably insular.
 
3:45 PM
@tchrist Yay for cord cutting! I know many, many young people who no longer watch television, including myself.
@ΜετάEd Quoi?
 
@Cerberus I haven’t watched television for 36 years now.
 
@Mitch Oh, they have a map quiz??
I want it!
 
toodles!
 
@Cerberus Quoit?
 
@tchrist Good. I haven't for ten years or so.
 
3:47 PM
I can't tell the difference betwen Le Monde and Figaro (Figaro is supposed to be to the right and Le Monde center). But I find their topics somehow...boring? Like their headlines just don't draw me in?
 
I rarely read them.
 
@tchrist I felt compelled to watch television on 9/11.
 
@Vitaly I watched that on someone else's television.
 
@Cerberus sorry to tempt you with that...they certainly used to, but I haven't been able to find it lately. I don't know if they even have word quizzes though.
 
@Mitch Wor?
 
3:48 PM
@Vitaly yes, exactly.
 
Word?
 
yes
 
@Vitaly Yes, I hooked up an aerial antenna for that occasion, when I was awoken by a call from Europe about it. This is no longer an option because they have changed to digital broadcasting, and my receiver is strictly analogue.
 
OK.
 
Merdre.
 
3:49 PM
@tchrist You can watch it on foreign live channels next attack.
You may need a VPN for some.
 
9/11 is my birthday. Write it down before you forget.
 
@tchrist they tend to put the most insular things in their 'Nation' section. But yes, the international news section feels somewhat...selective..like the NBC covereage of the Olympics (notoriously only when Americans are involved)
 
@Gigili Really?
 
@Cerberus Yes, unfortunately.
 
using a userstyle to filter out any sports news from my newspaper's website
@Gigili Hilarious.
I am surprised you got through customs!
 
3:51 PM
-1
Q: usage of affirmative

logeekswhat is the correct usage of word affirmative? What does it mean if someone says 'that is affirmative' when listening to a person explaining about a modification in a project.

Gen ref.
 
> The latest stat is that, since the beginning of this year[,] 400,000 [American] households have cut the cord and dropped pay[-]TV services.
 
@Cerberus kniff die Augen zusammen, klappte den Mund zu und kriegte einen roten Kopf
 
@Cerberus I know a lot of people who do that. People bridle at paying for shit they don't watch.
 
@Gigili Aww...
@Robusto Exactly. And that's only one of the problems with regular television.
 
I'm offk.
 
3:55 PM
@MattЭллен Scientific American is the opposite of dry, it's moved towards 'Discovery channel'-like enthusiasm and subject choice (things that are attempting to say 'science is so cool' but it come across as your mom saying 'awesome'.
 
@Mitch yeah. i used to love SciAm back in the day, but looking at it recently it's just been so... fluffy
it used to have some real meat
 
yeah..fluffy is a good term for it..I don't feel like I get anything from it.
 
or possibly my impression of what counts as meaty science coverage has changed. i was a middle-schooler last time i read it regularly
 
@Cerberus They want you to pay hundreds a month for a lot of crap that's just not even watchable. I mean, like, 0.1% is worth the time. But then you often can't get that 0.1% by other legal means.
 
@JSBձոգչ Old SciAm tasted better too. Like old Ovaltine.
 
@JSBձոգչ right, could be age/experience. like 'Seventeen' magazine..only read by under-seventeens.
I've heard.
 
@Mitch Yeah, I can remember when it actually had articles about, say, wasp behavior and stuff like that.
 
@Robusto it's called bundling. 0.1% is watchable, but everyone watches a different 0.1%
 
@Mitch Note that the Discovery Channel has been known to actively lie about scientific facts to make some silly hypothesis seem serious at all.
 
still, it's better than the history channel
 
3:58 PM
@Robusto Hundreds, even?
 
@Cerberus discovery also produces mythbusters, though, which means all is forgiven
 
@Cerberus I heard they even peddle some religious BS now (“archaeology” supporting Biblical stories—“teaching the controversy”—etc), or has that always been the case?
 
@Vitaly Who doesn't.
 

« first day (634 days earlier)      last day (4305 days later) »