« first day (1719 days earlier)      last day (3307 days later) » 

12:01 PM
@Rememberme I told you if you saw that before deletion
 
When i first came here it was soo mathy....when I came I saw mike ted and Pedro were debating on some topological question it was soo mathy those days @Incurrence I saw it
 
@Rememberme Is this not your only account?
 
I came with the name sayan I just changed it few days ago
I don't know what has happened to it these days
 
@Rememberme You mean 'not-math-chat' wise?
I guess people met eachother
 
Yes not math chat wise
What do you mean by that
 
12:05 PM
Well if we came in, asked a math question, and then left, it may seem rude
So people talked about non-math and got attached to one another to some extent
 
Well I have this bad feeling that this chat will die down slowly.......
 
@Rememberme It seems to be growing though
@Rememberme 36 people here
 
Ya but only for now.....
 
It'll get mathy again
 
I really miss David Wheeler
The question answerer
 
12:09 PM
I also miss David
He was incredibly helpful and seemed to be a genius
 
I know I did disappear from chat for few weeks but David Wheeler has not been here from nearly a month......
 
Last seen 12 days ago
 
He was the unsung genius of the chatroom@Incurrence
Well this chat has made some potentially big changes in my life.......
Like turning me into topology that's the biggest change this chat room made in my life
 
It got me started on textbooks
 
You know how I came into topology?
lol.....
 
12:19 PM
What, that we deleted so much?
 
Yup
 
Are you studying right now?
I am working on complex analysis
 
Then you will be coming up against the zeta function right ?
 
No
Not at all lol
 
Well Theodore W gamelin is a complex analysis book which has the zeta function @Incurrence
And if I am not wrong the statement of the Riemann hypothesis has something related complex analysis and complex numbers
 
12:23 PM
Yes indeed
But I haven't worked with it yet
 
And hence comes the zeta function
It is very fascinating....... It is what made me interested into mathematics when I was in 6th grade.....@Incurrence
 
How old are you now?
 
I think 14.......
 
You think?
 
This may I will be 15
Your birthday is in may....?
When?
@Incurrence I might be talking big names here but you have come across Julia set and Mandelbrot set right ?
 
12:31 PM
Indeed
I haven't really worked with either though
 
Oh great.....they are pretty great fractals
You have started topology?@Incurrence
 
@Rememberme Point set, yes
@Rememberme And a little measure theory
 
You require measures for it......?
 
My measure theory was for functional analysis
I wanted to read some background on $L^p$ spaces
So I could understand the $p-\operatorname{norm}$ better
 
Oh.....but why are you solo scattered ....I mean to say that you are doing complex analysis,a bit of point set then you did measures......what I was always told that you should finish on then go to another right?@Incurrence
 
12:37 PM
Well I am in uni
Taking functional analysis, complex analysis and algebra
Functional wants me to learn point set and had some measure theory stuff, complex analysis is complex analysis
 
Three amazing topics......
Bit I am still in with algebra.....this is going to take some real time
Well @Incurrence you did groups right?
 
Doing them now
 
I have a question......
 
shoot
 
How do you use generators and relations to define a group ?
It is there in my book but I don't get it.....
 
12:41 PM
That is a presentation you refer I imagine
 
You can explain me in terms of dihedral groups
 
@Rememberme I can't rigt now sorry, you can ask someone else, or I can explain on thursday
I have exam in two days and assignment in 3
 
Ok fine good luck
 
But most of all I am super tired ahaha
 
@Incurrence
 
12:47 PM
Hi @ᴇʏᴇs
How are you
 
@Rememberme I don't remember you
 
He is Sayan
With the pink avatar
 
@Rememberme Why did you change your username
 
I am sayan
 
So you won't remember him
 
12:49 PM
lol
 
Just felt like....
 
@Incurrence Did you guys already do integration in complex
 
@ᴇʏᴇs Nope, about to soon though
This week I would say
 
Contour integration....wow
 
Yea we did contour integration a couple weeks ago
 
12:51 PM
What week are you in, and how many weeks are there?
We are on 7/16 I believe
 
@ᴇʏᴇs is it complicated
 
@Rememberme No, the things we learn are fairly simple since this is an introductory class
We are on 10/16
 
@ᴇʏᴇs So pretty much same rate I guess
 
So how do you integrate in complex....just the gist
 
@Rememberme I think you take a parametrisation around the singularities is the gist of it
 
12:55 PM
Okay.
 
I have one question on my homework I'm unsure about but the prof. explicitly said we can't share it outside of class
 
Is it some kind of a secret method @ᴇʏᴇs
 
@Rememberme Yes
 
@ᴇʏᴇs @Incurrence Hello.
 
Hi @JasperLoy
 
1:00 PM
Hello William
We have 37 chat members
 
Why did he say not to share it outside the class....pretty weird....because I have always heard that mathematicians work in collaboration
Hi @WillHunting
 
@Rememberme Bcause he doesn't want us to get help from other people
 
Oh got it now .....
Good luck on it @ᴇʏᴇs
 
@Rememberme Hi Sayan.
 
@JasperLoy how did you know it was him
 
1:03 PM
@ᴇʏᴇs I know everything. I just pretend not to know some things.
 
He is will hunting @ᴇʏᴇs
 
Oh
 
I am thinking of not coming to this room anymore, still thinking.
 
I think Julian Rachman will also have the same reaction as @ᴇʏᴇs
Why @WillHunting
 
@Rememberme I talk too much rubbish and many people dislike me.
@Incurrence 39 now.
 
1:07 PM
The number of people here is disturbing me for some reason
@WillHunting I have also considered this
It is one of my greater sources of procrastination
 
How do I find the factorial of a decimal?
 
@Incurrence I did not feel disturbed but now I am.
 
@anonymous:as in ½!
 
Yes.
 
@Incurrence Why do you think so many are here?
 
1:10 PM
In that case you need some extension of the factorial to the reals, the one used most often (by far) is the gamma function
I believe wikipedia has an article on it, and there are several questions (with answers) on here
 
@WillHunting No idea
But I am tired as f
 
@Incurrence I think I come here mostly to talk to you and @ᴇʏᴇs.
 
@WillHunting It's probably good to be exposed to the math though?
 
@Incurrence Why were there so many removed messages?
 
Reasons
 
1:16 PM
@Incurrence I don't need to be exposed to it. I know enough math.
@ᴇʏᴇs Have you considered not coming here anymore?
 
@WillHunting But you haven't been exposed to everything, like path homotopic equivalence
Just fun little things
 
@Incurrence Well, that's what you think. =)
 
Oh okay hahahaha
You were DavidW and then you stopped coming here
 
No, I am not David.
 
@JasperLoy No
 
1:21 PM
Secret safe with me JL
aka
DW!
 
I am Will Hunting.
Every day, I hunt for the will to solve my problems.
That is what my name means.
@ᴇʏᴇs Yesterday when you asked me my birthday I thought you wanted to give me a present LOL.
@Incurrence DW never came here regularly anyway.
 
But he was awesome - he has been coming here for 3 years periodically. So he must be a secondary account
 
The nature of this room has changed a lot over the 4 years I was here.
People come and people go.
 
Yes I can imagine, and likely a bad way
 
Yes, a bad way, because it is more serious now.
@Incurrence The answer to why there are 38 users in this room is because they forgot to leave the room.
@Incurrence In the past, we used to talk much more rubbish and there were much fewer flags.
 
1:32 PM
@WillHunting What really? It is more serious?
2
 
@Incurrence Yes, indeed.
 
@WillHunting But it autoleaves after 10 minutes if you turn off your pc, and very few people leave the pc on 24h
Oh wtf
They changed the chat system
Seen 9h ago
 
@Incurrence Well, many people use their school computers, LOL.
 
Wow they changed the system
It no longer autokicks
Only 14 are in here
12
9
 
@Incurrence You can be a private investigator, LOL.
 
1:35 PM
11 is the correct count
 
I miss some friends I had in here. They left the site long ago.
@Incurrence Your textbook challenge is too challenging. Don't have to follow my list, which I might change anyway. Read what suits you best.
 
brb shower
Ted will be on soon lol
 
1:48 PM
@Chris'ssis what's the news?
@Incurrence autokicks?
 
@ᴇʏᴇs @Incurrence I think maybe I won't come to this room anymore. I may still hang out in room 168 and we can still email. Bye.
 
@MikeMiller I don't know if I've ever "left" this room, but most other rooms I do.
 
@JasperLoy :(
 
@WillHunting why not?
 
2:06 PM
Hi all. If you think this answer to an old question is correct, could you please upvote it, so that I can flag this exact duplicate? (I only need one, as far as I understand, though more are of course welcome)
 
It use to autokick peoplke when not 'seen' for 10 minutes or some close number @Robjohn
E.g. you need to leave your computer on
Now it doesn't kick people for a longer amount of time, or ever
The change happened 11hours ago I would conjecture
@Robjohn
Happening to all chat rooms it seems
 
@Incurrence As long as my computer is connected to the room, I stay connected. If I turn my computer off, I will be disconnected. I assume these people still have their computers on.
 
@robjohn They don't though
Since otherwise we get 'seen 1m ago' over and over
Whereas it has seen: 10h ago and they are still there
And there is 38 of them lol
 
@Incurrence There have always been people who show long times in the seen 1h ago
 
Hmmm perhaps I never noticed
 
2:18 PM
My computer is off right now
 
@ᴇʏᴇs good try ;-)
 
hehe
 
@robjohn Have you ever seen so many users online here at one time?
 
@Incurrence Yes, but not recently. When I started there would be large numbers of people here.
@ᴇʏᴇs I don't see any of your questions closed recently.
@ᴇʏᴇs Oh, it was deleted by Community.
 
@robjohn How do I find all solutions $z$ to $\cos z = i$?
 
2:26 PM
@Incurrence: the substitution $x=e^{i z}$ may be useful, if you know euler's formula for cosine
 
$$\cos z = i$$
$$\frac{e^{-zi}+e^{zi}}{2i}=i$$
$$e^{-zi}+e^{zi}=-2=2e^{i\pi + 2\pi k},\quad k\in \Bbb Z$$
 
@Incurrence Solve $e^{iz}+e^{-iz}=2i\iff e^{2iz}-2ie^{iz}+1=0$ with the quadratic formula
 
Is that for $\sin$ above?
Sorry I asked a similar question yesterday
I am confused robjohn
Oh damn
I see
I thought the denominator in both cases was 2i
 
2:53 PM
What can we say about the maximum possible area of the rectangle below?
and what happens with that maximum area divided by the angle $\theta$ when $\theta \to 0$?
 
r9m
@robjohn AWESOME!! :D
@Chris'ssis if you have an elementary solution to that ... I'll worship you on a sinking war-ship ! :D ;)
2
 
@r9m Yes, I have. :-))))) (I wonder why ... maybe I'm just lucky)
 
r9m
@Chris'ssis then be prepared to be worshiped under said conditions :P Awesome!!
 
@r9m :-)))))))))))
 
3:26 PM
i may lose my connection at any moment
 
3:54 PM
Test for convergence$$\sum _{n=1}^{\infty } \frac{1}{\displaystyle \frac{((2 n)\text{!!})^2}{((2 n-1)\text{!!})^2}-1}$$
Well, maybe it's too easy though ...
One is allowed to only use high school tools (anything about Stirling's approximation, say)
 
Hi @DanielFischer. One question: if we have some family $\{f_{i}\}_{i \in I}$ of entire functions and we know that for every $z \in \mathbb{C}$ set $\{f_i(z)\}$ is countable, is it then also $I$ countable?
 
@Cortizol Not sure. I think I have seen a counterexample, but I may misremember and it was a counterexample to something similar but different. I'm off to cook dinner in a moment, but I'll try to remember what it was.
 
@DanielFischer Ok. Thank you.
 
4:16 PM
Hello @robjohn @DavidWheeler !!

We have the initial and boundary value problem $$u_t=u_{xx}, 0<x<\pi,t>0\\u_x(0,t)=u_x(\pi,t)=0\\u(x,0)=f(x)$$

We are looking for solutions of the form $u(x,t)=X(x)T(t)$.

$X'(0)=0\\X'(\pi)=0$

$u_t=u_{xx} \Rightarrow \frac{T'(t)}{T(t)}=\frac{X''(x)}{X(x)}=-\lambda$

$X''(x)+\lambda X(x), 0<x<\pi\\X'(0)=X'(\pi)=0$

$T'(t)+\lambda T(t)=0, t \geq 0$


Why do we take at the last two lines $0<x<\pi$ and $t \geq 0$ respectively ? Why do we take for $x$ as at the problem an open interval and for $t$ we take greater or EQUAL to 0 ??
 
4:28 PM
@DanielFischer I want to write an algorithm that runs in time $O(|V| \cdot |E|)$ and calculates the transitive closure of a directed graph $G=(V,E)$. Could I show you what I have tried so that you tell me if it is right?
@DanielFischer That's what I have tried: pastebin.com/6hQC8XHD
 
ADG
4:48 PM
anyone in for a friendly talk
 
Depends how friendly
 
@r9m @robjohn have you seen this one? $$\int_0^1 x^x +(1-x)^{1-x} \ dx \ge \sqrt{2}$$ A simple solution is required.
 
ADG
@ᴇʏᴇs LOL
@Chris'ssis @Chris'ssis @Chris'ssis @Chris'ssis @Chris'ssis little buddy do you know AM,GM HM?
 
lol
 
ADG
lolly pop
@Chris'ssis $\int_0^1 x^x+(1-x)^{1-x}\ge(1-0)\min(x^x+(1-x)^{1-x})=1*\sqrt2=\sqrt2$
@Chris'ssis reply
 
5:02 PM
@ADG OK
@ADG If I ask a question it doesn't mean I don't know how to answer it (btw).
 
hi chat
@Chris'ssis: working on any interesting integrals lately?
 
Why does AmWhy have 1 reputation?
 
5:17 PM
per the top of that page, apparently their account has been suspended
oof, and for a year
 
@Semiclassical I told you I discovered a new integral representation of the catalan's constant? I just worked on different versions of that integral.
 
if you did, i'm afraid i'm forgetting
ah
 
@Semiclassical I discovered it yesterday.
 
ahh
neat
 
@Semiclassical I think to publish it, or to add it to my book without publishing it ...
Not sure what to do now.
 
5:21 PM
yeah, dunno how that all works
plus there's always the nagging worry that it's been done -somewhere- in the last few hundred years of mathematical literature
 
@Semiclassical Sure. I did a lot of reserach for it, and found it in no other part.
 
ahh
what kind of an integral representation is it, out of curiosity? (i'm fine with generalities rather than details)
 
@Semiclassical double integral involving trigonometric functions.
 
In my notes there is the following:

Periodic conditions:

$\exists T$ period, $f: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$
$f(x+T)=f(x),\forall x \in \mathbb{R}$

$\lim_{x \rightarrow T^{-}} f(x)=f(T)$

$I$ per. $T$
$\forall x \in I \Rightarrow x+T \in I$

Coud you explain to me what the last two lines mean?? @DanielFischer @robjohn
 
5:31 PM
oh, a practical Mathematica question for you. do you know much about how to make NIntegrate run as efficiently as possible?
 
No, I don't.
 
nuts. thought i'd ask.
 
I'm out to bring some food to needed people. BBL (in 1.5-2 hours)
 
later
 
@MaryStar They're your notes. What were you thinking when you wrote them? I can't really figure out what you meant.
 
5:49 PM
hmm
hey guys
 
Hi :)
 
@robjohn I didn't write them... The prof gave them to us...
 
@MaryStar Then you'll need to ask the prof. I can't really figure out what the last line is supposed to mean.
 
I suppose that $I$ is the domain of $x$. Does "$I$ per. $T$" that $T$ is the period??
And why would the following stand?? $\forall x \in I \Rightarrow x+T \in I$ @robjohn
 
6:29 PM
René Descartes (/ˈdeɪˌkɑrt/; French: [ʁəne dekaʁt]; Latinized: Renatus Cartesius; adjectival form: "Cartesian"; 31 March 1596 – 11 February 1650) was a French philosopher, mathematician and writer who spent most of his life in the Dutch Republic. He has been dubbed the father of modern philosophy, and much subsequent Western philosophy is a response to his writings, which are studied closely to this day. In particular, his Meditations on First Philosophy continues to be a standard text at most university philosophy departments. Descartes' influence in mathematics is equally apparent; the Cartesian...
I don't understand this diagonal lemma.
Not that that's surprising considering I am an idiot compared to people who inhabit math.SE.
 
This is a kind of record...... 46 people in this room now amazing!!!!
Hi @BalarkaSen
 
@BalarkaSen I have doubt in linear algebra
 
okay
 
6:48 PM
@Rememberme jasper?
 
lol @KarimMansour
 

« first day (1719 days earlier)      last day (3307 days later) »