« first day (1509 days earlier)      last day (3515 days later) » 

8:06 AM
It should have implications for this sequence: oeis.org/A100995
 
I don't understand Big $\mathcal{O}$ notation myself, could anyone put it in layman words?
 
Huy
@Analysis: What is your background?
 
@Huy Weak optimization and calculus
@Huy I have seen it, and it seems to be used for terms that are sufficiently irrelevant
 
Huy
@Analysis: You should be able to understand the given wikipedia entry if you've seen a bit of calculus.
 
Is it essentially a weak variation of another function?
E.g. the function is essentially convergent to another function?
 
Huy
8:08 AM
I don't understand your question.
 
@Analysis Big O means that there exists a constant "c" such that the absolute value of your function is bounded by "c" times the expression within in the Big O parentheses.

Or at least that is what I believe it means, correct me if I am wrong, someone.
 
Huy
@MatsGranvik: $\frac{2}{x} \in \mathcal{O}(1)$ as $x \to \infty$, can you find $c \in \mathbb{R}$ such that $|\frac{2}{x}| < c$ for all $x \in \mathbb{R}$?
 
@Huy I am not competent to answer.
 
Huy
Maybe you could ask Mathematica. ;-)
 
If $x\to \infty$ then any $c$ will do
Oh you said for all $x$ there nevermind
Then no
 
Huy
8:18 AM
@Analysis: My point is that it doesn't make sense using Landau symbols without saying something along the lines of "as $x \to x_0$" (where $x_0 \in \mathbb{R} \cup \{\pm \infty\}$). Unfortunately @MatsGranvik did forget about that necessary part.
Morning, @Khallil.
 
Good morning, @Huy!
 
Huy
@Khallil: How are you?
 
So with $e^x = 1 + x + \frac{x^2}{2} + \mathcal{O}(x^3)$ for $x \to 0$, was $\mathcal{O}(x^3)$ the chosen stopping point because the difference in actual value and approximation is less than $x^3$ contributes as $x\to0$?
 
I'm ok. I just woke up. The time is 9:23 in the morning and the weather is nice and sunny. How are you, @Huy?
 
Huy
@Analysis: Probably. Always depends on context.
@Khallil: I've been up for some hours and it's sunny over here as well.
@Khallil: Maybe you can help me here? matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/4438/…
 
8:25 AM
I won't be able to help out now as I'm quite busy, @Huy.
However, I will get to answering or leaving a comment on your question when I get the chance!
 
Huy
Okeydokey.
 
Why don't they teach complex numbers earlier anyway
I don't get why they avoid such a simple and useful concept so long
 
Huy
@Kainui: Because it is not at all useful before.
 
Rotation in a plane?
 
omg
kai what theeee
 
8:30 AM
hey
 
yeah wanna look at my question? ^^
 
Alright send it my way
 
Huy
@Kainui: Can you explain to me the application of a rotation in a plane for a kid in high school at age 15/16?
 
I can't believe you're in STACKS too what the... no wonder you didn't talk that much on skype -_-
 
@Huy can you explain the application of mathematics for ANY kid at the age of 15/16?
Who cares if it's useful?
 
8:32 AM
I have my characteristic lines right... change of variables.. taking partial derivatives and now I'm stuck... super
 
It's just fun and straightforward, but it is useful
 
Huy
@Kainui: It is useful to know how much you're gonna have to pay - roughly - at the checkout, e.g.
 
also... $u_x-u_y-u = z$ like do you use change of variables on the z or what
 
Huy
@Kainui: I think it's the wrong approach to teach something where kids will completely fail to see literally ANY usefulness in their life.
 
This looks separable @usu
 
8:34 AM
which one
because my book made these problems easy but what I'm assigned is coo coo
 
@Huy I thought you were talking about teaching Quantum Mechanics though?
 
Huy
@Kainui: Um, not really, no.
 
I don't get it... the examples made everything easy..... now I'm stuck?!
 
lol ok
 
Huy
@Kainui: I was just telling you that I don't think any kid would appreciate complex numbers if they were taught earlier.
 
8:35 AM
What? I don't see why not.
 
Huy
(because you were saying you wish they did teach it earlier)
 
complex numbers... college algebra learned it in my community college
wasn't too bad...
 
It's incredibly useful because all movement is N/S/E/W
 
Huy
@Kainui: you failed to give me any actual example of an application.
 
ok
later I gotta go
 
Huy
8:36 AM
(for that age group)
great argument ;-)
 
<_<
pft ignoring my question huh
 
@Huy Teach them propositional logic,modulo arithmetic and proofs?
 
Huy
@Analysis: While I do realise they would probably be able to understand it, I doubt they will care about it.
 
Elementary set theory - Elementary graph theory - Relations & functions - Induction & recursive definitions. I found them all very enjoyable
 
I prefer number theory over this pos pde book
 
8:42 AM
If this is an optional course, I think they will care regardless of what you give. Or are you trying to sell the idea to them?
 
Huy
@Analysis: There are other optional courses and I doubt they will take mine if it doesn't appeal to them.
 
So you are trying to sell it. How are you selling it? Will it be written in English on a page, or will there be a poster with graphics?
If poster - Graph theory
 
Huy
@Analysis: I'm not sure. I think just a short description.
No pictures.
 
Here is a question to upvote :-)
0
Q: Evaluating $\int_{0}^{\pi/4} \log(\sin(x)) \log(\cos(x)) \log(\cos(2x)) \ dx$

Chris's sisWhat tools would you recommend me for evaluating this integral? $$\int_{0}^{\pi/4} \log(\sin(x)) \log(\cos(x)) \log(\cos(2x)) \ dx$$ My first thought was to use beta function, but it's hard to get such a form because of $\cos(2x)$. What other options do I have?

lol, who downvoted me? :-)
 
omg
or at least tell me how to input a pde in mathematica
 
9:02 AM
Hi guys! Any ideas on how to find $\int_0^{\pi} \frac{\sin((n+1/2)x)}{\sin(x/2)} dx$, please? :)
 
Have a go at using the addition formula for $\sin(a+b)$ in the numerator, @mirgee.
 
@Khallil I have tried that to no avail, but It seems to be $\pi$ $\forall n \in \mathbb N$ so maybe induction?
But it doesn't work for me neither :/
 
@Mirgee, did you manage to reduce it down to the following form as well? $$ \int_{0}^{\pi} \dfrac{\sin \left( n+\frac{1}{2} \right)x}{\sin \left( \frac{x}{2} \right)} \text{ d}x = \int_{0}^{\pi} \dfrac{\sin(nx)}{\tan \left( \frac{x}{2} \right)} \text{ d}x + \underbrace{\int_{0}^{\pi} \cos (nx) \text{ d}x}_{= \ 0} $$
 
@Khallil Yes, precisely
This integral is not easier then the first one
 
9:18 AM
This one is an elementary integral. What happens for $n=1$?
And if we consider $\displaystyle I_n=\int_{0}^{\pi} \dfrac{\sin \left( n+\frac{1}{2} \right)x}{\sin \left( \frac{x}{2} \right)} \text{ d}x $ then what is $$I_n-I_{n-1}$$?
Some easy calculations show that $I_n-I_{n-1} =0 \Rightarrow I_n=I_{n-1} $ and since $I_1=\pi$, we have that $$I_1=I_2= ...=I_n=\pi$$
 
@Khallil Hm, I thought induction might work on this one, probably not
 
I was thinking of using complex numbers, @Mirgee.
 
@Chris'ssis There are some recursive formulas for $\sin(nx)$, maybe I should look at those?
 
Is there an easy way to $\frac{1}{\pi}\left[\int_{-\pi}^\pi e^x \cos(nx) dx\right]$?
 
That one can be done with complex numbers, @Analysis.
Consider the real part of $\displaystyle \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} e^{x} e^{inx} \text{ d}x$.
 
9:29 AM
@mirgee There you need nothing special, but only to proceed as I did. For these integrals it's good to check the behaviour of the first few terms. Then you have an idea about the way you should tackle it.
 
Must it be done using complex numbers?
 
It can done by integration by parts as well, @Analysis. You'll need to do it twice if I recall correctly.
^_^
 
And notice that we have the original integral within it, and then bring that over to get $2I$ and divide etc?
 
Huy
^_^
 
I did that but got it slightly wrong, and didn't want to do it again xD
 
9:31 AM
Something like that, @Analysis!
 
@Chris'ssis I see, nice. I wouldn't think of the $I_n - I_{n-1}$ trick, I haven't seen it before. Thanks :)
 
Let me have a go at it as well.
 
I got a page of garbage now :(
 
I'll let you know if I have any more success, @Analysis.
 
Okay thank you @Kha
 
9:33 AM
@mirgee It's just a matter of practice.
 
Imagine if I shortened your username to it's first four letters, @Analysis!
 
@Chris'ssis When they taught us integration at school, they said there are about seven ways to approach any integral, but that is false :)
 
@mirgee :-)
 
^_^
^_^
 
Huy
@Khallil: That would be ANAL!
 
9:37 AM
:-O
O-:
 
@Khallil Yes, I realised that earlier today xD. I typed A N A LYS I S, as individual posts, with the LYS joined intentionally to avoid it.
Also, what is that gif from, I must know
 
Apparently studying Analysis causes anal lysis because you break your butt trying to learn it!
 
Huy
@Khallil: You laugh now but you'll soon find out it's true.
 
What is the gif from nooo
 
I've heard a lot of that, @Huy. Don't scare me!
That gif is from an interview that I can't remember. It's Michael Jordan though, @Analysis.
 
Huy
9:47 AM
@Khallil: It actually won't. Only if you want it to. :> :> :>
@Khallil: Did you already find out which courses you'll be taking?
 
I also managed to finish off that integral, @Analysis. $$ \dfrac{1}{\pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} e^{x} \cos (nx) \text{ d}x = \dfrac{\cos (n\pi)}{\pi (1+n^2)} \left( e^{\pi} - \frac{1}{e^{\pi}} \right) $$
I know of the core modules for my first semester, but I still haven't looked at the options, @Huy.
 
Huy
@Khallil: What are your core modules?
 
@Kha That is almost exactly what I got hmmm. Mine had a $\cos(-n\pi)$
 
Differential Equations, Analysis (continues into Term 2), Foundations and Abstract Algebra, @Huy.
 
Huy
@Analysis: $\cos x = cos -x$.
 
9:50 AM
Remember that $\cos (-\theta) = \cos(\theta)$, @Analysis.
 
Oh my god
...
 
Dear lord.
 
Cya
 
Hahahaha!
 
Huy
@Khallil: Weird stuff. :P
 
9:51 AM
Noooo!
 
Huy
@Analysis: Bye.
 
Good stuff, @Huy!
 
Huy
@Khallil: I beg to differ. ^w^
I find it interesting though how differently different universities teach maths.
 
Me too. Everywhere's different and that makes things more interesting.
There wouldn't be any fun if all universities studied A, B and C in that exact order!
 
Huy
@Khallil: It seems in the US there is a rough standard curriculum though.
 
9:54 AM
Really? I'm guessing Analysis comes first then.
 
Huy
@Khallil: I think they have something like Calc 1-4 or 1-3, no idea what they learn there.
And precalc or so.
Very weird system.
 
At least you'll be able to know what you'll be doing after your final year of high school and will be able to prepare accordingly, unlike the rest of the world.
 
Huy
@Khallil: Well, we can just check online what we'll be doing. Isn't that the case for most universities? xD
And who on earth prepares for university. .______.'
 
Yep, but you won't know where you'll be going until you get your results about a month before getting to university.
 
Huy
@Khallil: Huh?
 
9:58 AM
I'm certainly not. I've been watching The O.C. this whole time.
 
Huy
@Khallil: And why would that be the case?
 
In the UK, you apply to university in the October of your final year of high school with your penultimate year results and your predicted grades. You then get conditional offers based on your final exams that you'll do. Then you do your final exams in the summer, get your results in August and go off to the university you make it into in September/October.
It's even weirder over here in the UK, @Huy.
 
Huy
@Khallil: I see. I don't think that applies for all of Europe though. In Switzerland, graduating from high school will suffice in order to study at any arbitrary university, independant of your final grades.
 
Yep, that whole paragraph only applies to the UK as far as I can remember, @Huy.
 
Huy
@Khallil: I know in Germany it also depends on the final grades whether you will be accepted or not.
 
10:01 AM
I like the system in Switzerland. It's much nicer than having to worry about your final grades right before you get into university.
 
Huy
I prefer our system.
 
Me too. ^_^
 
Huy
@Khallil: It can only be realised by trying to have a certain "skill standard" after high school graduation.
Apparently, in other countries such as Germany, skill levels vary extremly from high school to high school. :<
 
Which is easier said than done in a country like the UK that makes the exams easier to make it seem as if everybody's doing better.
 
Huy
@Khallil: That doesn't sound like a very good educational system. :(
 
10:03 AM
It really isn't. University is completely different though. ^_^
 
Huy
Yeah, I hope so.
 
$=2\left[\left[\frac{-2x^2 \cos(2n\pi x)}{2n\pi}\right]_{-1}^0 - \int_{-1}^0 \frac{-2x\cos(2n\pi x)}{n\pi} \, \mathrm{d} x\right]$
How do I make the $\int$ bigger?
 
\displaystyle
 
Huy
$\bigint$ ?
 
Huy that didn't work?
 
Huy
10:06 AM
I think it requires a package.
 
Does display style need a package?
 
I think you mean \Big\int, @Huy. Anywho, \displaystyle is better!
Nope.
 
$\big\int_{-1}^0$
 
Huy
There's a bigints package, iirc.
 
How to use display style?
 
10:07 AM
Just type it in before your code, @Analysis.
Like this: \displaystyle \int.
 
Thx
 
^_^
 
:) : $=2\left[\left[\frac{-2x^2 \cos(2n\pi x)}{2n\pi}\right]_{-1}^0 - \displaystyle \int_{-1}^0 \frac{-2x\cos(2n\pi x)}{n\pi} \, \mathrm{d} x\right]$
Very pretty
 
Huy
@Khallil: I just checked online and it seems in Germany, almost 50% graduate from high school. Do you know the numbers for the UK?
 
Not a clue. At which age do the students graduate from high school, @Huy?
 
Huy
10:11 AM
@Khallil: Typically 17/18, I think.
 
Ok, I'll check out the figures for A-Levels.
 
Huy
What do you mean by figures for A-levels?
 
Do you know what A-Levels are, @Huy?
 
Huy
I'm not sure I do.
 
When you're 16, you get to choose 3-5 subjects to continue with for the next 2 years until you're 18. Universities use the grades you get in A-Levels as a condition for getting in to their undergraduate programs.
 
Huy
10:14 AM
Okay. And what about A-levels?
 
Those are A-Levels!
 
Huy
Those 3-5 subjects?
 
Yep!
 
Huy
I see.
 
I can't seem to find a figure for the no. or percentage of students that finish their A-Levels, @Huy.
 
Huy
10:16 AM
=_=
In the United Kingdom, the average household net-adjusted disposable income per capita is 25 828 USD a year
:o
 
Is that low?
It is, isn't it.
 
Huy
Apparently it's over average, but it seems ridiculously low. :<
@Khallil: Isn't rent in e.g. London incredibly expensive?
 
It is.
 
Huy
Like 600£ per month for a 1-room apartment?
 
Elsewhere it's a fair bit cheaper.
I don't know the figures, but that seems like a reasonable guess.
 
Huy
10:21 AM
And groceries etc. are kind of expensive too, there.
 
Almost everything is more expensive in London.
 
Huy
Yeah.
 
Do I need a package to strike through things?
 
Huy
@Analysis: I think ulem or soul.
 
\usepackage{cancel}
 
Huy
10:23 AM
Oh yeah, that would work too.
 
Do you use TeXworks?
 
Huy
I don't, if you asked me.
 
Asked you both :)
 
Huy
I prefer TeXnicCenter.
 
I use TeXShop.
 
10:25 AM
I'll look into both, thanks
 
TeXShop is on Mac as far as I can recall, @Analysis. ^_^
 
Are you two around here every night?
everyday at this time* (It's 8:30PM here - Australia)
 
Huy
Not really. Especially not during week.
 
I'll miss you two then $:'$(
 
Huy
Don't worry. I'll be back.
I'm currently preparing my first exercise class in linear algebra for freshmen. :3
 
10:32 AM
Was that the optional one?
Also where do freshman sit? What age?
Freshman -> sophmore -> senior?
 
Huy
@Analysis: I usually call first year undergrads freshmen.
Isn't that the common notion?
@Analysis: No it's not optional, it's a compulsory course for all first year undergrads in maths/physics.
 
In Australia, high school is Grade 8,9,10,11,12 and university, first year, second year, third year, Honours year
 
Huy
@Khallil: The weather is phenomenal today. We went to play football yesterday because we thought it would be raining today. And now this. i.imgur.com/maZFMR2.jpg
 
@Huy that is beautiful, did you take that?
 
Huy
@Analysis: In Switzerland, you have 6 years of high school and afterwards 3 or 4.5 years of university, 3 for your BSc and another 1.5 for your MSc, ideally.
 
10:36 AM
If only I had such a fantastic view to take a photo of, @Huy!
 
Huy
@Analysis: yes, that's from my windows next to my PC. :P
@Khallil: I just want to play football!
 
I've got football tonight. It's 7 a side and I don't really want to go because I feel tired. T_T
 
Huy
I'll go instead!
 
I'm not usually on at this time during the week either, @Analysis.
I just derived a really strange result. Can you guys confirm it's true?
 
Huy
I think it's false, upon observations so far.
 
10:40 AM
 
Huy
Again?
 
Yep, I lost my paper from last time.
For part b, I got $\alpha^2 + \beta^2 + \gamma^2 = -12$.
$\begin{aligned} x^3 + 2x^2 + 8x - 5 & = (x-\alpha)(x-\beta)(x-\gamma) \\ & = x^3 - (\alpha + \beta + \gamma)x^2 + (\alpha\beta + \alpha\gamma + \beta\gamma)x - \alpha\beta\gamma \end{aligned}$
Comparing the coefficients of the LHS and RHS, we get the following
$(1) \qquad -2 = \alpha + \beta + \gamma$
$(2) \qquad 8 = \alpha\beta + \alpha\gamma + \beta\gamma$
$(3) \qquad 5 = \alpha\beta\gamma$
 
Huy
Yeah, should be correct, then.
Why is that weird?
 
I think I assumed that all of the roots are real.
 
Huy
@Khallil: Why would you ever assume that? :D
 
10:47 AM
Not a clue! =P
 
Huy
Does anyone know what to call symbols such as $\implies, \iff, \neg$? I know $\forall$ and $\exists$ are called quantors, but what about the others?
 
Logical symbols?
 
Huy
That would be a way, thanks.
 
In logic, a set of symbols is commonly used to express logical representation. As logicians are familiar with these symbols, they are not explained each time they are used. So, for students of logic, the following table lists many common symbols together with their name, pronunciation, and the related field of mathematics. Additionally, the third column contains an informal definition, and the fourth column gives a short example. Be aware that, outside of logic, different symbols have the same meaning, and the same symbol has, depending on the context, different meanings. == Basic logic symbols... ==
^_^
I thought $\forall$ and $\exists$ were called quantifiers, @Huy.
(At least, that's what they are referred to in Liebeck's A Concise Intro to Pure Math.)
 
Huy
@Khallil: Yeah, in German we call them "Quantor" and I thought it'd be the same translated.
but apparently the correct translation is quantifier.
 
11:12 AM
¬ is negation, $\Longrightarrow$ conditional, and yes we call them quantifiers
$\Longleftrightarrow$ Biconditional
 
11:26 AM
Cool!
I got $x^3 - 4x^2 - 40x - 281$ as my final cubic equation. Is there any way I can check it, @Huy and @Analysis?
 
Huy
@Khallil: I can check later if you want, right now I'm a bit busy.
 
Ok. Whenever you get time!
 
Sorry Kha, I am just finishing off some Fourier thing that is taking forever :\
Mainly typing it
 
Ah, that integral did look very familiar!
 
11:49 AM
Pardon my ignorance in this matter, but what does OP mean by |...| here?
A layman would take those as absolute value bars, and that statement which OP asks to prove is actually true, but they also ask about "norms" and "inner products".
 
Huy
@ParthKohli: The absolute value is a norm, and some norms are induced by an inner product.
 
So should I undelete this proof?
 
Hey everyone. Is it true that the points $A(3;-1;2), B(1;2;-1),C(-1;t;-3)$ are never collinear with any value of $t$? It seems to me so, since $\frac{1-3}{-1-1}=1$, but $\frac{-1-2}{-3+1}=-1.5\neq 1$.
 
I answered it with the perspective of a usual algebra student, not a real-analysis one, so hmm.
 
12:49 PM
$f(x) = \frac{\sinh(\pi)}{\pi} + \frac{2\sinh(\pi)}{\pi}\sum_{n=1}^\infty (-1)^n \left[\frac{\cos(nx)-n \sin(nx)}{1 + n^2}\right]$ What to do?
 
1:22 PM
What's the question, @Analysis? Is it just to find a simpler form of $f(x)$?
 
Originally that was what I wanted to do, but I realise now that it is in its simplest form. The following question is "Using the fact that $\sinh(x)$ and $\cosh(x)$ are the odd and even components of $e^x$, write down the fourier series of $f(x)=\sinh(x)$ and $f(x)=\cosh(x)$
Should I be noticing some simple way of doing this from the above expression?
 
I have hardly any experience with Fourier series, @Analysis. Sorry!
 
That's alright xD @Kha
 
If you don't mind, I have a very simple differentiation question, @Analysis.
 
Sure
 
1:29 PM
Would this solution be ok?
I didn't want to sketch the graph, so I just tried to describe everything I could.
Should I have said that $f$ is continuous over $\mathbb{R}^2$ instead?
Also, does everything seem water tight, @Analysis?
 
You will lose marks if you don't graph it, and yeah $\mathbb{R}^2$ would be better.
Looks good!
@Kha Lose marks if it is an assignment that is
 
Yep, it's just a pdf I picked up from the net.
Thanks, @Analysis.
^_^
 
Good to hear xD
 
Let me share some crazy stuff with the world
 
Okay
 
1:40 PM
Blow. Our. Minds.
 
$1=0$
 
Spagett
 
=P
 
xD
 
1:44 PM
@robjohn see above :-)
 
What was that final $F_3$, @Chris'ssis?
It's argument looked complicated.
 
@Khallil the hypergeometric function
 
It looked really cool!
 
@Khallil Thanks! That one is pretty hard to derive. It's a crazy integral from the same class with this one
2
Q: Evaluating $\int_{0}^{\pi/4} \log(\sin(x)) \log(\cos(x)) \log(\cos(2x)) \ dx$

Chris's sisWhat tools would you recommend me for evaluating this integral? $$\int_{0}^{\pi/4} \log(\sin(x)) \log(\cos(x)) \log(\cos(2x)) \ dx$$ My first thought was to use beta function, but it's hard to get such a form because of $\cos(2x)$. What other options do I have?

 
I must sleep now. Goodnight everyone, I hope to talk another time @Khallil
 
2:00 PM
I need to check that with Mathematica, some signs might be missed. Just to be sure.
 
2:13 PM
Indeed, there was a small problem that is now fixed.
 
2:46 PM
See ya later, @Analysis. ^_^
 
3:32 PM
Hello, Does any one know how to write ( A bar ) using LaTeX ?
 
Huy
@MathsLover: \bar{A}
 
@Huy, Thank you very much :)
 
3:52 PM
Anyone familiar with how to underscore in LaTeX?
 
Why would you want to do that @BalarkaSen?
 
Oh nevermind $\text{_}$ works well.
 
And in text mode, or math mode?
 
@DanielFischer $\mathcal{Hom}_A(G, \text{__})$, that's why.
 
Ah, a place-holder.
Also, $\operatorname{Hom}_A(G,\underline{\hphantom{M}})$.
 
3:57 PM
that'd do too. thanks.
 
4:11 PM
When considering an or statement in math like '... if $m>0$ or $0>M$', do you consider both cases at the same time?
 
@Anastasiya Ignore me I am being an idiot today
 
4:49 PM
@BalarkaSen
4
Q: The myth of no prime formula?

user177691Terence Tao claims: For instance, we have an exact formula for the n th square number - it is n^2 - but we do not have an exact formula for the n th prime number p_n ! God may not play dice with the universe, but something strange is going on with the prime numbers. (Paul Erdos, 191...

maybe you would like to add your say
 
there are formulas for primes. he is right.
and there are quite efficient ones too. Lucian is wrong.
See the Lagarias-Odlyzko paper.
It depends on what one calls "exact", @Alizter. I won't try to add anything in there unless it is clarified what is meant by "exact formula".
 
@BalarkaSen he is saying why bother with riemann hypothesis if we have formulas already. Why not find there exact asymptotic expansion etc.
 
RH gives computationally efficient formulas for $\pi(x)$, that is why. But formulas or asymptotics is really not all of what RH is about =)
 
yes. @BalarkaSen MHB post?
 
Yep.
=D
 
4:55 PM
I feel like waiting for a new console
 
Erm. What console?
 
@BalarkaSen no, waiting for the post about $c(n)$
that problem is intriguing
 
You'd have to wait. I have sent a mail to my collaborator. He seems busy.
 
I don't have any consoles apart from the N64
which i occasoinally play
 
Would you correlate that with why you're good at math, @Alizter?
 
4:58 PM
@Khallil I'm 'good' at math because I read math.
 
read
Math can't be read.
 
Would say that you do more math as a result of having more time to do so because you don't own a console other than the N64, @Alizter?
 

« first day (1509 days earlier)      last day (3515 days later) »