« first day (1599 days earlier)      last day (3417 days later) » 

r9m
10:00 PM
@skullpatrol :P lol
 
user134177
@skullpatrol :P yes, i know ;)
 
maths makes everything better
 
@MikeMiller Alright, thanks. I wasn't sure, so I thought I'd ask
 
No worries
 
user134177
@DanielRust you are right
 
10:00 PM
@blondblau I am 33 and never had a girlfriend. So don't feel too bad.
 
@MathyPerson No, that's $-1$, the one partition of $1$ has an odd number of parts.
 
WHOOPS
 
@DanielRust Hello again.
 
@MikeMiller It's correct modulo $2$.
 
@BalarkaSen hey
 
10:01 PM
Hey @DanielRust leave my girl friend @blondblau alone
 
lol @MikeMiller and @DanielFischer I see...I messed up the order to get 1 instead of -1. Thanks.
 
@skullpatrol but I don't wanna :(
 
nonsense. nonsense everywhere.
 
user134177
@JasperLoy ok, maybe it makes much things easier
 
nonsense nonsense everywhere, not a question to answer.
 
10:02 PM
Do you like skulls @blondblau?
 
Huy
That's the best opening line I've ever heard, @skullpatrol.
 
user134177
@skullpatrol no :P
 
user134177
;)
 
10:04 PM
@blondblau But then again, I am not trying to trivialise your feelings. I know it can hurt a lot, so take your time to heal. It might be faster if you look for someone else.
 
Huy
LOL.
 
I gotta try @blondblau
 
christ... you guys can get creepy
 
get used to it @DanielRust
and hey look you're addicted to the chat now
great
 
Huy
@DanielRust: Just join me and my popcorn and beer.
 
10:05 PM
What are you drinking, @Huy?
 
Huy
@MikeMiller: Feldschlösschen, it's a Swiss brand.
 
@BalarkaSen I hang out in chat when I have free time. It doesn't happen often :P
 
What kind?
 
@DanielFischer So, do you mean that it should be like that?


p=position-1;
l=j+1;
while (p>=0 and l<m and A[p]!=A[l]){
         if (A[p]<y*A[l]) l++;
         else p--;
}
@DanielFischer Or have I understood it wrong?
 
Huy
@MikeMiller: Is lager the correct English expression?
 
10:07 PM
That's a type of beer in English, yeah.
 
Huy
Yeah, it's a lager.
 
Great!
 
user134177
@Jasper Loy thank you
 
@evinda You forgot to multiply with $y$ in the test of the while, but I guess that's a typo and not a misunderstanding.
 
Are you a natural blond @blondblau?
 
Huy
10:08 PM
It's one of the most popular beers in Switzerland and by far my favourite. But only the bottled version, the one in cans I absolutely hate.
 
Me wants to know if I can Galois theorize over fibrations.
 
Huy
@MikeMiller: Do you like beer too, then?
 
Absolutely.
 
Huy
@MikeMiller: Which kind of?
 
@DanielFischer Oh yes, right!!!
So should it be like that?


p=position-1;
l=j+1;
while (p>=0 and l<m and A[p]!=y*A[l]){
         if (A[p]<y*A[l]) l++;
         else p--;
}
 
user134177
10:09 PM
@skullpatrol yes, blond hairs, blue eyes
 
@evinda Yup.
 
Just about all of it. I guess I'd say I like tripels and pilsners the most.
 
user134177
in german "blue" meens blau
 
But that's not fair to all the other beer I love.
 
r9m
@blondblau did you appear on the TV ?
 
10:09 PM
@blondblau Genau :D
 
Huy
@MikeMiller: Do you know San Miguel pilsner?
 
user134177
@evinda :)
 
user134177
@r9m ehm, no:P?
 
I do, @Huy
 
Huy
@MikeMiller: How do you like it?
 
10:10 PM
Good one @r9m ;D
 
I don't dislike it, but I think it's pretty unremarkable. I think a good standard for pilsners is still Pilsner Urquell (the original!).
 
r9m
@skullpatrol nah ,, I got carried away a little too far :P
 
Huy
Ok. I don't know many pilsners, because I liked lagers so much so far and didn't want to ruin evenings. :P
I'll try the Urquell then when I see it.
 
did I miss the beer talk? I'm a big fan of ales
 
Huy
If I don't like it, I'll blame you.
 
10:11 PM
drunkards. drunkards all over.
 
Huy
@DanielRust: I only know the word ale in combination with ginger.
 
r9m
@BalarkaSen I don't drink !
 
Huy
@DanielRust: Is Guiness an ale?
 
@Huy yeah
 
Huy
Oh, then I like it, sometimes.
 
10:13 PM
In america they probably get called 'craft brews'
 
Guinness is a stout- and a pretty decent one, for not being a craft beer 8)
 
Huy
Only when having very unhealthy food in pubs.
 
user134177
@evinda are you from germany?
 
Huy
I don't America.
 
I know you amphetamine, @r9m. :P
 
10:13 PM
Who comes into a math chat room 5 days before Christmas with that kind of news? @r9m
2
 
Huy
Lebst du denn in Deutschland, @blondblau?
 
r9m
@BalarkaSen :P LOL
 
user134177
@Huy ja, in Duisburg
 
Huy
@blondblau: Studierst du dort?
 
r9m
@skullpatrol Idk .. Santa ?
 
10:14 PM
@r9m No, Santa drinks.
 
@r9m LEL
 
heavily ...
 
user134177
@Huy ja, in Essen/Münster und du in Zürich, oder?
 
user134177
@Huy kennst du den Matheplanet?
 
Huy
@blondblau: Genau. Warst du schon mal in der Schweiz oder sogar Zürich?
@blondblau: Was meinst du damit? Ne Website?
 
r9m
10:15 PM
@DanielFischer how do you know ? :P
 
Got my five; rep capped; done.
 
user134177
@Huy ja, das ist ein deutsches Matheforum. Zum Skifahren nur einmal
 
Thank God, @Mike. You were becoming way too tiresome.
 
@blondblau and @Huy are discussing about blowing up New York city with nukes.
 
Give me two hours to become tiresome agin, @TedShifrin
 
10:16 PM
Hey @Mike. I was targeting that.
 
@r9m Experience. How else would my beers vanish?
 
You.
 
Ah, I'd prefer you didn't discuss that, @Huy. I quite like that city.
 
user134177
maybe its better to talk in english
 
You can always join Balarka on the ignore list, @Mike.
 
10:16 PM
I almost finished an answer.
 
Huy
@BalarkaSen: That reminds me of the top answer to the urban legends on MO, did you read that?
 
r9m
@DanielFischer :P
 
user134177
but my english is bad, but i will try it
 
Huy
@blondblau: Ich kenne nur matheboard.de. Aber das mag ich nicht sehr.
 
@TedShifrin Why?
Why me?
 
user134177
10:17 PM
@Huy ich glaube, matheplanet ist die größte deutschsprachige community
 
@PedroTamaroff I am currently working on a problem that involves: let $P^*(x)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} p^*_nx^n$, where $p^*_n = \binom{\text{number of partitions of }n}{\text{into an even number of parts}} - \binom{\text{number of partitions of }n}{\text{into an odd number of parts}}$. Would it be better to fully expand it out (I got $1-x-x^3+x^4+x^5+x^6-x^7......$ so far), or is there an easier way like the problem you helped me with earlier?
 
user134177
das größte deutsche matheforum *
 
user134177
wollte ich ich schreiben, matheboard mag ich auch nicht
 
@TedShifrin It makes it harder to follow the chat conversation if you ignore someone. You might even misunderstand what is being said.
 
I do that regardless, @Jasper.
 
10:19 PM
:(
 
The best way to improve your English is to practice here @blondblau
 
@Ted Well, I was barreling towards the ignore list anyway.
 
Why ignoring me, @Mike?
I did nothing!
 
Speaking of ignore, @Mike, have you seen Jacob recently? I messaged him and he hasn't replied.
I hope he's doing ok.
 
@DanielFischer And now if A[p]!=A[l] we need to do an other traversal?
 
10:21 PM
@DanielRust If I'm around, you haven't missed beer talk.
 
oh ok
 
I saw him the week before finals, @Ted. I'd prefer not to talk about non-chat-denizens here; I'm glad to talk elsewhere.
 
@MikeMiller You can talk in my bedroom.
 
Quite appropriately. You know where elsewhere to find me.
 
@evinda Yes, if we haven't found anything, we must look further. Now we multiply the negative number with $y$. Take care of the sense of the inequalities.
 
10:23 PM
smacks @Jasper
 
hey guys, this is an incredibly basic question- I'd like to show that the modulus of a complex variable $z$ is $|z|=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$
 
I am actually talking to Ramanujan now over email. Ethan, to be precise.
 
so if I let $z=x+yi$
 
@daOnlyBG Usually, that's the definition.
 
@Jasper: We have uncountably many Ramanujan-wannabes here.
 
10:24 PM
@daOnlyBG that's the definition of the modulus
 
ok, but why is it defined as such?
 
Huy
@DanielFischer: Don't you define it as the distance from the origin and then it follows from Pythagoras?
 
$z^2=x^2-y^2-2xyi$
 
One of them is Chris'ssis, @Ted
 
The one.
 
10:24 PM
@daOnlyBG You need $z\cdot\overline{z}$
 
but $z\bar z = x^2+y^2$, @daOnly
 
@daOnlyBG It's the distance in the complex plane that $z$ is from zero
 
@TedShifrin Aha. I give that label to Ethan and Chris's Sis only so far.
 
ok, so the modulus is $|z|=\sqrt{z*z\bar}$?
 
Well, it is true that $|z^2| = |z|^2$, so go for it, @daOnly :)
 
10:26 PM
@DanielFischer Should we do it like that?
 if (A[p]!=y*A[l]){
             while ((p>=0)&&(l<m)&&(A[l]!=y*A[p])){
                   if (A[l]<y*A[p]) p--;
                   else l++;
             }
         }
 
i'll just take it for granted then- I'd like to know why it's defined accordingly;
I don't see how that's the distance from z to the origin
 
@daOnlyBG draw a triangle and drop a hypotenuse
 
damn, @DanielF, you're acting geometric :D
All teasing aside, @daOnly, it is the distance formula plain and simple.
 
alright, I guess
I got it
 
draw a picture :P
 
10:29 PM
@evinda You should be able to check such things yourself, read your code carefully, and see what it does. (And you should find a couple of mistakes. Not many, though.)
 
I drew a pic, just not sure I understand where the conjugate fits in
 
cough cough
 
@r9m I have something amazing. I cannot say I saw many proofs, but I'm sure you might be able to say if there is something similar out. :-) I was working on something completely different when I saw this possible connection.
 
throws antiallergics down @Alizter's throat
 
@daOnlyBG can you at least see why $\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$ is the distance from $z$ to the origin?
 
10:31 PM
yeah, I can
 
@daOnlyBG using Pythagoras' theorem
 
Because, by the geometry of complex multiplication, when you multiply two complex numbers, their moduli multiply and their angles add. So multiplying $z$ and $\bar z$ gives you a positive real number of length $|z||\bar z| = |z|^2$.
 
@BalarkaSen I have a cold dammit
 
@Alizter: Take a break from math and physics and get healthy. It's your bedtime.
 
Anyone else find it interesting that the digital roots of triangle numbers follow the pattern $k_n = 1, 3, 6, 1, 6, 3, 1, 9, 9 : n = 1, 2, \dots$ for $k = r mod 9 : r \in \sum_{k=1}^n x, \dots$?
 
10:31 PM
It's my bed time too!
 
okay, got it- thanks, sorry if it's very trivial
 
Later
 
@daOnlyBG $z\bar{z}=(x+iy)(x-iy)=x^2-ixy+ixy+y^2=x^2+y^2=|z|^2$
 
$^2$ @DanielF
Danke.
 
@TedShifrin what's with the F? :P
 
10:33 PM
Because you whined about my pinging you all the time, @DanielR.
 
@Daniel pings both you and @DanielFischer
 
@DanielRust Habit. I'm much more often here in chat than you recently.
 
@TedShifrin haha true
 
@TedShifrin FYI - there's actually another DanielR who gets pinged :)
 
I think we had another Ted recently. Very confounding.
 
10:34 PM
Yeah, I get his pings sometimes
 
heh
 
Yes, but I can only do so much .... @Mike @DanielRust
 
@r9m at any rate, I didn't see anything similar so far, but that doesn't mean such a way (or a similar way) doesn't exist. I just wanna be cautios.
 
every subgroup of the generalized quaternion group contains $\langle 1, x^n \rangle$, right?
 
@DanielFischer I have never seen so many people speak German in this room at one time when @blondblau said she has blond hair and blue eyes :D
 
10:36 PM
@r9m The good part is that the proof can be easily taught in high school and uni. I mean it's hard not to understand it, it's less probable. This is only possible when missing the most basic knowledge.
 
We had a Teddy, @Ted, but they're not in chat anymore (I say they're in chat if @Ted autocompletes to more than one name... if it does, everyone it could autocomplete to gets pinged)
 
@skullpatrol Gentlemen prefer brunettes.
 
yes, I know the autocomplete game ...
@Chris'ssis: This truly is getting tiresome. Either share the proof or quit it. Your secret bragging is just too much.
9
 
Apparently @DanielFischer
 
@TedShifrin I don't understand your point. I'm discussing with @r9m, and it's no bragging. @r9m knows that when I say something is the way I say it.
 
10:38 PM
It is relentless bragging. And it's been going on all day.
It may be justified, but it may not.
 
@TedShifrin Just use the ignore button, eh?
 
user134177
i'm sorry, i wirte in english here next time
 
I think we should ignore, yeah.
 
user134177
*will write
 
10:39 PM
@TedShifrin I mean you should ignore me. I agree with you. God helps you find the ignore option.
 
Thanks @blondblau ;D
 
@BalarkaSen What about the trivial subgroup?
 
@blondblau: Es gibt Leute hier die deutsch sprechen :)
 
@PedroTamaroff Except that.
 
Teach me some German next time, @blondblau! ^_^
 
10:40 PM
@TedShifrin do you think that I'm bragging in front of you? I have very very huge, amazing dreams that have no coonection with bragging with such a proof in front of you.
 
God doesn't help me do anything.
 
@TedShifrin I think @Chris'ssis just likes to repeat stuff just like I do too.
 
In other news, VLC is getting all Christmassy!
 
@Chris'ssis Are you going to email me like you said just now?
 
Ordinarily, math people have the urge to share their discoveries, not to hide them, @Jasper.
 
10:41 PM
 
@TedShifrin Aha, but we are no ordinary mathematicians in this chat. We are a bunch of loonies.
 
@TedShifrin Sorry if you misunderstand me. I appreciate you as a professor, maybe I'm that kind of person hard to understand.
 
Speak for yourself, @Jasper :D
 
@TedShifrin Does Newtonian mechanics still work in higher dimensions?
 
Ordinarily, expert mathematicians also tend to be humble.
 
10:42 PM
Welcome to the loonie bin @blondblau
 
Sure, @Alizter. That's where symplectic manifolds come from :P
 
@BalarkaSen No, I don't wanna humble at all, but when you go the church maybe.
 
@TedShifrin Good.
 
@BalarkaSen I don't think @Chris'ssis is arrogant. She is just marvelling at the beauty of her result, she is not arrogant.
4
 
But Newtonian mechanics, as you know, has its limitations. :)
 
10:43 PM
@TedShifrin Go on?
I don't know
 
@JasperLoy Exactly!!!
 
or I am unaware that I don't or do know
 
Relativity theory ... first special, then general, then quantum mechanics ...
 
user134177
@TedShifrin cool:) is german your mother lenguage? @KhallilBenyattou i can do it ^^
 
user134177
@skullpatrol :)
 
10:44 PM
@TedShifrin oh
 
Nein, @blondblau. Ich hab' deutsch (und französisch und ein bißchen russisch) studiert.
 
Real world limitations?
 
Huy
@TedShifrin: Is that an order you would study the topics in?
 
I disagree, @Jasper. I find her extremely arrogant and she finds everyone to be jealous at her.
I mean seriously, what the hell.
 
I like to sit in my mathematical wonderland
 
10:44 PM
definitely not, @Huy, but I'm no physics expert at all.
 
@BalarkaSen Well, I think only I understand her well enough...
 
Huy
@TedShifrin: What kind of order is it then? because of the "then"s, I ask
 
special relativity, then quantum ... general takes a ton of graduate differential geometry :P
my then's were neither true to history nor true to learning, @Huy. I apologize.
 
Huy
I never specifically studied SR. I'm worried I will have trouble studying GR. :s
 
SR is very cool, @Huy. You replace the orthogonal group with the Lorentz group :)
The twin paradox is one of my favorites from college.
 
10:47 PM
Do you know why he chose the name "special" @Huy?
 
Huy
@TedShifrin: I never specifically studied it, but it came up during our Physics 1, 2 and 3 courses. Also during our course about General Mechanics.
 
Huh. I guess I'll have to try the next sunday.
 
@Ted Is mechanics the entire origin of the idea of symplectic manifolds?
 
I believe so, @Mike, but I'm no history expert. But I'd bet money on it :P
 
r9m
@Chris'ssis So you do think I am a grave digger ? -_- (referring to 'I just wanna be cautious') ...
 
Huy
10:48 PM
@skullpatrol: Because it only deals with inertial frames, iirc?
 
r9m
@Chris'ssis I like less probable proofs a lot :D
 
"The unreasonable effectiveness of physics in mathematics"...
 
user134177
@TedShifrin cool:)
 
Do you gamble @TedShifrin?
 
classical, @Huy?
 
10:48 PM
Galois covers @Mike
 
oh, and special relativity, too, I guess :)
no, @skull. One of my colleagues and I make nickel bets :P I am not a good poker player :D
 
Shoulda asked when I was on my computer, @Balarka
The Eagles game is on!
 
@r9m Actually, I'd ask you nicely to dig as deep as you can. I'm very curious about that. I need to find a way to send you my proof (but not know - as happened with other proofs) :-)
 
oh noes
 
Huy
@TedShifrin: We covered Newtonian mechanics, two-body systems, three-body systems, oscillating problems, Lagrange formalism, Hamiltonian systems, Hamilton-Jacobi, rigid bodies, and SR
@TedShifrin: It was a course titled "General mechanics"
 
10:50 PM
Lovely course, @Huy
You should know the right way to approach the physics problems I was going to pose to @Khallil and @Alizter. :) But I'm only halfway through posing.
 
r9m
@Chris'ssis yay !! So you wanna cut the deal for the shinigami eyes human ? ;) (evil grin) good ;)
 
Well physics sucks.
 
@r9m What on earth that mean? :-)
 
Ah, looks like you broke that promise you made a while back, @Balarka
 
It's a Death Note reference, @Chris'ssis.
 
Huy
10:51 PM
@TedShifrin: Is there a US equivalent for that course? Classical mechanics?
 
@TedShifrin Is it not draw diagram, work out values, equations then rearrange and plug
 
I thought I was making promises about branches of mathematics, @MikeMiller?
 
@KhallilBenyattou Ahhhhhhh :-)
 
I wouldn't cut the deal, @r9m. I'd get Misa to do it for me. =P
 
r9m
@KhallilBenyattou Bingo !!
 
10:51 PM
Stop saying that physics sucks @BalarkaSen
 
Shhhh @skull
Hell.
Well, he is not gonna unignore me anyway. So...
 
We tend not to do relativity in our upper-division mechanics courses, so far as I know, @Huy. We don't at Georgia, and MIT didn't, either.
That, now, @skull?
 
Huy
@TedShifrin: because it is too simple or hard or because it differs from the rest too much?
 
r9m
@KhallilBenyattou perhaps she has to find a guy who could be his Misa ;) (unless there's a Light Yagami pulling the strings and she is Misa) Either way I am a Shinigami ! (I win either way :P)
 
And in any case @Mike. My promise was that if he unignores, I'll stop being an ignorant prat.
 
10:54 PM
It is a matter of principle @BalarkaSen
 
You run the risk of having everyone else ignore you too
 
I dunno, @Huy. I can ask my physics professor friends. We do relativity in a separate "Modern Physics" course.
 
@MikeMiller What, physics?
just for physics?
 
Huy
ic. it is interesting to see how universities seem to structure courses in such different ways
 
i mean, c'mon.
 
10:55 PM
There's an L somewhere, @r9m. Since that's the case, you lose both ways! =P (L is the best.)
 
Sure, @Huy, I have plenty of gripes about the "standard" undergraduate math curriculum most places :P
 
Huy
@TedShifrin: For example?
 
I'm even prepared to study diff geo if he unginores me @Mike
otherwise, nah.
 
I tend to think algebra is taught too much by symbol-pushing. Most students never see linear algebra integrated with multivariable calculus/analysis. I am a firm believer in concrete examples and computations, even in theoretical courses ...
 
r9m
@KhallilBenyattou But anyway .. Ryuk had the last bite !
 
Huy
10:59 PM
@TedShifrin: I'm not sure what you mean. Could you be a bit more concrete, with this example?
 
Huh? @Huy mean about what?
 

« first day (1599 days earlier)      last day (3417 days later) »