« first day (1003 days earlier)      last day (4020 days later) » 

5:00 PM
I want to count the number of $3$ digit numbers obtained from $A$ such the their digit sum is odd such that

$(i)$ There is no repetition of digits.
$(ii)$ There is repetition.
 
@WillJagy I know, and if they are going to be hyper-sensitive, then perhaps they need to come back later.
 
Now, for $(i)$ I did this. We need $O,O,O$ or $O,E,E$ ($E$=even, $O$=odd)
 
yes
 
In the first case, I have $4!/(4-3)!=24$ combinations.
Wait.
 
@PeterTamaroff there are two evens and 4 odds, that leaves 4 choices times 3! arrangements
 
5:04 PM
I am counting $4\cdot 2!+4+4\cdot 2!$ by writing the second case as
$$OEE\\EOE\\EEO$$
 
So we get 48 with no repetition
 
44?
24+8+8+4?
 
I count 24 for both cases
 
@robjohn Oh, right.
 
you have only two evens, so they are both there, then there are 4 choices for the odd. that times six arrangements
 
5:06 PM
I have $2!\cdot 4+2!\cdot 4+2!\cdot 4=3!\cdot 4$
 
yes
 
OK, $48$.
Now I need to count repetition.
First, the case $OOO$.
 
@WillJagy recently?
 
This is just the functions from $\{1,3,5,7\}$ to $\{1,2,3\}$ so $3^4$?
 
@J.M. welcome back :-)
 
5:08 PM
@Hayaku welcome back :-)
 
@BabakS. If they don't understand at once, a picture of two great circles likely will.
 
@PeterTamaroff you have the same two basic things OEE and OOO
 
@robjohn What, I never left! ;)
 
@skullpatrol hello
 
@robjohn Yes. Now the case $O,E,E$
Well, in this case the $E$'s give me more options.
They give me $2^2$ instead of $2!$.
So it is $3\cdot 2^2 \cdot 4$
 
5:10 PM
Damn, sometimes math outdoes the cafeteria. The cafeteria doesn't get asked to shovel lunch into students' mouths.
 
The total is then $3^4 +3\cdot 4^2$.
 
@J.M. did you see my comment about the banner?
 
@robjohn That's what I was alluding to. :)
 
@J.M. What are you alluding to?
 
22 mins ago, by robjohn
Perhaps we need a banner... This is the Math chatroom; spoonfeeding is down the hall
 
5:11 PM
Some people are born with a silver spoon...
 
@robjohn Why did you write that?
 
@WillJagy I don't think it has anything to do with background, it's just about learning to set problems up. Evaluation is a different skill than construction. It is not a "plug and chug" type of question
 
Your Prof said it was for extra interest, so don't take it so seriously pal.
 
@skullpatrol I'd still like to learn it. None of my friends seem to know how to solve it either. Prof said it was "very tricky"
 
@Hayaku Solve what?
 
5:15 PM
@PeterTamaroff stats question
 
@Hayaku \meruns.
 
nearing the daily cap from just a single short answer to a practically trivial question.
 
@TobiasKildetoft The $\sqrt x$ one?
 
@TobiasKildetoft I got only five because of some nitpickers. Bleh.
 
5:22 PM
I am a lot happier with the rep I got from the one about groups with 2 proper nontrivial subgroups
(though the other answer is a lot cleaner than mine)
 
@PeterTamaroff Where is this?
(The front page is scaring me these days.)
 
@TobiasKildetoft That's the bikeshed. :)
 
@J.M. Bikeshed?
 
@PeterTamaroff Definitely a dupe.
 
5:23 PM
@J.M. Yeah.
 
can anyone help point me in the right direction? if I roll dice repeatedly, taking a sum as I go, until the sum is greater than 1, what is the probability that the final roll's value is between a and b?
 
@Hayaku what are the possible outcomes of the dice?
 
1-6
 
most of my dice have all values at least 1
but then you only roll once
 
i figure if the final roll is between a and b then we are going backwards from a-1..2..3..4..5..6 and b-1..2..3..4..5..6 until we hit some initial value
and then this range of initial values dictates the probability out of the outcome set
but i don't know if this is right
 
5:26 PM
@Hayaku but if you only roll until the sum exceeds 1, you roll once (or twice if you need it to strictly exceed 1 and roll a 1 first)
 
sorry I meant a boundary of B, not 1
(i choose 50 arbitrarily)
my original problem has 1
but i want to figure out the dice one first
 
Yo @JasperLoy how's it going pal?
 
user19161
@skullpatrol I got 2 downvotes today, lol.
 
@JasperLoy Welcome back to the rollercoaster :-)
 
@TobiasKildetoft It's a common metaphor we use.
@PeterTamaroff I've given a close vote.
 
5:33 PM
After having answered the "2 proper non-trivial subgroups" question, I realized, that one can do essentially the same to classify groups with 3 or 4 proper non-trivial subgroups. But for the ones with 4, it turned out that it simplified everything a lot if one knew that if all proper subgroups of a finite group have prime power order, then at most two distinct primes divide the order of the group
 
@J.M. Seems fine.
Question
 
I have not had a close look at the same question for 5 subgroups yet
 
How complicated should this question be?
Consider the following board:
 
@BabakS. How old are these students?
 
@J.M.: I see. Thanks for your suggestion. I think of Poles on Earth.
 
5:34 PM
 
21 or higher.
 
@BabakS. Exactly, they ought to cross at antipodal points.
 
The question is: in how many ways can we paint it with $11$ colours if we impose that no squares sharing sides are painted with the same colour?
 
@J.M.: I am not going to involve them in a Calculus version for the first time.
Illustrating with pictures are good first.
 
@BabakS. No calculus, just get a clear plastic ball, if possible.
I've used the ones for hamsters.
 
5:37 PM
Oh. yes. but my bag doesn't have enough space. Good point. :-)
 
@PeterTamaroff hmm, that seems fairly tricky
 
@TobiasKildetoft Yeah, seems like it.
 
@BabakS. That the crossing points are antipodal becomes, if you'll pardon the horrible pun, clear.
 
I am trying, though.
 
I see.
 
5:40 PM
@PeterTamaroff probably some sort of recursive approach will be a good idea
 
@TobiasKildetoft Recursive? How?
 
so fixing a colour for one of the most isolated squares gives you a new shape to colour, now with a restriction on the colour of one of the squares
so the number of ways to colour the large one is 11 times the number of ways to colour that new one (minus the ones where you pick the illegal colour)
 
@TobiasKildetoft Oh, yes. I am thinking like that too.,
 
hmm, on the other hand, this might not get nice
 
@anon Save our souls!!!
 
5:42 PM
@anon ANON!!!!
 
turn it into a graph, find the chromatic polynomial using deletion-contraction recursion relations
 
@anon LOL =)
 
(I am not joking.)
2
 
@anon I know.
@anon OK, the graph is this:
 
@anon This is what I was thinking
 
5:45 PM
@anon ...here we thought that the König does not have to say "I'm not joking". :)
 
@anon Could you give me a crash course on that?
 
The relation is $P_G(t)=P_{G-e}(t)-P_{G\setminus e}(t)$, where $G-e$ is deletion and $G\setminus e$ is contraction. I will have to explain later.
 
@anon Oh, but I am supposed to do this with basic combinatorics.
 
arguing with basic combinatorics would basically parallel the computation I'm sketching but in a more drawn-out way
 
@anon OK. I'm thinking about painting one square and then counting from there. I am not sure though.
 
user19161
5:50 PM
Let me see. I should retire when I reach 1k, lol.
 
there is also a direct formula involving summing-over-partitions. all of this was covered in my talk on the temperley-lieb algebra and tutte's invariants, as it happens.
 
user19161
@anon Wow, you sound like a professor!
 
@JasperLoy STOP IT, NOW
 
good old jasper.
 
@JasperLoy Are you going to make this phoenix thing a habit?
 
user19161
5:51 PM
@Charlie You are green like Jayesh. This is a sign, lol.
 
user19161
@J.M. What is this phoenix thing?
 
@anon Hm. I am thinking this, too: I can paint the red parts independently of each other, yes?
 
@JasperLoy I said it to you first
 
@anon Most interesting. I've never done a lot with chromatic polynomials, but I understand that they are a pain to compute in general. My interest has been provoked in the past. Could you provide some links to literature?
 
Well, no.
I mean.
I can put in any numbers I want, freely.
So, yes.
 
user19161
5:52 PM
@PeterTamaroff If you watched Good Will Hunting, they drew such stuff on the blackboard.
 
I can input any of the 11 colours in the red dots, so that gives me $11!/3!$ options to start with.
 
@JasperLoy Fine, "zombie". Whatever you kids want to label it. :P
 
yes, the stuff in the movie was all graph theory, things like 1/det(tI-A) for adjacency matrices A, etc.
 
Hello!
 
Now I can look at what happens if dots are all the same, different, or share two colours.
 
5:53 PM
I don't have a reference Lord Farin, sorry
 
http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/9265993#9265993

@Charlie
 
user19161
@J.M. Kids? You are not that old, and I am not that young!
 
@JasperLoy S'what you think. :)
 
@anon Am I thinking straight?
 
@PeterTamaroff yes, but those possibilities might not each give the same number of colourings
 
5:54 PM
@skullpatrol no, I never watched
 
so it is not really useful to single them out like this
 
@TobiasKildetoft Right, that's why I made the last remark.
"Now I can look at what happens if dots are all the same, different, or share two colours."
 
user19161
So the Ted Shifrin guy is on our site.
 
@anon No problem, thanks anyway :).
 
@PeterTamaroff yeah, thayt would work (so you should count those three possibilities separately)
 
5:55 PM
Put this as a question on main in about 5 hours and I will explain how to compute the chromatic polynomials (which tells us how many ways there are to color it with a palette of $t$ colors)
 
@TobiasKildetoft Right.
 
One mod down, two to go.
 
@anon Let me work it out myself first.
 
5 hours should be good
 
@anon hi anon
you said no hi
 
5:56 PM
sorry, hello charlie
 
:D
 
@Charlie "Why you no say hi?"
 
(-:
 
not you too, skull!
 
@PeterTamaroff you are the most meme guy I've ever seen
 
5:57 PM
@Charlie "meme-iest"?
 
@J.M. yep!
 
(okay, "most memetic")
 
memeful
 
memest
 
@J.M. I go for "memest", which can easily be misheard for something else :).
 
5:59 PM
@Lord_Farin Hmm, for what?
 
@PeterTamaroff "memest" $\sim$ "meanest" :P
 
That is not memingful :-)
 
hahaha
 
:D:D:D
 
@skullpatrol Didn't your mother teach you not to speak with your mouth full? :)
 
6:01 PM
@Lord_Farin Oh, =P
 
@Lord_Farin Yo Mama?
 
@Szabolcs Yo, long time no see!
 
HAHAHAHHAHAAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA
 
Hey all
 
6:05 PM
:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
 
@skullpatrol I LOVE THIS MEME
@Szabolcs wassup?
 
Learning about maximum likelihood methods, stats.stackexchange.com/questions/16758/…
 
Hey
 
you
 
I know, it's dry.
 
6:07 PM
take a sad song and make it better...
 
better better better
 
Na Na Na Na hey you
 
na na na nanana....nanana heey you
 
user19161
@skullpatrol Jude Law is hot.
 
6:10 PM
;O
 
I'm usually 36,5°
 
user19161
8
Q: Why is $n^2-\frac{n^2}{2} =\frac{n^2}{2}$?

user672009Could someone please expand on how to get from $\displaystyle n^2-\frac{n^2}{2}$ to $\dfrac{n^2}{2}$? I can't seem to wrap my head around that.

 
user19161
Guys, this question got so many votes and answers?
 
@JasperLoy NOT AGAIN
 
And any time you feel the pain, hey, Jude, refrain
Don't carry the world upon your shoulders
Well don't you know that its a fool who plays it cool
By making his world a little colder
 
6:12 PM
nanananana
 
@JasperLoy If I ask "why is 1-1/2 the same as 1/2?", will I get a crapton of votes, too?
 
Yes!
I bet there is one type of answer missing.
 
OH NOEEEEEEEEEES
@JayeshBadwaik HI JAYESH
 
A long answer that proves this is so using the first order logic.
@Charlie HI!
 
@JayeshBadwaik Long time no see
 
6:14 PM
@Charlie Yeah, have been busy somewhat. :-)
 
6 hours ago, by Lord_Farin
(Intermediary rant: RAAHHH @ this. Will it ever stop?!)
 
@JayeshBadwaik yeah, me too
crazy life
 
It seems we are on the same line :)
 
@JayeshBadwaik I think a close facsimile of Russell's argument has already been posted on main, accompanied with an astounding amount of upvotes.
 
We could have MSE junior
 
6:16 PM
@Charlie Rating please
 
@Charlie, please pay close attention to the following:
 
user19161
@JayeshBadwaik Are you the Hulk?
 
@skullpatrol nicki minaj..i'd give zero just because of the singer
 
:)
@Charlie, got that?
 
@Lord_Farin no
 
user19161
6:18 PM
@Lord_Farin LOL
 
@Lord_Farin Push comes to shove, give Charlie a Caesar cipher or something. ;)
 
nevermind, F, let it go
let it go, Indiana
 
@JasperLoy YES!
 
@Charlie Whatever. Your choice. Now don't come crying again.
 
@Lord_Farin i'm not crying
 
6:19 PM
@Charlie I didn't say you were.
 
i asked you a simple question, you made it complicated
 
"I'm not crying, I'm just sweating through my eyes..."
 
>8(
you are mocking me
I'll call another moderator
:D
 
@Charlie I'm just a little paranoid. You should have noticed that some time before. Didn't you? :)
 
@Lord_Farin no
you think you are paranoid?
I am afraid of my own shadow
 
6:20 PM
@Charlie To some IMO healthy extent, yes.
 
@skullpatrol 8,0
 
Perhaps "conscientious with one's private information" is a better description. But compared to community standards, I'm paranoid.
 
@Charlie :-|
 
user19161
@Charlie So when are you getting married?
 
@JasperLoy when you decide to stop deleting your accounts
 
6:22 PM
(-:
 
@Charlie I guess this gives ammunition for the "Bieber is a zombie" camp...
 
Ok, I'm seriously astounded.
 
user19161
@Lord_Farin OMG
 
yes, I cry so what?
 
@Lord_Farin "No, I did not try it." - how beautiful.
 
6:24 PM
@Lord_Farin Dude, delivery failure!
 
@Charlie Nothing wrong with it; people who don't cry at all are the nutty ones.
 
good
 
man...
you are drunk, go home
 
@JasperLoy The most disturbing part is the upvote.
 
user19161
6:27 PM
@Lord_Farin It is disturbing how I dropped from 20k to 100, lol.
 
@JasperLoy From what I gather, there's only one person to blame for that...
Overall consensus seems to be that we're glad you're back, though. :)
 
Lord Farin, of course
 
(-;
 
@JasperLoy It is perfectly alright to be disturbed by self-inflicted losses, my good man. :)
 
user19161
@J.M. Will you run for mod on MSE?
 
6:29 PM
I will
 
@JasperLoy I'd rather herd cats than herd mathematicians.
2
...and the luckless students that come along with them.
 
@J.M. ...lured in by said mathematicians and the few glimmers they have encountered elsewhere. So sad, all these lost souls.
 
@Lord_Farin See, you see what I'm seeing! :)
 
so many green avatars lately...
 
6:32 PM
Maybe I'll make my next piece of artwork green...
 
@Charlie Seasickness epidemic.
 
maybe
 
@BrianM.Scott Yo.
 
@BrianM.Scott Hi, by the way, mr. Scott
 
@PeterTamaroff What’s the problem?
5
@Charlie Hullo, Charlie.
 
6:33 PM
@PeterTamaroff Yo.
 
@BrianM.Scott Colouring graphs! =)
 
@BrianM.Scott or algal overgrowth.
 
I have done some work, I have!
 
hahahahahahahahahahhahahaa
 
:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
 
6:34 PM
@PeterTamaroff Are you sure? Charlie sounds a bit doubtful ... :-)
 
@BrianM.Scott To Oblivion with her!
 
@BrianM.Scott I laughed of what you said:"what's the problem?"
 
To get there you have to go through hell.
 
:)
 
I am counting the ways of colouring the following graph:
 
6:36 PM
Oh noes. The children's swing across the street is being taken over by loudly shouting and screaming teenagers! :(
 
Such that no adjacent vertices have the same colour.
 
@Lord_Farin DO SOMETHING!
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff What course is this?
 
@skullpatrol Nah, Lethe borders Elysium
 
@JasperLoy Combinatorics and other weeds.
 
6:37 PM
@Charlie I forgot my sniper...
 
@BrianM.Scott My work:
 
@PeterTamaroff How many colors?
 
Eleven.
 
@Lord_Farin true men use their hands
 
@BrianM.Scott Now, this is my idea.
 
6:37 PM
@Charlie Draw your conclusions. :)
 
@Lord_Farin you have no hands
@Lord_Farin or you are no man
 
Label the vertices that way.
 
@BrianM.Scott I always found that bit amusing.
 
Then, $2,4,7$ are independent of each other, in the sense I can colour them freely, @BrianM.Scott
So, I will consider how things will unveil when I choose to colour those in different manners.
 
6:40 PM
@J.M. Very apt. :)
 
@PeterTamaroff True; or you could use the larger set $\{1,3,5,6,8\}$.
 
@BrianM.Scott Don't ruin my idea =(
 
@Lord_Farin I'm supposed to be too old for cartoons, but I love that show.
 
First, suppose that I colour $2,4$ the same colour and $7$ different. In such a case, I have $10^2 9^3$ options.
Second, suppose that I colour $2,7$ the same colour and $4$ different. In such a case, I have $10^3 9^2$ options. This is the same if I colour $4,7$ the same and $2$ different.
Thirdly, suppose that I colour them all different, then I have $8\cdot 9^2 10^2$ options.
Now, I have to count in how many ways I can get each configuration.
@BrianM.Scott I am all ears to your idea now.
In the two cases, I have to take from $[11]$ a set of the form $a,a,b$. In the third, I want $a,b,c$.
 
6:44 PM
@skullpatrol interesting
 
@Charlie yipyipyip
 
@skullpatrol yipyipyip
 
@BrianM.Scott
 
Let him think...
 
give him a time @peter
 
6:46 PM
@PeterTamaroff Dealing with someone on main; I may be a few minutes.
 
@BrianM.Scott Oh, OK. No problemo.
 
user19161
No problemo, no petero
 
HAHAHAHAHAH
 
:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
 
user19161
My poem sounds nice.
 
6:47 PM
We had a poetry exercise in here yesterday.
 
@JasperLoy You don't want to find out what "petero" means in Argentina...
 
@JasperLoy: Your avatar has lost its color?
 
@PeterTamaroff Yes, this should work.
 
user19161
@BabakS. Yes. Be careful, there are several imposters!
 
@BrianM.Scott Snoopy dance
 
user19161
6:48 PM
@PeterTamaroff I think it means banana?
 
@PeterTamaroff Oh my god!
 
@JasperLoy No.
@Charlie You googled it?
 
@PeterTamaroff you said it before
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff OK, WTF is it?
 
And the count of the color combinations isn’t bad: you’ve $11\cdot10\cdot9$ ways to assign $3$ distinct colors, and $11\cdot10\cdot3$ ways to assign two.
 
6:51 PM
can someone help me understand something on mathworld.wolfram.com/UniformSumDistribution.html
 
@BrianM.Scott Good. I think I got it. =)
@JasperLoy It means "c**ks***er".
 
@PeterTamaroff Don't tell him; have him sweat for it. ;)
Tsk, damn.
 
@J.M. Awww, too late.
@J.M. Did you know?
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff OMG!!! Sounds like me, LOL.
 
O.o
 
6:53 PM
if P_n^(1) = integral from 1 to n of PX1...Xn(u)du - integral from 1 to n-1 of PX1...Pn-1(u)du tells the probability of getting a sum over 1 after n turns, how can i turn this to figure out the expected value of just the last turn?
as opposed to the whole sum
 
@PeterTamaroff Apart from knowing Spanish, I know a number of inelegant words in various dialects...
 
@J.M. Heh.
 
user19161
@J.M. I know some Tamil curse words, LOL
 
Kudos?
 
(removed)
 
6:55 PM
...which I'd probably employ only in situations like dropping an axe on my foot, or seeing a politician in person.
 
@J.M. Do I taste a slight disappointment in the representative democracy in your words? :)
 
is there democracy anywhere in the World?
@skullpatrol :)
 
@Lord_Farin I've always been disappointed in politics in general, not just where I live. Studying world history didn't make me happier.
 
@Charlie :)
 
@skullpatrol :?
 
6:58 PM
@J.M. Here's news for you. It's not politics. It's humanity.
 
@Charlie :-\
 
@Lord_Farin I agree, but politics tends to exaggerate the worst intentions...
 

« first day (1003 days earlier)      last day (4020 days later) »