« first day (715 days earlier)      last day (4307 days later) » 

7:00 PM
@t.b. I mean that as of know even though it will help I don't yet understand what I want to understand.
 
I was surprised I was able to answer an algebraic topology question.
 
Sorry for pinging you, didn't expect you to show up in here as a consequence.
 
Wait, that's BenjaLim, not MattN, who's studying AT.
 
@HenningMakholm You don't need very much for that. Hahn-Banach is plenty enough (and with HB you can prove a version of Banach-Tarski without further choice).
It's a bit more straightforward with the ultrafilter lemma, though.
 
Oh. Sort of "of course". The sum in the inner product of finite Abelian groups becomes an integral on compact groups.
@t.b. One point open implies the whole set has discrete topology? I don't believe.
 
7:08 PM
@MattN. sure, $x \mapsto \gamma x$ is a homeomorphism $\Gamma \to \Gamma$, so every point $\{\gamma\}$ is open.
Maybe I should have said that the Fourier transform of an integrable function is continuous and $1$ is integrable because $G$ is compact.
 
No it's ok. I'm just a bit tired. Did some 9 hours of concentrated work (Atiyah-MacDonald).
So I'm a bit bonged out.
@t.b. Ok, now I believe you. I didn't realise your argument involved this map.
 
@MattN. A group's topology is determined by its neighborhoods of the neutral element, just as a vector space's topology is determined by the zero-neighborhoods. For precisely this reason: homogeneity.
 
@t.b. Oh yes, I remember that from the FA notes. Thank you.
@t.b. Hm, this tells me that the dual $\Gamma$ has the discrete topology. But it doesn't tell me that $\Gamma$ looks like $\mathbb Z$.
But perhaps it does and I'm just tired.
I think I'll understand this by tomorrow.
And I think this is going to be an exam question: explain what a Fourier series is.
 
a particular state of an ocean with a discrete set of waves :-)
 
That is equally helpful as Jonas telling me that I should tell the lecturer that his book sucks. : )
 
7:20 PM
@MattN. No, I was just answering your question why the Pontryagin dual of a compact group is discrete.
 
Ok : )
 
A continuous homomorphism $\Bbb R/\Bbb Z\to \Bbb C$ lifts to a periodic homomorphism $\Bbb R\to \Bbb C$; now we have Cauchy's functional equation but with boundary conditions $f(0)=f(1)=1$...
the functional equ has exponentials $x\mapsto e^{ax}$ as solutions (requiring $0\mapsto 1$), and the periodicity condition tells us $e^{a}=1\implies a\in2\pi i\Bbb Z\cong \Bbb Z$
 
Ew, this reminds me of my struggle to do the dual of a finite Abelian group.
 
You already asked (at least) twice why the dual of $\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}$ is $\mathbb{Z}$ :)
 
I think I asked at least three times: twice in chat and once on main : )
@t.b. Hehe, yeah the second link is exactly what I meant with struggle.
Something I didn't understand properly otherwise I'd be able to remember.
@anon Thank you : )
@t.b. Ok, I'm going to bed soon. Is everything alright over there? How is algebraic topology doing?
 
7:38 PM
@MattN. More or less, yes. But that one non-semilocally simply connected space I know is one nasty beast...
 
@t.b. Just punch it : ) Or let me do it, I'd love to.
 
Oh, no need to punch it, but thanks for the offer.
 
: )
Come on, say goodbye/good night, I feel so guilty because you're here.
 
Good night! No need to feel guilty.
 
Good night! It was nice to see you.
 
7:45 PM
See you soon!
 
7:55 PM
Hi folks
 
Hi guys.
@tb Hi. Bro.
 
Hi all.
this guy is really trying my patience.
 
@t.b. Why?
 
Posting one trivial multiple choice question after the other, full of typos and garnered with zero understanding.
 
@tb But that is common. So you would be pissed off all the time! 8-).
 
8:05 PM
@t.b. You undid my upvote! I like answering his questions.
(and you're still here)
 
I am curious about the guy who keeps posting "2012" questions - not sure he has any ability in solving (or understanding) the questions he posts
 
@t.b. garnished with?
 
@MattN. yeah.
@MattN. shrugs
 
Poor him. I entirely disagree with your downvote. His post are not low quality.
 
No, they are very low quality.
 
8:07 PM
: D
 
They suck monkey balls fo shu.
 
@t.b. No. puts foot down For that it would need a "Dear Sir".
@JonasTeuwen No, I enjoy answering them. Just the right level for me.
 
@MattN. Perfect.
 
Anyway. I'm not here.
 
@MattN. LIES.
@MattN. Working on acing Einsiedler?
 
8:11 PM
Patience is trying again
 
wonderful :)
 
@tb (Ignore if you're not interested): This afternoon during the sixth coffee break I was wondering: "Do non-measurable sets actually serve any purpose other than provide funny paradoxes?". The reason I was wondering this was: "If not, can we replace ZFC with a different system where all the stuff is measurable and we still get a nice theory of integration?". Henning already exorcised the deamon that was in my head about adding axioms to ZFC.
@OldJohn :D.
 
@JonasTeuwen If we take the axiom of determinacy instead of choice we get that all subsets of $\Bbb R$ are Lebesgue measurable
 
@JonasTeuwen You get very far with countable choice and if you have dependent choice, you sacrifice almost nothing from measure theory.
 
@HenryT.Horton But then analysis will suck.
@tb Not far enough...?
@tb Yes, that I do know :-). But you sacrifice much of functional analysis.
 
8:16 PM
@JonasTeuwen I think it is better for sanity to accept that non-measurable sets exist - and then avoid them like th eplague :)
 
I guess my question is related to my ignorance in comparing different logical axiomic schemes.
@OldJohn But usually when I have a thing that does not work I change the space to make it work! 8-)... so this would be an extension of that.
Of course, it is just some intellectual game with myself. I was only wondering if we don't use them, then why should they be included in our definition of "set"?
And if we get a different axiomatic system where we don't have those, do we get easier proofs for some theorems?
 
Because they're there.
 
@JonasTeuwen I see your point. As an aside, I bought a book on Banach-Tarski once - but never read much of it
 
Unfortunately Stan Wagon's book is not as good as is often claimed...
 
@t.b.: pinging because I can :-)
 
8:18 PM
@tb Yes... I know that the question might seem dumb and that it serves no purpose. I agree, but I still like to think about it.
 
hey there @robjohn
 
@t.b. That's the one I bought :(
 
@OldJohn commenting on Stan Wagon's book? :-)
 
@tb Hmm, did you read all those books in full detail? You seem to know a lot. I tend not to read at all and just try.
 
@JonasTeuwen you need the periods to ping @t.b.
 
8:20 PM
Don't want to bug him too much 8-).
 
@robjohn sorry - the window keeps scrolling just when I try to click on that little arrow at the end :(
 
@OldJohn I think it's the only one devoted to Banach-Tarski out there. It's not bad, but it could be quite a bit better.
 
@OldJohn I know, that happens to me all the time, too.
 
@t.b. What's wrong with Wagon's book?
 
it's not a Red Radio Flyer?
 
8:21 PM
@OldJohn Scroll lock?
 
@robjohn Off the wagon again, eh?
 
@JonasTeuwen Good idea - never thought of that
 
@BillDubuque I find the presentation of many things decidedly clumsy. For example the presentation of amenable groups (the heart of the matter).
 
@JonasTeuwen Poor me. Not funny.
 
@MattN. It was a compliment :-(.
 
8:23 PM
@t.b. I haven't looked at it in a long time, but I do recall some things were not done as efficiently as possible. But I think that's a common problem when one is targeting readers of various backgrounds.
 
@BillDubuque That's right. I think it used to just be Red Flyer, now it seems to be Red Radio Flyer.
 
@JonasTeuwen I'm often accused (probably rightfully so) of reading too much. Yes I spent a good deal of my life in libraries -- mathematical and others. (my mom's a librarian - so that helped).
 
@tb Read too much?
 
Hey @t.b., have a minute? I'd like to compute the divergence of a pare...
 
I prefer to figure out things by myself... well... somewhat.
 
8:25 PM
@t.b. What nonsense.
 
Are there other axiomatic systems like ZFC?
 
Yo. Did someone in here flag me?
 
@MattN. I did not Bro.
 
@JonasTeuwen I vaguely remember something like GBF - but my memory is fading of these things
 
@MattN. Also, come here and have some drinks with me in Amsterdam. Try to convince tb to come too 8-).
@OldJohn GBF... What does it stand for? Great Brittian Folly?
 
8:29 PM
Goedel Bernays (von Neumann)
 
@t.b. You keep surprising me. Usually I am the one with the broad knowledge.
 
@JonasTeuwen Ok, will do.
 
@MattN. You were too late
 
@JonasTeuwen en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… (nearly remembered it right)
 
8:30 PM
@robjohn What does it mean? That they undid the flag?
 
@robjohn The thought of a mean square carrying a big bezouka in a Red Radio Flyer is too much for me to handle! I surrender!
 
@MattN. It means that there were flags to be looked at, but they were handled by the time you looked.
 
@robjohn I didn't know I had that power! 0_o
 
@MattN. Worrying about flags? You need fire water!
 
@BillDubuque Thats a big Bezoutka, and I'm not afraid to use it!
 
8:32 PM
Hmm - in the UK, NBG normally stands for "No Bloody Good" :P
 
:)
 
Good night everybody!
 
@Nimza nighty night!
 
@JonasTeuwen That's scheduled for early October actually. But I might not be able to drag the teddy along with us. (but I'll try : ) of course)
 
What is the ideal form of explosion crater?
 
8:34 PM
He can also come alone, then he can give a talk about crazy stuff (8-)).
 
@Nimza I know some about impact craters, but not about explosion craters.
 
@JonasTeuwen Morse-Kelley and New Foundations come to mind, but there are many others, of course.
 
Hmm, I do have knowledge about chemistry and electronics and things like that, maybe I should focus more on maths.
 
@robjohn hm... maybe you have some ideas?
 
@t.b. Great. Thanks. What are you working on now if I may ask?
 
8:36 PM
@Nimza Ask Rob, he's the expert on firing Bezoutka at ideals
 
@Nimza about what? Are you planning an meteorite strike?
 
user19161
@JonasTeuwen Aren't you already focusing on math?
 
Na, I wrote a couple of physics papers as well.
 
user19161
@JonasTeuwen I see. Another Albert Einstein.
 
@robjohn no, I've just came home from a walk around Kremlin and I thought that if the nuclear war starts I would be in epicenter :))) so I'm interested in a form of crater now
 
8:38 PM
@JasperLoy Err... no.
 
user19161
@JonasTeuwen You can be Albert Einstein. I will be Almost Everywhere.
 
Fine.
 
@JonasTeuwen well, still at the intersection of functional analysis, homological algebra and dynamical systems. Hoping to find my way back to rigidity theory
 
@Nimza Ow, I would rather visit a meteor crater.
 
@tb Is that pdf fuqed or is it just me?
I am working on the intersection of harmonic analysis, combinatorics and operator theory for now :-).
 
8:41 PM
I was teased just now. Someone accepted my answer, and then a few minutes later changed to another answer.
 
@JonasTeuwen works fine for me
 
@Nimza Are you in Moscow?
 
@OldJohn yes
 
user19161
@t.b. You really seem to know everything!
 
@Nimza Great - I like your city
 
8:42 PM
@tb Oh!! That sounds so cool!!!
@tb So, Krein-Milman is a rigidity statement or do I fail to understand?
 
@robjohn that's interesting too! Is there some function that it's graph approximate it's form well? (Something like cosh for hanging chain)
 
user19161
@Nimza If there is a nuclear war your best option is to hide in the refrigerator.
 
@Nimza best bet is probably down on the Moscow underground - I thought that was pretty amazing
 
@OldJohn and I think it is the only thing that saves the day :(
 
@Nimza At least it is quite beautiful down there :)
 
8:47 PM
@JasperLoy my best option is to be in epicenter I think... no pain at least
 
@JonasTeuwen No, I wouldn't call Krein-Milman a rigidity statement. A prototypical example is Mostow's rigidity theorem: two hyperbolic $n$-manifolds with the same fundamental group are isometric.
 
user19161
@Nimza Quick and painless death is the best.
 
@tb Ah, I figured that it were statements that characterize objects by much less properties than they actually have :-).
I need to learn more geometry.
 
there's a cool proof of Mostow rigidity with harmonic analysis
 
8:50 PM
Harmonic analysis you say?
 
Hi Peter
 
@JasperLoy Indiana Jones and the Crystal Skull: He survived a from a nuclear explosion by hiding in one
@OldJohn Hey
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff Where do you think I got the idea from? :-)
 
@JonasTeuwen yes, that looks nice :)
 
@JasperLoy HAHAHAH Totally fake I think.
 
8:53 PM
@JonasTeuwen yes. harmonic analysis. the isometry can be obtained as a minimizer of a certain energy functional...
 
@t.b. I will be there. Maybe my advisor comes too. And some idiots.
@t.b. Optimal transport? Even more kickass...
 
@PeterTamaroff MeAndMath seems to have just asked a question on main that is almost identical to what we were talking about last night
 
@JonasTeuwen I saw that you are on the very long list of participants :)
 
@tb Oh my. Only four :-).
 
user19161
@JonasTeuwen Wow and you are on the list? Good on you bro!
 
8:56 PM
@JonasTeuwen More will come - Helsinki is lovely at that time of year :_)
 
@OldJohn You should go.
 
Okay, my time's up for today, see you all soon!
 
user19161
@JonasTeuwen Maybe I should go there and serve all of you whisky!
 
user19161
@t.b. See you!
 
@OldJohn Yes. Brian has already taken car of it.
 
8:58 PM
@JonasTeuwen I am retired - and I have forgotten most of the stuff I did research on - now just playing with number theory ... for fun :)
 
@OldJohn Yes, so you go for fun. Like me!
@t.b. Goodbye ding ding ding.
 
@JonasTeuwen I see you're the fourth on the list. That is very few for a conference that's in a month and a half.
 
@JonasTeuwen I would love to - but my next holiday is likely to be somewhere else ... Holland :P
 
@OldJohn :P.
@robjohn Yes :P.
@robjohn Organisational fail?
 
@JonasTeuwen Or they didn't want too many attendees.
 
9:01 PM
@robjohn At least the speakers will come...
 
@JonasTeuwen If there are enough attendees that the thing goes on.
 
@robjohn The speakers will talk to eachother? 8-).
 
@JonasTeuwen perhaps. It depends on how much they want to go to Finland :-)
@HenningMakholm In how many ways can 2012 be written as a sum of two squares? :-D
 
@robjohn none?
 
@OldJohn Very good!
It has one factor of $503$ which is prime and $3\bmod{4}$
 
9:09 PM
@robjohn and it occurs to an odd power
 
@OldJohn Yes, one factor of $503$
@OldJohn I was actually able to use this fact in a geometry answer a while ago.
Not about 2012, but about sums of squares.
 
@robjohn I have been playing with sums of squares too - looking at solutions of $x^2+y^2=z^2+1$
(in integers)
 
$(1,1,1)$ =D
And any triad of $-1$s and $1$s
 
Yep - there are lots of solutions - I just can't find a parametric way of listing all of them
like the standard way of parametrising all solutions of Pythagorean triads
 
@OldJohn $(6,17,18)$
@OldJohn There are a lot, but I do agree that parameterizing them might be hard.
I can generate a family of solutions, but it is not complete.
 
9:23 PM
@robjohn yes - I found dozens, and spent 2-3 hours today trying to find a parametrisation using rational lines going through (1,0,0)
 
Can you generate me a family? i'm an orphan
2
 
@HenryT.Horton are you a solution?
 
No, I'm the problem :(
 
@HenryT.Horton sorry, then. :-(
 
@robjohn So tonight I started reading Modell's (old) book on diophantine equations
 
9:26 PM
@OldJohn I would love to read that. I don't have a copy
@OldJohn How is it?
 
@robjohn I only have a pdf (or djvu) not the hardcopy
 
user19161
@OldJohn I always found it amazing that such a parametrization exists for the Pythagorean triples!
 
It is good - a bit old-fashioned, but as you might guess, I quite like that:-)
@JasperLoy yes, it is so clear cut in that case - I thought it was wonderful when I first came across it
 
user19161
@HenryT.Horton I find your remarks very witty!
 
@HenryT.Horton A family will suffice?
 
9:29 PM
@robjohn I hope more guys will come :-(.
 
user19161
@Gigili You can simply give him the empty family.
 
user19161
@JonasTeuwen Why are there so few people? Is it a very specialized area?
 
@robjohn I'm not going to answer that.
 
@HenningMakholm too late :-)
@JonasTeuwen I hope so, too, for your sake.
 
@JasperLoy Not sure.
 
9:31 PM
@JasperLoy I'm not going to give anything like that to random strangers.
 
SIgh, MK deleted many of his recent posts a few hours ago. All that work for nothing...
 
@robjohn Should be like 1 line Haskell 8-).
 
@BillDubuque MK?
 
user19161
@robjohn I know that 1729 can be written as the sum of two cubes in two ways at least. :-)
 
@BillDubuque He deleted all but one line - is that a limitation imposed by the software?
 
user19161
9:32 PM
@BillDubuque Erm, why did he do that?
 
@OldJohn Probably, he did suceed in deleting some of them, and probably some safeguard clicks in after a few.
 
user19161
@robjohn The one who kept editing posts.
 
@JasperLoy I suspect he is packing up and leaving - I have seen similar behaviour on Wikipedia
 
@JasperLoy That was Hardy's cab number :-)
 
user19161
@robjohn Yes. How do you think I knew about it? :-)
 
user19161
9:34 PM
@OldJohn But why can't he leave it there? I mean, there were times I wanted to quit SE but I would not think of deleting my contributions.
 
MK? Wasn't the one Micheal Hardy or something?
 
@JasperLoy I think it a complex psychological issue
 
user19161
@OldJohn Ah OK. I am quite an expert in such issues, self-proclaimed of course.
 
Am I a retard if I need a toolchain to compile my $\LaTeX$ documents?
 
@JasperLoy I can sympathise to a certain extent, being mildly obsessive myself - but I do find his behaviour pretty extreme
 
9:36 PM
@BillDubuque Can you not rollback?
 
@JonasTeuwen I would never say you are a retard!
 
@OldJohn I am saying it :-).
 
user19161
@JonasTeuwen Use latexmk.
 
And some psychologists did as well. Maybe I should send them an e-mail that they were so right and that I hope they had a good career.
@JasperLoy I used it... But now I made my own.
Maybe back to latexmk. I did not like some of its peculiar behavior.
 
@JonasTeuwen I presume so
 
user19161
9:38 PM
@JonasTeuwen latexmk does not work with auto-pst-pdf though I discovered.
 
For some odd reason, I always very quickly encounter bugs while many people don't seem to have these...
@BillDubuque Well, I would say it is vandalizing the website... There is no protocol to say ban the user and rollback this? (I don't know of course).
 
user19161
@JonasTeuwen I think most shrinks know nothing about the human mind. You know who understands the mind? That Buddha guy!
 
@JasperLoy I believe that. Shrinks are doctors, not mind readers.
 
user19161
@JonasTeuwen Well, you know what I mean. I think most of psychiatry is crap.
 
But some shrinks are cool. They say: if you don't stop whining you will be an idiot for the rest of your life.
 
9:39 PM
@JonasTeuwen He probably has no clue that is frowned upon.
 
@JasperLoy This is the coolest psychiatrist ever.
 
user19161
@JonasTeuwen She looks so manly!
 
@JasperLoy Hmm, she is not. She is also an electrical engineer.
She "invented" electrical stimulation for (very severe) psychiatric disorders.
 
user19161
@BillDubuque One can delete at most five old posts a day.
 
Rolling MK's answers back doesn't even need mod powers; five 10k+ users can do it. The question is if we should. And if we shouldn't, then what do we do about the orphaned questions?
 
9:42 PM
@BillDubuque Since all contributions are " licensed under Creative Commons", I guess we can roll back if we want to - but the question is do we want to?
 
Did someone say orphan?
 
Alas, as I feared, we didn't handle it better.
 
Oh, I just meant if he deleted things where other users actually wrote a nice answer.
 
user19161
There was a user who started deleting all his answers when he got pissed with some SE staff. He got suspended.
 
user19161
@JonasTeuwen One cannot delete his question if it has been answered by another, and cannot delete his answer if it has been accepted.
 
9:43 PM
That's quite some childish behavior :-).
 
@BillDubuque From my experience as a newbie, I would say that MSE handles such issues better than Wikipedia does - I think there will always be cases that cannot be handled as well as we would like
 
user19161
@HenryT.Horton If you use linux, it's good to know that the major package managers can get rid of orphaned dependencies.
 
@JonasTeuwen Wel, it's possible -- not very likely but possible -- that he thinks he's giving in and doing what we thing is the right thing.
 
@JasperLoy Nixos.
@HenningMakholm Oh, right.
I wrote some really cool todo manager you know...
I has the comment "t". I write t <what I have to do> and it adds it to a file called todo.txt.
 
@JasperLoy Someone can delete a question while you are in the process of answering it though, I believe :(
 
9:46 PM
The coolest thing... is that it also gives it an id and a random numbers so no collisions. The other features are: no GUI, no dependencies, no databases (how cool is that?).
 
@JonasTeuwen +1 for no GUI
 
user19161
@HenryT.Horton Oh my eyes!
 
Where we're going, you won't need eyes
 
user19161
@HenryT.Horton Where are we going?
 
Does anyone know about the history of Asaf and chat?
 
user19161
9:51 PM
@HenryT.Horton Hmm, you must be taking me to an exciting place...
 
@BillDubuque Yes.
If you want to I can briefly mail you the story.
 
@JasperLoy No i'm just hoping you'll forget about it because I don't want to go anywhere with you
 
@JonasTeuwen Please do, I'm at my first.lastname@gmail.com
 
@BillDubuque Okay.
 
user19161
@HenryT.Horton Aww.
 
9:54 PM
@robjohn Do you want an e-copy?
 
user19161
Did any of you guys know that for gmail it does not matter where you put the dot or if you put it or not in the username part? The same does not hold for other google services though.
 
@BillDubuque Done that.
 
@JasperLoy Yes, it removes all the dots, so you can give out addresses with various dot patterns to help track how spammers get your address.
 
@JonasTeuwen Is that offer open to others? The chat logs were very confusing.
 
@HenningMakholm I will forward it to you too, but I think you know?
 
9:58 PM
@JonasTeuwen Oh, you sounded like you knew something I didn't.
 
user19161
@BillDubuque That is new to me, the tracking part!
 
@HenningMakholm Perhaps I do, I talk(ed) with him a lot.
 
user19161
@HenningMakholm I think it's just too long for inclusion here.
 
user19161
Who knew a math chat room could get so exciting?
 
@HenningMakholm Mailed it to you anyway.
 
user19161
10:00 PM
@JonasTeuwen Why are you reading postmodernism? Get back to grading!
 
@JasperLoy I have finished grading.
 
@JonasTeuwen 'kay, thanks. Yes, most of it I either knew or guessed.
 
Good.
If I want "special" things from LaTeX packages, am I doing it wrong if I have to read the source code...?
Maybe I miss some secret documentation :-/.
 
It's the only way I ever make anything work.
Tends to make the purists who know where the secret documentation is angry, though.
 
Also, LaTeX can use some $\lambda$-calculus. Should be some package...
 
user19161
10:03 PM
@JonasTeuwen I am not a TeXpert. I never have to read anything other than the doc, or post a question on SE.
 
I am also not an TeXpert, that is why I need to read the code...
 
@JonasTeuwen Thanks, you have mail!
 
user19161
@JonasTeuwen On MiKTeX, other than latemk you can use the native texify.
 
@JasperLoy Well you can use all the dot-infested variatiions of your gmail username however you like, e.g. for automatic filtering, etc. Spam tracking is just one application.
 
@JasperLoy MikTeX... are you trollin' me? 8-).
You can also do address+...@gmail.com right?
But many webforms think this is not a well-formed e-mail address...
 
user19161
10:12 PM
@JonasTeuwen Just in case you also have a Windows box! I am going to sleep now bro. Ding ding ding!
 
@BillDubuque (replied)
@JasperLoy I do not have a Windows box. Good night!
 
10:29 PM
@OldJohn The function $f:(a,b)\to \Bbb R/f(x)=\frac{\frac{(a+b)}{2}-x}{(x-b)(x-a)}$ proves $(a,b)$ and $\mathbb R$ are topologically equivalent, right?
 
@PeterTamaroff Brrr... What about... $\tan$?
 
@JonasTeuwen What about it?
It is symmetrical
 
@PeterTamaroff You just want a homeomorphism.
 
So I can use it for somthing like $(-a,a)$
 
@PeterTamaroff And you can shift it.
 
10:33 PM
you can use it for general intervals via affine transformation
 
@anon I can center it at $m=(a+b)/2$ by putting $\tan(\pi/2(x-m))$
 
@PeterTamaroff Clearly $(a, b)$ is homeomorphic to $(-\frac\pi2, \frac\pi2)$.
 
@JonasTeuwen I haven't gotten to that yet. I have that $(A,d_A)$ and $(B,d_B)$ are topologically equivalent if there exists a continuous invertible function $f:A\to B$
 
@PeterTamaroff Yes. So my statement is obvious.
@PeterTamaroff Prove that if $A$ is homeomorphic to $B$ and $B$ to $C$ then $A$ is to $C$.
 
@JonasTeuwen Oh, right, but topological equivalence is transitive
 
10:37 PM
So you have transitivity.
 
Topological equivalence is an equivalence relation.
@anon DERP.
 
I am a DERP?
 
@PeterTamaroff Yes, I know.
I am a DERP?
 
@JonasTeuwen I am.
 
10:39 PM
@PeterTamaroff Great, then we are with two!
anon can also join.
 
nah I'm good.
 
@JonasTeuwen I'm going off to watch Spongebob.
 
deeply enigmatic religious practice?
digitally enhanced reality processor?
 
@PeterTamaroff Perfect.
 
doubly exponential rate of progression?
 
10:42 PM
@HenningMakholm DSP with steroids?
 
Don't Even Recognize Politics.
 
Didn't Ever Really Plan to.
 
Do Everything Right, Perhaps.
 
@OldJohn That would be great. Where would I get one?
 
Derivation eventually ravages polynomials...
 
11:10 PM
"Does Earth revolve peacefully?" Dion eventually replied: "Probably". "Dodecahedrons exist!", retorted Plato.
2
 
Ding! [what an] Embarrassing reaction, Pear.
Do Eyelashes Regrow? Presumably.
 
11:32 PM
WTF? Is the nLab down? >:(
 
Describe Erdös: Really Prolific.
 
What kind of description is that?
makes notes
 
Downvote: Errors, Rudeness, Profanity (saw that somewhere)
 
Don't edit responses perpetually?
 
Do errors ruin popularity of the poster?
 
11:46 PM
Yeah. I get shoved in the halls now that I made a simple error in a post. Nobody sits with me at lunch.
I even edited my post to fix it but people still shake their head and walk away when they see me.
 
Oh, dear.
I can sit with you at lunch if you invite me since I don't know what kind of error you've made.
 
Thanks
 
There once was prolific sci.math poster who made so many errors that he often prefaced his posts with disclaimers like "I may be making an error...".
 
But I can't guarantee that I won't shake my head.
 
HTH: "You gonna eat that?" Gigili: <shakes head>
 
11:53 PM
nods
Quick, Draw an Elephant Running Perfectly.
 

« first day (715 days earlier)      last day (4307 days later) »