« first day (715 days earlier)      last day (4307 days later) » 

2:00 PM
@RagibZaman that's why it's not your job to come up with a problem. find a good supervisor (in anything) and let them guide you
 
I've been reading a huge pile of combinatorics journal papers/grad textbooks recently, only for about a month and I'm sick of it.
 
@BenjaLim Oh, I do know some of his papers.
@AlexanderAmenta It is best if you come up with a problem yourself.
@RagibZaman For what do you have a passion?
@RagibZaman You should then not work on a PhD in combinatorics :-). The project needs to be your (brain)child.
And you don't want to have that your children make you want to vommit.
 
@JonasTeuwen i disagree - if you don't have a significantly strong grasp of a field, how can you see which problems are most suitable?
 
@AlexanderAmenta That is not a disagreement with my statement.
I am just saying, that if you would be able to come up with a problem yourself, that would be the best.
 
I like most fields of analysis, but I got too far into analysis too quickly and it limited my exposure to other fields, recently I've been thinking more about algebra and its been really interesting so far.
 
2:02 PM
@JonasTeuwen ah, you're right, but that won't help @RagibZaman
 
@RagibZaman forgot to tell you that artin has a proof of the nullstellensatz
 
And of course, you are very right. Get some small problems to tackle and from there on find your own way.
 
for $\Bbb{C}$ without a lot of machinery
 
@JonasTeuwen it is best if you are able to come up with a good problem yourself. it's possible to come up with some pretty bad problems
 
@RagibZaman So, do they do master degrees in AU?
 
2:03 PM
Yea at USYD and UNSW I know for sure they do.
 
I am very able to come up with good problems. The problem is solving them...
@RagibZaman So maybe you should do that. Snuff some subjects?
 
we're talking about honours year problems, and they're pretty different from phd problems. you want things in which you could get reasonable progress in 9 months
but not too much progress, otherwise the problem is too easy
 
@BenjaLim Yuck.
 
@AlexanderAmenta Or you are too smart.
 
I have no problem with people thinking I'm too smart.
 
2:04 PM
Don't start working on a PhD in something you don't really like: you will fail.
 
I'm quite fine with that actually!
 
It will be a problem if they think you are smarter than you actually are. Certainly if that guy is your advisor.
 
if you're actually that smart, then it's no problem - but chances are you're not (few are)
and if you really were that smart, it would be better to work on something more difficult!
could just be my own biases, but i think it's better to not finish an honours project than to finish one
 
It needs to be something original, you are not working to get the Fields medal :-). Well, maybe that is a dream, but not the goal.
I suggested a masters degree to just do some courses in different fields and figure out what you like best. Not to solve problems.
I am pretty certain that you will fail getting a PhD if you do something you don't really like.
2
 
Yea I'm giving quite a lot of consideration into a masters actually.
I want to spend at least a few more years learning lots and lots of math, rather than specializing heaps into one tiny problem.
 
2:07 PM
of course nobody should do something they don't like - but they should be open to problems they hadn't considered
 
The lonely runner conjecture seems like a problem that a clever enough undergrad with a good supervisor could work on.
 
@RagibZaman There are plenty of such problems.
@AlexanderAmenta Pierre will be your advisor right?
 
Probably very naive of me, but it seems like one of those things that someone with a fresh mind could come and solve with relatively simple methods because they aren't clouded by all the advanced techniques.
 
@RagibZaman That can be very true...
 
Somewhat inspired by those 3 undergrads in Mumbai showing PRIMES is in P.
 
2:09 PM
@RagibZaman chances are you will not solve this problem, in which case it's a lot of time wasted unless you were learning pre-existing techniques
 
and they were computer scientists, not mathematicians.
 
@JonasTeuwen pierre and auscher
 
In any case: setting your goals too low will probably not make you reach something about that :-).
@AlexanderAmenta Wow, cool. You're lucky.
So you will go to Paris-Sud once?
 
@JonasTeuwen quite lucky. but the thing is, i didn't try to work with them
i'll be there from 1.5 years into the phd until the end
 
That is pretty cool, if you are there for some time you can also visit Delft for some weeks.
 
2:11 PM
i will be!
 
Can probably be arranged, but I don't have much influence on that but my advisor has (and he knows Pierre and Pascal quite well).
 
pierre's told me i should (and can) visit, so i will
 
Does ANU have some awesome partnership with Paris XI or something?
 
Ah, great.
Well, in Paris XI they have Pascal Auscher, and they all know each other :-).
 
no, but my ANU supervisor has a Paris XI collaborator
 
2:11 PM
@AlexanderAmenta Why... are you... not at IWOTA?
 
because i'm in russia!!
 
Oh, right.
 
(why am i in russia rather than IWOTA? because i booked my flights before i knew about it)
 
@AlexanderAmenta Because your supervisor has a collaborator there, your uni lets you spend most of your phd over there?
 
Just received an e-mail of my advisor about how cool it is there.
@RagibZaman Yea, these people like that.
They send me to ANU.
 
2:13 PM
where are you atm?
 
@JonasTeuwen cool?
 
@RagibZaman NL.
@BenjaLim Yea.
 
@RagibZaman it's an ANU/Paris XI joint phd (cotutelle)
 
@RagibZaman both universities have to approve
 
2:15 PM
Why is that ":("?
 
I want to say something like "you are too damn lucky" but that would be an insult to how hard you have worked to get that.
 
huh?
 
you can get these deals by talking to people, not by going through the standard channels - hence my advice
 
@JonasTeuwen why is it cool?
@RagibZaman who is lucky?
 
Alex
 
2:16 PM
there's luck involved, being in the right place at the right time - by not pigeonholing yourself early, you can seek out these right places
 
@RagibZaman no university medal :D
 
@AlexanderAmenta How is your French? I can send you some mail about a French conference.
 
@JonasTeuwen I can do the translation
@JonasTeuwen and why is anu cool?
 
@JonasTeuwen i know no french, but will be taking lessons from septemberish onwards
 
@BenjaLim I can read French, maybe he can go there.
@BenjaLim Because you are there.
 
2:16 PM
So at some point soon
All 3 of you will be at ANU
 
@AlexanderAmenta What do you mean? You should let yourself be known early on.
 
join ussss
 
I want to visit, definitely.
 
@RagibZaman you're missing out :D
@JonasTeuwen why because i'm there????????????
 
@BenjaLim You make it totally cool, bro.
 
2:17 PM
@JonasTeuwen i was talking earlier about doing a lot of broad math, not focusing on one thing to early. that way you can meet a lot of people, see what opportunities are there, and take them
 
@AlexanderAmenta Okay, agreed.
 
@JonasTeuwen if i'd 'chosen a field', i wouldn't have got this offer
 
@AlexanderAmenta Mm, I wanted to go elsewhere, and then I got a way better offer from my MSc thesis advisor :-).
 
@JonasTeuwen since it's not in my honours field at all, and it had never even occured to me - but i did a course with pierre and he could see that i cared about my work
 
I like Pierre's approach to math.
 
2:19 PM
@JonasTeuwen but i care about math as a whole, not individual fields - which sits in with pierre's approach. hence the phd
 
@JonasTeuwen i don't get it...
 
@AlexanderAmenta Me too :-).
@BenjaLim Haha, it is a joke. Australia seems nice to me, and it is also nice that you guys will be there, at least I will already know somebody by name.
 
@JonasTeuwen i agree with that. That's why I decided to stab myself in the guts to do reading course in several variables
@JonasTeuwen You know two at anu now
how great is it you have friends before you even arrive :D
 
and pierre. so three
 
@JonasTeuwen if you're in sydney, ragib makes it four
 
2:20 PM
there you go, he already knows half of canberra
 
@BenjaLim Yes :-).
 
I can't believe we're witnessing live networking being done on chat right here right now all live and exclusive guys
2
 
i always feel like we're clogging up m.se chat whenever this happens
 
@AlexanderAmenta don't worry there's only one topic going on now
it's not like 3 or 4 conversations are going on
 
i should ask some calculus questions
 
2:22 PM
all the other usual guys are not here
huhu?
 
Because we suppress the others?
We are like an opportunistic infection. Once the bacteria went on a holiday we funghi infest everything 8-).
2
 
yeah, like we should be on msn or something
 
@JonasTeuwen trust me I don't think the math education at ANU is that good.....
 
but then others can't join in.. i guess we're ok
 
@BenjaLim I know that it isn't.
 
2:23 PM
it's up to you to make it good or not @JonasTeuwen @AlexanderAmenta
 
yeah ANU education isn't great. it's probably not great in many places really. but the people are good
 
I'm going there for Pierre primarily.
 
@JonasTeuwen Like I had a look at AC and loved it and decided to do a reading course on it
 
Well, right, I mean to work there, and then Pierre can help me (once in a while).
 
I think it's the course that I've learnt the most at ANU
 
2:24 PM
@BenjaLim Axiom of Choice...?
 
I really am missing commutative algebra right now. Especially after seeing this
 
@JonasTeuwen you will have to teach me some stuff
 
Algebraic Combinatorics?
 
@JonasTeuwen AC on Arxiv is comm algebra
 
@BenjaLim Oh, right. When I am there, lecture me about that 8-). I will tell you cool stuff about functions.
@AlexanderAmenta Sure! And you teach me stuff!
 
2:25 PM
@JonasTeuwen I know nothing about this stone - weierstrass shit or borel measures.
 
Algèbre Commutatif, no doubt...
 
@BenjaLim Right, I know that. It is the coolest in a general Banach algebra.
 
@JonasTeuwen there should be a seminar course on harmonic analysis we'll all get involved in. should be really fun
 
speaking about that where is lashi
 
@AlexanderAmenta Excellent.
@ZhenLin Sir Bourbaki...?
 
2:26 PM
@BenjaLim probably still in missouri
 
@ZhenLin you need the definite article in the front.
I don't get why this guy won't prove the weak nullstellensatz using noether normalisation
 
@BenjaLim Because he can?
 
@JonasTeuwen What algebra courses did you do?
@JonasTeuwen TBH I actually quite like arzelà - ascoli
 
@BenjaLim Almost none? I just read some stuff.
 
@JonasTeuwen I skipped almost all the analysis lectures this semester :D :D
 
2:29 PM
Some papers, some stuff. You know.
 
@JonasTeuwen I mean surely you've taken a basic algebra course on groups/rings/fields/galois theory
 
I skipped all lectures except perhaps five in my five years of study.
2
 
guys i have to go and eat
 
Oh yes, I did the exam.
 
talk to you all later!
 
2:29 PM
See you!
 
@AlexanderAmenta borsch and vodka?
 
cya alex!
 
@AlexanderAmenta bye nice talkin come on chat more
@RagibZaman what are you doing at 12.30
way past my bed time
I hope you're not in kings cross
 
Reading papers on graph theory
 
saw the guy that got punched and then died?
 
2:30 PM
that exactly opposite of partying in kings cross
 
@RagibZaman WHY????????????
man that was scary
 
giving my heart and soul into these SUMS problems man
 
AH.........
Still trying to show the whole kernel is that
 
no I've stopped on that problem for now
 
ok
 
2:31 PM
I read an epic load of combinatorial stuff to solve Q9
 
ahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahahah
 
guys, is algebraic geometry usefull for other parts of math?
 
For number theory, quite a bit
 
@ChuckFernández why?
@JonasTeuwen so lucky
 
2:33 PM
But not so much for too many other areas I don't think.
 
before coming to anu already you have so many friends
 
@RagibZaman You like analysis?
 
category theory
AT
 
what do you mean why?
 
@RagibZaman complex geometry
 
2:33 PM
@RagibZaman You can combine analysis with combinatorics.
 
@MattN. my god
If I need help for AT
 
@JonasTeuwen Yea I like analysis, and yea I love that approach.
 
I will come to you @MattN.
 
Wilf's generatingfunctionology is a great mix, I love that book
 
@RagibZaman where did you learn your hard analysis from?
 
2:34 PM
@RagibZaman What approach? Oh, right.
 
Got the foundations from a mix of course notes and skimming lots of books
 
This is not an answer. I'm wanting to flag. It's clearly an advert as well, so it counts as spam, no?
 
@RagibZaman So read more about that?
 
@BenjaLim No, it's just Matt : )
@BenjaLim Sure, do that. But after my exams.
 
@MattN. No, leave it.
 
2:35 PM
@MattN. when
 
@BenjaLim Mid-September.
 
@MattN. AT exam?
 
@JonasTeuwen But it's annoying.
 
@JonasTeuwen That is actually a great idea...
 
@MattN. For you. The notes are good.
 
2:35 PM
@BenjaLim No, CA & FA.
 
@JonasTeuwen Can't skip lectures next sem
 
@BenjaLim Sucks.
 
@MattN. ok
@JonasTeuwen for starters I found the first half of my analysis course dead easy
 
@MattN. Do you have more exams or only those 2?
 
@MattN. Did you die in AT?
 
2:36 PM
@RagibZaman Those two, why? It's enough.
 
and how was your GT going in there?
 
@BenjaLim No, that was not so difficult. Why?
 
@RagibZaman last semester I only had exams for analysis and galois theory
how was homology? @MattN.
 
@MattN. Sorry, I didn't mean to sound like you don't do a lot of study, I was just wondering because normally one does 4 subjects per semester don't they?
 
@BenjaLim Yes, but you are quite good at it. Pierre told me that the results were quite... bad?
 
2:37 PM
@JonasTeuwen results for what?
 
@RagibZaman Hm, I think the definition of "normal" probably depends on your uni. No worries : )
 
finals?
 
@RagibZaman The Swiss system is different.
@BenjaLim Analyssi course.
 
mid sems?
 
@BenjaLim Good, especially cellular, why?
 
2:38 PM
@JonasTeuwen the final results?
 
Our Bro, @MattN. does pretty advanced courses...
@BenjaLim Oh, was the midterm I believe.
 
@MattN. ok thanks. Hey did you guys learn about CW complexes right at the beginning?
@JonasTeuwen 70% of the class failed.
 
@BenjaLim 89% of my class failed.
 
The swiss system sounds a hell of a lot better than what we have over here.
 
@BenjaLim I think so.
 
2:39 PM
HOLY SHIT
 
@RagibZaman Wait a second: when did I tell you that I was Swiss?
 
@RagibZaman The place where Matt is educationally wise way better than the ANU.
 
@MattN. did that not screw everyone up?
 
@MattN. Oops, I did... (above, nothing else).
@MattN. But that is like the coolest country on earth, Bro.
 
@JonasTeuwen Ok. I guess I'll have to kill now because you know too much and blabbed.
 
2:40 PM
I remembering being impressed with how far your courses go (from the questions you post).
 
@JonasTeuwen Yeah, if you're a cow.
 
remember*
 
@MattN. It was not a secret anyway here with teddy and such.
 
@RagibZaman ugh you read my questions? Yikes. They are all stupid.
 
@MattN. Well. Try another country.
@MattN. The questions are quite good. Stop whining. You act like a girl.
 
2:41 PM
@JonasTeuwen Hey, teddy is different. To me he's special. Or what did you mean?
 
@MattN. you've met him in person?
 
@MattN. Yes, but if one reads the chat it is quite easy to decide where you live (about).
 
@MattN. Not so, I took Functional Analysis last semester and was hoping I could help but many of the questions were harder than the level of questions given at my course.
 
It it taught by Einsiedler, that bro is hardcore.
We had an exchange student and he showed me the course and said he suffered.
 
@AlexanderAmenta actually come to think of it a lot of the material in analysis I led to functional analysis
like arzelà - ascoli, equicontinuous functions
@RagibZaman you should have stuck with AT lasst sem
then a lot of avenues would have been open for you
in terms of knowing stuff about homology, cohomology, etc
 
2:45 PM
@RagibZaman Well yes. The dudes inventing these questions are not trying to make questions from which you learn something because they're juuust the right level of difficulty but rather they try to impress and amuse themselves by coming up with clever questions that are interesting to them.
@BenjaLim Well that is not relevant, is it? : ) But as you know: I know his name, his favourite crisp bread and the colour of his favourite underwear.
 
@MattN. Well, if you can solve them you are quite good actually. It does serve a purpose, but not the purpose for the average student.
 
Ok, maybe not the last one. : )
 
@BenjaLim I think I made the right choice, I'm not as good at algebra as you so I think I'll be fine waiting another year to learn those. By dropping that I focussed more on my Rings/Fields/Galois Theory class and I understood that better.
 
@MattN. I will tell you a secret. Next year @AlexanderAmenta @JonasTeuwen and I will all be in the same uni
@RagibZaman good!!
 
(I got 94 in that btw, quite happy =D )
 
2:46 PM
So, MattN should come too...?
 
@RagibZaman hahahahaha
@RagibZaman I think that is better than getting 99 in my analysis course
 
@BenjaLim Somehow it's not so secret if you post it on a site that's visible by anyone on the internet. : )
 
@MattN. how was your GN going into AT?
 
What's GT?
Group theory?
 
Geometry/Topology?
 
2:47 PM
general topology
 
Oh, what?
 
@BenjaLim You should probably stop using these abbreviations...
 
@MattN. yes
I mean how was it just before you took AT
 
I don't understand. The two have not much to do with each other. Except that I needed the definition of path-connectedness
 
@MattN. Then what is the prereq for AT at ETH?
 
2:48 PM
@BenjaLim I reject your ArXiv abbreviations.
 
@BenjaLim I'd done one semester of it.
 
Make a macro if you'd like to use them.
 
@BenjaLim I know what those are, that doesn't mean it's well understood!
 
@BenjaLim Nothing.
Gotta go, byee
 
@MattN. OH CRAP
 
2:49 PM
That was a quick exit!
 
@MattN. Babye.
 
@MattN. bye
 
at any rate GT is geometric topology.
 
@ZhenLin that's why I made the correction
 
I like geometric measure theory.
 
2:50 PM
GN is even more inscrutable!
 
I was actually wondering something today. Do non-measurable sets serve any purpose? Other than give funny paradoxes?
 
They are forced
 
@JonasTeuwen Wasn't there a M.SE question about that just this week...?
 
I wondered this for a long time too
 
@RagibZaman nite!
 
2:50 PM
@ZhenLin I don't know...? I don't read it that often.
 
nite all
night guys
 
@BenjaLim Gnite
 
@RagibZaman GO TO BED FOOL.
 
@ZhenLin I actually was wondering if we could not redefine "sets" to only be the measurable ones if we actually do not care about the others.
 
0
Q: Advantage of accepting non-measurable sets

user1894What would be the advantage of accepting non-measurable sets? I personally feel that non-measurable sets only exist because of infamous Banach-Tarski paradox...

@JonasTeuwen Well, first of all, we should give up the axiom of choice... :p
 
2:51 PM
Jonas, basically, there are 4 things we "want", 1) all sets measurable 2) countable addivity of measures 3) cant remember and 4) cant remember lol
I can look it up if you want
 
@ZhenLin Well, not necessarily, right?
That would be like a very strange way of doing things because stuff gets even stranger than.
 
but basically, it turns out that we cant get all 4 desirable properties at once, we must reject one of them
 
@RagibZaman Translation invariance.
 
yes!
 
nite guys
 
2:52 PM
If we keep "all sets measurable" we get the banach-tarski paradox
 
You are mentioning the Vitali set and whether it is measurable wrt the Lebesgue measure.
 
You don't need much set theory to go from the axiom of choice to an unmeasurable set.
 
But the condition that all sets must be measurable plus the translation invariance messes things up.
As you partition a nice set into very ugly ones using choice.
 
Yup, you get things like Banach-Tarski
 
@ZhenLin Right, but perhaps we can change or add other axioms which make it impossible to construct a non-measurable set.
 
2:53 PM
Right. You can either give up translation invariance or countable additivity to get around this problem...
 
So we give up countable additivity.
And then use the Caratheodory construction.
 
Eh, how does one do analysis without countable additivity?
 
Ok, but it seems like the best one to give up is that "all sets are measurable" no? The others seem far more useful.
And we don't often run into the problem "damn I wish this set was measurable but its not and this is a problem for me"
Countable additivity or translation invariance though? Invaluable.
 
@ZhenLin Subadditivity...?
That's what you do with outer measures.
 
Are we talking about outer measures now?
 
2:56 PM
Then you find a restriction that improves the subadditivity to additivity.
So, I was wondering if we could actually skip all this.
 
hmmm
 
In the end we don't care much about $\sigma$-algebras, but only about our measurable functions.
So, they are like some technical thing to me that is there to make things work.
 
If every set is measurable, doesn't that mean every function is measurable...?
 
So why not take our measurable functions as primitives? But then again... the non-measurability messes it up.
@ZhenLin Yes. So that should mean that for the theory to fruitful, our "sets" should be less prevalent (in one way or another) than the ZFC sets.
It was just something I was thinking about while sitting in the coffee bar, nothing... profound.
I was wondering why we actually do all this stuff. It seems to serve no purpose other than make things work.
 
I think that is indeed at the core of it all.
 
2:59 PM
Isn't that a noble purpose, though?
 
Well... that is what a lot of mathematics is about...
 
We usually restrict the set of objects on our general space. Why not restrict the space instead?
Yes, I know :-).
But that doesn't mean that I should not think about it, right? :-).
 

« first day (715 days earlier)      last day (4307 days later) »