@OldJohn, all lipids normal. There is another item, Hemoglobin A1c which is considered the more important of the two ordinary tests for diabetes. They want 4.8-5.6 thingies, which I got eight out of ten times, but in 2010 Dec it was 5.9 and this time 6.0. I think we should just get to throw out our one worst test, like dropping the lowest quiz score.
@MikeSpivey, a month ago Anton said he was hung up with the legal stuff. There will be a number of guarantees enforceable by law. At the same time, nobody ever made any serious headway on programming an alternative (a huge task to do it right) and things would eventually fall apart on the 1.0 platform, so there is no real alternative. My guess is they can migrate as soon as everything is signed. Maybe Anton will have extra time over the winter break.
hi! I'm new in the chat... but does anyone who whether a constant speed geodesic obtained in a coordinate frame remains a constant speed geodesic in another? is it still a geodesic at all in another frame ? Not sure if the chat is a place to ask
@robjohn Really? I've not gotten that impression. There are lots of people active on both sites. Some of the top users over there (e.g., Qiaochu, Mariano, JDH, MattE, David Speyer, Pete Clark), have participated quite heavily here at times.
@robjohn Well, perhaps MSE also thinks that MO is pariah.
user19161
See, MSE can accept all questions and MO only research level questions, and some questions on MO are pretty trivial, so MO is the real pariah, not MSE. QED.
@MikeSpivey, the best info on what is actually happening is meta.mathoverflow.net/discussion/1416/5/mathoverflow-20 There are plenty of other threads warning against doing it, but it is happening. The idea makes me nervous too, but it is not realistic to thing that Anton and Scott Morrison can maintain the software side indefinitely. Part of the panic over this was bad dealings with someone named Jeff Atwood, who is now out of the picture.
@WillJagy I believe Jeff was one of the original founders of the SE network. Regardless, he was the primary liaison between the SE folks and math.SE in the early days.
I think it fits both parties. I liked Jyrki Lahtonen's short summary, that Bill had a very precise notion of how MSE should work, and got upset when people did not go along with that.
To all, my only interaction with Atwood was an attempt to get him and Pete L. Clark communicating by email. The results were less than stellar. However,i continue to think that really explosive stuff should be discussed between two opponents (or two allies) and not exposed to 50 random pairs of eyes until people can calm down a bit and use clean language. I have no reason to doubt Atwood's importance in this.
Does anyone know of a program comatible with common functions I can use to solve a large system of linear equations, I cant use wolframalpha, there data input is too small
@Ethan you are not looking for numeric calculation here btw, so scilab is of no use. Probably sage math will be better. If you are looking for some software to enable you to solve bigger such problems in the future, symbolic manipulation software like sagemath, mathematica etc will be much more useful. You can also learn sympy and numpy, which have a higher learning curve, but are much more powerful.
Okay, here is the system: $$(\log5)\begin{pmatrix}g_1\\g_2\\g_3\\g_4\end{pmatrix}-\begin{pmatrix}z_1\\z_2\\z_3\\z_4\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}g_1&g_3&g_2&g_4\\g_2& g_1&g_4&g_3\\g_3&g_4&g_1&g_2\\g_4&g_2&g_3&g_1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}f_1\\f_2\\ f_3\\f_4\end{pmatrix} $$
Anon, do you know alot about linear algebra? I think I can give a very elementry proof of dirichlets if I can show a certain system of equations is always solveable
Also heres another identity
lambda is the vonmangoldt function
let s->1, and you prove the infintude of primes congruent to 2 modulo 3
lol
I can get alot of those with out using dirichlet characters and other non sense, just algebra and some periodic series manipulations
I wouldn't say I do anything "for a living" (that would be, like, a career), but I just finished a job as a security guard and will be tutoring next semester. Yes I am a student.
Right now I just got back to looking at schur-weyl duality and tensor symmetry (chapter 9 of Procesi's Lie Groups). I was looking at Monsky's theorem a bit earlier. I will (hopefully) be presenting both of these topics at an informal conference on the 29th.
"Nothing general appears to be known about or , although it is possible to express all in terms of known transcendentals (Zucker and Robertson 1976)" on this page mathworld.wolfram.com/DirichletL-Series.html
when they say that
do they mean the functions cant be expressed in terms of other functions? like the hurrwitz zeta etc
I think I can give many of those in terms of large expressions involving hurrwitz zeta functions
for example in this previous sum
re-write the vonmangoldt sum
in terms of primes
integrate both sides wrt to s
you should get an euler product
composed of primes congruent to 2 modulo 3
allign the congruence classes of the L functions up with weighted values of these vonmangoldt sum
*s
I can give many of these for ak+b
the case for modulo 5 , b=1,2,3,4, looks like they should each take up a quarter of a page though
the expressions were encoded in that large system I had you solve
These vonmangoldt dirichlet series' were generalized cases
of the previous paper I showed u
that 1
I just subtracted the zeta function weighted with a constant and let s->1, then re-wrote the harmonic series with a logarithm and eulers gamma constant (sense they both approach the same thing as n->infinity)
which can be re-written in terms of prime sums like I said before
Because the L function has an euler product, I can break up each of its values into congruences because the dirichlet characters are periodic
and then use previous identitys to obtain each euler product
weight them appropreitly
and then I should have the L function
but written in terms of hurrwitz zetas
functions
and logarithms etc
actually prolly not logarithms, those should disapeer when integrated with respect to s
anyway they converge double exponentially, the first 10 terms should give you hundreds of digits of accuracy
no
im 17
lol
I have more general formula, i thought i could get a fast converging series for somthing not rational as thats kinda useless, but I end up geting double series that cant be simplifyed
Una vez escuché que CR es el tercer país del mundo donde la gente es más longeva y se supone que es por la alimentación. El primero es Japón. El segundo no me acuerdo
