« first day (870 days earlier)      last day (4150 days later) » 

user19161
12:05 AM
@PeterTamaroff I have 250 answers now Pedro.
 
jasper
can i get in a private chat with u
fora sec
 
Doesn't it suffice to show that $|\int f(x)\delta(x) - f(0)| = 0$ as $t \rightarrow x$ over the support of f(x)?
for the definition of $\delta(x)$ given?
 
The definition does not make sense.
It is like I would define a green elephant and use that to deduce there are pink ones. Bullshit in bullshit out.
 
@JonasTeuwen Could you do me a favor at take a look at my question (in the bounty statement) here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/15248/… ? I'm calling in the big guns for this -- it's driving me nuts.
 
12:22 AM
What are your big guns? The open mapping theorem? :-).
 
@JonasTeuwen Someone who understands how to use the OMT to prove that statement (unfortunately not me....)
But hopefully you.
 
@JonasTeuwen isn't it analogous to how you can 'define' the delta function as the limit of a sequence, like $\delta(x)$ = $\frac{n}{\pi(1 + n^2 x^2}$ as $n \rightarrow \infty$
 
user19161
@Ethan There are no private chats, the transcript is publicly available. You can email me for really private talk.
 
The integral $\int f'/f$ counts the number of zeros right?
And then you can modify the path continuously - through the holomorphy.
@Bitrex Nope.
That's not the definition.
 
@JonasTeuwen It does count the number of zeros, but the argument principle.
*through the
 
12:25 AM
That's the argument principle.
Then you shake the curve a bit and you get your statement.
 
How does that work?
This shaking?
 
By holomorphic 'contractions'
That is usually not in standard (undergraduate) complex analysis.
 
Could you elaborate? How does this relate to the OMT?
Any reference would be great.
 
@JonasTeuwen Yes, sorry, you're right.
 
homotopy?
 
12:27 AM
The statement is about the continuous dependence on number of zeros.
Err, homotopy.
And you can modify your curve continuously.
If you get over one +1
 
Indeed.
I don't see how the theorem follows though. I also don't get the bit about f(z) being forced to wind around the unit circle.
 
I'm a pretty hungry asshole right now, so I'll make a sandwich! Wish I had a servant.
2
 
user19161
Well, the people were not happy that I provided the complete solution so I have deleted my two previous answers, sad panda.
 
Don't delete answers. :(
Especially if they're complete and correct.
 
@JasperLoy Let them assholes bitch.
 
user19161
12:29 AM
But to be fair, I did not provide all the steps. I could fill in even more steps.
 
user19161
Let me explain why I decided to give more steps.
 
user19161
Yes, I like rep, but in this case, it is not really for the rep that I did that.
 
I've got a really neat density proof. I like it better than Schmuland's (and Nate's) 8-).
 
user19161
If someone asks such a basic question, chances are, even with very few hints, he cannot solve the problem himself.
 
@JasperLoy I would not explain, if they don't like it they should just bugger off.
 
user19161
12:30 AM
And also, what is complete or not complete is very much a matter of judgment.
 
user19161
If there is too little info given, the site degenerates into a site with many basic questions that lack fairly meaty answers, and loses its value as a reference.
 
@JonasTeuwen I'm afraid I still don't see the solution.
 
I am afraid I didn't explain it well.
But I have seven days.
I need to read about Burkholder now.
And make a sandwich.
 
@JonasTeuwen :(. This nagging detail is destroying me. Please, relieve me from my torture.
 
That's what mathematics is young man (I guess...? 8-)): suffering.
Pain, agony, despair, suffering, torment.
 
12:33 AM
We are masochists.
 
Looking for our fix: a proof.
 
user19161
@JonasTeuwen Anyway, it is not an asshole but amwhy. =)
 
It is like some drug craving.
@JasperLoy Does not matter, even if you do it people will still think you are an asshole.
You help some people and they think you are an asshole.
 
@JonasTeuwen And I'm having serious withdrawal right now!
 
As soon as you gain some visibility, there will be people that wouldn't grant you the light in your eyes and think you are an asshole!
 
user19161
12:35 AM
@JonasTeuwen No, they think I am not helping them because to help them I should only provide the hints! =)
 
Hence, asshole.
A little star.
@Potato Find some other fix!
 
user19161
But to show every step, I can even show for example that 2+3=3+2 since we need to invoke commutativity.
 
Also check my second starred remark.
@JasperLoy I would think the guy explaining me that way is an asshole.
 
user19161
Hence strictly speaking I did not show every step.
 
user19161
Hence I am not an asshole. QED.
 
12:37 AM
You always are an asshole, as soon as you are helping.
So do it your way.
Ah! Good idea, I'll play Sinatra.
 
user19161
@JonasTeuwen QED bro.
 
user19161
@ethan Are you here?
 
user19161
@JonasTeuwen I like that song bro.
 
@JasperLoy It has some good lyrics.
 
user19161
So hints to elementary problems and complete solutions to difficult problems? What is elementary? What is difficult? Maybe millennium problems are elementary!
 
user19161
12:44 AM
Also, the most difficult things lie in the most elementary things. For example, what is pi?
 
user19161
So I get downvoted for providing complete solutions when X thinks I should provide hints. And later I get downvoted for providing hints when Y thinks I should provide complete solutions.
 
user19161
FACEPALMHEADDESKRAGEQUIT
 
@JasperLoy Yes, so you are always an asshole as I've said. So do it your way and the ones that disagree should f...bugger off.
 
user19161
Now the asker will not get the correct solution because he only knows the hints, sad panda.
 
user19161
He will maybe know that this is a solution to the trigonometric equation, but he won't know that there are infinitely many solutions and what they are...
 
user19161
12:56 AM
@JonasTeuwen I thought you would say "More beer!"
 
Well, basically yes. If you do not spend time on people finding you less an asshole (and failing to do so), you better have a beer.
 
user19161
WTF, did is using QED in his answers too!
 
user19161
Ah, comments on deleted posts don't expand!
 
user19161
Why do you keep spitting out full-fledged solutions? – amWhy 54 mins ago

@amwhy In a way, not all the steps are provided. The asker also has to fill in some gaps himself. =) – Jasper Loy 51 mins ago

You know what I'm getting mean, Jasper. – amWhy 50 mins ago
 
user19161
Well, it's OK, I will recover... =)
 
user19161
1:09 AM
@JonasTeuwen I will be your servant bro!
 
user19161
Hey @mechanical, I see you are here too.
 
user19161
Wow BMS got 11 stars for that line.
 
@JasperLoy What line?
 
user19161
@Mechanicalsnail -------------------------------------------------------------------------> Look to the right!
 
@JasperLoy I see nothing by BMS or with 11 stars.
Oh. Had to expand it.
 
user19161
1:15 AM
@Mechanicalsnail Are you on a small screen?
 
user19161
So you see, two people can see the same thing but see different things. Very deep...
 
@JasperLoy 1280x800
With tiny fonts.
 
user19161
Also, two people can see different things but see the same thing, also very deep...
 
user19161
That ethan guy keeps appearing when I disappear and disappear when I appear.
 
Good night guys.
 
user19161
1:20 AM
@JonasTeuwen Night bro, see you in your dreams...
 
user19161
1:33 AM
Hey @iseth I see you are here too!
 
@JasperLoy I'm running tracerout on you
 
user19161
1:50 AM
Hey @ethan.
 
Type full answer, javascript crashes on page, browser quits, answer all gone.
:(
 
user19161
@Bitrex Browser?
 
Guess I should be typing up my answers in an external editor.
 
user19161
@ethan What is it you wanna tell me?
 
Yes, some script on the page crashes, and the web browser locks up.
 
user19161
1:55 AM
@Bitrex I mean what browser are you using?
 
@JasperLoy Chrome.
 
user19161
2:14 AM
Ethan's gone again, over and out!
 
I need @BrianMScott
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff Haha, you even commented on that post to get him here, pretty desperate.
 
@JasperLoy Yes! Of course.
 
hello
 
@Ethan Is your surname Hawke?
 
2:28 AM
lol
 
user19161
@Ethan What is it that you want to tell me?
 
can i go into a seperate chat with you?
 
user19161
@Ethan Did you get my message? I said there are no truly private chats here.
 
nvm
il figure it out later
lol
look at this
lolololololol
at 2nd series
 
wow what a nightmare
 
2:34 AM
double exponential convergence
:f
lolololol
 
user19161
@Ethan Would you like to accept the answer I gave to your question? =)
 
which one
jasper
 
user19161
@Ethan The one on infinity!
 
user19161
@Ethan Hey I got the invitation, but I prefer to talk here. Even if we talk there, everyone can read.
 
oh
wana answer my bounty
and then I can try to answer one of yours
 
user19161
2:36 AM
@Ethan So if you want to say some secret, email me.
 
user19161
@Ethan I have no questions for you now I am afraid.
 
you can make one up
nvm
 
user19161
Well, I don't like to give bounties...
 
do you know of any partially additive functions, that are also periodic
that arn't the composition of additive functions with periodic multiplictive functions
 
user19161
Nah, I don't know these things. I only know very little like I said.
 
2:39 AM
o
If I want to look up articles on a particular subject
 
user19161
Try posting your question on the site.
 
do you know any archives
 
user19161
@Ethan There is arxiv.org
 
I don't have a question, and even if I did lol, I cant post more then 30 questions in 50 days
or somthing
or vice versa
 
user19161
@Ethan Well, if you are asking that many that is not a good sign.
 
user19161
2:41 AM
anon is here, you can ask him.
 
i dnt have a question
though
anon
wana see a relation between the barnes G function and chebyshev function
 
@Ethan you have a lot of questions
 
isn't that what the sites for?
 
user19161
2:56 AM
@Ethan Yup, but if there are too many questions then maybe one should consider changing the learning habits...
 
user19161
I think the upper cap on questions is reasonable.
 
never
lolol
are there any additive periodic functions?
are there any additive periodic integer functions
other then 0
or some other
retarded example
 
f(n)=f(1+1+...+1)=f(1)+f(1)+...+f(1)=nf(1).
 
I don't understand
f(1)=0
if its additive
 
what makes you say that?
f(0)=0, sure.
 
3:03 AM
a(1)=a(1)+a(1)
subtract a(1) from both sides
lol
 
additive means f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y).
 
f(0)=2f(0) :)
 
no
f(ab)=f(a)+f(b), when gcd(a,b)=1
well atleast
 
if you wish
 
thats my
definition
are there any additive functions, that are periodic?
 
3:04 AM
define f(-1) and f(p) arbitrarily for primes p; everything else follows.
 
user19161
@Ethan You can save space by typing more things on the same line.
 
user19161
Today is a sad day, I got two downvotes...
 
were dirichlet characters only created because there multiplictive and there dirichlet series admits an euler product
 
@Ethan If you study representation theory
 
what?
 
3:06 AM
You will know the reason for the use of the word "character"
For if $\rho : G \to \textrm{GL}(V)$
 
Benjalim
 
is a representation
 
do you know about analytic number theory
 
user19161
I better not say anything about character. Otherwise Benja will say "Don't use terms you don't understand".
 
@Ethan Algebraic number theory yes :D
 
3:07 AM
@JasperLoy do downvotes not show up in your public profile to others?
 
Have you seen any of these before
 
@Ethan Analytic no.
 
wait
do you know about the vonmangoldt function
 
@BenjaLim Duuuuude. Did the world end yet?
 
3:08 AM
@Ethan $\Lambda$
 
user19161
But I am thinking, how would Benja know if I know about characters or not? =)
 
@PeterTamaroff Yes because I am talking to you now.
@JasperLoy I know of your character.
 
look at this identity
 
@BenjaLim How is it chillin?
 
@PeterTamaroff Quite good.
 
user19161
3:08 AM
@anon It does, but that's not the point. I am not trying to be perfect. I just got downvoted for trying to provide a more complete solution to help the asker.
 
I finished some algebraic number theory problems
 
 
@Ethan What are my top tags ?
 
I cant look at your page
have you seen that identity before?
 
user19161
@BenjaLim Nah, you don't know me well...
 
3:09 AM
@Ethan I have not studied analytic number theory: Look at my top tags here
@Nur hey
 
Nur
Hello, BenjaLim.
 
oh
 
@Ethan That is undreadable.
 
benja lim
 
Nur
I agree. What's up with your handwriting?
 
3:10 AM
 
@Nur where you from?
 
lololololol at 2nd one
 
user19161
@anon I deleted the post dear anon.
 
oh. peer pressure.
 
@Ethan The reason why I like algebra is because I find it more elegant and beautiful
 
3:11 AM
3 terms should give you several hundred digits of accuracy
 
Nur
@BenjaLim U.K.
 
Dealing with that kind of stuff just seems ugly.
 
lmao
 
Nur
What about you?
 
ok
how
 
3:12 AM
@Nur You can see my about me on my profile page.
 
user19161
@anon I was ranting about it in chat just now if you go back further in the transcript.
 
Nur
@BenjaLim It says "We're sorry, we couldn't find the page you requested."
Are you sure you got one? :p
No worries, anyway.
 
user19161
@Nur Haha, that is because his account is bugged.
 
user19161
You need to search the main site for his searchable account.
 
Nur
Oh xD
 
user19161
The great Benja.
 
what is algebraic number theory good for?
like what are some main results
 
if you put analytic and algebraic number theory together you get langlands program
 
Nur
@JasperLoy Another annoyingly good mathematician then! :]
 
user19161
If you put algebraic geometry and algebraic number theory together you get arithmetic geometry.
 
3:18 AM
benja
you know about dirichlet L functions
right?
 
user19161
@Nur Yes, unlike me. I am only a banana.
 
@JasperLoy I have a problem,.
$\epsilon$-nets.
 
user19161
You can ask and we can all take a look at it.
 
why the hell is there so much terminology in abstract math
 
user19161
@Ethan Well, all the sciences have that I guess.
 
3:20 AM
I know like biology
they need to name everything
wtf
 
user19161
Why do they have pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis?
 
fake
 
The book, says, verbatim:
"We then call a set $B\subset P$ an $\epsilon$-net for the set $M\subset P$ if the distance from every point $x\in M$ to some point $y\in B$ (in general, depending on $x$) does not exceed $\epsilon$"
 
what is all that set crap
 
Can we put it has "for each $x\in M$ there exists $y\in B$ such that $\rho(x,y)<\epsilon$"?
 
3:22 AM
I think that's what they mean, yes.
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff Yes, that is right.
 
Or $B\cap B(x,\epsilon)\ne \varnothing$.
 
@peoplepower Indeed.
 
@JonasTeuwen Hat is ready to go.
 
Nur
@JasperLoy banana mathematician! :]
 
user19161
3:23 AM
@PeterTamaroff Are you working in a metric space P?
 
@JasperLoy Aye.
It is about precompact spaces.
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff Then yes. This concept will come up in totally bounded sets.
 
user19161
A set in a metric space is totally bounded if for every $\epsilon>0$ there is a finite number of $\epsilon$ balls that cover it.
 
user19161
Of course, totally bounded implies bounded.
 
user19161
And bounded implies totally bounded in Euclidean space.
 
3:27 AM
Is @MarianoSuárez-Alvarez around?
 
Nur
You wouldn't like that name sticking on you. There's this guy who advocated for creationism by arguing that bananas are perfectly curved for the human hand and he's now known as Banana Man.
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff You want to ask him the same question?
 
@JasperLoy Not really.
 
user19161
@PeterTamaroff OK, because if you do, I will RAGEQUIT.
 
lol they show him like the first species of banana, it looks like a fucked up squash
 
user19161
3:34 AM
I am having a terrible headache. I think I am doomed.
 
user19161
@potato Do you know that there is a book with "argument principle" in its subtitle?
 
@JasperLoy Man, I am loving some proofs in this Russian text.
They are delicious.
 
user19161
3:53 AM
@PeterTamaroff Good for you. You know, I think I will take a break from this site to recover from the shock of getting two downvotes just now... Merry Christmas!
 

« first day (870 days earlier)      last day (4150 days later) »