> Drifloon’s description in the Pokédex tells the terrifying tale of a creature that attempts to drag children into the underworld, but it just looks like a purple balloon with poorly drawn eyes and a terrible hairdo. If I saw one of these chasing after a child, I don’t think I would feel any sense of danger.
> Garbodor is a pile of trash. Also, his arm kind of looks like the nozzle you would use to put gasoline in your car
> I’m pretty sure Herdier is just a dog wearing a blanket. This is basically a dog from a cold area of the world that somehow ended up in the world of Pokémon
@Unionhawk Eh, I don't have a problem with people finding Pokemon designs silly and of themselves. It's just when people complain about "oh, the newer Pokemon have terrible designs compared to the ones I grew up with".
> The only Pokémon to date with a title, I’m not entirely convinced Mr. Mime isn’t just a failed clown trying to disembark from the human species.
> After the Easter Island statues – that appeared briefly in Super Mario Land on the Game Boy – came to terms with the fact that Mario didn’t want or need them anymore, they moved over to Pokémon series to become Noespass and Probopass. They’re basically gigantic noses and one happens to have an intimidating mustache.
> Klink, Klang, and Klinklang On their own, any one of the these Pokémon would be an admittedly strange, but average Pokémon. Taken as a group, however, they combine to become an impressively lazy naming convention.
> Luvdisc presents a Pokémon version of the chicken and the egg conundrum. During the design process, did the name come first? Or did the creature come first?
> Another creature from the kingdom of inanimate objects confusingly defined as Pokémon, Litwick, Lampent, and Chandelure seem like creatures that would be more comfortable in the world of Harry Potter. Are we entirely sure they're not lighting fixtures with faces drawn on them?
> Stunky makes this list because its name is ridiculous, and there is basically nothing to physically distinguish him from a real-world skunk.
> Much like its brothers Klefki, Garbodor, Litwick, Lampent, and Chandelure, Vanilish might have powers and a personality, but it is basically an inanimate object. Vanilish can pretend all it wants, but there’s no denying that it is basically an ice cream cone.
> Scrafty can spit acidic liquid from its mouth like an Alien, but he can’t seem to figure out how a belt works or that Pokémon really don’t need to wear pants.
> Phantumb looks like a ghost that accidentally got stuck in a tree and has basically been trying to play it off as an intentional fashion choice for the rest of its life. His name is also dangerously close to Phantdumb, which might have been more appropriate.
> These two get thrown together because their journey from young Pokémon to full evolution is exactly the same. Instead of gaining new appendages, or changing appearance, they just gather together in groups of three. For some reason though, they’re considered evolved.
> Phantumb looks like a ghost that accidentally got stuck in a tree and has basically been trying to play it off as an intentional fashion choice for the rest of its life. His name is also dangerously close to Phantdumb, which might have been more appropriate.
My name is Tony and I have a significant problem.
Each time I shave, no matter what precautions I am taking, such as wearing goggles to shield my eyes, I get cut facial hair not fall to the floor but get some attracted into my eyes causing serious discomfort and pain to subsequently extract it....
I made quests for stormcloaks but even after that when i give the axe for the jarl of Whiterun he gives me the axe back. So when i give the axe to Ulfric he talks as if he didn't gave me the axe before and says that i joined the wrong side and just goes back to his throne. Could it be because i u...
Should that be the unique identifier used to identify each unique item in the feed? and, if an item shows up twice in the feed for some reason (say because it was updated at some point), should the GUID be the same?
@StrixVaria I'm basically just building up to a rant that The Canadian Press provides us with abunch of stories via a feed, and the same story shows up multiple times, and everyone is like "zomg what do we do".
If the GUID is intended to be a "story ID", then I would expect it to be the same for multiple versions of a single story. But if it's a "message ID", then it should be different
I want to give myself a filled_map with data value 0, i.e. the very first map I would have ever generated.
I have tried:
/give @p minecraft:filled_map:0
which outputs the error: There is no such item with name minecraft:filled_map:0.
I have also tried:
/give @p minecraft:filled_map 1 0
Wh...
@murgatroid99 More or less. From what I see, the issue appears to be user error on their end, or a system that doesn't meet the users needs. Some writers are filing their stories twice in such a way that it shows up as a new story.
Like they want the story to show up twice, with two separate bylines, so it makes a new ID
@Wipqozn I see. Yeah, if they said that same ID = same story, then you should not make additional assumptions about what stories are the same if they have different IDs
We've had this issue before, where a story shows up twice and they're like "What happened?!?" and we tell them it's because they're using the system wrong, that doing X makes a second unique copy of the story.
@murgatroid99 Yeah, This conversation has been going on since we started using these feeds a few months ago, and it came up in testing. EVerytime I told them the same thing: The GUID is what we use to identify stories, as instructed by CP (feed provider). If a story shows up twice with different GUIDs there's nothing we can do.