Definitely no.
This may sound like a flippant response but it's actually grounded in experience and much thought.
I'm in a STEM discipline where LaTeX is considered by faculty to be the ONLY way to do word processing so I've had time to really formulate my viewpoint here.
Note: I use Word h...
I don't like downvoting, but was really, really tempted to do so here.
@FaheemMitha I have rescued at least 2 people from nervous breakdown as Word completely screwed up their 150+ page thesis', just by moving images around a week before due date.
Rescued them with converting everything to LaTeX that is.
I use LaTeX for anything serious. More often than not through LyX nowadays. But I could see doing something in LibreOffice. Especially if it doesn't need math layout.
@derobert me too, although for smaller stuff I often use reStructuredText, e.g. with Sphinx. But always markup, otherwise you get What-You-See-Is-All-You've-Got.
@Anthon Sometimes that's what you want (e.g., trying to do something where visual layout is very important. Say, a flyer). Other times, its a half-page long, who cares?
@Braiam so? You don't, and you should be able to open docx in libreoffice right? And, don't tell anyone, but I don't know if I've ever used a non-pirated version of windows or word and could open everything fine
@FaheemMitha heh, I had a whole VM with Windows and Office installed just to use PowerPoint to make Posters and finally abandoned it all for a nice LaTeX template.
@FaheemMitha Never tried it. No doubt one can. But I suspect it's a lot harder than using, say, Inkscape or GIMP (or Illustrator or Photoshop). And if you want to work with a designer...
@FaheemMitha I'm not sure you follow, but here it goes: I create a docx file, send it to someone, after a while they call me because they can't open it, I ask what version of office they have, and they answer me 2003
I remember in the mid 1990s trying to struggle with LaTeX alone. It was quite terrifying. I guess comp.text.tex existed, but I never thought of asking them. And they aren't exactly the same as tex.sx.
*TeX shines when you want to use a page layout over and over again. Its a fair bit of work to set up a layout, but once you have it, it mostly just works.
So if you're a journal and want all your articles formatted the same, it works real well there.
Or I have a manual for one of our products here written in LyX/LaTeX, and its very nice that I can export it to simplex or duplex, A4 or US Letter, or even HTML, all from the same source. And it mostly just works.
@derobert yes, html conversion is a weak point. there is tex4ht, but the original maintainer passed away. it seems it is still being maintained, but i'm not sure about the current status
@JasperLoy try posting a question on the main site. Make sure to mention your distribution, your graphics card and the driver you are using for it. Also post the contents of your $HOME/.xsession-errors
@strugee come on! They have added some cool features but removed loads more and are completely ignoring their userbase while attempting to make the desktop less customizable,
@JasperLoy if you can ssh in, you can use that to debug. If you can't ssh in, I think your best bet is to get a network console set up (unless you have a serial port for a serial console), and see if you can get the kernel panic message that way
@JasperLoy also, if they keyboard lights start blinking when the machine crashes (num lock, caps lock, scroll lock—those lights), the kernel does that on panic. At least with some keyboards. So that'd indicate its trying to give you a message, and you'd probably be able to see it on one of those consoles.
@terdon GNOME Classic is fully supported by GNOME devs. it's guaranteed to keep working across GNOME releases. and GNOME and MATE have a healthy relationship with each other.
I am unable to log in to my account, having recently installed Linux Mint. I had this problem with Ubuntu 13.10, and no amount of re-installations seemed to fix it. However, Mint gives me a very useful window alerting me that my session lasted less than 10 seconds, and displays the contents of my...
Video tutorials are the single worst fad in the history of the internet
Text is searchable video is not. And I really don't weant to sit through 10 minutes of some script kiddie talking just to find the 3seconds that are actually relevant to me.
This is just my own personal opinion and I realize that I am apparently in a minority but I hate video tutorials. What's wrong with text and images? You can actually search through text and find the part you care about!
Video tutorials mean I have to sit through irrelevant introductions like "H...
@Braiam in that case, vote up my answer. What a horrible,horrible idea!
I have just often found myself looking for a quick answer and the top google hits are some 12 year old script kiddie who likes to hear his/her own voice. I can't even know if the effin video will answer my question unless I watch the entire thing. No. Video explanations are bad in 90% of the cases. Closer to 100% when it comes to computer stuff and 110% when it comes to the command line.
@FaheemMitha how is that a counter example? That's a 11 minute long video! The SE sites are for specific solutions to specific problems. Took 10 seconds of blah blah before he even mentioned what the hell it is about. I won't be able to copy/paste any code from that... the list goes on :)
Every time he says "uh" I wasted another second of my life which I could have used to read documentation.
Still not buying. I just really dislike the format. I want to be able to skip to the part I actually care about.
@FaheemMitha Not mean, that's how +_I_ talk as well, that's why I don't want video tutorials. Also, one second is not much reading, say I read a single word (pretty sure I read faster than that) still more useful than a second of listening to "uh".
The not searchable thing is my main problem. Say you watched that, it was great and at 7:43 he makes a particularly useful observation. 3 years later, you remember and want to find it. You need to sit through the whole thing again
@FaheemMitha Oh, hey, I'm not attacking you. Sorry, that might be a cultural thing, I get worked up but there is 0 animosity here. Obviously, you should use whatever works for you. I just personally feel very strongly against these things
@FaheemMitha that is definitely cultural. In my institute in France, we interrupt all the time. Same in Spain when I did my PhD. Wouldn't happen in the Anglo-Saxon world though.
@Braiam yeah, that translates to chair or full professor but the term does not exist in English (unless it is some obscure architecture thing to describe cathedrals)
@terdon LET'S PLAY MINECRAFT! In this 30-minute video tutorial, I'll show you how to put 6 blocks together! Actually, I'll show you that a T=1354–1360s, the rest will be a bunch of BS because I like to hear myself talk!
To find good video tutorials, sort by length. The shorter, the better.
Try with the -c option:
-c
--continue
Continue getting a partially-downloaded file. This is useful when
you want to finish up a download started by a previous instance of
Wget, or by another program. For instance:
wget -c ftp://sunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk/ls...
I had to do a video showing how the heck you install a chrome extension that doesn't comes from the chrome extension store... the freaking easy instructions wasn't followed by most, granted, some of them don't even know english (like 30%)
Well, then that requires a little clicking in Add/Remove Programs :-/
Yeah! Text::CSV_XS 0.23 keeps returning forever from getline, even when the CSV file is over. Version 1.04 works. I wonder when that bug was fixed. This is going to be fun to track down...
Oh, and could you rate my level of insanity, on a scale of 1 to 10?
# "fix" a bug in Text::CSV_XS prior to 0.26.
if (Text::CSV_XS->version < 0.26) {
my $old = \&Text::CSV_XS::getline;
no warnings 'redefine';
*Text::CSV_XS::getline = sub {
my $res = &$old;
$res or return $res;
@$res or return undef;
return $res;
};
}
I haven't tested that yet...
Tested, appears the old version had a prototype of ($;$) which has to be added to avoid a warning. Other than that, appears to work.
I just bought a new laptop Lenovo IdeaPad U330 touch and after some struggle (with the Secure Boot stupidity) I have managed to install Arch Linux. I have configured my system, installed all the drivers (I think), then I noticed that my dmesg is being spammed with the
ideapad_laptop: Unknown...
@terdon sure, but please edit the title to reflect the actual question... at least once OP has confirmed that the wireless is what he/she actually cares about.