« first day (1602 days earlier)      last day (3386 days later) » 
01:00 - 11:0011:00 - 23:00

1:26 AM
Anyone here?
 
 
6 hours later…
7:06 AM
@Jolenealaska I know no such thing. I always forget about the cap.
 
I was giving you shit anyway :)
Hi hon!
Your're early tonight.
I've had an interesting day of ups and downs with my camera.
 
7:22 AM
Hi @Jefromi I just had a thiought about you.
 
creeeeeeeepy
 
Not really :)
 
@Jolenealaska hello
and hello @Jefromi and @ElendilTheTall
 
Not long ago I posted a pic of some fish that I just pulled out of the sous-vide
Hi rummi!
 
howdy y'all
 
7:24 AM
You said something to the effect of "Uh oh, that's looks carefully plated...that's how the madness starts"
Yep, pretty much
 
Aha!
 
2 days ago I made cookies, not because I cookies, I just wanted to take pictures of cookies...
Yesterday, I was digging around for something else to photograph....
You know it has began when say to yourself, "Oooh a frozen chicken! Yay! I even have a blowtorch!"
 
I'm glad to know that even though I've bought some new gadgets I'm still more "normal" than a few people out there!
I have not had that particular thought so yes I think you are off to adventures.
 
Have you blowtorched your chicken yet?
3
Does sound like pretty awesome skin!
 
7:31 AM
Nope, I have an idea for a very nice shot in my grandma's big cast iron skillet. To give it all it needs, I need some red potatoes and a couple of sprigs of thyme. So next time I shop.
 
Cool!
Fanciest thing on my end is possibly doing sous vide ribs this weekend.
 
I just baked off a couple of croissants I froze during that adventure a few weeks ago. My project tonight is to compose a shot with those, some artistically messy flour and a rolling pin on a wooden cutting board.
 
goodness, I would just eat the croissants!
 
I'll actually probably end up spraying them with lacquer to use as props in later shots.
 
I don't know if you can keep a real croissant for long, even lacquered
 
7:37 AM
When I shop next I am going to buy 1 wine glass, 1 water goblet and 1 pretty plate.
That was something I had planned to ask you.
 
Having real wine glasses is super nice!
 
It would be nice to have the croissants, a couple of dinner rolls, a baguette and maybe a rustic loaf all preserved to use as props, but I don't the best way to do it.
Funny things is that I don't drink wine - at all. Bourbon yes, but not wine or beer.
 
You can probably save the normal bread as props
dry it out in a low oven, and it won't go moldy.
but I'm afraid the croissants will dampen and squish with time
 
I'll buy a cheap bottle of wine and keep it in the fridge, I'll funnel it back in when I'm done with it.
 
I tried to drink bourbon, the first few sips were pretty awesome and then it was a little much.
I love the flavor, though, I have it for baking and ice cream.
 
7:42 AM
I'll get a white wine glass and a bottle of white wine for now.
 
you probably don't have to pay for real wine
 
When I was a kid, I would go with friends to the mall and buy a "Big Gulp" Mountain Dew on the way and spike it with my dad's Jim Beam.
 
you can use an empty bottle and apple juice
 
Yeah, but cheap wine is really cheap.
 
And it comes in bottles?
 
7:44 AM
Dad never noticed how fast he would go through bourbon.
 
Here, you may get a 2 Euro bottle at Aldi, anything below is in a tetra pack.
 
Well if you want to show the bottle you probably don't want to show a $2 bottle, but...
 
Yeah, like that $5, but it'll last forever.
 
If it's in the background, the label may not even be readable
 
Charles Shaw is a brand of "extreme value", bargain-priced wine. Largely made from California grapes, Charles Shaw wines currently include Cabernet Sauvignon, White Zinfandel, Merlot, Chardonnay, Sauvignon Blanc, Shiraz, Valdiguié in the style of Beaujolais nouveau, and limited quantities of Pinot Grigio. These wines were introduced exclusively at Trader Joe's grocery stores in California at a price of $1.99 per bottle, earning the wines the nickname Two Buck Chuck. In 2009, an international version of Chardonnay from Australia was introduced in limited stores. Prices in states other than California...
 
7:45 AM
also, I don't have the feeling that cheap wine producers save on labels
 
People might recognize that label here, I'm not sure, it can be a little infamous.
 
OK, if it's always the same wine which is sold cheap, that's a problem
the problem is that glass is so heavy, else I'd send you a good looking bottle from French wine
 
I want a traditional bottle of Chianti, other than that, I'll think that I'll just pick a bottle of white (for now) and red (sometime later) with pretty labels.
 
There's plenty of nice-looking California wines!
 
heck, I'd send you a real bottle of wine, but 1) it's heavy and 2) it's forbidden to mail alcohol to the USA
 
7:49 AM
There are plenty of pretty bottles of red and white at my local store that'll work just fine for very little money.
I accomplished one neat thing with my camera today...
The little tripod that came with the camera is pretty useless and it really was annoying me earlier. I started looking on Amazon at good tripods....And then I had a thought. I have a very nice, infinitely adjustable (height and tilt) microphone stand. That, the useless tripod, 3 old earplugs and wicked Alaskan duct taping skills have led to no need for an expensive tripod.
 
Cool!
 
It's perfect. :)
39/45 so far for that silly orange peeling thing.
and 11 "favorites" and 4000 views in 2 days. <shrug>
Next up...Apple coring!
Somehow @Jefromi's new starred message looks dirty.
@rumtscho both you and tall have commented that I need to diffuse my light sources. I only have 2 sources that aren't pretty well diffused by the fixtures. Is there any reason I shouldn't just tape up some wax paper? The bulbs are fluorescent, so I'm not going to burn the joint down.
 
8:39 AM
 
8:49 AM
 
I think wax paper lets less light through than a piece of cheap white fabric
thin fabric, I mean
a translucent piece of plastic (a shopping bag?) will also work
if you can rig up some kind of frame and put on it something diffusing (fabric, wax paper, plastic, whatever) you can maybe find a way to hang it before the fixture when photographing and remove it when not
it will rid you of glaring highlights like the one on the top container in the second picture
 
I can probably do that, even with a couple of coat hangers (and duct tape, of course)
It was exactly that glare that made me think of it.
 
I'd find it more elegant to use hooks and string
you know these small screws which end up not with a head but with a hook?
you can screw them into the ceiling close to the fixture
 
Duct tape has a certain Alaskan panache. It's hard to explain, but it makes me smile.
 
put a string on your frame and suspend it from the hooks.
@Jolenealaska well, if that's what you'd like to use, go for it
 
9:03 AM
The duct tape on the frame, not holding it in place.
For that, probably the hook part of the coat hanger.
Jeez...where did that big ass finger hole come from??
 
croissants are finicky
 
I thought I was improving it, but not with that damn finger hole!
 
morning ladies
 
getting there though. That's just a screen snip. I adjusted the color level a bit in the first one.
Hi sweetie.
 
white balance looks a bit warm
and damn those shadows
 
9:11 AM
One nice bit of progress today:
1 hour ago, by Jolenealaska
The little tripod that came with the camera is pretty useless and it really was annoying me earlier. I started looking on Amazon at good tripods....And then I had a thought. I have a very nice, infinitely adjustable (height and tilt) microphone stand. That, the useless tripod, 3 old earplugs and wicked Alaskan duct taping skills have led to no need for an expensive tripod.
 
That and the wifi software is installed (causing my computer to crash, it took me 2 hours to get it to boot)
 
good grief
you don't believe in doing things easy do ya?
 
apparently not!
And once again I can't remember the wifi password. What's the website again? The string of numbers?
 
192.168.1.1?
possibly 0.1
 
9:17 AM
once I type in 192, it'll remember the rest.
I want to use the sauerkraut shot in a question on main. Can we get rid of that glare in gimp?
 
what glare?
 
Above the croissants is a picture of fermenting sauerkraut.
 
we can certainly do something about the main blob of glare
 
Just for fun, I'd like to try to even out the background too. How the right side is darker.
 
ok
open it up in gimp, get a cup of coffee, strip off, and let's start
 
9:22 AM
OK!
it's up
 
teehee
ok
 
In GIMP and programs like it, we can work with Layers
these work just like sheets of paper
we can stack them, rearrange the stack, cut bits out so you can see the sheet underneath, all sorts
we can also use them to make changes that we can easily undo later simply by deleting or 'turning off the layer'
the layers palette is over on the right at the top
you will see a little thumbnail of the image next to an eye icon
got it?
 
no....no eyeball
I see "layer" on the top menu
 
9:29 AM
Oh...that whole panel is gone!
 
press Ctrl+L
ok?
 
there it is :)
 
sweet
ok
now we want to duplicate the (only) layer so we can work on a copy
Click and drag the layer down to this icon
If we just clicked this icon, it would make a new, blank layer
when you drag an existing layer to it, it duplicates it for you
 
so I grab the thumbnail?
and drag it?
 
yup, anything from the thumbnail rightwards
 
9:32 AM
apparently...OK
 
so now you have <whateveryourlayeriscalled> copy
 
so now I have 2 thumbnails
 
you have 2 layers
 
ok
gotcha
 
we'll work on the top layer, leaving the bottom layer intact
it's always worth working 'non-destructively' so you can make changes easily later if you wish
this might not be highly important now, but i'm trying to teach you good habits
(apart from editing naked, that's just a perk for the tutor) :D
ok
head over to the Tools palette on the left hand side
 
9:34 AM
And always a good rule :)
 
penultimate row, last column is an icon that looks like two crossed Band-Aids
 
got it
 
That's the Healing tool
it takes the texture from one part of the image and blends it with another
this is the kind of tool they use to give models flawless skin
 
I'm thinking this will be how to fix the finger hole
 
Maybe!
 
9:37 AM
(later)
 
Before you start, seeing as we're working on a small part of the image, let's zoom in
Press Shift and + a couple of times
 
3 works well
 
actually, just +
 
centre up the area you're working on by holding the spacebar down and moving the mouse
happy?
 
9:40 AM
Yep, the glare is centered and zoom =100%
 
ok - you can zoom in a little more if you want - see how you go
now, the first thing to do with the Healing brush is choose your source, ie where the texture is going to be taken from
 
ok...i think i see where
 
you want to take it from just off to the left
the source will move with the brush
hold CTRL and click
 
that's where I was looking...what woud be about 1.5 inches IRL
 
I've placed it here
you want a reasonably large brush (as shown by the size of the circle)
you can adjust the size with [ and ]
 
9:43 AM
That is exactly where I went before you showed me :)
 
S@B
now, the glare lies just over two different bands of wood in the backdrop
 
oops...I did something...
 
so I suggest brushing over the left half of the glare with this source, then choosing a new source from the other side
Ctrl + Z to undo
it might take a bit of experimentation to get a good look
 
Lol...first I undid my last message
hold up...I'm lost somehow...
 
9:46 AM
Lost me at [ and ]
for the size
 
that changes the brush size
 
and what??
 
a bigger, softer brush is more subtle
if you were trying to paint out a spot on a wall, would you use a big decorator's brush or a tiny miniaturist's one?
 
I get that, I want to make it bigger, I dont understand the instruction of [ and ]
 
press those keys
[ makes the brush smaller
] makes it bigger
 
9:48 AM
OOOH
 
in increments
 
gotcha
 
oh, I see what happened
:)
lol
 
ok, this is where practice comes in
I just did it at this end and my process is: do a bit of healing, re-set the source somewhere else, heal a bit more, reset the source somewhere else, 'pulling in' different bits of the image to achieve a subtle blend
the vertical bands of color in the wood are your guide
set your source so you are blending from the same band
brush in a bit, assess, and change your source if necessary
 
9:52 AM
wow...ok, great exercise
 
remember you can always use Ctrl Z to undo a change you don't like
 
how do i say "pick up" and "drop here"?
 
Ctrl click to set the source, then click and drag to brush
 
sorry, I should have made that clear :)
I forget you're a total noob at this - I've been doing this for over 15 years
 
9:55 AM
You're doing great....just a quick aside on that...
The manual is of soooo little help with actual problems...who writes this shit??
 
nerds
 
It carefully told me that the big connector on the cord goes into the computer, the little connector goes into the camera....Well thank you soooo much for that.
And then it goes into three paragraphs of acronyms that only look vaguely familiar.
 
lol
have you finished Healing yet?!
<cracks whip>
 
OK, I'll mess with this a minute and then come up for air.
 
lots of small brushings are better than one big one
better results, easier to undo
 
10:05 AM
 
EXCELLENT
you're a natural
 
The only thing I can see is that you've duplicated a couple of bits from the edge of the reflected box
heal those puppies out
 
gotcha
 
jojo, I am impressed
 
10:09 AM
 
fantastic
Ok, well seeing as you are some kind of wunderkind, I will show you a similar but different tool to fix that eye-catching blob just beneath the lid, top left
SPACEBAR over to it
 
         got it
 
sweet
ok, this time we'll use the Clone tool. Heal does some fancy blending by looking at the source, looking at the destination, and blending the two. It's great for areas with fairly even tones, like before
but here we have two very different tones - the wood, and the red of the lid
they are sharply delineated
if we Healed it, we'd get a weird blurry edge that wouldn't look right
The Clone tool doesn't do any fancy blending, it just takes pixels from one area and dumps them in another
The Clone tool is just to the left of the Healing tool, the icon is a rubber stamp
You select a source in the same way, Ctrl Click
 
hold on...
 
10:15 AM
To read, then see, I have to bounce back and forth between seeing it, and seeing you
 
sure
You always want to clone from the nearest clean area, so what you need to is set your source to the left of the spot, set the brush size so it's just a little smaller than the lid we're cloning from, then brush in from the left
then, reset your source to the right of the spot, where the lid is darker, and brush in from the right
Try and maintain the hard edge of the lid where it 'meets' the wood
 
I got it...almost there..
 
Then do the same with the bit of blob that's over the wood, rather than the lid
 
Hold on...
 
Take your time
it's not quite as forgiving as the healing tool
 
10:19 AM
I 've got to go to the restroom, but I've almost got it...brb
 
ok
peeing yourself with excitement evidently
 
10:33 AM
<twiddles thumbs>
 
lovely
 
Struggling a bit more with this
 
yes, it's trickier
but it's easy to pixel-peep
if you zoom back out, it will become less noticeable
remember the viewer's attention will probably be elsewhere anyway
 
Which I want to do now
I wanna see where we're at
 
10:35 AM
- (minus) to zoom out
If you then click the eye icon next to the top layer, you can see the before and after
impressive, no?
 
I'd call that a win!
 
Much better...I see one more thing I want to address, but that looks fine :)
Without that big glare, what I want to be seen, can actually be seen.
 
@Jolenealaska good line of thinking
when you work with visuals, getting to understand your tools (camera, GIMP, whatever) is only a small part of it
 
This isn't intended to be pretty, but the glare was a distraction.
 
10:40 AM
a good designer or photographer understands how the viewer's eyes see the picture, how they jump from element to element
 
@rumtscho hasn't jojo done well for her first ever photo retouching?
 
And now your eye is drawn where I want it, at the top of the cabbage
 
I'm so proud <sniff>
 
@ElendilTheTall Yes, you are a good teacher, and @Jolenealaska is a good pupil
 
You are a very good tutor.
 
10:42 AM
pffaw, I just type some words, you're doing the work
 
her pictures are starting to look really good
especially considering that a week ago, she was just relying on the camera to do the best it can, it's very, very good progress
 
You were right in that I could have have made myself nuts trying to get that smudge at the lid perfect, but you don't even see it once you zoom out.
 
yah. We're not editing the front cover of Vogue here
I think it could do with some color correction, the white balance is somewhat warm
and a bit of a contrast boost
we can do all that in the Levels tool which you use yesterday, if you so wish
 
the sauerkraut shot?
 
yes, contrast boost and I'd rise the midpoint too a little bit
 
10:45 AM
ya
 
it's shot in the shadow, nothing will change that, but giving a light boost in the midtones tends to make pictures friendlier
 
want to do that jojo?
 
Ok - Colors Menu > Levels
 
another layer?
 
10:48 AM
no, this one
you could do another layer though of course
 
that's what I thought
 
in fact, do it
good habits and all that
 
the rule of thumb for another layer is "whenever I have reached a state I might not want to destroy"
they do take up disk space in the GIMP format, but once you export to jpg, it doesn't matter. jpg disregards layers.
 
Why is my thumbnail a checkerboard?
 
10:50 AM
You created a new transparent layer instead of duplicating the existing one
 
because you've made a new blank layer
you can right click the layer and click Duplicate Layer
 
do I want that?
 
saves moving the mouse too much :)
no, you want a fresh copy of your retouched layer
 
ok, so once you've done that, Colors menu > Levels
 
10:52 AM
since they're the same, does it matter if I'm at copy, or copy #1?
 
you can and should rename layers
 
double click the layer name
call the first duplicate 'retouch', then the second one 'levels adjustment'
or whatever you like, but make it something logical, natch :)
 
@Jolenealaska they shouldn't be the same
The idea is not to have two copies of the original, but a version of the original, then a version without the glare, and a third version with the colors changed
 
@rumtscho they should if she's duplicated one
i think that's what jojo's done
 
10:54 AM
so you should be copying the glareless layer, not the original layer
 
I've got the original, 1 that has been retouched, one that is about to be edited
 
and the one that's about to be edited is a duplicate of the retouched layer?
not the base layer
 
I can see on the thumbnails that I have 2 copies of the retouched, named retouch and levels
 
cool, that's perfect
ok, so Colors menu > Levels
 
How do I make "levels" the active picture in the midle panel
 
10:58 AM
Click the layer once
you won't see any difference yet
until you edit 'levels' in some way, it's identical to the 'retouch' layer
 
what is there is the original...with the glare
 
@Jolenealaska an important thing about editing layers
they are really like a stack of sheets of transparent celluloid with a picture on them
if you have a layer which is completely painted (like yours) on top, then you can only see this top one
 
01:00 - 11:0011:00 - 23:00

« first day (1602 days earlier)      last day (3386 days later) »