« first day (978 days earlier)      last day (2681 days later) » 

4:00 PM
Wowee, Mike was FAST on your killer sudoku.
Killer isn't my best genre, so I'm only a third ish of the way
 
@Sid mind if I put a nicer picture up on your question? I can paste it in here first if you like.
 
Nobody has solved my riddle yet?
 
No idea
 
Sid
4:21 PM
@dcfyj Please feel free to do so...
I have been hoping someone would put up a black and white one as well for the color-blind.
 
Sadly it's smaller but I think it looks good.
 
Sid
Yeah, edit in your picture...
 
I already did
 
Sid
My paint skills are as horrible as it gets..
 
(I am modifying it in paint to make it a bit better though)
 
4:31 PM
use GIMP
paint is horrible
 
Sid
That's better. Only if you had edited in the lines to show all the squares, it would have been much better.
 
That's what I'm doing now
 
Would it sound weird to say that when the Clue series is over it won't actually end?
 
4:48 PM
@TheGreatEscaper Mike was really fast. I made an error my first time through and had to scrub a lot to get back to a consistent point, but even without that it took me not much under an hour to test solve that sudoku.
 
@Volatility how's progress?
 
Sid
Yeah, I am surprised he got it that fast.
 
@Mithrandir I would have credited you for that answer except I was actually pretty sure mine was going to be wrong too :)
 
Hmm. Interesting. Waiting for an overseas call from the US Congress ;)
 
Sid
Wow, @Rubio I am surprised the Times hasn't got any downvotes yet. And only 51 people have paid for it so far. You need to up your game to get more people to pay for it. :P
 
4:54 PM
It looks too professional for downvotes
 
I'm surprised nobody's at least gotten the decoding yet
 
there you go @Sid picture edit all done :P
 
At this point every clue I could give without outright telling someone what it is, is in there
 
And then you'd be stealing, because you didn't just not pay, you stole someone else's upvote that they gave.
 
I'm kind of fond of the color blind version :)
 
Sid
4:57 PM
As payment and gratitude for your services, I would upvote some of your posts. :P
 
I suppose? Didn't really do it for rep
 
That's against the rules
Vote for the post, not the person
 
Yeah, @Sid. Don't do that.
 
Sid
I know, but still..
 
(I was thinking that too but wasn't sure)
 
4:58 PM
@Mithrandir not if they're good posts
 
23 secs ago, by Mithrandir
Vote for the post, not the person
 
Sid
Fine, I would upvote some good posts, which I haven't upvoted yet..
 
@TrojanByAccident If he thinks it's a good post he probably already upvoted :P
 
@Mithrandir If they are posts that he would upvote anyway, but maybe just didn't see
 
Also, aaaaaand Deusovi out of the woodwork!
 
Sid
5:00 PM
Yeah, I leave many posts to be upvoted and then forget to upvote them..
 
Yep, got back from the Hunt last night! :D
 
I never even looked at it, much as I expected to do.
 
Has anyone gotten a tag badge yet?
 
That's for answering isn't it?
 
yes
I have a score of 79 in answers in
 
5:01 PM
Yep I have one
 
Yeah, I don't answer much lol. I doubt I'm remotely close to any of them.
 
So let's see if I get a tag badge on Puzzling or SFF first :P
 
Second is more helpful to you @Mithrandir
 
I have one on each
 
Sid
5:02 PM
@BeastlyGerbil Did you ever look at the puzzle that I sent you? Because, if not, you are free to answer it..
 
@Sid sorry, I didn't have the time
 
i've got bronze for riddle, rhyme, and ... oddly ... math
 
I won't answer it though. Some people could say I've already looked at it
 
@dcfyj Hang on, why is it showing the bronze tag badge there? I have one of those
 
5:03 PM
I've got riddle, rhyme and wordplay
 
I have a riddle tag badge on puzzling, that's it
 
And so close to cipher. Just need 6 more answers
 
And a Harry Potter tag badge on Scifi
 
@Mithrandir It might be showing mine... not sure
 
I've actually nearly got silver riddle
 
5:05 PM
@dcfyj no, even if I go manually
heads to Puzzling Meta
 
The closest I am to any given bronze tag badge is 6 questions (aka I need 14 more, not counting the overall score) >.<
 
One week until i get Fanatic. whee!
 
Until you forget to log in on day 99
 
Congrats in advance
 
5:07 PM
You really been here that long?
 
@dcfyj I forgot on 94 once
 
@Mithrandir we're head to head here :P
 
That long. That short. 100 days flies. :)
 
I've visited 163 days consectutive...
308 days overall
 
Hmm, that tag badge thing on unearned is network-wide...
 
5:08 PM
I usually don't get on on the weekends so it's a hard one for me to get
 
> visited 152 days, 63 consecutive
^me here
 
@dcfyj even just flicking open the app and then closing it counts :P
 
> visited 256 days, 63 consecutive
^me SFF
Oh but wait
If you have a userscript it makes it much easier
 
My current count
> visited 185 days, 1 consecutive
 
Why didn't that quote?
 
5:09 PM
99 more to go :P
 
There's another use case for this script. The retrieval of the flag summary counts as a site visit for the Enthousiast & Fanatic badges. You just have to visit the global flag summary once a day. — Glorfindel Jan 11 at 8:33
 
< visited 107 days, 93 consecutive
 
0
Q: WikiHop - The Wikipedia Encyclopedia game

MelkorThis is a little puzzle based on the Wikipedia game which my friend showed me. All you need is a device with internet connection. The aim is to find a way from one Wikipedia page to another using links. Example Q&A: Q: Minecraft -> Sweden A: Minecraft (https://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

 
> visited 107 days, 93 consecutive
> visited 185 days, 1 consecutive
Huh
It quoted them for me
But not for dc
 
> It's probably because I used Shift+Enter :P
 
5:12 PM
yeah, shift+enter kills formatting
 
**test**
*more test*
 
annoying, isn't it
 
What's annoying is this chatflag bug
The Comics proposal on Area 51 died, I restarted it
 
@Mithrandir the click to star/unstar?
 
@TrojanByAccident no
 
5:16 PM
That WikiHop "puzzle" is, at best, just going to end with a bunch of people tied at the same hop count.
 
Yeah...
 
@TrojanByAccident When a user flags a message, every 10k user on the network is notified. It shows up as a blue number on your avatar. But there's a bug that keeps showing flags when there are none.
 
I'm really sure if it's a fit for this site either
 
@Mithrandir oh
@dcfyj same. I kinda want to flag it, but I can't find a fitting flag
 
hi @Deusovi
 
5:17 PM
Hey BG!
 
Yeah, there's bugs like that for actual review numbers, too, that show up once you're a certain rep.
 
vlq maybe?
 
I VTC'ed it as "too broad" because it's not going to have a single answer.
 
@Khale_Kitha not a bug
 
@TrojanByAccident Not flagworthy - it's not an exceptional case.
 
5:18 PM
So it's been argued, Mith, but I was able to prove that wrong
 
@Deusovi hmm
 
@Khale_Kitha After 10k, that number shows the total number of review items that have not been completed yet.
 
Yep, I know
 
Oh never mind, you're still too low rep to VTC. Yeah, go ahead and flag.
 
Everything else is cahcing
 
5:19 PM
Not when 6 other people can confirm it =D
 
I'm going to be watching @Deusovi's profile page all day today now
 
the annoying thing about flat chags, is they stay there till you click them but by that time they've been reviewed anyway
 
@Rubio Creeper :P
 
@Rubio ...Any particular reason why?
 
Yes?
 
5:20 PM
Oh cool, I'm nearly at 30 kilorep!
 
Yup. :)
 
kilorep? Interesting naming convention
 
I like it
 
I said if the Times wasn't solved before you hit 30k I'd change the TidBits to add your 30k Club welcome
Looks like I'm gonna have to :)
 
You should CamelCase it @Deusovi :P
 
5:21 PM
or pascal to follow many conventions :P
kRep =D
 
...why?
 
Why not is the real question :P
 
Because of SI standards.
@Khale_Kitha Pascal is a unit already. We need to name the unit of reputation after someone else known for doing a lot of work with reputation...
Let's call it a Skeet! :P
 
CamelCase is a standard...
 
Not for units.
 
5:22 PM
pascal is a naming convention, hehe
 
I have 13.9 Skeet :P
 
It is for variables and kilorep could be considered one :P
 
How? That's a unit, not a variable.
 
1000 rep ^^
Stop thinking Math and think programming already :P
 
...You mean you use variables like litre in your code? I do not want to read code written by you.
 
5:24 PM
What's wrong with having litres (or liters) as a variable?
float litre = 30;
^ is perfectly acceptable and viable.
 
Because you're not measuring "litre". You're measuring "volume".
float volume = 30 would make much more sense.
 
True, but if it's a container that has measurements of litres on it I would probably say something like litresInBottle.
 
python 2: `volume = 30L`
problem solved
 
@Will Isn't that L for "long"? :P
 
Yes.
 
5:26 PM
sub liters_to_quarts($) {
my($liters)=@_;
my $quarts=1.05669*$liters;
return $quarts;
}
 
@dcfyj Why not volBottle (or volumeInBottle)?
 
I'm pretty sure using "volume" there would be silly :)
 
@Rubio ew, one-liners
 
@Rubio volInQuarts and volInLitres would be much better.
 
liters would be a perfectly acceptable name for the example case, because it would have likely been a constant
1000 rep being a constant value for the var
 
5:27 PM
I'd only use units as 'variables' if they were constants.
 
I've started a debate!
 
/end
 
@Rubio That's infinitely easier to read
 
and I don't want to hear about my indentation. THAT IS HOW TO INDENT. END. OF. DISCUSSION. :)
 
@Rubio PUTTING BRACES ON THE SAME LINE AS FUNCTION NAMES IS HERESY
 
5:28 PM
aww. it ate the indents anyway :(
 
ew poor indentation :P
 
Also, you have no indents :P
 
@Deusovi HAVE AT YOU
 
@Deusovi This.
 
@Deusovi Yeah, I like to completely separate mine, makes it easier to read
 
5:29 PM
Yeah! You can see where the { and }s match up!
 
Yup
 
Nope. Will never do that. Can't stand it :)
 
Makes it much easier to fix brace errors when they occur. Everything is nice and vertically aligned.
 
Don't you have to do indentations in python anyhow?
 
5:30 PM
Though if you have an addon that shows little lines on the side, that helps, too
 
You see? That's the right way to do it.
 
danged browser locking up
 
Nope. Not gonna do it. :)
 
@Khale_Kitha or you can use ctrl+[
 
lol
doesn't do anything
Bah, restarting browser.
 
5:31 PM
If your editor doesn't let you find matching braces, get a new editor.
 
user image
3
 
Select the brace and do that (or ]) I always forget which it is
 
@Will looks fine to me :P
 
@Will Lol. I love that post
 
lol Will
Death to that code style.
 
5:32 PM
@Khale_Kitha I'm guessing whoever wrote that is used to python
 
"I will write in Python, in any language I am given. Nyah!"
 
or even
if (n == 0)
System.out.println(String.valueOf(a))
 
Rubio, why not? Can you tell me what possible visual or practical advantage making braces share space with the line above can give?
 
I've just kept out of those because this is a new language to me. Literally :P
 
lol
 
5:33 PM
What is?
 
I think BG's saying that they've never coded.
 
I have but only in python and html
 
@BeastlyGerbil Basically the point is that Rubio is wrong about everything. That's all you need to know.
7
Ah, alright
 
@Deusovi Personally I find the extra whitespace visually distracting, and it eats an extra line of screen real estate for the start of every block to very minimal benefit
 
Oh, it's not too bad. most languages you can pretty much just read normally now-a-days
ew html
 
5:34 PM
I learnt it for the site
 
ew html :P
 
@Rubio But you don't mind the extra whitespace at the end of a block, or the "eating an extra line of screen real estate" there? At least be consistent.
 
lol
 
No because there it concludes a "paragraph". It feels semantically right.
I didn't say I was consistent, or even sensible. But there are lots of people who agree. Go figure. :)
 
5:35 PM
Basically Rubio doesn't mind endings, but beginnings are a no-no :P
 
Sure, and those people are all heretics.
 
:)
Also I use vim, fine. Pedants.
 
@Deusovi If you can get a copy of Code Complete, you should check out chapter 31 :)
 
Aww, my book's at home - no fun, Will
 
5:37 PM
hehe, I found that page too
 
hehe
 
oh good - ioccc.org is coming back in 2017
 
I win :P
 
I'd be inclined to argue that jelly is more annoying.
 
Everything I learned about coding and indentation style I learned from the IOCCC. :)
 
5:38 PM
Seeing how I saw a SE post about how to do something that 'requires' 10 lines of code in C# done in 2 characters
lol
 
@Rubio So clearly they're wrong :P
 
@Rubio I can tell. :P
 
sorry 5 characters
3
A: How many minimum days will he take to complete N units of work?

DennisJelly, 5 bytes ×4’½Ḟ This uses a closed form of @KennyLau's approach. Try it online! or verify all test cases. Due to a lucky coincidence, Ḟ is overloaded as floor/real for real/complex numbers. This is one of the only three overloaded atoms in Jelly. How it works ×4’½Ḟ Main link. Argument...

 
@Deusovi (hehe. That was a straight line just for you :)
 
haha this one
3
A: Obfuscation Challenge

german_guyMalbolge I'd say that it can't get anymore obfuscated than Malbolge ;) (=<`:9876Z4321UT.-Q+*)M'&%$H"!~}|Bzy?=|{z]KwZY44Eq0/{mlk** hKs_dG5[m_BA{?-Y;;Vb'rR5431M}/.zHGwEDCBA@98\6543W10/.R,+O<

 
Sid
5:43 PM
Gareth's CCCC still not solved.... @Deusovi @Rubio Solve that now...
 
Some say that when Malbolge is finally understood, the earth will crack open and we will all be enslaved to work a giant assembly line replacing its core with a chewy nougat center. p.s. We ask that users tag their answers as community wiki, and link to the source, when the work is not their own. Thanks!! — Jonathan Van Matre Mar 14 '14 at 14:38
lol
 
I saw that haha
The funny thing is, it has to be understood by a person, because that person made it in the first place :P
 
That's a big assumption :P
 
@dcfyj Nah, they found it buried in an ancient tomb along with some inscription. Something about eternal torment.
 
It's a pretty sad day when you don't undterstand your own creation...
 
5:46 PM
Maybe it really means: "Bing Tiddle Tiddle Bong."
Anyone have any ideas for Hugh's rebus?
 
@Rubio Don't do that, just make another issue
 
@dcfyj The guy who created it has never written a program in it. It took two years for someone to actually write one, and it took a heuristic search algorithm to do even that.
 
Yeah, I just saw that
Just ran accross this great hing
LOLCODE is an esoteric programming language inspired by lolspeak, the language expressed in examples of the lolcat Internet meme. The language was created in 2007 by Adam Lindsay, researcher at the Computing Department of Lancaster University. The language is not clearly defined in terms of operator priorities and correct syntax, but several functioning interpreters and compilers exist. One interpretation of the language has been proven Turing-complete. == Language structure and examples == LOLCODE's keywords are drawn from the heavily compressed (shortened) patois of the lolcat Internet meme....
 
hahahaha
 
o_O
 
5:53 PM
The examples are pretty funny
 
@Mithrandir I'd actually consider doing a semi-regular Times format, but I know repetition tends to get tired quickly and I wouldn't want to run it into the ground.
 
Related projects, "ArnoldC ...[which]... replaces lolspeak with quotes from different Arnold Schwarzenegger movies"
 
lol this example:
HAI 1.2
CAN HAS STDIO?
I HAS A VAR
IM IN YR LOOP
UP VAR!!1
VISIBLE VAR
IZ VAR BIGGER THAN 10? KTHX
IM OUTTA YR LOOP
KTHXBYE
 
So what does the following code do, dcfyj?
 
@Rubio Just make sure that the puzzle is different each time. Maybe format as a magazine instead of a newspaper and have multiple pages :P
 
5:54 PM
OH NOES!1!!1!!!1ELEVENN!!
 
Woo Literature launches tomorrow
Everyone have their example questions ready? :P
 
Sounds like a category of love poetry ;)
"Woo Literature"
 
o_O
 
lol
COME WITH ME IF YOU WANT TO LIVE
YOU SET US UP
I'LL BE BACK
 
 
I still think this wins
 
@Will Don't make me create buffalo-lang.org
 

« first day (978 days earlier)      last day (2681 days later) »