« first day (1190 days earlier)      last day (3446 days later) » 

12:31 AM
0
Q: Do we need more reviewers?

fredsbendI was not logged in for some reason (maybe the cookie expired or something) when I click my bookmark to the C.SE review queue. This is what I saw: This is all the review tasks that are available for anyone who hasn't done them yet. Once logged in, they all say zero tasks available for me. Wha...

 
 
6 hours later…
6:26 AM
0
Q: Why was ;What is the biblical definition of marriage put on hold?

HelloThe reason given was that the question was unclear, how is this question unclear?

 
 
10 hours later…
3:58 PM
0
Q: What to do when it is not clear which denomination to ask?

kutschkemThe question Is theodicy considered an open problem or a solved one, according to catholicism? was originally formulated without the denomination restriction. The reason behind it is that I don't know which denominations to ask to get the answer I am looking for. The basic question is: Why is the...

 
 
5 hours later…
8:29 PM
@MattGutting: hi are you here, how did you set the link exactly?
 
I'm here :-)
@Hello I have a bit of time for the discussion
 
howdy -interesting idea on Jesus' baptism being a Jewish one, I will investigate further, but I know the mikveh was also used by a woman about to be married on her wedding day and it has spiritual signifigance
 
Hm, okay. I think one of the problems is the word "baptism" itself; since it's Greek, we don't see it in a Jewish context in the Old Testament
 
@MattGutting - I think Jesus was showing his 'go the second mile' in his commitment to God, by being baptized or immersed in water, mikveh
@MattGutting how do you set the link to discuss from that page to here?
 
@Hello That's more or less the Catholic idea - although they might say he's showing his commitment to the people of God.
@Hello Making links. What you do is put the text of the link (like "Link Here") in square brackets, and immediately afterwards put the address in parentheses - so it looks like
[Link Here]( linkhere ) except without the spaces in the parentheses
 
8:35 PM
@Matt what about 'confirming his purity' before God since this is one of the meanings of the jewish immersion in water
 
@Hello I don't know about that.
Do you think that's why John was baptizing?
 
@MattGutting so, on the former page you would put (upper room) in parantheses?
@MattGutting or (The Upper Room)
 
@Hello You might say [ upper room ]( chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/1167/the-upper-room ) without the spaces. Try it :-)
 
why is there a 1 inside my name on the type bar
is there another hello or something
I think John was doing his jewish prophet thing of calling the people back to God, only in this scenario because of where John was, on the brink of Jesus and the new cov. he was 'preparing the way for Christ', by calling,
@MattGutting John was baptizing a 'baptism of repentance from sin and turning to God', but he did it as a prophet of the old cov., there was no new cov. at this point in time even though the 'lamb could be see, visually'
the lamb had not yet taken away the sins of the world
 
@Hello One thing at a time :-) First ...
There's a "1" inside your name because there is 1 new statement addressed directly to you (with your username in it).
Second ...
He was preaching a baptism of repentance; that's why he was reluctant to baptize Jesus. But Jesus wanted this "for the fulfillment of righteousness" (or something like that, I don't remember the wording). What do you think that means?
 
8:51 PM
@MattGutting - only Jesus would not have to repent, and He had no original sin, I do not think, because of 'Adam 2' , so perhaps he 'went the second mile', although it wasn't needed to showed his attitude of always doing right by immersing anyway, the mikveh can be a commitment to God immersion, John called the people to turn wholeheartedly to God, and Jesus was wholehearted so the immersing in water could signify this,...or
@Matt John had a true message from God in his call, It was actually the Father calling through John so Jesus naturally responded with his 'Yes' that he always gave to the Father's will, Jesus heard the Father in John's call and naturally answered, yes I will.
Jesus could be seen in this as leading the way to God, affirming that John's call was right and was from God, and JEsus' actions showed he agreed wholeheartedly with it
something to that effect...what you do think
 
@Hello Question I've never thought about before: Do we have any evidence about how long John continued baptizing after he baptized Jesus?
 
@MattGutting none from gospels that I can think of right away,..other sources I don't know
@are you saying after John baptized Jesus, he may have stopped?
 
@Hello I like this last suggestion. - hangon something came up at work
 
@MattGutting I have to go now too, something did come to mind, later in the gospels I recall something to the effect that the disciples of John left him and followed Jesus instead, not en masse, but it was a few, and something about finding those bapt. with the baptiz of John and rebaptizing them into Christ, ...after their John baptism nice chatting, hope to talk again, can you add your info here and can I read it later on? hope so
 
By the way, did you know that you can link your reply to my statement? Hover over my last comment and you'll see it highlight the statement of yours that I'm replying to. Useful thing to do in chat.
@Hello If I tag your name on a comment here, you'll see it in the notification bar on the main site, just like if it appears in a comment on the main site. Get to it when you can.
 
9:05 PM
@Matt ok can u leave me what u think our topics of disc. mean? bye for now
@Matt not sure what you instructed me re highlight, etc. and what it does,..im green
 
@Hello We'll talk later when you have more time :-)
 
9:45 PM
@MattGutting You can preformat text by putting it inside tic marks. [link text](link)
That exactly is:
`[link text](link)`
@Hello Most of the formatting on the main sites works in chat too: christianity.stackexchange.com/editing-help
Some cool auto things with links though.
A link to in image in a chat message by itself:
Wikipedia:
The domestic cat (Felis catus or Felis silvestris catus) is a small, usually furry, domesticated, and carnivorous mammal. It is often called a housecat when kept as an indoor pet, or simply a cat when there is no need to distinguish it from other felids and felines. Cats are often valued by humans for companionship, and their ability to hunt vermin and household pests. Cats are similar in anatomy to the other felids, with strong, flexible bodies, quick reflexes, sharp retractable claws, and teeth adapted to killing small prey. Cat senses fit a crepuscular and predatory ecological niche. Cats can...
The permalink of a former chat message:
1 min ago, by fredsbend
Some cool auto things with links though.
A post on any SE site:
7
Q: How can I teach my kitten not to steal the other kitten's food?

bee.cattI have two kittens, not from the same litter. The older kitten is 5 months old, and I have had her for 3 months. The younger kitten (not even half the size) is 3 months old and I have had her for 2 months. The older kitten was already quite a bit bigger than the younger kitten when the younger ki...

Bold = **Bold**
Italics = *Italics*
Link text = [Link text](http://link.com)
> A quoted message = > A quoted message
Preformatted text = `Preformatted text`
`escape special characters` = \`escape special characters\`
 
all hail the cat pictures
 
Isn't that first one the best!?
One more thing. You can
enter multiple
lines in a message
by holding shift then
hitting enter.
It will auto-overflow eventually.
@Hello Click the dropdown arrow to the left of a message when hovering over it for message options. One of them is reply
That links the messages. Now you can click the grey "reply message" arrow on the left of the above message to see what it refers to.
 
 
1 hour later…
11:19 PM
@fredsbend- hi fred, how r u tonight, or today, depending on where u r, where are you exactly?
@fredsbend I see your pic just dropped into room, ru there fred?
@fredsbend, are you in chat, fred? how r u?
 

« first day (1190 days earlier)      last day (3446 days later) »