@Flimzy I think Christianity has way fewer localized/specialized terms than Judaism. Not sure about Islam. My trouble with that site is that they don't seem too concerned with post quality. They're both just okay most of the time, and off-putting the rest of the time.
See two of the three recently questions have this issue. 12 I've never heard of those things.
To be fair, I think most of the Islam quality problems are because most of them are ESL speakers.
@FMS the problem with using this link as an explanation of the Church's position on Christ as God and Man is that it explains what we believe, whereas the question is asking why what we don't believe is wrong. Different emphasis.
@FMS It does; but it looked to me like the question is not "Do Christians believe X, and why?" (which is what the Catechism answers), but rather "Do any Christians believe Z, and why not?"
I was reading this: The Human Knowledge of Christ. Just thinking the OP question is an error that has been tackled before. I may need to digest it some more.
It is an error, or at least potentially. It seems to me that the OP is asking whether it's more reasonable to believe that Jesus was adopted (see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adoptionism) than that he was born the Son of God.
My thinking, in line with this site criteria, that to answer the question, first point out the errors then proceed to the Catholic perspective. You had good foresight.
Well as @fredsbend said, this can't be answered without a denomination scope. Because there might be some denominations who hold to this belief; I can't answer for them and Catholicism; and I'm not going to be able to give the Catholic belief without a lot of discussion which is based on the idea that his question is inaccurate.
@MattGutting Well said. PS saw my comment on your answer to annihilation. There seemed to be a contradiction.
*or they are material, and then they continue to exist, at least in matter, which is incorruptible, since it is the subject of generation and corruption. Is there a mistake here?
Thanks! Gotta get kids to school. Thanks for the invite here and chat. Don't understand stating incorruptible and the proceeding to say since subject of [...] corruption.
@MattGutting Very good. And Btw I had already weighed in with a vote.
@MattGutting Glad you clarified that that was Aquinas' thinking because current thinking after Einstein is Mass + Energy conservation. Aquinas' is matter conservation.