The 2nd Monitor

General discussion about codereview.stackexchange.com - Welcom...
Jan 7, 2019 00:45
Based on the questions I've seen I think I should be able to make good contributions. Time will tell :)
Jan 7, 2019 00:39
True
Jan 7, 2019 00:37
I see it as a win-win-win. I get to keep myself sharp, users get to (hopefully) get helpful tips to improve their coding skills, and this site gets good activity and content that hopefully spurs more activity and content.
Jan 7, 2019 00:34
@bruglesco Thank you, @bruglesco. I'm hoping to be a regular here.
 

Charcoal HQ

Where smoke is detected, diamonds are made, and we break thing...
Jul 25, 2017 15:07
@Mithrandir Ahh. I saw the message above it which did not apply to us.
Jul 25, 2017 14:29
@Mithrandir Not sure why I was mentioned in this comment. I'm not a moderator at that site.
Sep 2, 2016 14:03
Will do, thanks!
Sep 2, 2016 14:02
They did post it again about an hour later, too, which only proved without a doubt they are trying to spam
Sep 2, 2016 14:02
In a nutshell I originally removed the link because the question was valid otherwise and the link wasn't presented in a spammy way. But after they re-added it, and it was pointed out that they had done this elsewhere, I removed their question altogether because at that point it was clear it was spam.
Sep 2, 2016 13:59
@Yvette Sorry for the delay in getting here. But I technically should be working. :)
 

 Webmasters

Chat discussion for Webmasters Stack Exchange -- Feel free to ...
Oct 19, 2015 14:23
Been a lot of spam on this site within the last 48 hours. If anyone sees a spammy link please flag it as spam so we can clean it up.
Mar 11, 2015 17:09
@ChrisW I see that. Looks like Stephen gave a good response.
Mar 10, 2015 15:14
Maybe the Workplace but you should ask in their chat or meta before posting there just to be sure your queation is ok.
Feb 14, 2015 18:38
@Wyck I just reverted the migration before you posted. I'll close i there as it doesn't work here, either. Thanks for reaching out via chat. :)
Feb 14, 2015 18:20
@Wyck Would you like me to revert the migration?
Jan 31, 2015 14:14
@closetnoc You're right about Linux. A control panel here could be useful especially if someone is not a Linux nerd, I mean, experienced with Linux. :)
Jan 30, 2015 20:36
@leepingpongpang Local dev environments are usually just enough to get the dev work and some testing done. There's usually no need to have robust tools to manage things since there isn't usually much to manage.
Jan 30, 2015 19:38
@leepingpongpang Sure. Why not? If that will help you keep things organized and makes things easier to manage, go for it.
Jan 30, 2015 13:54
@leepingpongpang What do you mean by "web panel"?
Jan 29, 2015 18:37
@w3d I now Stack Overflow recently changed their appearance. Maybe a change is in the works for us as well?
Jan 29, 2015 15:44
@w3d Can you post a screenshot? I am not seeing it.
Jan 20, 2015 14:07
@blade19899 Here's a question with some very basic info to start with.
Jan 16, 2015 19:07
@blade19899 In what ways are you hoping to learn? Are you trying to offer hosting services? Just want to learn about it in general so you can pick a good provider? Are you just trying to take maximum advantage of your current hosting?
Dec 17, 2014 01:22
@StephenOstermiller The secret hats seemed to have been flushed out quicker, too.
Dec 15, 2014 02:39
Hats are here!
3
Nov 29, 2014 14:44
The 301 redirect tells the search engines, and users, that the content has moved to a new permanent home and to update their records accordingly. This includes search engines rankings.
Nov 29, 2014 14:43
It's not that complicated. Just do a 301 redirect from the original URL to the new URL. Blogger doesn't offer you an .htaccess file to edit but they do expose a web interface to do this.
Nov 24, 2014 02:06
@dan What's funny is how I learned that is from Futurama. It's the apartment number for Bender. :)
Nov 23, 2014 14:08
Interesting fact, 1001001 is binary for the ascii $ symbol
Oct 27, 2014 11:40
They're crawling for vulnerabilities.
3
Oct 8, 2014 15:00
I say good riddance! Now maybe people will stop obsessing over their PR.
Sep 8, 2014 20:59
@w3d Worked for me
Jul 17, 2014 05:25
Apparently meta tags are all you need for good SEO. I can't believe people still believe this
Jul 9, 2014 00:46
@jonsca I am agreement with Stephen about it being too broad for Webmasters.
Jun 16, 2014 13:46
@blunders Unfortunately, outside of chat, I don't think there is a SE site that this would fit into. Generally looking for expertise or advice is not the goal of SE. You might want to consider asking this in Meta SE to see if they have ideas there as that would get you the definitive answer to this. There are so many sites now that one might be suitable that I am simply not aware of.
Jun 12, 2014 12:45
@blunders Unfortunately this is an area outside of my expertise. I've never actually built websites to be money makers. I know that sounds weird but its true! But I am sure others who frequent this site have built sites for this purpose and can shed some light on this for both of us.
May 26, 2014 18:14
Maybe someone tried to access them and had a Google toolbar or other tracking software installed?
May 9, 2014 18:48
@StephenOstermiller Congratulations!
May 7, 2014 18:52
@w3d Yeah. Someone shared the url somewhere, for sure.
Apr 9, 2014 11:38
I don't know. I'm guessing it's a combination of factors that you mentioned.
Apr 8, 2014 00:30
@dan It seems to happen in cycles. Hopefully this is the start of a new one. I'd like to see this site busier and getting more attention on the Hot Network Questions sidebar.
Apr 7, 2014 19:07
Is it just me or does the site seem more active over the last week or so?
Mar 17, 2014 00:28
@dan My take on it is the same. And I think our room is now unfrozen.
Mar 10, 2014 13:23
@w3d You would think that would be standard operating procedure.
Feb 4, 2014 21:48
The software recommendation beta site is up and running. Let's see how this goes.
Feb 3, 2014 16:01
I would recommend posting on meta what canonical question you think needs to be made so it can be discussed first. We do that for all potential canonical questions to make sure they really are necessary.
Feb 3, 2014 16:00
Typically if there is a question that has good answers already in existence we just close the others as a duplicate and all new answers can go in there. If the question varies in scope (i.e. looking for web hosting), then a generic canonical question is usually made as then future questions are closed as duplicates of it.
Jan 31, 2014 16:57
@w3d That is a dedicated spammer.
Jan 27, 2014 20:08
@w3d Already committed. Although I expect it to be a train wreck I'm hopeful it can workout.