Doorknob

probably more than half of the "other" are of the kind you describe

30 of them are "too many comments (auto)", 24 of them are "other", and 14 of them are comment flags

i have had basically no time to handle flags since the other mods resigned (for unrelated life reasons)

there are 68 right now

surely answers should follow the specification as it's currently written - is there not precedent in the form of edits that invalidate answers taking advantage of unintentional loopholes?

@Jonah because of scoping -- the yy variable only exists within the pipe

@James mine would probably be [surround unimpaired targets easyalign]

lol

→ 6 messages moved to Trashcan

@Pavel unclear

from what i understand it hasn't been decided yet

@Fatalize not necessarily

@LuisMendo no worries!

done

it did not occur to me that the trivial solution would just work

yeah, i probably should use it more often

@flawr lol

of course :P

sure :)

indeed

@flawr i'm good friends with alex now and we've met up in person a few times

pretty sure this site is generally about low numbers being better :P

@cairdcoinheringaahing 6

ah

in the middle of something right now but i'll look over it more closely in a bit

@ngn from skimming it, at least one part of the description is wrong (adjectives come after nouns, not before) @cairdcoinheringaahing

@DJMcMayhem string literals can contain newlines, yes

ah

but it still produces the correct output :P

this just concatenates the empty string with that giant block of text with the empty string

@DJMcMayhem lol, ruby doesn't have a special meaning for """

@DJMcMayhem it seems like seeded prngs break this challenge

yes lol

i fixed today's smbc

@mbomb007 refusing to use someone's pronouns isn't respectful

@ArBo you can shorten this by abusing a gcc implementation detail

woah, javascript has native arbitrary precision integers now?

not that i can find

hmm... now all challenges that involve printing an uncountable set are impossible

@JohnDvorak just output {{1,2,3,4,... and claim that once it's done with that one it'll output the rest :)

@Fatalize publishing the transcripts would be personally harmful to several people. lots of the discussion was very personal and the people who participated did so under the assumption of privacy.

@A_ you've been warned before; please stop sending large numbers of meaningless messages in chat

→ 27 messages moved to Trash

@curiousdannii huh, really? i'm 95% sure that i've been "taught" this at some point in an english class

prescriptively the latter, but both are correct

predicate nominative :P

@cairdcoinheringaahing this is also correct

@ngn this is correct

← 27 messages moved from The Nineteenth Byte