I love coming up with a question, looking for and failing to find an answer, posting it, and only THEN being shown a similar enough question to give me my answer after I've already made myself look like an idiot lol
@doppelgreener I see your point, and yeah, I agree that's a tangent but it does answer the question. I'm not sure their example is necessarily needed though. And I can't imagine that situation occurring and the DM allowing the player to get their spell slot back if they actually cast it, nor allow the bard to take their thing back
:55027157 I wanna say yes since it's just a force but also wanna say no cus "can perform simple tasks that a human servant could do" a human servant can't fly
@Cerberus Right, that's kinda why I was looking for a better way to word it. But seems ultimately there's no way to connect both with your for a single object
Well my question is how do you properly reference an object with with owner being the word "both"? ie "this is both your home". Would it be homes, home, or another word? I know rewording to avoid this situation is the easy answer but is there a correct way to say this. For context a friend of mine said this to me and another friend and it didn't look right so I was trying to see what was actually right