M--

@Berthold I am not raising this concern lightly.

I am absolutely concerned about them having access to my PII: meta.stackexchange.com/q/149636

They seem to be in dire need of some reading. Reading up on the consensus/meta, both here on Magento and MSE, reading up on the established norms, and I regret to say, even the CoC.

@MurtuzaZabuawala well, that's for accepting the agreement which considers some circumstances (as the answer points out, a vacation). Being active and actively moderating (~30 min, or 1 hr as you said, per day requirement) is a different story. And that's just handling the flags and whatnot.

I should've submitted some edits to get to 150, I just didn't think it matters

81 votes, that's just sad :(

@GeneralGrievance Magento is definitely one of those sites. I seriously hope you get to be elected and bring some order to this community and educate folks. Posting AI, committing voting fraud, spamming, sock puppetry, lack of basic understanding of the network rules, and absence of meaningful communications, even amongst the most "seasoned" members, is really concerning. Besides hoping for some order, I can only wish for the fire not to spread. Good luck.

@Spevacus no worries, thanks. If anything, it lead me to investigating that user, finding other type of issues.

p.s.2. which later got the proper disclosure.

p.s. although they did post this new answer which includes a link without proper disclosure

@Spevacus I don't understand why this is tpu: metasmoke.erwaysoftware.com/post/579183? Am I missing something?

@Cow why is this one tpu: metasmoke.erwaysoftware.com/post/577992? Their answer with multiple links to their website is still up. :/ But I dunno what's the issue with that question.

@Anerdw thanks, that's when it matters the most, especially considering that 2-rep limit will probably go away around that time.

Does anyone have a timeline on when API for Discussions will be functional? cc:@Makyen

@tripleee thank you for keeping us accountable :) p.s. don't you love it when your flight is delayed 4 times to the point that you'll definitely be missing your meeting, so there is no point in going... thanks United!

@tripleee I let you take it from here :) I will be on a flight tmrw, but am available to discuss more tmrw night

I am already heading to bed, but it's possible that I have reported as spam prematurely, was looking into the user and they have had multiple plagiarized VLQ answers and in my mind it just registered that they're trying to get views for their (allegedly) channel. Need to look into it in the morning a bit more, but I apologize for the inconvenience (should've waited till I was sure)

while it is annoying to see "Failed to get Metasmoke URLs" everywhere, I am sure putting up with comcast is much worse :( thanks for dealing with that

^^^ same

here: i.sstatic.net/3HNS3.png with AIM and cannot access MS

OK, so there must be an issue on my end or an unrelated matter

@ThomasWard any updates?

thank you ^__^

@ThomasWard OK, I was freaking out :D

@Glorfindel I am not following... It's asking for clarification in the second part which should be a comment. First part says I am the developer and I am shocked that you have this problem, definitely not an answer; even as a comment it would just be cluttering the site. Why you're not comfortable with NAA?

@SmokeDetector @Glorfindel are you sure about fp?

@Makyen not quite, we still need you to say it once again so next time we can quote you three times instead of two :D

@Glorfindel @RobertColumbia based on the quote above from Makyen, we should give feedback on manually reported posts. Only not on your own reports. Problem solved.

@Glorfindel I think you got it wrong (or maybe it's me). @RobertColumbia isn't asking if we should add a feedback on our own report. They are asking generally if there should be any feedback on manually reported posts. Which I'm almost sure there should be. But your point is right. It's better that the user reporting it avoid giving feedback as well.

@RobertColumbia I really doubt so, because I've seen them sending feedback on the manual reports themselves but sure we can bother @Makyen and ask'em if we should or we should not add feedback to manually reported posts.

@RobertColumbia I am not aware of that rule (any reference?). Besides, I wasn't comfortable with the language and marked as rude. Different feelings among different people :)

any improvements are welcome :)

that's cool

thanks for the response/explanation

and now the challenges, I personally am just holding a tab on the stuff there, and removing spam and r/a stuff (and occasional egregious aigc), but it is in dire need of moderation, even for an experiment

I was asking because I initially warned that staff won't have the capacity to moderate: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/408998/… same as what happened with Discussions

@Spevacus That's good to hear

@Spevacus have you received meaningful support from staff re moderating the lobby?

Obviously I am not asking to evaluate every post, but rather wanna know if that can be a sensible edit as we come across such posts.

A lot of times I come across an older script that is (sounds) useful but I find out it is not working anymore only after installing it.

@rene I was wondering if it makes sense to or edit generic phrases to the title of questions (scripts and apps) that are no longer maintained or do not work due to the changes to the system or maybe are not needed because an FR was implemented, e.g. Orphaned, Broken, Obsolete, etc.? I thought about closing too, but that has more long-term effects (what if someone wants to maintain it now?! flagging for reopening is just more work).

learnt something new today :)

@Makyen wait, why do I see a diamond besides your name here?

@Makyen should the post be deleted then? I just cannot imagine any legit use case for that userscript

is this a legit userscript: stackapps.com/questions/6599/roomba-vtz-vote-to-zero? it promotes voting to trigger roomba without considering content of the question/answer(s).

:/

@natty alive

@natty fetch count

@Natty send tp tp tp tp tp