Vincent Thacker

!!/report stackoverflow.com/a/79714946

!!/addblu superuser.com/users/2980527

!!/addblu superuser.com/users/2980528

!!/addblu superuser.com/users/2979161

!!/addblu superuser.com/users/2980432

!!/addblu superuser.com/users/2980403

!!/addblu superuser.com/users/2980440

!!/addblu worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/users/133436

!!/addblu superuser.com/users/2974638

!!/addblu superuser.com/users/2974636

!!/addblu superuser.com/users/2973023

!!/addblu superuser.com/users/2973000

@SmokeDetector Plagiarized verbatim from existing answer on the same question

@SmokeDetector The user answered the same question 15 hours ago which was deleted by a mod for NAA, and this new answer contains a copy of that previous answer, starting from the text This post is hidden. to the end. The preceding text is new. Anyway the entire thing looks AI-generated due to the dashes and symbols used.

!!/location

!!/report stackoverflow.com/a/79704539 "another gibberish table"

!!/report stackoverflow.com/a/79703176 "gibberish"

@SmokeDetector Spam link and phone number posted by OP in a comment on the post, rather than the post itself

!!/report superuser.com/q/1910903

!!/master

@Cow Hi! Haven't seen you in a while

!!/report superuser.com/q/1909853

!!/addblu stackoverflow.com/users/30155645

Alright sounds good

We've also had a handful of posts that had a similar style but later determined to be TP

I'm not sure, honestly

@VLAZ That's why I said "might"

@metasmoke @VLAZ I think this might be TP, it has been flagged and deleted as spam

!!/report serverfault.com/q/1188766

!!/report physics.stackexchange.com/q/855410 "same persistent troll who always posts is useful"

!!/allspam superuser.com/users/2951237

And has nothing to do with the scope of that SE site

@Spevacus Looks very spammy

!!/report stackoverflow.com/q/79694206

!!/report stackoverflow.com/a/79694198

@VLAZ "weere it posted with no offensive language, I'd have also marked it NAA rather than TP" That is certainly true. However, since it has no salvageable content, the way I interpreted it, TP supersedes NAA in the same way as it does for gibberish. Also there is zero impact since it is a 1-rep account

@VLAZ I think you're misunderstanding: "The word “salvaged” here means there would be something of value to the site after the offensive portion(s) were removed/rephrased", "If there’s no content to salvage, then tp- is appropriate—or tpu-"

@VLAZ There is nothing salvageable in that answer though

@SmokeDetector Possible troll, posted 3 low-quality answers in a short span of time with the first one being a R/A non-answer.

@SmokeDetector This is hilarious. The spammer copied a previous spam post.

!!/report serverfault.com/q/1188656

!!/standby Makyen/EC2-linux

!!/report stackoverflow.com/a/79692631

!!/standby Makyen/EC2-linux

!!/location

I cautiously agree. Getting suspended once for AI usage only to continue doing so is not a very good sign.

@naturallyInconsistent I agree. I hope it is not an attempt to use AI to farm rep.

And also here: physics.stackexchange.com/q/856026 especially in the last sentence (note the proper dashes and meaningless language).

I am fairly confident that the user has continued to post AI-generated content in their later edits, even after their initial suspension. See e.g. physics.stackexchange.com/q/856216.

@peterh But that doesn't prevent thinking about a hypothetical scenario.