Thinking Out Loud

While users are lurking, turtles, trucks and improper methods ...
Sep 30, 2024 18:43
hello
 

 The h Bar

General chat for Physics SE (physics.stackexchange.com). For M...
Apr 16, 2023 11:40
QFT has virtual particles. GR doesn't have such magical properties. So QFT>GR
Nov 3, 2022 23:10
What do you mean by transforming a 'function' from one frame to another?
Nov 2, 2022 02:53
@SillyGoose You can't learn Noether's theorem without knowing some classical mechanics.
Oct 30, 2022 19:08
I'm waiting for the day when virtual photons will be discovered at the LHC.
Oct 22, 2022 21:10
It depends on what problem you're talking about.
Oct 22, 2022 21:09
Certainly not. You're on earth, right?
Oct 22, 2022 21:06
Observations show that the expansion of the universe is accelerating, such that the velocity at which a distant galaxy recedes from the observer is continuously increasing with time. The accelerated expansion of the universe was discovered during 1998 by two independent projects, the Supernova Cosmology Project and the High-Z Supernova Search Team, which both used distant type Ia supernovae to measure the acceleration. The idea was that as type Ia supernovae have almost the same intrinsic brightness (a standard candle), and since objects that are further away appear dimmer, we can use the observed...
Oct 22, 2022 20:46
The curvature of the universe is sourced by every matter/energy present in it. This curvature is a local quantity, that is, it is time and position-dependent. de Sitter is the solution our universe asymptotes to at late times.
Oct 22, 2022 20:37
How are they different?
Oct 22, 2022 20:32
de Sitter :)
Oct 22, 2022 19:28
Hey physicists
Sep 17, 2022 08:44
Yes, I know.
Sep 17, 2022 08:43
I remember you being called sir a lot. I want to be called a sir too.
Sep 17, 2022 08:42
Hi John Rennie sir.
Sep 15, 2021 16:24
@MoreAnonymous Bogolyubov, Sheldon Glashow and Einstein. Seems like he always explicitly stated something he didn't like about other physicists (at least these 4, which are the ones I saw in that video).
Sep 15, 2021 00:46
@Slereah Gell-Mann was obviously an accomplished scientist, but I didn't really like his attitude towards other physicists. I went through snippets of his interview on youtube where he talks about other physicists, and he comes off as envious and vain.
Sep 13, 2021 21:25
Dyson, Gell-Mann, Weinberg, Hawking
Sep 13, 2021 21:25
We lost some giants in the last few years
Sep 13, 2021 21:14
for humans
Sep 13, 2021 21:13
lol
Sep 13, 2021 21:13
I have a similar feeling. Everything is consistent with GR. Not sure when we'll see the first deviation in any expt
Sep 13, 2021 21:12
the next decades belong to GW astronomy. Take this up, future grad students. Don't waste your hopes on quantum gravity
Sep 13, 2021 21:11
The only thing that I think is quite interesting is color-kinematics duality
Sep 13, 2021 21:10
idk where hep-th is going. Seems dormant as far as breakthroughs are concerned
Sep 13, 2021 21:08
SR is nice too
Sep 13, 2021 21:07
yeah I can imagine
Sep 13, 2021 21:06
you mean like Einstein's papers?
Sep 13, 2021 21:06
Nothing can beat GR as of yet. It's incredibly hard.
Sep 13, 2021 21:05
yeah I know
Sep 13, 2021 21:03
Gravity as an entropic force
Jun 18, 2021 13:06
@Korra That's tricky to answer and depends on the specific problem at hand. The 2 most general rules are to ensure that the background solution is recovered when the perturbation parameter is put to zero, and that successive perturbations (of whatever quantity you're computing) are smaller than the previous ones.
Jun 17, 2021 18:56
hi
Jun 10, 2021 14:37
no c++
Jun 10, 2021 14:37
long time
Jun 10, 2021 14:37
hey guys
May 30, 2021 04:42
yo
May 17, 2021 22:02
@BioPhysicist Relative to the current location, I suppose.
 
Mar 31, 2023 22:51
I think this old answer of mine might be of some use to you: physics.stackexchange.com/a/328294/133418
 
Nov 4, 2022 16:52
@RC_23 The Schwarzschild solution is a vacuum solution outside the source. It's the same thing as saying that the electrostatic field of an electron comes from solving Maxwell's equations outside the point charge: but there is obviously a point charge that sources the field. There is obviously a matter source for Schwarzschild as well. The origin is the singularity, however, and it is excluded from the domain of spacetime manifold under consideration. You can derive Schwarzschild by putting a non-zero, distributional source of some mass at the origin.
Nov 4, 2022 16:52
First of all, who says that the Schwarzschild black hole contains no mass?
 

 Problem Solving Strategies

General chat for high school physics. For MathJax see meta.sta...
Nov 2, 2022 02:54
I wanna be sir
Nov 2, 2022 02:50
I just searched for 'sir' in this chat and it found 12132 matches
May 11, 2021 08:22
@JohnRennie Hello!
May 11, 2021 08:21
John sir :D
 
Mar 29, 2021 14:50
This goes for anything in physics.
Mar 29, 2021 14:50
We need to make sure that the solution at hand is sufficiently general enough that it can be applied for the purposes we intend to use it for.
Mar 29, 2021 14:49
@Axionlikeparticles Like I mentioned, however, the problem has nothing to do with the higher derivative theory. You get the same Lorentzian -> Euclidean switch in linearized Schwarzschild, which is a solution of GR.
Mar 29, 2021 14:47
@Axionlikeparticles You will see it everywhere in physics. Taylor series expansion is the most powerful and widespread tool in physics.
Mar 29, 2021 14:46
Oh yeah, sorry, my bad. Yes, I meant 2Gm/r<<1.