independant film, one or two word title, sci fi, i think it takes places about a hundred years from now. i didt get to see much of it. i quit it because it wasnt a good time to watch it. I thought i would see a prompt for 'continue watching'
help finding a movie that is free on youtube? its a dystopian future after global (nuclear?) war that starts october 2022. my youtube history is off, besides i started watching it thru Roku.
@scottbb Oh certainly not wrong to ask on SU, it just got very little attention there. And I am far from having chutzpah to move it.. else I likely would have.
In Adobe Lightroom, I can pick a series of raw (DNG) pictures from my Mavic 2 Pro and create a panorama. Overall, Lightroom's photo merge does an amazing job in stitching panoramas like this one. I tried some other tools but still, Lightroom's results are the best (at least, in terms of color/lig...
It just occurred to me this is the more common vise grip species, not to be confused with the rarer vise-grip. The common vise grip over-teases its wing feathers to mimic the often overlooked hyphenated markings witnessed by plier watching enthusiasts.
@manassehkatz-Moving 2 Codidact also placing descriptive text that names the item in the image when the above text already named it is redundant. that is why "" is used. it tells screen reader software to skip over the image
instead of he image source as he alt text, a description like "reinforced metal plate affixed to brick wall with threaded rod and hexnut" or "decorative iron plate shaped like a gear affixed to wall... .. rod and hexnut
In that post you described the images fine. In which case the alt description isnt neceassry. i wondered why the link was placed there.. and i questioned the use of imagery that named something as 'stock photography'
A less likely possibility is that you're looking at the internal head of some foundation repairs, given this is inside a basement and therefore underground.
An older building may have had extra work done to install reinforcing against quake damage or subsidence. The round part would be a load s...
I want to speak mopre about that alt text since you still seem unsure of best procedure, but i came across an old answer of yours i was looking to edit .. but there was questions about it.
holy crap! people just dont really look at WHAT was edited, they assume a red box around an image means it was deleted. without reading the edit summary... how did these people get so many points?
With that new title that actually describes the item in simple terms, the ALT text can be "nullified" by changing "insert image description here" to "" (two double quotes with no space between them), screen reader software will see that and ignore it.
@criggie a simple description is ideal. "Gear puller", if the question was more specific like, what is the function of this device?, You might say "A gear puller often used to remove steering wheels and fan belt pulleys" Notice the new title?
@Criggie "place image description here" is a slap in the face to blind people. No indication of an image is better then saying "Oh here's an image to look at, sorry blind guy, you aren't included.
Okay so I did.. identification can be important. I would also expect people to be self policing. But, alas, it is true, people don't know how to Image search properly.
@NiallC. I would immediatley downvote a question like that. And thank you for removing unidentifiable tag. Did I suggest it? Or suggest a wiki for it? I don't have authroty to remove tags, only suggest edits toheir wikis.
Yea. im seeing that. they rejected my edit. (same issue, didn't see the edit in markdown) then left a comment that there image was a valid addition. then i explained the reason, and they said in so many words they cant be bothered with that.
@JourneymanGeek well hello sir. question. is it just me or are OP's even more obstinate on SU when it comes to image description suggested edits than the other sites?