Vochmelka

you

@Jasper Loy That's the same thing.

I'm highest paid janitor in Alberta.

Happy leasehand, happy lease, they say.

And I'm a rig worker. Probably the only one using LaTeX.

I'm bald.

nerds

which is not a prejudice

Speaking of the word prejudice, I think it is overused these days. What most people do, however, is a generalization.

@KitFox Yeah, that's pretty much what I'm doing in my thesis. For a moment, I was thinking about saying mentioned or discussed as it could be more convenient as it is a thesis. Dunno... Anyway, thanks!

@KitFox Something is tested, while...

hey guys, how does "while the key features and differences are pointed out" sound to you? Semantically, when I describe something, it is not really stressing/pointing out, is it?

What is wrong with "Walter P. Stanley, III found all the old records of the Bangor Lions Club after years of (them) being lost under a pile of dust" then?

@RedDwigнt What would grammaticians you speak about say instead? "Walter P. Stanley, III, left, found all the old records of the Bangor Lions Club after years of being lost under a pile of dust"? I think it is better to put the after part at the very beginning to stress the meaning. Dunno though...

Hello! How does "After defining ABC from practical point of view, an emphasis is put on..." sound to you? Is it both gramatically (should be) and especially semantically correct?

I'm just creating MWE to put it on SE. It is a bit complicated considering I want to have colored borders around other references.

That is beyond my current knowledge. I had thought about groups though :-).

(and in the same time linkbordercolor={0 1 1}, so turning off colors isnt option either.)

howdy! Do you guys know if there is any way to put citebordercolor = false within hyperref package? I want border around citations invisible. Using rgb for white colour is really the solution.

Are your long codes (>2000 rows) warning-less?

hey guys, what do you think about using \mathcal for vectors and matrices? I don't like bolding as it highlights the text way too much.

@JosephWright thanks, I've just done that.

hey guys, I found a solution to my question, which is imho better than the recommended ones. Should I respond on my question and accept it as the right answer? :-) Seems weird.

Hey guys, should I unaccept an answer when another user suggested more elegant solution?

anyway, using \section*{} in appendix doesn't work, better said it hides section from ToC (that's good), but it deforms its name, i.e. instead of wanted A.1 Name of section it just shows Name of section.

@Speravir :))

@Speravir yep, I know.

@Speravir I tried to google. I'm not that stupid.

@TorbjørnT. yep, that works, now I have to find out how to prevent ToC from showing sections of an appendix.

I devote one of my appendices to source codes and I think it could be useful to distinguish between them somehow.

Hi there, do you guys know if there's anything like subappendix?

@tohecz That would be cheating.

@percusse Don't tell me you would keep this one gravatar.com/avatar/… - like it's not even my fault, they should have given me a better avatar!

How come my default avatar looks pretty lame compared to percusse's one?

@percusse I'm all for voting!

Somebody has to be the first one

sorry

I only who is not that...

hey guys, what do you think about using \mathcal for vectors?