@MartinSleziak Yes, that's possible, even with just a regular watch/blacklist entry regex. There are a few existing entries which do, effectively, that. It tends to be a bit computationally expensive in a regex, depending on how extensive the check is, but can be made such that it's not too bad most of the time.
@MartinSleziak Yes, in response to the wave of spam on [mathoverflow.net], I created a new Rule which looks for those keywords in titles on [mathoverflow.net] and [meta.mathoverflow.net].
@MartinSleziak Yes, autoflagging, generally, requires at least a couple of different detection reasons, if not a few or more. For this content, it would also be easily possible to set up a spam wave which targets it specifically with automatic flags, but I'd want to discuss it with at least one moderator on the site prior to doing so.
@MartinSleziak What flags were raised through MS on a post can be seen from the post's flag logs page, which is /post/{postID}/flag_logs. For autoflagged posts, there is (mostly) a red flag to the left of the post title which links to the flag_logs page. IMO, the link to that page should be present all the time, but that's not currently the case.
@starball To be solicited, the question needs to be requesting links to resources. The question does not ask for such. The affiliation is disclosed, but at least from just the URL, the link doesn't appear directly relevant to the question. It might be, but I haven't visited the site. If it's not directly, or at least tangentially, relevant to the specific Q&A, then it's just spam.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Body starts with title and ends in url, potentially bad asn for hostname in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body, potentially bad keyword in body (99): flash bitcoin software by Daniel White on bitcoin.SE
@Cow, I feel like the post you just TPed might be a genuine question. The user is asking how they can correct errors with their site, and simply linked their site.
In fact, the site errors out if you attempt to visit it
Actually, it errors because of the 4 Ws instead of 3
@Cow Because the URL for the image returns headers that indicate a content type of "text/html", the alt text is displayed in the browser. If you look at the source of the revisions the URL is there.
np. It's effectively impossible to see without looking at the HTML (or Markdown). However, the rendered version in FIRE and on MS will give a hint towards this behavior, as they will both show a placeholder image there first, which is replaced by text instead of an image when the placeholder image is clicked on.
@Vickel That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
