@Nick That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in answer and Potentially bad keyword in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
> Would not be caught as a post, title or username.
@Nick The regex contains an unescaped ".", which should be "\." in most cases. Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
@jps That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
> Potentially bad ip for hostname in body, potentially bad keyword in body ---------- Potentially bad ip for hostname in body - www.wedgatematrimony.com suspicious IP address 166.62.28.128 Potentially bad keyword in body - Position 12-32: wedgatematrimony.com
sdc test-q Bumping into Muyern Trust Hacker changed everything for me. It helped me see through my boyfriend's lies. His Instagram account, which used to make me happy, turned into a treasure trove of evidence. With Muyern Trust Hacker, I found out he was flirting with other girls. It hurt, but it also gave me the proof I needed to confront him. When I confronted him, I learned he had cheated on me many times and had even fathered three children with different women. It was a shock,
Do you guys know, if I have a list comprehension in Python and check some data vs a unique set that is created inside the comprehension, if Python builds the unique set for every iteration or it saves it in memory or something? Example: [i for i in somdatalist if i[0] in {x[1] for x in someotherdata}] - Will it be faster to create the set outside of the list comprehension?
@Cow I don't Python. But I'd expect that it would be optimised so it doesn't re-create the set all the time. There is a well-known compiler optimisation called Loop-invariant code motion which transforms a loop to pull unnecessary calculations out of it. E.g. for (int i = 0; i < something.length; i++) will optimise the access to something.length to be essentially int length = something.length; for (int i = 0; i < length; i++)
I'd expect Python to do something similar with sets.
@lyxal Please use non-capturing groups, i.e., (?:whatever) instead of (whatever). Also, yolasite.com, company.site, and tilda.ws are already blacklisted domains. I would just watch glucoslim[\W_]*+erfahrungen. (The [\W_]*+ is to catch the case where there's a space between the 2 words.
@jps That pattern looks like it's already caught by Blacklisted website in answer and Blacklisted website in body Append -force to the command word(s) if you really want to add the pattern you provided.
