Just following along with what previous entries prefer to do. For example, the blacklisted keyword directly before the one I just added is natures[\W_]*+method[\W_]*+cbd(?:[\W_]*+(?:review|oil|price|uk|united|kingdom|australia|nz|new|zealand|gummies|\d++|[\da-f]{5,}+)s?)* , which uses [\W]*+
So eh. Just doing what I've seen others do for the same scenarios.
user435118
1:54 PM
@Spevacus The difference is one is greedy and one isn't but I'm not sure which one we should be using...
On greedy vs non-greedy
Repetition in regex by default is greedy: they try to match as many reps as possible, and when this doesn't work and they have to backtrack, they try to match one fewer rep at a time, until a match of the whole pattern is found. As a result, when a match finally happens, ...
@SmokeDetector This is TP because it simply recommends three products without explanation of how they can answer the question, it's a link dump; at least NAA, and against the FAQ. It was deleted.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, bad phone number in body, potentially bad keyword in body, potentially bad keyword in title, +1 more (366): Garmin GPS technical support number by adse on superuser.com
!!/test-q Long and thick eyelashes give my brown eyes a striking doe-like look that I love. I am sure that if you have green, blue, or black eyes you too love long, thick eyelashes that enhance your eye makeup.
@SmokeDetector fp- As much as I hate to say this, No is an answer to "Is there a virtue to learning how to compute by hand?". Could use some details though.
@Spevacus There's quite a few legitimate posts on SE with garmin\.com. OTOH, it is used in some spam to give the impression that some other site is legitimate. In an attempt to have something which at least misses some of the FP, let's try:
You can't search using variable length look-behinds on MS, but searching on MS for the following regex should get close to what the above will do: garmin\.com(?<![>"]http://www.garmin.com)(?<![>"]https://www.garmin.com)(?<![>"]http://garmin.com)(?<![>"]https://garmin.com)(?<![>"]http://buy.garmin.com)(?<![>"]https://buy.garmin.com)(?<![>"]http://developerportal.garmin.com)(?<![>"]https://developerportal.garmin.com)
You can check the history :-) It was just the author's comment that went "No........" to my comment. I don't think they are too keen on improving that answer. This answer: matheducators.stackexchange.com/a/19556
The 'Red Flags' (Spam and R/A) have disappeared as options in the Flag pop-up for both answers and questions (see below). Where did they go?
