@EliahKagan That pattern looks like it's already caught by Potentially bad keyword in body and Potentially bad keyword in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
You have posted three answers in rapid succession which all promote this web site. Please review the promotion policy. Flagging as spam. — tripleee1 min ago
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, blacklisted website in body, potentially bad ip for hostname in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body (197): DevOps Implementation by seven mentor on pm.SE
@ByteCommander I didn't get the chance to see before it was removed, but what was the original question? I saw that it was edited. Any substantial changes?
@SmokeDetector tpu- Text of question copied from this other page. Potential spam seed. Post was reported by mod of the site because the user profile had NSFW content and links.
@ByteCommander Just wanted to make sure the comments I was putting on the reports were accurate; for some reason, your comment attached to the !!/report command didn't go through. So I put as much detail as I could
ahh 5e is great! Haven't really played 3.5 as 5e came out (or at least the starter kit did) more or less around the time I started getting into it, but feels super open-ended and not as BS-y as 4e
@Das_Geek it gave magic to barbarians, need I say more? xD from what I read about 3, 5e. takes a lot from it and simplifies it and has made it super accessible - still wanna try 3.5 though due to it's legendary status
I recently came upon this suggested edit by an anonymous user. The editd inserted two images which weren't present in the original post and on the first glance didn't contain any additional information. The comment was in arab letters and therefore didn't help. So I decided to reject with
no ...
@SmokeDetector fp- Gonna fp this one because I can't be sure it's not a genuine question.
@SmokeDetector Hm, a comment on the post says it could be a referral link. Might need to change my feedback
@SmokeDetector spam- The user lists themselves as "Owner of Pacific Northwest Products". According to a quick Google search, which gave this linkedin page the owner of "Pacific Northwest Products" and "Legendary Fishing Rods" are the same. This still might be a genuine question about their own site, but I doubt it
@SmokeDetector Not sure why the ping, FP due to 'cat on KBD'; but @Machavity and @Makyen gave it a tp --- The User's Account doesn't bring anything to light.
@Rob We both gave it FP. I'm not sure where you're seeing the TP. The autoflagged post was actually a question, which had no valid body content, but the question was in the title.
Instead of saying "Autoflagged FP: flagged by SmokeDetector, Rob" it had said "Autoflagged TP: flagged by SmokeDetector, Rob" I'd spot the disagreement easier. Need 2nd coffee. ;)
On the site, how to treat questions which use junk text to get around that filter is debatable. There's at least one SO moderator who's fine with R/A flags on questions which use junk to get around the question non-code text length filter. It's not clear that other moderators are OK with that. As far as I know, there's no meta on it. I'm also a bit concerned that flagging such questions as R/A is quite unwelcomming.
I agree that these types of questions are something that are reasonable be blocked at the system level, and that they are a user specifically trying to get around the existing quality filter. I'm just not really seeing it as within this project's scope to be arbitrating things at that level. Without a meta covering the case and saying that spam or R/A flags are an OK way to handle it, I'm quite uncomfortable with us autoflagging them.
I kinda get the frustration at seeing all these resignations, but that frustration shouldn't lie with the mods given up their own time to keep scrubs like us learning, it should lie with SO for firing/making such great peeps resign
Their Account looks OK (they'd probably want some upvotes) but giving them a Flag for repeating a single character (and somehow submitting that) imposes a stronger penalty than it being NAA. If it were gibberish (keyboard smashing, different characters) I'd lean more towards a penalty, especially on a new account. But with the welcoming policy (and our Policy: no blacklist for "xxxxxxxxxx") a penalty seems unwarranted.
@EliahKagan That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in answer and Pattern-matching website in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
@EliahKagan That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching email in body and Pattern-matching email in answer; append -force if you really want to do that.
@EliahKagan That pattern looks like it's already caught by Pattern-matching website in answer and Pattern-matching website in body; append -force if you really want to do that.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in body, bad keyword in title, blacklisted website in body, pattern-matching product name in body, potentially bad ip for hostname in body, +2 more (395): Best Weight Loss Pills by JamesKiefer98 on askubuntu.com
I recently came upon this suggested edit by an anonymous user. The editd inserted two images which weren't present in the original post and on the first glance didn't contain any additional information. The comment was in arab letters and therefore didn't help. So I decided to reject with
no ...
