You ruined your king-side castling, and if you queen-side castle you do so in the face of a potential pawn storm. Plus your pieces aren't helping each other the way they should.
I am personally paying $45 for an "unlimited" plan from a different provider, and it really is unlimited everything. unlimited minutes, texts, long-distance charges, and data.
but there are two problems: 1. that plan isn't offered anymore to new subscribers, and 2. the data speeds SUCK. and 3. it only works in my city; if I leave the city my cell provider has no coverage and I'm "roaming". So, three problems.
I forget exactly. they make it confusing on purpose. my internet is bundled with my wife's cell phone and our tv and there are some extra fees and discounts, blah blah.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Peanuts. Chances are close to 100 % that you would be able to get a better total by combining different services from separate companies.
In fact the only area that has any useful competition is the wired internet, because the regulators force the providers to lease bandwidth to competitors, who resell it cheaper than the main providers.
@Cerberus yes, we have that too. But their bargain prices here are not that different from the regular prices. And furthermore the plans are never easily comparable.
@Cerberus perhaps. There is at least one provider here, Virgin Mobile, who leases bandwidth from a big player but is not owned by them. I don't know if Bell (their provider) is forced to sell them bandwidth or just finds it profitable.
@Cerberus I mean it's so complicated to compare prices between rival carriers (including their sub-carriers) that it literally took me hours of work on a big-ass spreadsheet and my comparison was still taking into account maybe 75% of the factors that mattered.
I don't do it so systematically: I just estimate what my typical usage would cost for each provider on the fly when I look at their pricing, and add some hypothetical value for flexibility.
Oh, and for extra fun: all the carriers use different radio technology. So even if they sold unlocked phones, which they don't, the phones probably don't work on any network but theirs anyway.
@Cerberus Yeah, that's all I ended up doing too. But because their pricing is INTENTIONALLY confusing it still took me hours. And I was lucky that all the providers had the phone I wanted (Google Nexus S)...
Considering that not all carriers have the same phones, or if they have the same phones it might be a different variant of that phone, that adds just one more confusing parameter to the question of switching.
Because the carriers heavily subsidize the phones and also hold a virtual monopoly on sales of the phones so they control the "retail" price.
So if you want the Galaxy Nexus, pretty much every carrier sells it for $600. All the retailers who sell it sell it for $600 because they sell it through an agreement with the carriers, not simply on their own.
And those pre-paid plans are not that great. The data prices are ridiculous. And the plans themselves are somewhat confusing. Basically the only advantage pre-paid has is that you can't get shocked by a large bill because your service cuts off instead of your bill getting larger.
Their monthly prices are also much lower, than is the big advantage. Yes, the data plans look awful, but then don't the non-pre-paid data plans look awful too?
I'm usually mistaken the use of send and sent, please say the difference between the following sentences..
I'll send a report within two minutes
or
I'll sent a report within two minutes
@JasperLoy nothing in there says 'jump back to reference'. if your item is on the same page it highlights, but your reference was many pages back (I think) so I have no idea.
@Vitaly A combination of bittorrent and something else, like distance/path or whatever. Did you not read my comment that I can get 1200 KB/s otherwise? It can't be my connection alone.
user19161
@Mitch See the part marked yellow? That is the arrow to click.
@Vit Last Survivor has changed his def deck to four Pathrazers. Still with Whisper. I'm trying to figure out a deck that would give me 45 pts. So far I got it to 43.
I'm looking for a term, word or metaphor for being social but within rules or boundaries. I don't like the word privacy as it has a negative connotation. I think the word social is overused or misunderstood, especially in the online realm. I assume real social interactions operate on trust and th...
@JasperLoy now back to content. oh. hm... you have a point (in that it is factually correct). On the other hand many of the direct questions like 'where did X come from?' are closed as gen ref with a link to etymonline (which uses a number of reputable sources like OED or AHD or MW or whatever).
@Mitch Exactly. I was remarking earlier today to Matt that I now think that all answers should be posted in the answers, however simple. A comment is a comment; an answer is an answer.