"One first cute improvement appears in the list of authors. Aside from Aharonov, Cohen, and Elitzur – who have produced lots of garbage about "weak measurements" over the years – another stellar co-author has been added, the crackpot-in-chief Lee Smolin."
hey guys, there's one thing I'm confused about. normally when we deal with a wave function, we can use/solve Schrödinger's equation to determine its evolvement with time, but our $\psi$ is not always a wave function, for instance when we talk about spin. so what confuses me is, why don't we have a "Schrödinger equation" for such $\psi$?
Lee Smolin (; born June 6, 1955) is an American theoretical physicist, a faculty member at the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, an adjunct professor of physics at the University of Waterloo and a member of the graduate faculty of the philosophy department at the University of Toronto. Smolin's 2006 book The Trouble with Physics criticized string theory as a viable scientific theory. He has made contributions to quantum gravity theory, in particular the approach known as loop quantum gravity. He advocates that the two primary approaches to quantum gravity, loop quantum gravity and string...
"One first cute improvement appears in the list of authors. Aside from Aharonov, Cohen, and Elitzur – who have produced lots of garbage about "weak measurements" over the years – another stellar co-author has been added, the crackpot-in-chief Lee Smolin."
'The only correct sentence in the paper is a sentence in which the authors refer to themselves, "all cretins are liars", but even this sentence isn't quite right. It's misspelled.'
Anyway, back to physics 101. How much would it cost to build an Orion nuclear star ark with 2018 technology?
For example: say that for some reason tomorrow, some cataclysmic event is about to happen. How much money would it take to build a colonisation ark capable of sustaining at least 500 - 2,000 people for generations until they find a new planet to live in?
With current technology?
Aka: Orion nuclear spacecraft are the only viable option, meaning: "SCREW YOU, PARTIAL TEST BAN TREATY! WE NEED TO GET OFF THIS ROCK!"
If we funneled an international effort to build an Orion nuclear bomb-propelled interstellar ark, how much money would the price tag be for initial construction, R&D, maintenance of the already assembled parts in orbit, launch of the personnel and colonists, plus equipment, etc.?
Project Orion was a study of a spacecraft intended to be directly propelled by a series of explosions of atomic bombs behind the craft (nuclear pulse propulsion). Early versions of this vehicle were proposed to take off from the ground with significant associated nuclear fallout; later versions were presented for use only in space. Six tests were launched.
The idea of rocket propulsion by combustion of explosive substance was first proposed by Russian explosives expert Nikolai Kibalchich in 1881, and in 1891 similar ideas were developed independently by German engineer Hermann Ganswindt. General...
Well, that the momentum-limited one is smaller, less heavy and faster.
Oh and...less costly.
100 metres in diameter, with a dry mass of 100,00 tonnes, 300,000 1 Mt nukes, a departure mass of 400,000 tonnes, capable of 1 Earth gee of acceleration to 0.033 c, and is 3 trillion USD in terms of price tag.
Oh and...they are capable of a one-way, no slow down 133 year journey to Alpha Centauri (which Proxima b is part of anyway).
By comparison, the energy-limited one is....20 km in diameter, has a mass of 10,000,000 tonnes, with 30,000,000 1 Mt nukes, a departure mass of 40,000,000 tonnes, capable of 0.0033 c, and 0.00003 Earth gees of acceleration, which means an estimated mission time of 1,330 years and a price tag of 30 trillion USD in today's money.
So, the Momentum-limited one is both faster and cheaper.
So, we are going to assume the momentum-limited version is the one being chosen for construction.
And the Orion project I propose to resurrect (in spite of international law violations, due to the whole..."no testing nukes in space thing") would be a similar long-term investment.
@Secret? So, that being said...if we started R&D and construction NOW....
How long to finish the momentum-limited monster of an interstellar ark?
I am assuming that private companies and space programs both cooperate on this one.
@FutureHistorian I’d speculate instead that the most expensive project in human history will simply be to survive and grow long enough for a project like Orion to be necessary and feasible
Still, assuming we somehow begin construction tomorrow, we could finish (assuming a 10 - 20 year investment and no funding cuts or delays)....between 2028 - 2038.
Hmmmm. Not bad for an interstellar mission.
Now, ETA to Proxima b would be HOW LONG if you account for deceleration?
You also need to account for R&D costs, paying people to keep those 300,000 nukes safe, the cost of the equipment to get all that U-235 + the launch costs to get the stuff into orbit, you get the point.
If a Sol-level catastrophe was scheduled to hit in the next ten years, I think you’d be much more likely to see people working in archives which would preserve the memory of himsnity
In modern physics, the double-slit experiment is a demonstration that light and matter can display characteristics of both classically defined waves and particles; moreover, it displays the fundamentally probabilistic nature of quantum mechanical phenomena. The original experiment was performed by Davisson and Germer in 1927.
The double-slit experiment was first performed by Thomas Young in 1801. His experiment was part of classical physics, well before quantum mechanics and the concept of wave-particle duality. He believed it demonstrated that the wave theory of light was correct, and his experiment...
Diffraction refers to various phenomena that occur when a wave encounters an obstacle or a slit. It is defined as the bending of light around the corners of an obstacle or aperture into the region of geometrical shadow of the obstacle. In classical physics, the diffraction phenomenon is described as the interference of waves according to the Huygens–Fresnel principle. These characteristic behaviors are exhibited when a wave encounters an obstacle or a slit that is comparable in size to its wavelength. Similar effects occur when a light wave travels through a medium with a varying refractive index...
@Akash.B No, I do not understand what you mean. If there are no slits, the electrons do not go through.
You can imagine that the electrons sort of change direction as they go through the slits.
Some excellent news: fifty years after its demise, the journal Physics ─ as it appears on citations, but perhaps better referred to as Physics Physique физика as its title appears on its cover, or Physics Physique Fizika as its latin-alphabet transcription ─ has now been made available online, fr...
... which is all sorts of trouble because that fourth time derivative allows for decaying and growing exponentials on top of your oscillatory solutions
I'm saying that split-step Fourier is the embodiment, in code, of the dispersion relation
the dispersion relation is just telling you that any mode with wavenumber $k$ advances a phase $\omega \,\Delta t$ in time $\Delta t$ where $\omega=\omega(k)$ is an explicit, known function
so
you just separate out into modes, and you impose an explicit phase on them