« first day (2716 days earlier)      last day (2212 days later) » 

@0celo7 I'm about to conk off to sleep, so remind me to look at this tomorrow
 
@BalarkaSen ok
 
12:44 AM
I've asked my first question ever!
Although on electronics stackexchange...
 
1:39 AM
anyone up
 
Sorta. I was about to head to bed. The child get's up by 08:30 no matter what I do. And she expects me to be there for morning playtime.
Or were you looking for someone who knows serious math?
 
@dmckee nope
@dmckee 8:30 doesn't seem bad at all
my nephews terrorize the house starting at 0600
 
2:08 AM
@BernardoMeurer 170 pages
new target 210
 
 
2 hours later…
4:02 AM
This is probably a very strange question but can it ever be the case where the Riemann tensor components are equivalent to some of the Einstein tensor components???
 
4:57 AM
@EmilioPisanty it turns out there already was a question about Hawking radiation as a function of distance. Boo :-)
7
Q: Intensity of Hawking radiation for different observers relative to a black hole

NathanielConsider three observers in different states of motion relative to a black hole: Observer A is far away from the black hole and stationary relative to it; Observer B is suspended some distance above the event horizon on a rope, so that her position remains constant with respect to the horizon...

 
5:56 AM
A bit irritating when @DavidZ puts reasonable questions on hold singlehandedly. When someone asks about a defibrillator works for example.
 
@Pieter on hold doesn't mean closed for good. Vote to reopen and optionally post about it on the meta. I'm abivalent about the question as I'm not convinced it's really a physics question, but I wouldn't vote to close it if it was reopened.
Oh what the hell, I've voted to reopen it - I assume the other reopen vote is yours.
 
Morning.
 
Yes, I had voted to reopen. It was not a difficult deep physics question, but it was a reasonable question from someone who wants to know how such a device works.
 
Guys, is probability amplitude the same as probability density?
Because I don't exactly understand what's going on here: ibb.co/hnQPjx
 
@NovaliumCompany probability amplitude? Where did you see that used? It isn't a standard term as far as I know. However if it's being used to refer to $\psi^*\psi$ then yes it's being used to mean the same thing.
 
Anonymous
6:10 AM
I guess the square of probability amplitude gives the probability a.k.a probability density
 
Anonymous
In quantum mechanics, a probability amplitude is a complex number used in describing the behaviour of systems. The modulus squared of this quantity represents a probability or probability density. Probability amplitudes provide a relationship between the wave function (or, more generally, of a quantum state vector) of a system and the results of observations of that system, a link first proposed by Max Born. Interpretation of values of a wave function as the probability amplitude is a pillar of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. In fact, the properties of the space of wave functions...
 
@Blue Aren't probability and probability density different?
 
Anonymous
13
Q: Probability amplitude in Layman's Terms

DeepuWhat I understood is that probability amplitude is the square root of the probability of finding an electron around a nucleus, but the square root of the probability does not mean anything in the physical sense. Can any please explain the physical significance of the probability amplitude in qu...

 
Anonymous
@NovaliumCompany Okay, read that
 
Anonymous
@NovaliumCompany There's a subtle difference. I need to leave for college now. Maybe we can talk about this in the evening
 
6:15 AM
I'll have to go to high school :D...
Yep, the evening is fine.
Have a nice lecture :D
 
6:39 AM
@Pieter cc @JohnRennie I really don't believe that's a physics question. It's reasonable, sure, but not for this site.
A more specific question about some particular physical principle involved in how defibrillators work might be on topic.
 
6:51 AM
@DavidZ There are so many fake highbrow questions about spacetime, quantum mechanics etcetera. And all the homework. To put those on hold require five close votes, it is too much effort, I feel that three should be enough. But then you can go in and singlehandedly close based on your idea of what the site should be about. If I had such powers, I might close other stuff. Or let a 1000 flowers bloom.
 
Anonymous
7:05 AM
@Pieter It's possible that out of 10 questions a moderator closes, one gets closed unfairly. But mostly, from what I've seen the closures are mostly reasonable. As for that particular question about defibrillator, I feel that falls in the "medical physics (equipment)" category, and it should be allowed. For the record, earlier experimental physics was not that much encouraged on this site, but nowadays the site is more lenient towards such questions.
 
@Pieter I agree with Blue. The mods aren't perfect but it's easy to focus on the areas where we disagree with them and ignore the vast amount of work they do that we never see. The question is now in the reopen queue and will be reopened if enough 3k users agree.
 
7:25 AM
mornin
 
@Blue That doesn't really make sense to me.
 
Anonymous
@DavidZ OK, which part of it?
 
The feeling that the question falls under medical physics.
 
Anonymous
That question wouldn't fit in the Engineering SE beta, nor in Electrical Engineering SE or in any any other SE site. The only people who would have detailed knowledge about a defibrillators' working are medical physicists.
 
Anonymous
And if this site is not the place for such questions, then no other SE site is. And if that is the case, it is perhaps time to re-think our policies regarding allowance of such questions.
 
7:34 AM
That's irrelevant. We don't use other sites' scopes to determine what is on topic here.
 
Anonymous
@DavidZ Well, I don't see any meta post discussing this issue, about medical physics equipments questions i.e.
 
Anonymous
How are you sure the community agrees with you?
 
Well, I'm basing my assessment in large part on this meta post:
18
Q: Are engineering questions appropriate for this site?

user10851Often we get questions of the form "How to build this particular device?" or "Why was this design implemented in such-and-such product?" Are these questions appropriate for Physics Stackexchange?

 
Anonymous
@DavidZ "Physics is not just theoretical, and experimental physics is on topic here. This includes questions about the usage of laboratory equipment."
 
Anonymous
That post is too vague to make any reasonable debate based on that
 
7:37 AM
@Blue Yes. But a defibrillator is not laboratory equipment.
@Blue If you think so, I'd suggest making another meta post seeking to clarify it. As an post, it plays a large role in determining the scope of the site.
 
Anonymous
@DavidZ Yes, I guess I'll do that
 
I agree that it would be nice to clarify that post, but on the other hand, it does provide some guidance. It's definitely more clear than not having any information about engineering/device-related questions at all.
 
@JohnRennie cc @NovaliumCompany 'probability amplitude' is a perfectly standard term
It denotes any quantity whose squared modulus is a probability or a probability density
@JohnRennie no, the wavefunction itself
 
OK, for some reason I had never come across the term. Oh well.
 
Both in continuous systems (squaring to a density) and in finite systems (squaring to a probability)
It's analogous to the amplitudes of other waves, which square to intensities
 
7:50 AM
I guess that applies to non quantum systems as well e.g.the energy density of light or sound.
 
@JohnRennie I guess it preferentially inhabits more technical literature? Also probably stuff not much older than twenty years or so. A search might help place it.
@JohnRennie but then it's not a probability amplitude
 
Anonymous
The "density" in this case refers to a probability density, while energy density is just "energy per unit volume"
 
Terminology ... meh
 
@JohnRennie doesn't ask about the inside of the horizon
 
@EmilioPisanty agreed, but if I was going to ask about the inside of a horizon I would need to edit the question to be more specific. I might edit the question accordingly or I might not.
The problem is that it's impossible to get inside an event horizon. When we include Hawking radiation the black hole evaporates before we can reach the horizon. Even in the purely classical case an infalling observer sees the horizon retreat before them and they only reach it at the instant they hit the singularity.
That means asking whether an observer inside the horizon sees any Hawking radiation is a bit pointless.
 
8:07 AM
I am watching the news and getting depressed.
 
even if we consider an actual Schwarzschild spacetime, an infalling observer does not observe Hawking radiations.
 
Wars, why is everyone so bloody keen on wars?
@Slereah infalling doesn't have to mean geodesic motion.
 
Al Jazeera English have been playing the same clip of Syrian children suffering from the effects of chemical weapons, over and over for several days now.
 
Well sure, but then the same is true of Minkowski space
A Rindler observer also observes Unruh radiation
 
I could be falling into the black hole with a non-zero proper acceleration
 
8:09 AM
Plus you'd need a pretty big acceleration to see anything
who's in that much of a hurry to crash in the singularity
 
@Slereah This is the question
 
Details, details, don't bother me with your details :-)
 
hm
let's see
"For the infalling observer in Schwarzschild coordinates the radiation distribution function is not quite thermal, though it becomes thermal when the collapsing object reaches its own Schwarzschild radius."
 
And Elizabeth Puranam just pronounced Vojislav Šešelj flawlessly. Gotta love those Kiwis.
 
I need more coffee and I need it baaaaad
 
Sid
8:22 AM
@DawoodibnKareem that would be very depressing to see..
 
Oh it's heartbreaking.
Oh, but she butchered Sun Zhengcai.
 
8:42 AM
Hm
A paper by someone called Davide Fermi
I wonder if he's a relative of Enrico Fermi
Also Italian
heh, his thesis was on the Alcubierre drive
Lo Spaziotempo di Alcubierre
 
I don't understand Farcher's comment.
 
@DawoodibnKareem the sign is wrong
 
It looked correct to me. Hang on, I'll look again.
 
Oh no, hang on ...
 
Yeah, I'm pretty sure the sign is correct.
 
9:14 AM
Yes, I agree. I can't see what Farcher is objecting to.
 
Which makes your sarcasm a little hard to grok.
OP did make a slip, sure, but it's not an incredibly bad question.
 
Agreed. I have deleted my comment. In any case I shouldn't have posted it. If I saw a comment like that I would flag it for deletion. I agree it's not a bad question, which is why I have answered it.
 
And he's now fixed the question anyway.
No he hasn't. He's still got it wrong.
 
@JohnRennie Arbitrary question: Have you ever listened to Children of Bodom?
 
Damn! You changed your $\neq$ to $=$ just as I was calling you out for it.
 
9:18 AM
@DawoodibnKareem yes, it was a copy and paste error.
@BalarkaSen I haven't. From the name I'd guess they are a doom rock band. Is there a good place on YouTube to start with them?
@BalarkaSen I've just been listening to the first album from Marillion, but don't tell anyone! :-)
 
They are somewhat of a melodeath/powerdeath band. Someone recommended this to me, and I love it:
@JohnRennie Hahah
 
I'm currently listening to BBC 6 music, but I'll put on the Bodom album now.
 
Nice, let me know what you think of it.
 
Two lead guitars? Hasn't that been done? :-)
 
Good observation. I hadn't noticed that, but it's obvious now that you said it.
 
9:24 AM
@JohnRennie you haven't heard my band yet
Nothing But Guitars
 
There's some tight keyboard works throughout the album
 
When I was a PhD student I and a group of friends made up a fake band with band member names that poked fun at people in the department. Then we posted an ad in Melody Maker for our first single. It seemed funny at the time.
 
One of my physics professor was actually a musician
 
The more you reveal your university life the more it feels like you were le epic troller. No wonder you ended up in hbar.
 
@JohnRennie Let me guess. Then you split up. Like all good bands do.
 
9:28 AM
^my professor
I forget what he taught
Solid state physics maybe?
 
who the hell uploads in dailymotion these days
 
that guy does, apparently
also Daily Motion has less stringent copyright checks
 
I've been at all sorts of gigs covering the complete spectrum, and I have to say that metal gigs have always been the most fun. It just feels like the metal crowd are just there to listen to the music and have a good time. There's always a brilliant atmosphere.

The best gig ever was the very first gig by Ozzy Osbourne when he had left Black Sabbath. In the tube train on the way home someone wrote Ozzy is God on the train wall and I felt like embracing him (I didn't because I'd probably have been thumped :-)
 
Ugh I should listen to Black Sabbath someday
 
@JohnRennie I'd have paid to see that.
 
9:32 AM
Haven't heard a single thing by them
 
Not Ozzy Osbourne. But you hugging an Ozzy Osbourne loving graffiti artist then getting thumped.
 
Is there a Klezmer band called Black Shabbat
 
@DawoodibnKareem it was the spirit of all the fans that made it so great. Everyone there was already a fan and they just wanted to have a great time listening to the music. No violence, no stupidity, just everyone having a great time.
@DawoodibnKareem :-)
 
Oh, I'm familiar with the phenomenon. I have not lived my entire life in a cardboard bo.
box
May a thousand camels shit upon my X key!
 
rip
@BernardoMeurer Have you ever actually went to a Death Grips show
just arbitrarily curious
 
9:36 AM
My sides
 
A friend of mine who shall remain nameless found himself in a very similar position. He went to a party where LSD was being handed round and decided to try some. On his way home he was halfway up an escalator when he became convinced that the escalator was going on forever and he became terrified of being stranded for life halfway up.

When he got to the top he was so relieved that he hugged the guard at the top. The guard though he was being attacked and lamped him then called the police :-)
He hasn't taken LSD since!
 
Yup. It's always a "friend".
 
No, honestly :-)
 
I'm sure John tried hardcore shrooms
LSD is for beta males
 
I was always wary of anything psychedelic as I was a major maths nerd at the time and thought it might impact my ability to do maths.
 
9:38 AM
@JohnRennie only takes amphetamines
 
confirmed
 
@BalarkaSen where I used to live in North Somerset the shrooms grew all over the place. Really. You could walk to a nearby field and pick them. But I never tried them.
@Slereah it's true - I am Paul Erdős
 
He has an Erdos number of 0
quick let's make a paper together
 
@JohnRennie Oh right I remember, you told me that before. From whatever stories I have heard, shrooms feel a little scary.
Also did you mean Erdős Pál
 
He's not your Pál buddy
 
9:42 AM
@AccidentalFourierTransform Grat! You won. :-)
 
I eventually came to the conclusion that the best way to have fun was to go drinking with friends. Drugs always seemed isolating to me while alcohol increases sociability.
 
@JohnRennie you can do drugs with friends
 
Having said that, I'm told ecstasy has a similar effect. I have never tried that either.
@Slereah you can be in the same room with them, but I didn't find it a social experience.
 
you're doing it wrong then!
or the wrong drug :p
 
Possibly, but I don't plan to start experimenting now :-)
 
9:45 AM
have 15 people smoke a single joint
100% social experience
 
that's not a lot of joints for 15 people
 
what if its a really fat one
 
Anyhow we should probably stop setting a bad example to impressionable young physicists
 
Lol
 
@BalarkaSen but while you're here, I found that I couldn't do any maths for 24 hours after smoking cannabis. I think it wrecked my concentration. The first time I discovered this I was terrified I had suffered permanent brain damage :-)
I'd be curious to know if you find the same.
 
9:52 AM
Do you really believe I have ever tried any of the drugs I boast about in hbar? :P
 
Absolutely not (officer)
 
I would not admit to any crimes, but hypothetically looking at a mathbook while under the influence of psylocybine might be painful
Hm, what's a good notation for the set of operators on a Hilbert space
There's $\mathcal B$ but I think that's for bounded operators
Maybe $\mathfrak A$ since they form an algebra
 
@BalarkaSen you planning on trying out some drugs?
 
No more drug discussion please. We're all law abiding physicists here :-)
(the second law that is)
 
I shall violate it
 
10:00 AM
$F \neq m a$ for you?
 
I was thinking of the other second law :P
 
@DawoodibnKareem :-)
 
ugh my internet is poop
 
Entropy always increases?
 
Decay is inevitable
 
10:02 AM
@JohnRennie I know some weedheads in real life but none who does math so I can't confirm if it's a generic phenomenon that cannabis inhibits analytical thinking, though
 
I think the first second law was probably ... an imaginary line joining a planet and the sun sweeps out an equal area of space in equal amounts of time.
How many second laws are there?
 
Kepler's law is 10/10
 
@DawoodibnKareem Newton, Kepler, Thermodynamics, Asimov.
 
Oh, I'd completely forgotten Asimov.
 
And Arthur C. Clarke
 
10:05 AM
What's Arthur C Clarke's second law?
 
Asimov who?
 
British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law is the best known and most widely cited: When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong. The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible. Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. == Origins == All three laws appear in Clarke's essay "Hazards...
@PrathyushPoduval peasant :-)
 
I remember Asimov's laws
 
Oh he’s the guy who wrote I robot?
 
What is it with the youth of today?
 
10:07 AM
The I guess his laws are the robot laws? :P
@JohnRennie fyi, I liked it very much :P , I just forgot after a long time
 
Maybe Asimov's stories just seem quaint to todays young readers. Back in the 1970s they seemed amazing.
 
I was never fond of reading, it takes too much work and I can’t concentrate for a long time
So it ain’t the fault of the books for me
 
I can't read huge tomes because I don't like using bookmarks. It breaks the continuity of the story for me
On the other hand, some huge tomes are so disjointed that it doesn't matter if you start anywhere in the book and read it sideways
Those are my favorite
 
Did Asimov write for Twitter at all?
 
Asimov stories are great but he was terrible at ending them
It was always "Quick let's talk to the big wig and present him our evidence, he will immediatly change everything on the planet!"
 
10:13 AM
Most of Asimov's stories were thinly disguised whodunnits
 
If that shit worked we wouldn't have all that global warming
@JohnRennie some not even at all
A bunch of them are just detective what's his name and his robot friend
 
@Slereah very, very thinly disguised :-)
 
Daneel Olivaw
 
Actually I like those books. I think they are a fascinating portrayal of a future society.
 
We've had Asimov stories for about 100 years and they still didn't manage to make one good movie out of them
He was fairly good at world building
 
10:19 AM
This be some good science fiction
beyond the halfway mark Burroughs goes full crank
 
 
1 hour later…
11:37 AM
WHY??????????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
echoes into space
@Slereah? This is bad, right?
Because now I am sad.
So, Proxima b + superflare = RIP life on Proxima, right?
Even the simple kind?
 
White dwarfs and red dwarfs are generally rather active and prone to flares.
That's a problem for any planets round a white/red dwarf because the flares produce a strong solar wind that basically blows away the atmosphere. And without an atmosphere all the water evaporates (or freezes) making it hard for life to exist.
This is basically what we think happened on Mars. Although the Sun is far less active than a dwarf Mars has no magnetic field to protect it and over the 4 billion years or so that the Solar System has existed the solar wind has stripped the atmosphere from Mars.
 
12:01 PM
1
Q: All of the postulates of quantum mechanics without additional information

PiKindOfGuy$\newcommand{\braket}[2]{\left<#1|#2\right>}% \newcommand{\bra}[1]{\left<#1\right|}% \newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left|#1\right>}% $As an undergraduate who's trying to learn quantum mechanics it's frustrating to not be able to distinguish between what is a postulate and what is additional information. G...

that fool made the mistake of asking for axioms!
 
12:12 PM
@Slereah I am tempted to troll you
 
did I make a mistake
 
what exactly does that Schroedinger equation mean
 
Noooo
 
you did not state it precisely
 
git rikt
 
12:12 PM
@BalarkaSen reminding you to read the spin thing
 
to be honest I didn't care much about that part bc it is the boring part
 
also there's an interesting doubt on the math chat
 
@0celo7 Oh thanks, I truly forgot.
searches back in the chatlog
 
But it's a parametrized ray I s'ppose
 
Okie dokie reading
 
12:13 PM
$\psi : \mathbb R \to \mathcal H$
 
in what sense is the derivative taken
 
@0celo7 If $M$ is any closed n-manifold whatsoever, $H^n(M; \Bbb Z/2) \cong \Bbb Z/2$, aka any manifold is $\Bbb Z/2$-orientable :) You don't need orientability of $M$ to say that: you'd've needed that if you were working with $\Bbb Z$ coefficients.
 
Hm, what's the derivative on rays again
 
you're right
also it should say and $H^3(M\setminus B)\cong 0$
I think there's a typo in your version
 
Yep, it should say that.
 
12:19 PM
I guess it's just the usual derivative with the Hilbert space norm
 
also it should probably just be $(j_M\times j_N)^*$
nothing with $\oplus$
 
I wonder if the direction is right. $w_2(M \# N)$ lives in $H^2(M \# N)$, and $w_2(M \setminus B) + w_2(N \setminus B)$ lives in $H^2(M \setminus B) \oplus H^2(N \setminus B)$. The latter is image of the former by the isomorphism
So should it not have been $(j_M^* \oplus j_N^*)^{-1}$?
 
sorry working on a presentation, can we discuss tomorrow
 
Ok for sure.
 
@BalarkaSen Maybe I mean $j_M\amalg j_N$, whatever the hell that means
 
12:24 PM
Eh, the Mayer-Vietoris map doesn't come from a space-level map.
 
because that map is what you get for $M\setminus B\amalg N\setminus B\to M\# N$
 
Well, true.
 
@BalarkaSen One of the MV maps is inclusion, and that's what I want here
 
Ah fair, yes, that's right.
I don't think you should call it $j_M \sqcup j_N$ though
Just name it something, like $j$.
 
right
 
12:28 PM
Hm
Do commuting self-adjoint operators share the same spectrum?
Well I guess not since $A$ and $2A$ commute
 
@Slereah "commuting" is a very tricky business and it's not sure what it should really mean
 
It's tricky to define the sample space of a quantum theory given some commuting observables
If they're commuting the probability theory will be the same, but then again different operators have different spectrum
Which define different sample spaces
Oh wait, I think you need to define random variables instead
but then what is the sample space
I guess it would be the decomposition of the Hilbert space in some basis
 
@BalarkaSen I'm too good at finding errors
 
big if true
 
@BalarkaSen see my recent doubt
 
12:41 PM
saw and upvoted already
not my cup of tea ofc
Hm I wonder how the proof that spheres don't admit Anosov diffeomorphisms go. It seems already super hard for $S^3$, which is a foliation fact.
 
0
Q: Is the speed of light actually double its speed?

Ondřej DvořákHow do I come to this question? Einstein´s relativity means, there are observable phenomenons that have to add to reality relativity of time so the theory would not fall apart. My question is, is time relativity real or is there other thinkable and workable explanation for the phenomenons. Like ...

goodness
 
"Given a set of commuting observables $\{A_i\}$, they define a Kolmogorov probability theory $(\Omega, \Sigma, P)$ where $\Omega$ is the sample space (which is the projective Hilbert space), $\Sigma$ the $\sigma$-algebra and $P$ the probability, such that the observables $A_i$ define random variables $X_i$ with probabilities of measuring the value in $E \in \sigma(A_i)$, the spectrum of the observable, defined by the projection-valued measure
$$P(X_i \in E) = \mu^{A_i}_\psi(E) = \langle \psi, \mu^{A_i}(E) \psi \rangle$$"
 
Off topic?
Unclear?
 
does that sound alright
 
@EmilioPisanty I'd give it a +1 for referencing $\tau$ to be honest.
 
12:54 PM
> It´s similar to π that does not exist without τ.?
I mean, yes
in the sense that $\tau$ does not exist without $\pi$ either
 
@EmilioPisanty I see your post and raise you this one
It as far as I can see almost perfectly orthogonal to the question.
 
@JohnRennie wow
just
wow
 
Is John right? there's nothing made of negative energy?
what does that mean
 
I am made of negative energy
at least in the morning
Does Stack Exchange have lifetime bans?
 
1:11 PM
no
Ron Maimon only got 10 years and he did something awful
 
Anonymous
@Slereah It does have answer bans though, which is more or less permanent
 
I'm sure 10 years should be enough for JD
 
Anonymous
At this rate, JD might soon reach that treshold
 
Maimon's ban ends on august 8th 2026
2026 will be a common year starting on Thursday of the Gregorian calendar, the 2026th year of the Common Era (CE) and Anno Domini (AD) designations, the 26th year of the 3rd millennium, the 26th year of the 21st century, and the 7th year of the 2020s decade. == Predicted and scheduled events == August 12 – A solar eclipse is predicted. === Date unknown === Having begun in 1882, construction of the Sagrada Família in Barcelona is scheduled to finish. Onboard plutonium generators delivering heat and electricity to Mars Science Laboratory will run out. Launch of PLATO, the third ESA Cosmic Vision M...
There is a solar eclipse on august 12
The end???
 
Anonymous
@Slereah Possibly
 
1:17 PM
@Slereah I don't know what your problem with JD is
just because he doesn't subscribe to the same mainstream things you do
there are multiple correct interpretations
 
Anonymous
There's a difference between non-mainstream and clearly wrong XD
 
Let's say he has an attitude problem
 
he's harmless
 
So's a baby on an airplane
 
1:41 PM
@Slereah would you ban the baby for 10 years
lock him in a dungeon and throw away the key?
 
yes
 
why are we still here
 
hey it's our friend John Duffield
 
@JohnDuffield I will strive to continue your legacy
6
 
keep on trucking
 
2:40 PM
@Semiclassical "In his paper in this volume, John Nolt calculates that each American is responsible for about two
deaths as a consequence of their climate-altering activities"
this must be the Fermiest of the Fermi calculations
 
No, that would be the number of fermi calculations performed per day on earth
 
Mar 19 at 19:47, by 0celo7
@JohnDuffield Ugh, I thought having you back would be nice...
 
sometimes he can't keep up the irony
 
Irony is exhausting.
 
2:48 PM
@JohnRennie I admit that working with Duffield is sometimes challenging
but it is so with any great personality
 
I sorta enjoyed debating with him insofar as it served as something to push against
though that only works insofar as I have enough knowledge to feel comfortable wading in
When it comes to how to read Einstein / interpret GR etc, I pretty much stay away because I just don't know enough
on the history of QM though I feel a lot more confident
 
the only thing that frustrates me is why he clings to einstein so much
 
because Einstime is smrt
 
lol
The reliance on appeal to authority is frustrating
 
Haven't you gotten banned for that before
 
2:54 PM
You'll never crush my spirit
3
 
Historical questions are interesting, but they're not the same as physics questions
 
Gotta do a deep clean of the PC this weekend
 
Is it interesting what Einstein said about GR vs. what modern GR people would say? Sure
 
I have a feeling my CPU cooler is completely full of dust
 
And once you've found such a discrepancy, you can argue about why Einstein's take is better than the modern one
But to simply say "Einstein said it, debate over" is just lazy
 
2:57 PM
especially since I don't think Duffield actually understands it
 
Yeeeah.
 
I'm not sure he knows what understanding means
 
it means agreeing with Einstein
 

« first day (2716 days earlier)      last day (2212 days later) »