« first day (2716 days earlier)      last day (2227 days later) » 

8:00 PM
Well, tbf, Verlinde has gone down the entropic gravity route
 
@bolbteppa that was in mathematical physics
 
That entropic gravity thing looks pretty crazy and he went on about it iirc
 
and that's not something I'd expect LM to like
 
Yeah he wasn't very happy with it
 
@Semiclassical And I think it is very very interesting
 
8:00 PM
meh. if it's about gravity, I pretty much shrug my shoulders and don't worry about
 
Are you not curious about the problem of merging GR and QM
?
 
I cede such discussions to people who care and know stuff about it
not really.
 
@Semiclassical You can become one
 
I am both ignorant and disinterested, so no.
 
My research is not on the topic, because it is pretty much a grant pit, but otherwise it is a profoundly interesting question
 
8:03 PM
@G.Bergeron btw: I agree with the spirit of the second point, but tbh I've yet to see a concrete example of this.
 
I found more integrability stuff, this one looks like the best source yet, videos and good notes following them:
 
@Semiclassical Fair enough, you need first to know enough QFT and GR to really see where the problem comes from
@bolbteppa Ha! This is actually my research field
 
Nice, this stuff drives me crazy
How the hell do you get those Lax matrices
 
@bolbteppa A bit general of a question... for a chat medium
 
8:06 PM
Link is weird, not opening
 
huh
there we go
 
Ah
haha
In mathematics, in the theory of integrable systems, a Lax pair is a pair of time-dependent matrices or operators that satisfy a corresponding differential equation, called the Lax equation. Lax pairs were introduced by Peter Lax to discuss solitons in continuous media. The inverse scattering transform makes use of the Lax equations to solve such systems. == Definition == A Lax pair is a pair of matrices or operators L ( t ) , P ( t ) {\displaystyle L(t),P(t)} dependent on time and acting...
The original Lax paper gets those matrices by trial and error, fair enough, that's one example which takes ages but at least something
The other examples e.g. NLS make me want to cry :p
 
@Semiclassical every schoen and yau paper
 
@bolbteppa You find a solution of the Yang-Baxter equation
 
I've never seen YB brought up, hmm
In theoretical physics, the (one-dimensional) nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLSE) is a nonlinear variation of the Schrödinger equation. It is a classical field equation whose principal applications are to the propagation of light in nonlinear optical fibers and planar waveguides and to Bose-Einstein condensates confined to highly anisotropic cigar-shaped traps, in the mean-field regime. Additionally, the equation appears in the studies of small-amplitude gravity waves on the surface of deep inviscid (zero-viscosity) water; the Langmuir waves in hot plasmas; the propagation of plane-diffracted...
Always stuff like that, a mess, or they just give you matrices out of thin air, e.g.:
 
the problem i always had with integrability stuff was how hard it was to find a source which explained things well
 
Yeah, these notes look really crazy haha
 
I suggest reading old Baxter's book
 
The Babelon book is insane too
The exactly solved models book is crazy
 
8:18 PM
i was about to say
 
It's all crazy
 
Babelon is mad
There's a set of notes by Dubrovin which I always wanted to make work
 
Yeah them notes look good
The book I linked to ages ago, Baker Abelian is like a baby versio of Dubrovin, and it's like 1000 pages long
Algebraic geometry like nobodies business
 
Are you familiar with the maths, by themselves?
@bolbteppa The one by Baxter?
I thought it was cute and nicely introduced 8\
 
The maths is all too crazy, I think integrability requires a different kind of thinking
The Das book is pretty good
This is the only book I've found a way to derive the Lax matrices in, but it's pretty convoluted and requires some very clever choices
 
8:22 PM
This, for me begin to put a toe in the crazy territory: bookstore.ams.org/cbms-85
 
He solved the XXZ chain directly in the infinite case by making use of a quantized affinely extended universal enveloping algebra of sl(2)
 
You can see the contents in that, it's pretty nice, the only real book that's made sense so far
I am stunned at how complicated the math is yet they actually solve problems
 
I used some results which I tediously verified to calculate some cross-section for neutron scattering in the end
Yes, the expressions for the overlaps you obtain are in terms of humongous contour integral that takes a page to write, the results of which you then need to integrate numerically directly in C cause everything else is too slow bweuh!
 
Apparently fermions make things easier in this realm, e.g. Ising is more straightforward, need to write it up though
 
8:28 PM
But the nasty maths is mainly because there are quantum algebras of symmetries which means a lot of the things that make everything nice in undergrad physics disappears
 
-2
Q: Is terahertz radiation new?

IronManRegarding the future applications of terahertz technology, I thought we already knew the entire electromagnetic spectrum. In fact we do not, terahertz lies between microwaves and infrared radiation. The future applications of this is astonishing. For example, faster communications and next genera...

This was a middling question. But then, that last sentence.
Absolutely golden.
 
Right now I'm calculating expressions for the matrix elements of the SU_q(3) quantum group in the symmetric representation and a lot of tools I want to reach to do not work anymore...
@bolbteppa That seems old school!
Also, symplectic geometry can rapidly become tangled as it is a relatively new branch of mathematics
 
I think that the phrase "symplectic geometry" is a bit deceiving
in that it's not just "symplectic manifolds"
 
ok symplectic topology, if you prefer
 
Sure, I wasn't meaning to quibble
 
8:31 PM
@EmilioPisanty Can you give me a hand with Bibtex?
 
just to say that it's tough going
 
yeah
 
The math subject which tantalized me for a while were Riemann-Hilbert problems
but jeebuz
that's rough
 
I think the logic is, starting from the Lax equations, you can derive the zero-curvature conditions, and then by expanding out the zero-curvature conditions with 2x2 Pauli matrices you can derive all the basic Lax matrices by some simple choices, it's in chapter 12 of that book, the question is why those choices, but it seems very unified
Quantum groups, my god, another mountain
 
Too many mountains.
 
8:34 PM
This stuff is like the 'combinatorics' of theoretical physics I'd say
 
@bolbteppa It's quite nice in how the ''quantization'' procedure is rather the same as the one applied to phase space to obtain QM but now applied to the dynamical symmetry algebra
 
The other subject I've had an interest in is resurgence theory, mostly because I would like to understand nonperturbative physics
 
The non-genius normal mathematicians stay away from combinatorics :p
 
@bolbteppa LOL a few in my families are combinatorists...
 
@G.Bergeron I tried to learn about them without knowing the serre relations you deform were a lie algebra thing :(
 
8:35 PM
The only parts of combinatorics I feel like I trust myself on are the parts I can reduce to generating functions
 
@bolbteppa Yeah, the Lie theory is often too nice... We get spoiled by it
 
and the q deformation stuff is madness, but I recently found a q-calculus book which q's baby calculus so if I read it I'd say I'd love quantum groups :p
 
@bolbteppa It's the stuff of my daily research
 
a pity that most of the resurgence theory papers I've seen just go over my head too fast
 
Overall this stuff is cool, it's been a real challenge to make any sense of it at all, and am still basically nowhere
 
8:37 PM
@Semiclassical That I'm not that familiar with
 
How much lie theory had you studied going into this, e.g. did you go through Humphreys or something
 
The nLab page is a decent summary for once: ncatlab.org/nlab/show/resurgence+theory
 
@Semiclassical Except that most talks in special functions conference seems to rely on that :P
 
@Semiclassical nLab is like the least pedagogical resources, in general
 
8:38 PM
hence the caveat :P
 
@bolbteppa A had a graduate course and a lot of picking up things on the way
There is a lot I still don't know
 
I think what I understand of it can largely be summed up as "how to make asymptotic series useful"
 
I'll read it up!
 
The idea of divergent series meaning something was sheer magic to me for a while
 
OK, now I need to go back to work... On those q-deformed groups!
 
8:40 PM
Good stuff
 
I mean, the usual issue is that asymptotic series work as approximations but shouldn't be pushed past that
 
See you
 
this stuff is in the spirit of getting past such obstructions
later
 
I'd love to know Hardy's book on divergent series
There is simply too much to know
 
yeah
the more you know, the more aware you are of your own ignorance
(the opposite holds as well, as I think most of us have experienced)
 
8:43 PM
The price of such knowledge is trying to do a tiny bit on some topic every now and again apparently :p
I will finish up the derivation of these stupid matrices someday and put it on an overleaf
 
8:57 PM
@BernardoMeurer I at a bad keyboard
But shoot
 
vzn
@G.Bergeron any opinion on Verlinde?
 
@EmilioPisanty How would you make an entry for:
1. https://law.stanford.edu/publications/the-future-of-copyright-in-a-digital-environment-summary-of-discussion/
2. https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/99/04/18/specials/rushdie-address.html
Oh, wait, 1. is ez
just 2.
Actually 1. isn't easy
 
rob
@EmilioPisanty Oh, good question. What seems to have happened is that two moderators added the "book recommendation" banner (about forty seconds apart) so the post ended up with two banners. The fix was to hit "remove banner" (which removed them both) and put the banner back.
 
@rob o/
 
9:34 PM
@BernardoMeurer yeah, that'll need to wait for a better keyboard, likely tomorrow morning
 
howdee
 
@rob ah
@BernardoMeurer but that one looks reasonably easy
Try as a template the reference HHG Tutorial in my thesis
What style are you using?
 
10:13 PM
Why doesn't this get any answers after 5 days? :/
 
don't people get asked to contribute chapters by the editor?
 
@eulB Are you the former Blue here?
@eulB Yes, I believe the editor contacts them first
 
@lılostafa Probably because no one wants to generalize there - I suspect people have very different views on this and there's no single "professional" opinion.
 
@lılostafa no?
@lılostafa yeah so there's your answer
 
@eulB What?
What if an unknown researcher who happens to be the editor of a book contacts you to write a chapter for a book published by Springer?
@ACuriousMind This is something that I really need advice for
 
10:28 PM
@lılostafa then do it if you want?
what's the big deal here?
it's not a paper, you're writing something for a book, so it doesn't matter if the editor isn't well known as long as the publisher is.
 
@ACuriousMind I showed my advisor the error and he reacted with glee because I have to something harder to fix it :(
 
 
1 hour later…
11:53 PM
Last night dream involve 4 weird expressions:
(Cont here instead)
$-(xz)^2 z(forgot)dz-zdz^*$
$z(forgot)dz-zdz^*$
$(xz)^2 z(forgot)dz-zdz^*$
$-z(forgot)dz-zdz^*$
According to that weird blog in the dream, the author basically create 4 types of complex numbers. After looking at them the first thing that reminds me of is the multivalued magnetic potential of magnetic monopoles. A cutscene then showed a hemisphere seen from the top, coloured in 4 different colours correspond to the 4 quadrants defined by the above equations
 

« first day (2716 days earlier)      last day (2227 days later) »