« first day (446 days earlier)      last day (4479 days later) » 

7:00 PM
@MetaEd But often the most obvious things one would need to correct for or select against aren't even mentioned, or in an unsatisfactory manner. That makes me suspicious. I'm often not impressed with the conclusions they draw from experiments, though the experiments themselves are very interesting.
@Kitḫ Hmm you speak wise words.
 
I've deceived plenty of ethics committees.
 
It might be fun to perform unethical experiments on ethics committees.
 
@Kitḫ To change the subject completely, I heard those missing people were found not knowing who they were any more. They were presumably given monkey brains.
 
@Kitḫ to trick someone into having their balls probed?
 
7:02 PM
@MattЭллен No, you don't have to trick them into attaching a device to their penis. You can tell them that. You just have to trick them about the reason they're doing it.
When viewing lesbian sex and straight sex, both the homophobic and the non-homophobic men showed increased penis circumference. For gay male sex, however, only the homophobic men showed heightened penis arousal.

Heterosexual men with the most anti-gay attitudes, when asked, reported not being sexually aroused by gay male sex videos. But, their penises reported otherwise.

Homophobic men were the most sexually aroused by gay male sex acts.
 
@MattЭллен Sure. You recruit them for a sex study where they will view porn.
 
@MattЭллен Yeah I wonder what excuse they used. I would certainly not be amused if I thought it was for some medical experiment. I might be prepared to set aside my shame for that. But not for this.
 
But it is possible that they were actually aroused by watching porn when they knew someone was watching them.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 yeah, that's fair enough
 
Pervs.
 
7:04 PM
heh
gets me every time
 
@Kitḫ Yeah but there are controls for that too. they were shown gay, straight, and lesbian porn, and there were two groups of men.
Wow it seems this is an old study? hm. Why did it get so much airtime last year....
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 But maybe they liked having other people watch them watching porn while pie was cooling in the other room.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 probably some liberal bleeding heart trying to let queers get married
 
Hey! I'm queer and I'm married! You don't see me going around eroding the foundations of...
 
@Kitḫ But shouldn't that have led to an overal arousal for all kinds of porn? Unless it's apple pie, cuz, wowzers that's hawt
 
7:07 PM
Uh.
Never mind.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 It was overall arousal for all kinds of porn.
So maybe homophobes are just sex machines.
 
maybe homophones are fax machines
4
 
spits coffee
 
science in action!
 
7:10 PM
We need to get Matt into a LTCR.
He needs an outlet.
Or a receptacle.
 
@Kitḫ Haha.
 
I'm not sure which.
 
Long Term Committed Relationship.
 
oh! right, one of those
 
7:10 PM
Not to be confused with GFCI.
 
Obviously?
 
@Kitḫ No, the homophobes were more aroused by gay porn, the non-homophobes were not aroused by gay porn (but were aroused by lesbian porn and straight porn)
 
Seriously, I think Kit is raising all of reasonable alternative explanations.
Then there could be a hundred others that we cannot think of.
 
@Kitḫ oh! gosh no, don't plug me into one of those
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Everyone was aroused by all the porn, except for the non-homophobes who were not aroused by hot man-on-man action.
 
7:12 PM
I will be convinced once something is revealed about the mechanism by which homophobes are aroused by gay porn more than their tolerant peers.
 
@Cerberus sigh: correlation != causation. But the experiment showed the correlation.
@Cerberus I don't think you understand the point of the experiment.
 
There is nothing that says homophobes were more aroused.
 
Then what is that?
 
@Kitḫ exactly.
 
@Kitḫ I keep looking, but I'm always disappointed I'm not getting aroused.
bisexuals have way more fun
 
7:13 PM
@MattЭллен Are you looking at the porn?
 
@Cerberus The point is that the experiment found that homophobia was positively correlated with homosexual (gay) arousal in "straight" men.
 
@Kitḫ well, how else can I tell?
 
i.e. the more homophobic, the more gay arousal.
 
@Kitḫ wait, which is the porn again?
 
@MattЭллен How else can you tell what? I got lost.
 
7:14 PM
And the men LIED, or WEREN'T AWARE, of their arousal
but their penises betrayed them. As penises so often do.
 
Those sneaky penises!
Penes! Penides! However you do that.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Well, OK, but: 1. I would have to read the whole paper to be convinced that the groups in this experiment can be extrapolated to the whole population; and 2. those are confusing results—what does it mean? What conclusions can we draw from that?
 
@Kitḫ no that IS what the study said. homophobes were MORE aroused by gay porn than non-homophobes. and it was positively correlated.
 
@Kitḫ I don't know. I am sat here wondering if girls and electrical sockets are similar
 
coughs, laughs, water up nose
 
7:15 PM
@MattЭллен Yes. They are.
 
This was an amazing time to return
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 No, the study does not say that homophobes were more aroused by gay porn than any other kind of porn. Therefore, my suggestion that they are sex machines could in fact be valid.
Homophobes like all porn.
 
@Kitḫ We're speaking across each other. I meant they are more aroused by the gay porn.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Than the non-homophobes are. Yes. I know.
 
At any rate it is an interesting experiment.
 
7:17 PM
@Cerberus What does it mean indeed. I can think of several explanations. Does it apply to every single man out there? probably not. I mean, obviously a bi- or gay man would be both aroused by gay porn AND probably not homophobic.
 
@Cerberus It is one I wish I could have participated in.
 
@Kitḫ if only you were in the other room
 
@Kitḫ If only God had made you a homophobic man.
 
@MattЭллен While the pie was cooling?
 
@Kitḫ I'll be staring through the hole
 
7:19 PM
The fact that those people look like extremely boring people really adds to the scene.
 
Dirty, dirty boy.
I forgot that Mr. Shiny made me straight too.
I guess I should break that date with my girlfriend.
I haven't seen her in over a month.
 
@Kitḫ although I meant the old WMT room
 
yesterday, by Kitḫ
Bonobo!
 
@MattЭллен Oh. Right. Well, there's the other one.
 
@Kitḫ Yay a date!
I haven't had a date in ages.
Not complaining, by the way.
Ugh, Barrie is always so caustic.
 
7:23 PM
It's not really a date.
Maybe I'm not queer anymore.
 
@Kitḫ what? how did I do that?
 
Why not?
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 I don't remember. I just remember that it was you.
 
I suppose it is a compliment.
 
@Kitḫ I don't remember doing it.
I guess I can put that on my resume.
 
7:24 PM
@Cerberus what's that?
 
@MattЭллен When people are nice to one another. You'll learn.
After all, you are a bright boy.
 
@Cerberus har har har. I mean what do you suppose is a compliment?
 
@MattЭллен Kit's saying that Mr S. turned her straight.
Hmm looks like I might not have to venture into the cold to palaeographe.
 
7:26 PM
We're supposed to go to my friend's, but I don't know the address and she's not picking up her phones.
Yay!
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 "I don't see why they can't pull the same trick in reverse." Brilliant plan!
 
@Kitḫ and that's why I posted this video :)
 
@Cerberus more time with Cerb for us!
 
And Tim Minchin is just the kind of guy who could do it!
 
shh! I'm trying to listen a second time :)
 
7:32 PM
hey! @aedia
@aedia what ya doin?
@aedia hey!
 
giggles
 
giggles and tries not to spit out coffee
 
"Slightly Annoyed from Berrick(?)-on-Tweeds(?)."
@MattЭллен Yay!
 
@Cerberus it's how people sign letters to newspapers here
well, a mockery of it
 
We're trying to figure out the town name.
 
7:35 PM
@MattЭллен Yeah I know, and the "slightly annoyed" sounds very funny for some reason.
And what is that place?
@Kitḫ Ah jinx!
 
Berwick upon tweed
 
Ah!
Where is that?
 
@Cerberus It's funny because why would someone write a letter to the paper if they were only slightly annoyed?
 
@Cerberus northumberland (I just looked it up)
 
Does it stand for something, like a backward area?
@MattЭллен Yeah OK.
 
7:37 PM
It's just a funny name!
 
@Kitḫ Yeah exactly!
 
Like jammy dodgers!
 
@Kitḫ Hmm yeah.
 
@Kitḫ giggles I can't help but think of pajamas
 
7:38 PM
> Berwick is a town in the county of Northumberland and is the northernmost town in England
 
Oh, pretty.
 
@MattЭллен I like it. Trying to find the ramparts.
Ah! I see them. They look 17th century.
 
Here is the skyline of my hometown.
Pretty unimpressive, no?
 
@Kitḫ the lake looks lovely
 
7:43 PM
@MattЭллен It is a river.
 
@Kitḫ oh! d'oh. well that looks lovely :D
 
Thanks.
Here is another unimpressive picture. The brick church and way off in the distance, the water tower.
 
that's pretty, a good winter-scape
 
I don't think we have any other landmarks.
 
7:45 PM
404'd
 
But the Toronto skyline is pretty nice. You've got that big tower.
 
@Kitḫ The water is nice.
@MattЭллен Yay Oxford!
@Kitḫ Pretty! I like it!
 
^ I can't find a good skyline picture but here is a familiar Hudson river sight
 
7:47 PM
@Cerberus :D yeah! I call it my home town, but I wasn't born here. Don't tell the locals
 
@aediaλ River! Water! Bridge! Very nice colour setting.
 
@MattЭллен It looks f'ing awesome.
 
@MattЭллен I know, they lynch a few university people every year at Balech or whatever their Celtic holidays are called.
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Yay water! High buildings! I know that antenna thing. It's pretty well know around the world, I think.
 
@Kitḫ Yeah. The spires are legendary. So pretty. I really should go up the Carfax Tower one day and get a good look.
 
7:50 PM
@Cerberus heheh "That antenna thing" was, until recently, the tallest free-standing structure in the world.
 
@Cerberus I found more on Panoramio of the river! (<-- it's the Amtrak train!)
 
Here is the gigantic city I will live in, in the next couple of years.
Farther down the river, but still close to my hometown.
 
that's really picturesque
 
It's a lovely town. I am looking forward to moving there.
 
This is my birth town
mmmm, scummy
@Kitḫ you just looking for a house?
 
7:53 PM
@MattЭллен I can't tell what I am looking at. Roofs? Chimneys?
@MattЭллен No, making some rather complicated arrangements.
 
@Kitḫ yeah, just a skyline pic
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Really? How tall is it? And what is it called again?
 
@Cerberus It's the CN Tower
 
@aediaλ Yay trains!
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 it's a great view
 
7:55 PM
The CN Tower is a communications and observation tower in Downtown Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Standing tall, it was completed in 1976, becoming the world's tallest free-standing structure and world's tallest tower at the time. It held both records for 34 years until the completion of Burj Khalifa and Canton Tower. It remains the tallest free-standing structure in the Western Hemisphere, a signature icon of Toronto's skyline, and a symbol of Canada, attracting more than two million international visitors annually. Its name "CN" originally referred to Canadian National, the railway com...
 
@MattЭллен I'm jealous of your Oxford skyline
 
@Kitḫ Looks idyllic! And gigantic (assuming the picture was taken from a great distance, and the trees and buildings are giant models of actual, smaller buildings and tree)! So you are going to move?
 
@aediaλ :D the tourists all over the ground get in the way of my appreciation most days ;)
 
@MattЭллен Nice-looking chimneys you've got there!
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Ohh yes I remember.
I feel like an ignorant peasant now.
Oh, and the good news is: phone tells me I don't have to go!!
 
@Cerberus yay!
 
7:57 PM
It's -10 outside, supposedly, so I'm not complaining.
 
@Cerberus In a year or more, probably.
 
@Cerberus It's ok. I don't think you're a pheasant. Oh, you said peasant. hm.
 
Town hall where I grew up.
 
8:03 PM
 
@Cerberus We had a high of +18 today. I didn't wear a coat when I went out midday tries unsuccessfully to hide gloating expression
 
And the town.
 
that's ornate
 
@aediaλ You're lucky gloating unicorns look cute.
Or I...
 
Somebody write a question asking for the difference between pheasant, pissant, peasant, and pleasant.
 
8:04 PM
@MattЭллен Thanks!
 
@Cerberus Your star-shaped town looks like something out of a fairy tale! Are you sure that's real?
@Cerberus giggles
 
@aediaλ The star is in fact the most effective way of defending oneself against 16th-century cannon while protecting one's own cannon.
 
form square against cavalry!
 
For square?
 
8:08 PM
Ah.
Indeed.
My using cannon plural/collective is a bit technical or old fashioned, isn't it?
 
No.
 
Hmm.
 
I don't know anything about cannon, so I can't really say
 
OK.
But I do hear people say cannons too.
 
8:09 PM
they swim in the water like fish, so they're can be plural or not plural too.
 
Or perhaps guns is more frequent.
 
It sounds normal to me, but "cannons" would sound fine if I were speaking of Lego cannons
 
@MattЭллен Hmm what?
 
@Cerberus just me spouting nonsense
 
Like "put your two guys over there with their cannons and I'll make my archers shoot from the wall" or something
 
8:11 PM
@MattЭллен Haha all righty!
@aediaλ Hmm so cannons makes you think of informal usage?
 
@MattЭллен Exactly.
"Cannons" makes me think of someone who has never been in battle.
 
To celebrate my staying home, I'm going to listen to the rest of Tim's video.
@Kitḫ Ah, right.
 
@Cerberus Yes. I think I would say it with the "s" in my normal speech in a case like that. It makes it seem more obvious whether they have one or two cannons and I don't think I would notice a problem. But I would probably expect a museum display to talk of a fort being bombarded by plural cannon.
 
@Kitḫ That's more or less what I meant by suggesting that cannon is more technical, though I placed the spectrum as a whole towards the technical/formal a bit more.
@aediaλ Right, OK, that makes sense.
 
I think we need an EL&U question about the use of cannon as a plural vs cannons
 
8:14 PM
It would be closed immediately.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 Isn't there one?
 
"Look it up in a dictionary."
 
12
Q: "Cannon" as plural

Chris DwyerI'm reading a novel based in ye olde pirate-times, and I have come across the author's usage of "cannon" (without the "s") to refer to multiple cannons. The ship boasted 32 cannon onboard. Is this just an archaic usage that the author is employing for purposes of story-telling? Also, how/wh...

 
The answer, posted by Will Hunting, will be "Cannons is non-canon. QED."
 
Haha yes.
 
8:16 PM
@MattЭллен Beat me to the punch.
 
There we have it. cannons predates cannons. Will Hunting is wrong even in my imagination!
 
@Kitḫ you've got to get up early in the morning to something something
 
@MattЭллен The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
 
@MrShinyandNew安宇 lol, so true
 
codez y u no c colum? iz rite ther. i ken c it.
 
8:20 PM
bang? what goes bang in Oxford? and what was that flash?
 
Oh, dear. Duck and cover.
 
I see nothing. I guess it was a single bullet execution
 
Hey @Spare!
I missed your line.
 
Hi
Matt's post kinda made it a moot point.
 
OK.
Any success in your thing?
I wish I could help more.
 
8:23 PM
It didn't work out the way I'd hoped.
@Cerberus It got messy, but died down a bit now.
 
@SpareOom Hmm OK.
Must have been extremely annoying.
 
@Cerberus Yes, it was (and is).
 
@Cerberus I hope 4 U to have always success in your thing.
 
@Robusto Thanks, man! I really needed that.
@SpareOom Did Kon respond?
 
Oh that thing!
 
8:28 PM
@Cerberus I didn't report there. I had more evidence form the other site and it wasn't enough, so I didn't bother.
 
OK too bad.
 
@Cerberus Thanks. I know what's needed if there's ever a next time, though.
 
OK, and what is that?
 
@Cerberus 'Twas a problem of bits of "evidence" being scattered and in forms that aren't concrete.
@Cerberus I would have to have something that can't be tampered with. He said, she said doesn't work, obviously, but I didn't now screenshots could be altered without detection, and things like that.
 
@MrShinyandNew - that Coheed and Cambria album was good, I enjoyed it. Thanks.
 
8:33 PM
If a rocket launches on a launchpad and there is no one there to hear it, does it produce onomatopoeia?
 
@SpareOom Ah OK, yeah, that makes sense.
@Kitḫ Awww.
 
Fwoosh! Whish whoosh hisssssssss kaboom vrrrrrr wheeee!
 
Hey, does anyone know Javascript and Greasemonkey?
 
@Cerberus =P
 
8:35 PM
continues making rocket noises to see if anyone notices
 
@Robusto Ah you're there!
 
@Cerberus I hear Python is a good language to learn.
3
 
I was afraid to ping and bother you.
 
2 mins ago, by Robusto
If a rocket launches on a launchpad and there is no one there to hear it, does it produce onomatopoeia?
 
Hahaha.
 
8:36 PM
@Robusto The script you gave me works great, except when the address doesn't end on .html: then it keeps adding .single an infinite number of times.
 
0
Q: What Sound (onomatopoeia) does a launching Rocket make?

Ben BibikovI searched all the internet and comics but couldn't find any onomatopoeia for Rocket blasting into space. Any ideas?

This question should die. How dare Writers.SE send us their cast-offs?
 
var href = location.href;
var regex = /(\.single)\.html$/i;
if (!regex.test(href)) {
location.href = href.replace(".html",".single.html");
}
This is your great script.
 
@Cerberus What else would it end on? What other possibilities are there?
 
So I was thinking, is there a way to cut off everything after .html?
 
@Robusto No.
 
8:37 PM
@Robusto They're losing their chance to coin a new word.
 
@Robusto http://www.slate.com/articles/life/dear_prudence/2012/01/hooking_up_drunk_shoul‌​d_my_friend_call_her_one_night_stand_a_rape_.html?wpisrc=newsletter_rubric
 
But they searched all the internet!
 
@aediaλ lol, most effort ever
 
@Cerberus Ah, OK. No problem. I didn't realize you had query strings to deal with, because the examples you gave didn't have any.
 
I don't know why they do that, but it messes things up.
 
8:38 PM
Gimme a sec.
Easy fix.
 
yet, somehow, blast slipped their mind
 
@Robusto Yeah I had no idea either. Until today, I think they hadn't.
 
@aediaλ Maybe they should go to a launch and write down the noise it makes. If they stand very close, they'll be able to hear it better too.
 
@Robusto Yay!
 
var hrefParts = location.href.split("?");
var regex = /(\.single)\.html$/i;
if (!regex.test(hrefParts[0])) {
	hrefParts[0] = hrefParts[0].replace(".html",".single.html");
	location.href = location.hrefParts.join("?");
}
Try that and tell me how it goes.
 
8:43 PM
 
@Cerberus This brings to mind my all-time highest-scoring answer from the SO mother ship.
 
@Robusto Hmm it doesn't appear to work.
The script is active, but nothing happens, the address doesn't change.
 
Does it work in the other cases? The ones where the old script didn't fail?
 
@Robusto Hah, you even came out on top in this guy's testing.
@Robusto Lemme see...
@Robusto Nope. No .single is added.
 
@aediaλ goddamn I love science
 
8:48 PM
Gimme a minute. A co-worker just asked me for help.
 
Oh shit I have run, store closes in 12 minutes. BRB!
 
go, cerb, go!
 
yay rockets!
 
var hrefParts = location.href.split("?");
var regex = /(\.single)\.html$/i;
if (!regex.test(hrefParts[0])) {
	hrefParts[0] = hrefParts[0].replace(".html",".single.html");
	location.href = hrefParts.join("?");
}
@Cerberus: ^
I found the problem. It was a C&P issue, as usual.
location.href = location.hrefParts.join("?"); fails because, well, there is no frickin' location.hrefParts!
@Cerberus: BTW, why are you reading this crap?
 
I would prefer a one night stand
 
8:58 PM
@MattЭллен Yes, but you're not the target audience.
 
I never am
 

« first day (446 days earlier)      last day (4479 days later) »