« first day (1047 days earlier)      last day (3882 days later) » 

12:08 AM
howdy @snailboat
 
 
1 hour later…
 
2 hours later…
3:10 AM
yesterday, by cornbread ninja 麵包忍者
Forever alone.
goes to eat worms
 
3:48 AM
@RegD: Another wow episode. I didn't think they could keep up the tension, but I was wrong. Somehow they managed to take it up to 11.
 
 
1 hour later…
4:53 AM
What's the difference between biological eye and naked eye?
 
5:37 AM
Guys, which person do you think speak English better?
This is Shinzo Abe from Japan
This is Park Guen Hae from Korea
But Park spoke English in front of a lot of listener whose first language is English.
 
5:52 AM
HI
 
6:32 AM
Hello
 
7:20 AM
yay
my emulated CPU works
but the problem is freaking TIMING!!
 
7:56 AM
@Cerberus I wear them for cycling
in the cooler months
 
8:36 AM
@Cerberus prachtig, dankje.
 
awe
There is this question over at ELL:
6
Q: Plural subject + Linking Verb + Singular predicate nominative

Sherlock All people are a mystery. Since the subject is plural, should the the predicate nominative mystery be also plural? And would the meaning still be the same? As in All people are mysteries. How about the following? All people are a phenomenon. All people are phenomena.

Although native speakers might instinctively know what it should be, I have a feeling there would be a more linguistically depth needed to explain why it is like this?
I guess what I'm trying here is to invite someone to come up with an in-depth answer that can give more insight on the issue in question.
 
9:22 AM
Hi@MattЭллен
How are you?
 
Fine thanks, Noah. How are you?
 
I am good.
I have a question
There are some nouns that can be used both as countable and as mass ones. But how to do you know when to use which?
 
That's the native speaker's dilemma. How can I explain something I just know?
I saw a ewe give birth to a lamb. I ate some lamb for dinner.
 
Okay, so there's no rule?
Approval
No some are tricky
For example Approval
I have got approval to go ahead with this plan
I have an approval to go ahead with this plan
 
When you are trying to count something, e.g. apples, then you use the count
@Noah in that situation it depends on what you have
do you have general approval to do something?
 
9:33 AM
Well, it's an email. So basically it's both.
 
It's hard to explain those technical terms. Even in Korean, I can't explain some grammatical topic but I just know it. If I were able to explain it then I should become a teacher
 
Then it doesn't matter, does it?
English doesn't for you to have a binary state
 
For example, you got an email that has the go ahead for something, which is the general thing. But in the mean time, it's a paper, right?
 
if something is two things then it is two things
 
Okay
So in that case you can use any of the two.
right?
 
9:34 AM
yes
 
@MattЭллен oh I see this chat now has Your International Moment of Zens. Marvellous innovation.
 
Has anyone seen the VHS2?
 
I have, but I didn't recognize it as I don't know what VHS2 is.
 
It's really messed up movie but pretty scary.
 
He seems to be a troll.
 
9:37 AM
Oh those I have seen alright in abundance.
 
@RegDwighт And you are also a troll:)
 
I am not also a troll. I am the troll. Sheesh.
 
I think it's one of the best found footage type movie ever made.
 
@RegDwighт When words fall in a chat room, and there's no one around to troll, are they true?
 
@MattЭллен sadly I was not there to read your question, so I won't answer it.
So the proper orthography is V/H/S/2.
6.2/10.
 
9:39 AM
Good. Dr. Troll
 
Top 5000. That's not saying much.
 
I read a placard that said: Obama, fuck your red line
 
I am a bit worried that it's rated better than V/H/S.
 
I think it was from Syria
 
That was another great movie, The Thin Red Tape.
 
9:41 AM
IMDB is full of loser movie critics. Don't trust their rating
 
That's what loser movie critics say.
"People who don't rate this movie the way I rated it just don't get it."
 
@RegDwighт Were you able to sell your [forgot the name]?
 
I was selling my [forgot the name]?
 
No were you able to?
 
Such a sellout
 
9:43 AM
 
Lego samples
Finally
 
Oh. I wasn't selling LEGO samples.
I was, and am, pitching an official LEGO set.
And I'm not sure how long you think such things typically take, but they typically take much longer than you think.
 
So it's an NP Complete problem.
 
Yes, a No Problem Complete problem.
 
Right. Exactly that.
But talking of NP Complete, I was reading something about it, it makes no sense. It's like asking: can we turn "ash" back into "wood" with exactly the same structure, retaining everything.
Maybe @MattЭллен can explain it alittle further
 
9:52 AM
me?
 
Yeah fo real Brits can't explain shit.
 
Unlike crocodiles.
 
That's why they have a shit PM. They can't explain it!
 
Yea
you are our math and computer genious
 
9:53 AM
@RegDwighт touché
 
I am your genius, period. For all your genius needs.
 
I certainly can't explain that one
 
becuase they dont have the guts
 
Anonymous
10:26 AM
Hello.
 
Anonymous
I was wandering if there is anything similar to a wildcard in English
 
Anonymous
Some symbol you put in the middle of words to show, that there should be a word there but do now know what/which
 
Since when is that language-specific?
 
Anonymous
@RegDwighт hmm?
 
Anonymous
Then what is it?
 
Anonymous
10:29 AM
% or ? or *
 
Anonymous
really?
 
Unless you described it wrong.
 
Anonymous
oh,
 
Anonymous
I think I remembered it now.
 
10:30 AM
People who bother you: "N_GGERS".
Annoy, not bother. My bad.
 
but "TROLL" doesn't start with an N
 
It does if you write it as NROLL or NTROLL.
 
Anonymous
Suppose: someone said to me, that she hasn't seen cats and dogs being "happy, playing, in peace" together in
 
Anonymous
Oh, I just realized that is one bad example
 
Anonymous
Anyway, I got it.
 
Anonymous
10:32 AM
thanks
 
Anonymous
One last request: Is there a word to describe the action, in which a person says thank you without meaning it
 
Anonymous
Like someone saying to you. " I wish you .... "
 
Anonymous
But, you know he/she does not mean it
 
other than lying?
disingenuous sentiment
 
Anonymous
eh, I will go with men·da·cious
 
Anonymous
10:36 AM
first time to hear it
 
Well I wouldn't go with that one.
 
Anonymous
@RegDwighт Ok, don't be shy. Let it out.
 
Anonymous
:p
 
Why would you go with a word nobody understands, including yourself?
 
10:37 AM
Insincere is probably a better choice
 
Anonymous
Well, since when are we required to write only in simple words.
 
Anything is a better choice than a word you do not understand.
 
Anonymous
If that was the case, we would be using 100 words a day.
 
Anonymous
I just looked it up, and came to understand it.
 
Looks like you're missing the point. Even though I am only using very simple words.
@Simon_eQ you have never seen it used. You don't know how it's used, when by whom and where. You can't possibly start using it right just like that. And more to the point, you can't expect your audience to understand anything.
 
Anonymous
10:39 AM
It's not a Rocket-Science man.
 
Anonymous
I got it.
 
So what man is it?
 
10:59 AM
Hello, rocket-science man and others.
 
Hello!
 
Mars ain't the kind of place to raise your kids. Snickers is.
 
How's the room?
 
Prachtig.
 
Stop snickering at our misery.
 
11:01 AM
Okay, I am persnicketing at your maverick instead.
 
What is your misery?
 
It's misery owned by you.
 
I own Cerb's misery?
 
You ask me?
 
Oh, potential misery, then.
 
11:02 AM
You're telling me
 
That's like between you two, dude.
Only impotential misery is true misery. All other misery is merely potential.
 
I believe the opposite of "potential" is "actual", or "in the act".
 
I believe in the existence of angels.
 
Excuse us?
 
I believe in the existence of bears
 
11:04 AM
Never.
 
Look.
 
I am looking.
 
Do you want to start a new pedant war?
 
I am good looking.
 
God knows how many people died during the last Pedant Wars.
 
11:05 AM
@Cerberus start? We're in the middle of it.
@Cerberus God knows many other things, too.
 
@Cerberus well, the average death rate of people across the globe...
 
But it's an agonising death, people screaming their lungs out forced to read "your wrong!" until they die.
Artillery shells are more humane.
 
I hear they care for lost children
 
Do they?
As long as they can be indoctrinated?
 
between 2005 and 2010 0.85% of people died
 
11:13 AM
Or, as they call it, indocternated?
 
That few?
 
Artilery shells don't have testes, so they are, on average, more caring than men.
 
Haha.
I suppose.
 
@Cerberus according to picky wedia
Mortality rate is a measure of the number of deaths (in general, or due to a specific cause) in a population, scaled to the size of that population, per unit of time. Mortality rate is typically expressed in units of deaths per 1000 individuals per year; thus, a mortality rate of 9.5 (out of 1000) in a population of 1,000 would mean 9.5 deaths per year in that entire population, or 0.95% out of the total. It is distinct from morbidity rate, which refers to the number of individuals in poor health during a given time period (the prevalence rate) or the number of newly appearing cases of t...
 
11:16 AM
That's wicked.
I guess it is that low because most countries have bulge at the lower end of their ehm population pyramid.
High fertility and all.
 
ah! could be
 
Even we in the West have a bulge in middle age.
 
I'm aiming to keep trim
 
Otherwise it would be impossible: if you die within 80 years from birth, there has to be a chance of 1/80 for you to die every year.
Same.
 
All of my gandparents lived (or are living) past 80
 
11:22 AM
I don't understand your math. Or you don't understand math.
 
I think. Actually I don't know how old my mum's parents were when they died
 
@MattЭллен Great! I think three of mine made it pas the mark, the other one was dead long before I was born, from smoking.
@RegDwighт Why not?
 
If you die within 80 years from birth, that says exactly nothing about your chance to die in any given year.
 
It is perhaps better formulated differently: if people die at the age of 80 on average, that means each about 1/80 of the population should die yearly.
@RegDwighт Why not? This is ehmm how do you call that in probability theory, where the only information you have is just that people reach the age of 80 on average.
 
Exactly. And that information is insufficient.
 
11:27 AM
Why?
 
Because it's completely irrelevant. It is not related in any way shape or form to your probability of dying.
 
Well, probability "is" not.
It is a subjective conclusion drawn based on what information you have. So, sure, we have more information in reality, so that's why 1/80 is much less accurate than what we know in reality.
We know that old people are more likely to die, for example.
And that the composition of the population is not proportional (as in number of people per age group).
So I can't suppose that you age is a random number between 0 and infinity.
Which I would have to do to get a chance of 1/80.
Agreed?
 
I have no idea what you're talking about. Sorry.
 
Okay, then.
 
What does "a chance of 1/80" even mean?
 
11:34 AM
Well, that's difficult.
 
It's only difficult if you don't define it.
Which is my whole point.
I have no idea what you mean by 1/80. You seem to mean two entirely different things at different points, actually.
(But really neither of them follows from people getting 80 years old on average.)
 
I'm not sure what your point is here.
 
I am not making a point. I am asking you a question.
 
@RegDwighт If you assume no information other than that fact, it should follow.
As explained above.
 
@Cerberus what should follow?
Please state it clearly for me. What exactly follows.
 
11:37 AM
That a random person at a random age has a chance of 1/80 to die every year.
 
And that's what I said was completely wrong.
 
But why?
I'm assuming you know nothing else about this person, and you don't know about the composition of the population, so you assume it's entirely proportional.
 
Exactly.
We're keeping it simple.
 
user87637
Geezis, another heated debate!
 
So would you say it follows that 1/80 of the population should die every year, then?
Hello, Jasper;.
 
11:39 AM
@Cerberus No.
 
Porque no?
 
Because then no population at all would be left.
 
No births?
 
That's what I'm asking you.
You said that 1/80 of the people magically disappear with no replacement.
 
I didn't say no replacement?
 
11:40 AM
You did.
 
Where?
I guess I assumed births equalled deaths.
 
You said 1/80 of the population dies every year. So the population continuously decreases all the time.
 
By default.
@RegDwighт That does not follow.
 
@Cerberus But then 0% of the population dies every year.
 
Why?
 
11:42 AM
Because the population is then constant, as you just said.
 
If my cat dies every year but I buy a new one every year, 100 % of my cats still die every year, sadly.
That would be really sad, in fact.
But my cat population would remain constant at 1.
 
Marketing meeting, alas. BBL
 
@RegDwighт But I understand your assumption now, that "die" means "no replacement". I guess it all depends on one's assumptions. Bai!
 
12:21 PM
I put all these songs on my phone, knowing that I'll like them. I started playing them in alphabetical order, but I'm still surprised everytime when the next song comes on and I enjoy it.
I have such low expectation that I don't think I'll even know what I like
 
@Cerberus You should get a dog.
 
He is a dog
 
12:46 PM
bones all around
 
@Cerberus it appears that Twink has settled down.
 
finally got married, eh? Got kids on the way?
 
well...let's just say he's not uncontrollable anymore.
he just needed a pal
In my humblest opinion, it doesn't say much for society if some people have to come on the internet to find friendship and attention...
 
people don't
some people do
there are plenty of people who don't use the internet and still have friends
 
thank you for the edit :-)
 
12:57 PM
:D
 
1:14 PM
Hiya @KitFox
 
hiya
 
How's the office today?
 
cold
I can't figure out how to wrap my right hand.
 
why are you wrapping your right hand?
 
I did a good job on my left, but I can't seem to reverse it for the right side.
 
1:17 PM
oh, to keep it warm?
 
For practice, but also for warmth.
My husband got me a heavy bag this weekend.
:DDDD
 
Why is it heavy?
 
is that a euphemism?
 
I got some hot pink hand wraps.
A heavy bag. For punching.
Dude.
 
oh! nice :D
 
1:19 PM
rolls eyes
 
I don't even lift
 
I used to do kung fu.
 
@MattЭллен Well, there you go. They've all survived so far.
 
@Mitch good point
 
Nothing quite as nice as working over a bag when you're pissed off.
But it's been eleven years or so and I can't remember how to wrap my hands.
 
1:20 PM
@KitFox start with your right.
 
Then I have to unwrap my left...
 
@KitFox that still sounds like it should be a euphemism but for what I have no idea.
@KitFox get those put-on-by-yourself punching gloves that they have for boxerobics.
 
well, bag is slang for "woman you don't like"
 
@Mitch Do I look like a hack to you?
 
maybe there's a euphemism in there somewhere
 
1:22 PM
@KitFox Probably not. I don't know what a hack looks like.
 
if you merge all those pictures together you get an average idea of what a hack looks like.
 
Oh. No, Kit does not look like a hack.
 
Yes, I look something like Batman.
 
"working over a bag, a heavy bag" -> "(doing something to) a large woman you don't like"
 
@MattЭллен No no no. A hack is like the code I found once in my production codebase. There was a form, in an iframe, on a page. The submit button was in the outer frame. In order to submit the form, it called iframename.hiddensubmitbutton.click();
 
1:25 PM
@KitFox In costume?
 
There, well, this will do.
@Mitch Uh. Sure. Yes.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 ha ha. Yes, that is a hack. Well, sometimes hacks are done by good people for good reasons that will become bad in the long run.
 
God damn users ignoring instructions.
punches stuff
Yep, that feels about right.
 
@KitFox Oh. That helmet and breast plate do not look comfortable then.
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 classy. no way someone could exploit that
 
1:27 PM
@Mitch I changed it to call iframename.form.submit().
@MattЭллен well, it was an internal app. But still, wtf.
 
@KitFox have you controlled your versions woman?
 
@KitFox stupid users. Why don't you just force them to not be able to do stupid stuff. Give them options but only out of a set of one.
e.g. "Do you want to continue? Options: Yes."
 
A pop-up: Are you a teacher leader?
User clicks "yes"
 
@JohanLarsson Her versions woman is three deployments out of synch.
 
Response: You LIE! Now your account is deleted, bitch.
 
1:29 PM
@KitFox they're leading from behind.
 
0
Q: Is the place for the king / queen's feet on a throne called the 'threshold' of the throne?

nicholas ainsworthIs the place for the king / queen's feet on a throne called the 'threshold' of the throne? The place for the feet can be seen in this picture:

photograph of a computer screen
 
@Mitch not a good thing right?
 
points to the first person to print it off, scan in the print and post a screen grab
 
dodges pointing finger
@JohanLarsson I have great respect for Versions women. They're doing all the real work.
 
Ok, I trust you.
 
1:41 PM
Excellent! Do you want me to hold that bag of cash for you? You know, lighten the load. I'll be right behind you even if you don't hear me.
@MattЭллен: I was going to say something clever but everybody cleaned up:
@MattЭллен: He's being categorical... for some interpretation of categorical. That is, he's using 'is' to mean 'is and nothing else'. — Mitch 1 min ago
 
Oi! I just...
tch
 
Guys, anyone familiar with as3?
 
@Mitch I don't know what you mean by this. He was saying "threshold can only mean doorway" or there abouts.
 
@KitFox just punch some more.
 
It doesn't mean this because it means that.
 
perhaps he meant "the only meaning for threshold I can find is doorway"
 
I'm out of paper, so maybe someone else can print that
 
Is that a camera shot of the...
 
but that's not what he said.
 
@KitFox yeah. that's what I mean.
 
1:44 PM
On web applications, if you have to deal with large files such as game or picture (such as 8mb game). What is the best approach to do it reliably without making the web application sluggish?
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 nice :D
 
@Mitch Right. Which is wrong.
 
@MattЭллен it's what he meant.
@KitFox it's not wrong. meaning it can be right. one meaning of 'is' is bidirectional, not just subset.
 
I have noticed if you directly save this 8MB data into a bytearray then program will easily become sluggish.
 
Then don't do that.
 
1:46 PM
@EnglishMaster It depends on your platform. Consider just writing it to disk.
 
But on web application, it's not reliable to save this data into local file system (disk).
 
where is my damn coffee...
@EnglishMaster Why not?
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 did you check the printer?
 
On Flash, it will show up a annoying message saying like "Will you allow this program to access your harddrive?"
 
@Mitch that explains why it's printing so fast!
@EnglishMaster Oh, you're referring to the client.
 
1:48 PM
Yeah
 
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 but the colors are a little runny.
 
It's impossible stream this kind of data too (and I'm lazy).
 
why is it impossible to stream? does the user need it all at once?
 
@Mitch It may be true that threshold means doorway, but that is not the reason it does not mean the thing you put your feet on.
 
So... you have a flash app that gets sluggish when you load 8mb data into it.
 
1:50 PM
@MattЭллен Sort of
It's currently being built but I have a strong feeling that it's going to get sluggish
because i've experienced it before
 
So try to make it smaller than 8mb
or plan ahead to break up the pieces so that they're not all needed at once
Or use a different technology
 
Yeah, that's my first plan. Deal with games that are small enough for web apps (maybe 3~5 MB)
But I wish to be able to run any games including 8 MB ones
 
you might need to figure out what, exactly, are the conditions that make it sluggish
 
@KitFox Yes, I agree, but that was the OPs intention of the use of 'is/means', 'threshold means doorway...and nothing else (like a footrest)'
 
@Mitch I'm sure it was. So OP needed to rewrite that to make the correct assertion.
 
1:54 PM
'correct' -> 'more explicit'
 
Sweet used the word so. Sweet was asserting a conclusion based on the fact that threshold means doorway. Sweet's answer was incorrect.
 
wait..are you putting your boxing gloves on?
 
what Sweet wrote and what Sweet meant may have been different things, but that's not the point. I can only argue with what Sweet wrote.
 
actually, I don't know anymore because the comment thread has all been deleted, Kit.
 
I suppose I could have said "If you don't mean so edit it your answer to have the words you do mean", but I assumed Sweet could understand English.
 
1:57 PM
@MattЭллен We argue all the time with intentions.
 
@Mitch Me? No, just handwraps this morning. I don't have actual boxing gloves, just bag gloves.
But I was practicing wrapping my hands this morning.
 
I know. It's so hard getting the left one on.
 

« first day (1047 days earlier)      last day (3882 days later) »