« first day (197 days earlier)      last day (4728 days later) » 

12:00 PM
Me gotta see if bagels are here yet. AFK.
 
1
Q: How do you say that you're 'high' (from smoking marijuana) in German?

ghshtaltHow do you say that you're 'high' (from smoking marijuana) in German? Is the expression limited to marijuana or is it used in other instances as well? Also if there is a term for people who smoke a lot of weed, that'd be interesting to know. Thanks!

 
Kit
Ok, what's AFK?
@RegDwight Oh, that's classy.
 
Away from keyboard.
 
@Robusto Take that!
 
Kit
@ThirdIdiot First thing I noticed is that her tits at at her knees.
 
12:01 PM
Mkay. Now let's talk about palatalization or something.
 
Kit
@RegDwight Ok, what's that?
@RegDwight You know, I tried talking about donuts. Who doesn't like donuts?
 
7
A: What rules of the English language allow the first t in patient to make a sh sound?

KosmonautThe reason something pronounced [ʃ] ("sh") would ever get the spelling "ti" is because of palatalization. Basically, the "io" diphthong contains a palatal consonant [j] ("y" sound), which, in certain cases, pulls the place of articulation of other consonants towards it (e.g. t->ʃ). The palataliz...

4
A: Pronunciation of voiceless alveolar fricative /s/ as ʃ (/sh/) in slang?

KosmonautI do this. It is called palatalization and is caused by the "tr" combo more than anything. The same process also occurs without "s", and with "dr". I often say, for example, "tree" as [tʃri] ("chree") and "drier" as [dʒrajɚ] ("jrier"). These variants don't come from Yiddish, German, or any ot...

In linguistics, palatalization (), also palatization, refers to two separate processes. In phonetics, a palatalized consonant is one pronounced with a palatal secondary articulation, indicated in IPA by a superscript ‹j›: (e.g. . A vowel that has become fronter or closer may be called a palatalized vowel, but this does not refer to a secondary articulation as it does with consonants. In historical linguistics, it is a sound change in which a consonant becomes pronounced closer to the palatal place of articulation, usually considered a "softening" effect like that of hard and soft c. ...
 
I can now create tag synonyms
 
Kit
@RegDwight I asked you to explain it, not @Kosmonaut, not @wikipedia.
 
Doing it for my tag
 
Kit
12:03 PM
@RegDwight But thanks.
 
@Kit I can't explain it any better. I would if I could.
Besides, I am biased because I palatalize way too much stuff.
 
Kit
I mean, you could have just mentioned "voiceless alveolar fricative."
I know how to retroflex.
 
Can someone please tell me how to review a post?
 
Palatalization has nothing to do with the voiceless alveolar fricative.
 
What is reviewing for?
 
12:05 PM
Mar 31 at 13:47, by RegDwight
@JSBangs Re: palatalization, in Russian schools, щ is presented as a palatalized version of ш. So you have м — мь, т — ть, г — гь, and so on and so forth, but there is no ш — шь; instead, there's ш — щ.
 
Kit
@RegDwight No, but then I'd have been in the ballpark.
 
Apr 5 at 15:36, by RegDwight
@Cerberus Russian has lots of palatalization. The spelling reflects that. That's why you have two letters for each vowel and those crazy ь and ъ.
 
Kit
@ThirdIdiot Click the review button.
 
@Kit Everytime I click the review button, I get a list of reviewed answers.
Actually depends what review button you are talking about.
 
Kit
@ThirdIdiot Answers that might need to be reviewed.
 
12:07 PM
Those are not reviewed. Those are proposed for review.
So if you see something bad or fishy there, fix it or flag it.
 
@RegDwight Ahhhhh! I understand! See ya fullas, I've bot to sleep.
 
Kit
@ThirdIdiot Ciao.
 
Kakao.
 
Kit
@RegDwight That reminds me, Reg. What about new users who don't have the rep to comment anywhere, and have essentially posted a comment as an answer?
Or should I look on meta before I ask you?
 
Flag it. I'll convert it.
If it has a nugget of wisdom in it, that is.
Otherwise I'll just kill it with fire.
 
Kit
12:09 PM
@RegDwight Why fire?
 
Reg, are you the big dawg on German.SE yet?
 
Kit
@RegDwight Why not, say nuke it?
 
Mar 11 at 15:29, by RegDwight
user image
May 1 at 21:42, by Robusto
user image
@Robusto Not really. I'm mostly doing janitorial work. Editing, retagging.
I only have like five answers so far.
 
You are a mod there?
 
chal chinaesseoyo?
 
12:11 PM
@Robusto No.
Though in chat, I am.
And that's where I hang out a lot, too.
 
So you just like janitorial work.
 
@Robusto No. But I feel like they need some help. Lots of it.
It's a very different crowd.
Mainly programmers, from the looks of it.
So they format everything as code.
 
@RegDwight — Well, if they ever need bad jokes, I can assist in that. But I'm not doing any scut work.
 
And the tags would be a complete mess if not for my efforts.
 
Kit
@RegDwight I started that way here too, until I figured out how to do the other.
 
12:13 PM
2
Q: Was ist eine angemessene Übersetzung für "shitstorm"?

swegiWas ist eine angemessene Übersetzung für "shitstorm"? Gibt es dafür ein deutsches Wort?

 
@RegDwight — Have a pity hug. [Pity Hug]
 
Kit
@RegDwight Classy.
@RegDwight purr purr
 
@RegDwight — Wie heißt ZOMG auf Deutsch?
 
Probably ZOMG.
 
Kit
@Robusto Zombies, oh mein Gott!
 
12:14 PM
O mein Gott.
No wait. Actually, no.
German kezboard.
Thus, YOMG!
 
Kit
@RegDwight If you believe that origin...
 
I'm going to start asking yodeling questions in German.SE.
 
Kit
@Robusto And I'll ask questions about dirty lederhosen that I've translated from bad English using Babelfish!
 
@Robusto Yeah, there's a shortage of those.
@Kit You wouldn't be original. That's like every second question on German already.
 
Kit
@RegDwight Claudia Schiffer?
 
12:17 PM
Nah. I'm not gonna get involved with the Krauts. I have to leave you at least one site where I don't kick your ass.
 
@Kit Sure, if Claudia Schiffer is a translation from bad English using Babelfish, then yes.
@Robusto There aren't that many krauts there. Mainly just Pekka.
 
Kit
@RegDwight Claudia Schiffer in my dirty lederhosen?
 
The rest is... well, not krauts.
You are welcome to lurk in their chat to see what I mean.
 
@RegDwight — Are Austrians scorned and shunned?
 
Your German is way better than that of some of the people there.

 deutschsprachiger Raum

General discussion for german.stackexchange.com. You may speak...
 
12:19 PM
@RegDwight — Must be truly lame then.
 
Well, I'm waiting for the public beta.
Besides, look at ELU. Look at the top 50 people by rep. Barely any native speakers in there.
So that's not a bad thing in and of itself. (Of course I would say that.)
 
Yeah, we get mostly posers and wannabes here. By which I mean pineapples.
 
We need a new word. Pineapples is getting too transparent.
People are starting to understand what we're talking about.
Can't allow comprehension to happen.
Not in this room, anyway.
 
But we can't create the word in plain view. That would be self-defeating.
 
Kit
@Robusto I'm a pineapple. claps hands Whee!
 
12:25 PM
@Kit — From what country? Hawaii doesn't count.
 
Kit
@Robusto Hawai'i is not a country, no matter what the birthers say.
@Robusto Chilean pineapple.
@Robusto Definitely. Slopes of the Andes.
@Robusto No, wait. Peru. Peruvian pineapple, slopes of the Andes, near Machu Picchu.
 
Stop @mentioning me. I'm trying to tease people in other chats. Well, if you count @RegDwight as people.
 
I am a Turing-incomplete pineapple.
2
 
Kit
@Robusto Oh sorry.
@Robusto Is that bothering you?
giggles
@RegDwight Wait, are you affiliated with Knight Industries?
 
@Kit Only via you.
The six degrees of Kit.
 
12:43 PM
We are losing @RegDwight to the Krauts. Well, he was never really here anyway.
 
You're not losing me, honey.
Apr 29 at 20:59, by Kosmonaut
Oh great, EL&U taught you to use "honey" inappropriately
I know where my roots are.
Those krauts can't teach me to use Honig wrong.
 
Yeah, but Liebchen doesn't necessarily taste good on toast.
 
Kit
@Robusto Speak for yourself.
 
Genau!
 
I am. I taste terrible on toast. But I am a sweetie nonetheless.
 
12:45 PM
Der erste, der fand ein Liebchen,
Die Schwieger kauft’ Hof und Haus;
Der wiegte gar bald ein Bübchen,
Und sah aus heimlichem Stübchen
Behaglich ins Feld hinaus.
Das Gedicht Die zwei Gesellen wurde im Jahr 1818 von Joseph von Eichendorff verfasst. Es wird teilweise auch unter dem Titel „Frühlingsfahrt“ geführt und ist unter diesem Namen 1840 von Robert Schumann vertont worden (op. 45 no. 2 in „Romanzen und Balladen“). Text Die zwei Gesellen Es zogen zwei rüst’ge Gesellen Zum erstenmal von Haus, So jubelnd recht in die hellen, Klingenden, singenden Wellen Des vollen Frühlings hinaus. Die strebten nach hohen Dingen, Die wollten, trotz Lust und Schmerz, Was Rechts in der Welt vollbringen, Und wem sie vorübergingen, Dem lachten Sinnen und Herz. ...
 
That's where Schumann got his "Spring" symphony?
 
Apparently.
 
Wow.
 
I had to review/critique/write an Aufsatz about this poem in school. I chickened out and went with Goethe instead.
Got me volle Punktzahl.
 
Hahaha.
It's interesting, I can read German so much better than I can speak it now.
 
12:48 PM
i missed out on the german beta because i kept switching my commitments around
 
But everyone who wrote about Die zwei Gesellen got in a useless discussion with the teacher, who just wouldn't agree with any view other than hers.
@hippietrail Well, again, everybody's welcome to terrorize visit their chat.
 
Can I convert all my SE accounts to SE OpenID?
 
@RegDwight — I hate that kind of teacher. That is an anti-teacher.
 
Leaving no trace of my Google OpenID whatsoever
 
@Robusto Nah, she was a very fine teacher, and she did have a point. That's not what I'm getting at here.
 
12:50 PM
@Vitaly — Is there a problem with Google OpenID I should know about?
 
@Robusto No, it's my personal problem with public identity
 
My point (and that of my classmates) was, had I reviewed Die zwei Gesellen, she would have agreed with anything I would've written.
 
i can be terrible when i try
 
@Vitaly — So a person can be vain and reclusive all at the same time? Interesting.
Really? Someone flagged me for that?
Flagging for slagging. It's come to this.
In EL&U chat, no less, which is nothing but slagging.
 
I think this is a gentle reminder that I should not leave the chat for a split second.
 
12:55 PM
Yeah. I blame @RegDwight.
Well that chilled this chat out but good.
 
I joined the German Beta to try and escape the tyranny of @RegDwight but lo! he is everywhere.
 
Except when you need him.
 
ZOMG oh no i done wrote 'try and'
 
Mar 21 at 16:16, by Robusto
@JSBangs — He sees every sparrow that falls.
 
Hope Vitaly doesn't see it.
@Robusto word
 
Kit
1:08 PM
Billaire's been saving up.
 
I'm hanging out for the Travel, Languages, and Japanese SEs to start
 
@RegDwight How do we talk in separate room?
 
Kit
@Billare How did you get all those questions in so fast?
 
What do you mean?
I typed them all up in a separate processor, copy and pasted them, and had to answer some CAPTCHAs to pass through.
 
@Robusto Sorry, Freitagsbesprechung.
 
1:17 PM
Schade.
 
Kit
@Billare Oh, Copy-Paste. Of course.
 
@Billare Um. you go create one? I've never done that myself, actually.
 
1
Q: Why "animal sounds" are different in different languages?

GigiliAnimal sounds are different in different languages. For example Bee sound is "viz viz" in one language and "zzzzz" in another language and "zum zum" somewhere else. Why animal sounds are different? Do animals make different sounds related to languages?!

'Do animals make different sounds related to languages?!' ...Um, I'm not even sure how that should be interpreted.
 
Whatever, I'll just say it
I'm very concerned that many of a certain user's answer are very low quality.
They just answer without even making sure of what they are saying, making stuff up as they go.
 
@Billare That's life, just that some of us do it better than others. ;p
Unless you mean me, in which case, how dare you!
 
1:22 PM
lol no
I feel like said user is purposely trolling.
 
I'm not so sure to start guessing at who you mean, though. There are lots of SE users that seem to neglect the responsibility they have - moderators included.
 
Kit
Oh, crap. Are you talking about me?
@Martha!
 
Well, I was trying to be discreet, @Kit. ;)
 
@Kit Yes ma'am?
 
Kit
I'm at work, so I can't baby ambush you today. Maybe later.
 
1:29 PM
time for korean barbecue!
 
@Kit You need to take baby pictures to work. Like, srsly.
 
Kit
@MrDisappointment Maybe you should refer to this "mystery user" by a handle.
@MrDisappointment Something sneaky, like "KITT."
@Martha You said it sista.
 
@Kit I honestly don't know who @Billare has in mind, and I don't have anyone particular in mind - though I could think of at least one that falls into the moderator category, but not on this site.
 
Kit
@MrDisappointment It's funny, I was thinking of someone who I feel has been posting trolling comments.
@hippietrail There's such a thing?
 
@Kit /me reclines into shadows
 
Kit
1:33 PM
@MrDisappointment Oooo, you do that so well. Very creepy.
groan Speaking of crappy answers...
I wish I had better questions to ask.
 
@MrDisappointment There is a guy on SO with I guess over 20k points or whatever and when I read his answers I just think 'no no no no no no'.
 
@Reg: is it possible to frame a question about the acceptability of a given English word that isn't marked as “vulgar,” “obscene,” etc in dictionaries, e.g. fool (as in, how likely is it that a native speaker takes offence when told he's a fool)? if so, how do I frame it?
 
Kit
@Vitaly I like a fool. Delicious.
 
@Vitaly — That's a very hard distinction to make, sometimes.
 
@Vitaly Um. Just go ahead and ask?
5
Q: Is the noun "liar" considered offensive? Would it be offensive to use it with a proven liar?

Josephine HoweIs the noun liar considered offensive? Would it be offensive to use it with a proven liar?

 
1:43 PM
@Reg: wow, so it isn't subjective when asked like that? Thanks
 
Well, it's open and all.
Besides, somehow I suspect your wording would be more bullet-proof.
 
It's a legitimate and, I might add, important function of this site to guide people in the matter of potentially dangerous usages.
 
I am actually going to phrase it like that example almost verbatim @Reg
since I cannot come up with anything non-subjective myself in that case
0
Q: Is the adjective “vain” considered offensive when applied to a person?

VitalyI am given to understand by the Chambers Dictionary and Webster's that vain can be understood as thoughtless, empty-headed, useless, which all sound rather strong to me. Is it likely that a native English speaker takes offence at the following phrase? You are vain. If not, does the word hav...

 
@Vitaly — @Vitaly. If I offended you with my earlier comment, I apologize. I meant no disrespect. I was just trying to joke with you.
 
OK.
 
1:58 PM
@z7sg And it's their other actions on the site, too; given that important privileges are granted by 'earning', it begins to escape me that they manage at all to get where they are.
 
@Vitaly — Odd as it may sound, I wouldn't insult you (in jest, the way I do with @RegDwight) if I didn't like you and think of you as a friend and equal. It's an inverted sort of affection.
 
Kit
@Vitaly I think a lot of EL&U participants have a good deal of respect for you.
 
@Kit Well I for one can't respect anyone until they have over 2k rep.
 
Kit
@z7sg Oh, z7sg, I will spend today earning your love then.
Ahem
 
2:04 PM
Hehe, I saw that... ;)
 
Kit
@z7sg Nothing to see here. :)
@z7sg There's absolutely nothing going on between me and @Robusto.
 
@z7sg On any SE site? Please be specific regarding your criteria.
 
@Kit I want to believe you I really do, just like when you said you had no affiliation with Knight Industries.
 
Kit
@z7sg I have no affiliation with Knight Industries.
 
@Kit: I like your comment.
That problem has been bothering me for a long time.
 
Kit
2:11 PM
@Vitaly I was thinking of a similar question recently about the differences in the offensiveness of certain slang words.
 
The only way I can see is being constantly observant of nonverbal signals among native speakers when they are told something or tell someone else something
But that tactic isn't available in a country that doesn't speak English
 
Kit
@Vitaly I like yours because non-native speakers can avoid slang, but might use words that are not listed as offensive or vulgar, and yet still get into trouble.
 
One could compensate for that by watching lots of TV shows in a way, but that isn't quite reliable
There could be bad actors and what not
 
Kit
@Vitaly Nor on the Internet, which blinds us.
Oops. Don't tell anyone my super-secret password, ok?
@Vitaly Also could be very dated.
 
@Vitaly — Another problem is that you speak and understand English so well that I assume you understand everything, including context and connotation.
 
2:16 PM
Nah, @Vitaly is just whiny.
He keeps asking me if I hate his shopped images.
 
Insult! Insult!
 
Him's like that.
Sorry, I meant to say, my dear @Vitaly is awfully whiny like a little girl OMG grow some balls.
Or something.
 
@Robusto There is no real context or connotation on the Internet, which is devoid of nonverbal signals (in reality, those constitute the major part of context and connotation). People like to imagine everyone else can magically read their minds on the Web— we are not evolutionarily hardwired for Internet chatrooms.
 
Smileys! Smileys!
 
And:) that's:) why:) I:) keep:) asking:) whether:) my:) shopped:) pictures:) are:) insulting:), because:) I:) can:) never:) know:) for:) a:) fact.:):):)
 
2:18 PM
@Vitaly — No, but people can share a certain simpatico even in UTF-8 without smileys.
 
And even if someone claims something isn't insulting, it doesn't mean anything.
For all I know, they could be trying to come off as ‘generous’ (what's the word?), unwilling to be viewed as having a hair-trigger temper (thx @Kit)
 
Wait, are you calling me generous? Why you ... I oughta ...
 
Kit
Hair-trigger temper.
@Vitaly Hmm. Easy-going?
 
Yes, thanks.
 
Kit
Is it lunchtime yet? By the gods, I'm hungry.
You guys want to get some Thai food?
 
2:24 PM
@Robusto Well, that reminds me of the typical mind fallacy.
 
Lunchtime? It's barely time for second breakfast.
@Vitaly — Yes, but few escape that fallacy.
 
Kit
@Robusto Right, I should probably have elevensies before lunch.
 
@Vitaly You don't make any sense there, do you?
 
Kit
@Robusto I already had second breakfast.
 
> And even if someone claims something isn't insulting, it doesn't mean anything.
Then what's the point in asking?
 
Kit
2:26 PM
@RegDwight You are such a twit. Just kidding!
 
@RegDwight The wording of the response may give a clue. At least with people who have a good command of English.
 
@Kit — No. He really is a twit.
 
Kit
@Robusto More like a tw*t.
 
@RegDwight Unless you are consciously processing every single word you post here, of course.
 
Kit
Do you guys know British slang well?
 
2:28 PM
@Robusto I like this fallacy, it helps me understand people better.
 
Kit
@z7sg Thwack!
 
@Kit I know it pretty well.
@Kit Hey! You want me to answer a question... you thwack me first??!!
 
Kit
There was this Python sketch where they were presenting censored versions of "naughty" words...
@z7sg Yes.
@z7sg You deserved it.
...anyway, one of them was "kn*ckers", which got laughs, followed by "kn*ckers", which got bigger laughs. I figure the first was "knickers"? But what would the second be?
 
@Kit I deserved it? :D
 
Kit
I should've said one of them was knickers.
 
2:31 PM
I don't know the sketch... knickers and knockers I guess
 
Kit
Knockers?
 
knockers = tits = jugs = boobies etc
 
Kit
OOOOOHHHHHH! Right. Forgot about that one. Brits use that slang too then?
 
Yeah, sometimes it's surprising how much crossover there is in slang.
Ah, I nearly forgot, we also say knackers meaning balls. As in "she kicked me in the knackers"
 
Kit
@z7sg Is that related to knackered?
@z7sg Knockers and knackers would make more sense to me than knickers. But then I don't get why bloody is so bloody offensive.
 
2:38 PM
@RegDwight Oh, and this is obvious, but I think I will mention it explicitly anyway: asking whether someone is insulted and getting a no in response pretty much frees one from possible future charges
@RegDwight That's all part of the human social protocol really, but it's rarely made explicit
See @Robusto, it's not only art I tend to subject to analysis.
 
@Kit No I'm sure knackered comes from knackers' yard where the old horses were made into glue. No idea where testicles fit into to that.
 
@Vitaly — I sensed that about you.
 
I feel like bloody is some sort of blasphemy. I don't know. Pretty good question actually.
 
@Kit All the best ones have been taken!
 
2:48 PM
I wish Anthropology.SE was there
I read about the British that they never take it into the personal plane in jocular arguments at pubs
You could say, “Your car sucks” or “Wow, what a stinky dress” or something along the lines
But never “You are <…>”
At least that's what I read
Now I am wondering, is that different in the US?
For informal, pub-like settings
 
Kit
@Vitaly I think we have more fun insulting each other personally.
 
@Vitaly — Cf. slagging or slagging off.
 
Kit
@Vitaly Kind of a lighter form of the dozens.
But maybe that's just the people I hang out with.
 
Hmmmm. I see.
Though I definitely heard “Yo mama” from a Briton in that context
But now that I think of it, he was more like mocking Americans there
 
Jez
g'day
 
2:57 PM
Hello.
 
Jez
so who here's interested in languages in general?
 
Kit
@Jez Everyone.
 
Jez
ah
 
Kit
Can't take it. Getting lunch. AFK.
 
Jez
would anyone be interested in following my French site propsal? :-)
28
French Language & Usage

Proposed Q&A site for students having questions about French, expert speakers of French wanting to discuss the finer points of the language and translation questions from any language to French. Questions may be asked in English or French.

Currently in definition.

 
2:59 PM
Have a nice lunch @Kit
 

« first day (197 days earlier)      last day (4728 days later) »