« first day (3579 days earlier)      last day (658 days later) » 

00:03
Per-engine costs of $1 million or so as well
 
6 hours later…
06:31
@TheMatrixEquation-balance Super Heavy can't return from LEO, so this config means expending SH and should be more expensive than refu
refurb. unless the refurb is catastrophically costly
 
6 hours later…
12:54
1
Q: JPL Horizons sending too many emails

HaywireI submitted a job that, I think, should have returned 100 emails from JPL Horizons. I now have over 6000 emails and they are coming in at about four a minute. Anyone else had this problem? Anyone know how to stop the deluge? I have emailed JPH Horizons default email address. Details Initial PID...

 
2 hours later…
14:47
I can imagine single Starship missions to GTO, but nothing beyond that.
15:25
@PearsonArtPhoto I swear I’ve seen a curve plotted for a single Starship of payload vs velocity/orbit height, but I couldn’t locate it quickly. I recall it starting with a lot of payload and dropping precipitously as it was asked to add more delta-v beyond getting to LEO. It’s not clear (to me) whether the numbers I’ve seen for GTO include recovering the second stage or not.
 
3 hours later…
18:24
@ErinAnne - (in terms of interplanetary capabilities) Getting a 120-ton Starship to LEO and then requiring 10-15 refueling launches - is not a revolution in space technical capabilities. It is just a hard and possibly farfetched option. But having powerful 2-nd and 3-d stages (launched by SH) instead of Starship, could allow direct flight to planets without flybys. This is revolutionary (in my view). And reusable SH will make it inexpensive.
 
2 hours later…
19:58
by gosh we should launch POWERFUL rockets
I'll start calling people! this will be revolutionary
We did have powerful rockets before. But at a price ($250 million). SH will do it for $25 million (including price of 2-nd and 3-d stages).
Also, engines never cost $2 million, like Raptor right now.
The second stage needs only one engine.
20:40
Example: "Europa Clipper" - "The SLS option would have entailed a direct trajectory to Jupiter taking less than three years." Falcon Heavy was chosen to launch the spacecraft and saved an estimated US$2 billion in launch costs alone. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europa_Clipper
Now, with SH, you can launch it directly to Jupiter, and practically for free.
This is what I call - revolution.
20:57
@TheMatrixEquation-balance where are you getting high performance dirt cheap upper stages from?
SpaceX - steel fabrication "dirt cheap". SpaceX engines - also "dirt cheap". These are new - commercial enterprise prices.
Any second stage - cannot cost more than Starship.
 
2 hours later…
22:36
but starship costs too much somehow
I need to stop participating in this before I injure myself from rolling my eyes
2
Starship is too heavy. Why would you need 120 useless tones for interplanetary research?
tons
23:38

« first day (3579 days earlier)      last day (658 days later) »