So I got all the ingredients to make a crockpot roast. Meat, carrots, potatoes, garlic, celery, etc.. If I prepare it all tonight can I refrigerate it until tomorrow morning?
@TildalWave I just need to know whether it's a good idea to let everything sit all prepared in the fridge overnight. I'll probably just try to get up a little earlier than normal...
With no access to the underlying DB. It is hosted BB. So I have no clue what the DB is storing under the covers. SOAP never defines what goes in each field, just the fields.
took me a while to find where i could add that. gotta scroll all the way down to the bottom, which takes a while because somebody is especially thorough about adding lots of events that go well into the future
Hey all - seen a couple of things on twitter about SpaceX possibly firing the landed F9 stage later today, is there any/can we expect any firm information anywhere?
@TildalWave Yes, that is not surprising. And actually a reaonable point. If crew are killed, and a vehicle is lost, and there are three crew and three seats left, they are taking them. A Soyuz landing without a custom seat liner is going to hurt a lot, but should not be fatal.
Lots of amusing discussion around whether the LC-40 TEL is in use. Answer - Yes, because the launch hold down clamps are attached to the base of the TEL, but the upper arm of th eTEL grasps the second stage, which is not there on Orb-2 first stage. The TEL is just fully down on the ground and a crane is holding the top in place.
@geoffc No, it's impossible to land more than 3 in a Soyuz as it's outfitted now. And that likely won't change even with future upgrades. But they can send another one up without crew.
@TildalWave I did not mean more than 3, agreed, not possible.
Rather, if a crew of 7, 3 launched on Soyuz, 4 launched on Dragon and something happens to the Dragon. But say some of the crew is killed as well. So only 3 crew left. But none of them launched on Soyuz. Ok, contrived case, but the ability to know how to land in a Soyuz or Dragon could be important.
Landing in a Soyuz without the custom seat liner meant for your back is probably going to be very painful.
@geoffc Soyuz can take more than 3 to make distance to the station and remain in orbit for a couple of days at least
with orbital module it's supposed to keep crew of 3 for at least 6 days or something like that
they're supposed to be able to dock with each other no? I mean, it's how Mir and Zarya (ISS) started
so you send one more vehicle up, but it docks with Soyuz instead of ISS
Here's a question ... will Dragon and CST-100 (and Orion) be able to dock with a Soyuz? We did it with Apollo-Soyuz in mid 70's, are we capable of doing that now?
also, there's no good reason that ISS Russian and US segments couldn't detach, is there?
@TildalWave Russian section provides reboost and basic life support. Maybe if you kept Russian side, node 1, and ditched US lab, ESA, JAXA but it seems unlikely those would be the issue. Attitude control via thrusters is Russian sidem via Gyros is on the truss I think.
@TildalWave ASTP adapter was huge. Doubt more than 2 were ever built.
For relative scale. That is a pretty big docking adapter, when you consider the size of Apollo and Soyuz.,
yeah I've seen photos of it, or at least the mockup don't recall... I didn't mean to use the actual ASTP adapter, I meant if we're capable of doing what we've done 40 years ago
in other words, since NDS is also known as iLIDS where i stands for international, is it actually international, or is that just another of those meaningless monikers
look like they're experiencing some technical difficulties, YouTube stream just gives errors
ah here we are
maybe we even get sound if we'll behave :))
dunno why but YouTube stream gives me errors all the time, switching the browser and from Flash to HTML5 player didn't help... USTREAM and native NASA TV player work OK
I think I now understand Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel's "Accretion of Risk" a lot better spacepolicyonline.com/news/…
mainly, that it could be a reply to NASA doing too many things at the same time and trying to assure uninterrupted service more than quality and security of fewer providers but under more scrutiny and with more dev money thrown into it
Why would you require ability to dispose of pressurized cargo? Does it matter that it's pressurized before it burns up, or did he mean that cargo can be disposed from the pressurized compartment (i.e. ejected)?
@TildalWave How do you get stuff to the unpressurized side? Much easier if you can walk in and tie down the bags. To get to the unpressurized side you probably need a spacewalk which is expensive.
@geoffc Yeah I know, so the other option that I mentioned. It's not "pressurized cargo" that's disposed of, it's cargo from "functional volume" (which happens to be pressurized)
does disposing of "pressurized cargo" require expendable vehicle?
@TildalWave I guess if the vehicle is recoverable, seems like a waste to return garbage. Usually you can take down much less than take up, so filling the Progress/Cygnus/ATV with crap seems like a better plan than taking it down in a Dreamchaser/Dragon/CST. So does not require it, but seems like a better option.
Also, this is how it was always done, so this is how we shall do it going forward.
Until you have so much downmass available that it does not matter,
TLDR: This is a follow-up to our initial proposal for transitioning to a more user-friendly code license. The purpose of this post is to address the concern expressed most frequently in response to the initial proposal: no attribution requirement. Also, we want to make sure everyone has ample ...