I am confused about what is the relative meaning of zeugma compared to syllepsis, both in its current meaning and possibly in former understandings of these words.
The New Oxford American Dictionary has:
zeugma
a figure of speech in which a word applies to two others in different senses (e...
@F'x, it is. And I'm back to Paris next week probably. In case of collision of 2 concurrent editions of the same post, it seems that the system keeps track of the the last edition only.
@F'x, I'm afraid it's the other way around. When I committed a change to my last pet-post I saw a top of the page banner mentioning "be aware someone has just the same post in the meantime" (probably better worded than that actually).
Our StackExchange overlords have programmed a giant AI, capable of understanding (and answering) every SE question. You may have heard of the “Watson” prototype that they resold to IBM because it was performing well below expectations.
Now, they don't allow it to actually answer questions,[1] be...
Yes, but that's not the point. The lost decade is still lost. It can't be undone. Skim the article in case you haven't. "[W]ith his escape [in the caves of Tora Bora in 2001, bin Laden] likely caused the Americans more damage than through anything else since 9/11."
I'm reading some textbook selections for my linguistics class and the author mentioned a "linguistic framework" and I don't know what that term is referring to. I've tried checking on Google but every site it sends me to talks about a particular linguistic framework but none have an actual defini...
It's not about technical rabbit holes. It's just that I fail to see a fundamental difference between asking "what does 'banging 7-gram rocks' mean" and "what does 'linguistic framework' mean".
@MrHen That's like saying that that other OP should go ask Charlie Sheen.
Today’s Quote of Time.com ([email protected]) carries the following line of Charlie Sheen’s remark. Being totally ignorant of the background of CBS and Warner Brothers’ cancellation of the production of the program, I have no idea about the phrase, ‘bang 7 gram rock.’
I understand the line af...
Anyhow, if someone asked "where do I get a linguistic framework / 7-gram rocks" or "how do linguistic frameworks / 7-gram rocks work", or "is this thing here a linguistic framework / 7-gram rock", etc., that would be off-topic.
I remember reading, some time in grad school, that there was a controversy about proper usage of figuratively and literally when used to denote meaning of a word in its strictest sense — but I've totally forgotten what those arguments said.
Some my questions are: What are those argument...
Richard John "Rick" Santorum (born May 10, 1958) is a former United States Senator from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Santorum is a member of the Republican Party and was the chairman of the Senate Republican Conference.
Santorum is considered both a social and fiscal conservative. He is particularly known for his stances on the U.S. invasion of Iraq, Social Security, intelligent design, homosexuality, and the Terri Schiavo case.
In March 2007, Santorum joined the law firm Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC. He was to primarily practice law in the firm’s Pittsburgh and Washington,...
When naming a class in an object oriented programming language I came a across a case where there were a few proposed names for describing a component that is responsible for abstracting registration related actions.
Candidate names:
ApplicationRegistrator
ApplicationRegistrar
ApplicationRegi...
Okay, just for the record, I have asked around, and it's not really a good fit for Programmers. It also might get much worse answers there. Along the lines of my "why do you care" here in chat.
Well, this kind of question makes me feel like we're being asked to use a violin as a paperweight. Yeah, it will hold the paper down, but that's not really where it shines.
Beta Q&A site for feedback on projects you're working on, by sharing your code with fellow programmers and getting extensive feedback/review of best practices, design pattern usage, application UI, security, etc.
@JSBangs We have a table with a column named "SKIPED". (It's supposed to be "Skipped".) Drives me nuts, but it would be too much work to change it. Ditto for the page called "Sheduling.asp".
i think that IDEs encourage this garbage. since all of the function names are auto-completed for you, you don't have to experience the pain of typing it out all the time. you might not even notice
The person who came up with "Skiped" (and "Sheduling") can't blame an IDE. I suppose he can blame not having English as a native language, but I still rag on him every chance I get. (He's mostly retired now.)
i said in my very first comment that "activatable" is probably not in dictionaries, but this should not be considered a definitive proof that it isn't a valid word
I try to avoid using terms like "methodology" and "paradigm" because they are so often misused. For example, I regularly see "methodology" used where "method," "procedure," or "algorithm" would be more appropriate, among others. That's like saying "biology" when you mean "person," and to my ear...
on another topic, my commitment to BCG is still not considered fulfilled, even though I asked 5 upvoted questions and submitted 5 answers (not all upvoted)
The commitment isn't fulfilled until about a day after the site enters public beta. This is because it's especially important for people who committed to the site to be on at the beginning of the public beta.
Edit
The other criteria is that you post 10 questions or answers.
@Robusto: looks like someone wasn't satisfied with your answer to his rainbow question, so he posted it again.
From the wikipedia page on rainbows:
A rainbow spans a continuous spectrum
of colours—there are no "bands." The
apparent discreteness is an artefact
of the photopigments in the human eye
and of the neural processing of our
photoreceptor outputs in the brain.
Because the peak respo...
Is it true that Paul McCartney died in 1966 and was replaced by a look-a-like, or was this really just a conspiracy theory? Is there any proof either way, or all just speculation?
@Robusto: just wanted to pop in real quick to get the joke explained:
"these two terms have become inextricably yoked together (ha ha) over the years, blurring the distinctions and our ability to articulate them (again, ha ha)."
I was attempting to answer a question today on SO and include some screenshots to help illustrate what I was talking about. Everything was fine until I went to upload my fourth image. Here is what the post screen looked like before I selected to upload:
Once I pressed the Image button I got t...
@RegDwight I thought about that excuse once (I was posting work-related files and this NSFW image appeared out of the blue), but I never thought it would fly
what verb can you use that describes both mounting a steed and have intercourse with a woman? I used ride, I think it fits, but maybe there's a better choice
Not as well. It's not a common expression, but it would probably be understood as well as any verb would. Many verbs can be used to mean "fuck" — know what I mean? Wink, wink.
YOU's excellent work and the OP's detailed screenshots made it pretty easy to get to the bottom of this:
You'll note in the screenshot (the one that Daniel censored away) that the image definition is pretty broken; you see something like ![![![bla][3]][ etc. This utterly wrong markdown causes th...
Hungary, like most of Europe, actually has better cell (ahem, sorry, mobile) phone coverage than the US, but it's devilishly difficult to access said coverage from the US.
It's also very hard to get a Hungarian mobile provider to sell you a mobile plan, even a pay-as-you-go one. Or at least, that has been my mother's experience. They keep wanting her to provide the Hungarian equivalent of a Social Security number, which of course she doesn't have. (My barely-11-day stay wasn't long enough to include a visit to a cell phone store.)
@Fx Ok, ok, not difficult, but expensive. Right now, I can call my mom's cell pretty cheaply, but it uses up her minutes something fierce.
It was pretty easy to get my iPhone to work in Europe (both Hungary and England, more specifically Heathrow airport), but even the relatively-cheaper roaming rates you get if you pay the extra $6 a month are basically a dollar a minute. And my sister's T-Mobile phone doesn't work at all there.
(Even though theoretically T-Mobile uses the same type of network as Europe.)
@Fx The biggest annoyance was that they refused to give my mother her old mobile number back, because she hadn't used it in over a year. And it's not that they gave it to someone else already or anything. It just seems like pointless bureaucracy.
(In Harta, which really isn't a large town, we called up the local internet guys - I swear, they were teenagers - at 9:00 a.m., and by noon, we had both internet and cable TV.)
But the thing is, the phone companies in Hungary don't have much more history than the internet companies. During Soviet rule, almost nobody had a phone line, and mobile phones were the stuff of science fiction.
(Harta is my dad's hometown in Hungary, in case it wasn't clear.)
After listening to the discussion on the podcast this week, I thought I had a pretty good idea of what sort of questions could be considered too simple for SO. For example, I would have thought that the question
What is a Subclass
would be the perfect contender. However, with a bunch of answers...
"I've asked this question on English. Let's see how it fares over there, shall we? 'What is a sentence?' Update: The good people over at English closed my question within 10 minutes."
I've come across instances of people wanting to get rid of accounts, disassociate et cetera. they'll all have reasons, to be sure, but I can't say I can fathom them TBH.
I mean, if, for instance, your employer is querying data.SE to determine name changes (possible?) in attempts to continue to monitor your contributions, that's a very strong approach indeed.
I'd be more concerned with my employer than washing my contributions, in such circumstances.
@MrDisappointment Well, yeah. But it could be somebody outside your control/knowledge: once someone has found your profile and memorized your user ID, no amount of changing your display name will hide you from them.
(And SE makes it quite difficult to maintain two different identities/profiles. Most of the "log out" links do nothing of the sort, as my sister & I found out when she wanted to sign up for EL&U.)
For example, until/unless they change the whole auto-login thing, I refuse to log in to SE on a public computer, because I can't be sure that pressing "log out" will actually prevent the next user of that computer from accessing my account.
Is it correct to say "one such family are..." as opposed to "one such family is..." in some circumstances?
Say, for instance as used in the article here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_family
[...] One such family are the genes for human haemoglobin subunits; [...]
The problem occurs wh...
@RegDwight — Well, now I got some mod on my ass for that question, telling me it's not properly referenced. I told him to go ahead and delete it if it ain't good enough. I'm a frickin' expert on rainbows, and I am skeptical of sites that can't take common sense for an answer. I sure don't need another time sink.
Consider this example:
Commercialese is an instrument of art,
designed to enrich and invigorate our
language—surely you will all agree
with this—, and we should encourage newcomers to learn it. However, a side-effect is the
spread of commercialese to other
domains. This we must obje...
There is now a disassociate button on the user page, accounts tab. To use it, you'll take the following steps:
Change your OpenID on the site you wish to associate. Change it to something you aren't using on any other Stack Exchange sites†. If you have an alternate OpenID, change that too. If y...
It's so easy, I can't breathe...
And the best part is hidden in the comments.
"you'll need to use two different OpenIDs if you don't want an auto-association"
@RegDwight — They're only the smartest people around because they say they are. Sorry, I'm in a bad mood and I'm going to go eat dinner before I just trash this whole SE thing forevah.
You see, I didn't include any NASA pictures, I just used common sense.
@Robusto was smarter than me in that he did include a picture, but he also wasn't smart enough in that he forgot to shop a "(c) NASA/JPL" into one of its corners.
So there you have it.
NASA pictures or no pictures at all. Wimps and posers, leave the hall.
I'm trying the whole not-catching-up thing now, as in I didn't read what happened this morning before I joined in, and so far, I don't think I've missed much.
(I admit I did have chat open for most of today, and religiously read everything that was posted, but that's different, isn't it?)
@RegDwight Skeptics is a site for leading questions.
@RegDwight Mostly the questions that are answered there are 1) easy enough to be trivial 2) answered by other, official skeptics themselves.
@RegDwight If it's not duh-obvious like, "do ghosts exist", there's a high chance it won't get answered...or if it is, it's answered via unenlightening copy & paste.