« first day (824 days earlier)      last day (4397 days later) » 

13:00
Can it be ....what is the thing?
I am fairly sure there is no problem from the second structure, but it is less used.
@Mistu4u In normal statement, we have normal word order. In direct questions, we have subject-verb inversion. In indirect questions, we have normal word order again.
So Have you any idea what is the thing? is considered wrong by most people.
To put it simply, it is wrong.
@Cerberus, is this comment wrong?
He is being too liberal.
@Cerberus thx, checking out what "subject-verb inversion" is =D
Yeah, I have to check it too.
13:04
All style guides condemn that word order, but, yes, you see see used, just as yes, I think your right.
@TemporaryNickName The subject and the finite (main) verb are swapped.
He is mad.
Is he mad?
I don't know whether he is mad.
A lamp stands beside the bed → Beside the bed stands a lamp.
@Cerberus No use asking you then!
@TemporaryNickName That is another kind of inversion.
In this example of subject verb inversion, is the lamp subject? Also in second sentence is the bed subject?
That is subject-complement inversion.
Jez
Jez
13:07
Heh politicians refuse to invert word order all the time
"We need to ask what are the challenges"
Or subject-predicate.
oh alright,
@Cerberus Not related to conversion to question, I guess!
@Mistu4u Nope!
@Cerberus 0.4 lawler
13:08
Okay, I am seeing the previous chats.
@Jez Well, the thing is, if you add a comma, it becomes a direct question.
She asked, "is he mad?".
Jez
Jez
@Cerberus yeah but their tone of voice suggests that it's not a direct question
oh
a. The dog came down the stairs.
b. Down the stairs came the dog. - Subject-verb inversion
And you can leave out the quotation marks, even: she asked, is he mad?
that is the subject verb inversion
13:08
But you really need the comma there, and the direct questions needs to be appropriate.
The dog is coming down the stairs.
Is the dog coming down the stairs?
but the sentence b sounds pretty weird lol
@TemporaryNickName That is wrong, I would say. Subject-verb inversion would be *came the dog down the stairs?
@TemporaryNickName I disagree.
It is subject-complement inversion. The verb stays put, it is still in the middle.
13:10
a. The dog came down the stairs.
sounds the most natural to me
That is normal word order, yes.
A simple statement.
@Cerberus Came the dog down the stairs? What kind of question is this?
Jez
Jez
@Cerberus that sounds like olde english
or poetic
@Mistu4u It is either wrong or archaic.
Hence the asterisk: if you put an *asterisk before a word or sentence, you signal that it is never used like that.
13:11
we usually use do-support rather than invert the subject and verb these days
@MattЭллен Except with auxiliary, copular, and modal verbs.
@Cerberus yes.
> Have you seen her? (auxiliary verb have)
> Can you see her? (modal verb can)
Did the dog come down the stairs?
The dog came down the stairs.
> Are you mad? (copula are)
13:13
@Cerberus BTW, if you think the subject-verb inversion example is incorrect. Then I think you must fix the error on wikipedia page for people =D
Subject–verb inversion in English is a type of inversion where the subject and verb (or chain of verbs, verb catena) switch their canonical order of appearance, so that the subject follows the verb(s), e.g. A lamp stands beside the bed → Beside the bed stands a lamp. A distinction is made here between subject–verb inversion and subject–auxiliary inversion. In the most frequent cases of inversion in English, such as in question formation, the verb with which the subject inverts is required to be an auxiliary verb (one of a restricted set of verbs including is, can, does, etc.) These case...
@Cerberus So Can can also be a copula like in You can be like him where can adds the subject and predicate.
@TemporaryNickName Ugh, that whole article is a mess. It was probably written by a certain modernist linguist of a particular branch of linguistics that changes all the terms. The terminology in that article conflicts with "normal" grammar terminology. I'm not touching that!
@Mistu4u In that sentence, can is a modal verb, and be is a copula. But only the finite verb is inverted when there is inversion, and be is an infinitive, so in this case you and can would be swapped in subject-verb inversion.
13:18
@Cerberus, That was a lot of good teaching today.Thank you. :)
Jez
Jez
" c. *Under the tree sat he. - Subject-verb inversion impossible with weak definite subject pronoun"
that seems OK to me actually
well maybe poetically
under the tree sat she and he and me and thee
@Mistu4u It was a pleasure!
b. "I am hungry", said Bill. - Subject-verb inversion
I think I have encountered this typish subject-verb inversion many times from books =D
@Jez No, that is subject-complement inversion. Or subject-predicate inversion. Subject-verb inversion would be sat he under the tree.
@TemporaryNickName Yes, that is very common (although it is not subject-verb inversion).
Jez
Jez
how legit is it to invert a question like "The plumber, is he?"
13:21
Would thispost get closed? 1.I haven't seen her since last year.
2.She hasn't been unemployed since she left school.
3.She has been ill since Thursday.
4.Look someone has left their bag in the room.
5.Have you ever been to Rome?(Not did you ever go to Rome?)
6.Nobody answered the phone when it rang.
7.I never knew my grandmother as she died before I was born.
8.It's the first time I ate caviar.
9.The first time we spoke was just the other day.
10.It stinks here somebody has been smoking.
Jez
Jez
"Tired, are you?"
It is taken from a test
@Jez how legitimate is yoda?
Jez
Jez
that inversion only works with the verb "be"
which some native speakers think is confusing
Jez
Jez
13:22
cant really say "football, played you today?"
@Monica yes. you are asking more than one question at once.
Weird rules
For all you can have a look here for a glance on inversion types.
@Monica what is your question?
Well, I was completing a test.
13:24
@Jez Umm not very?
and it seems like more than one answer is possible in some of the quesions
Jez
Jez
@Cerberus in spoken English, it's pretty common. you might say it that way on purpose.
@Jez That is short for "[You're] tired, are[n't] you?"
Jez
Jez
not really.
@Jez Yeah OK, but it's not exactly...formal.
13:25
@Monica you could ask about each one individually, then, on English Language Learners
Could you have a look at it please?
OK
and it won't get closed there?
There was such a question there
Have you read the FAQ?
It's the first time I .... caviar.
@Monica it depends how you ask.
13:27
I used past simple, but present perfect is also possible
But there shouldn't be two possible choices in one test
@Monica Try not to ask questions that are controversial as it must have been questioned before.
@Cerberus, No sooner had I reached home, my cell began to ring is an example of subject-auixilliary inversion and through the beach, there runs some boy is an example of subect-verb inversion.Correct?
But a friend of mine asked me to find tests for her on present perfect
Jez
Jez
@Mistu4u a boy probably wouldn't run through a beach
most tests online are like that.
13:30
Best way to determine if the question you are about to ask is not already has been asked is by search it first but use grammatical terms to increase your chance of finding.
@Jez Okay, substitute boy with dog. Is it okay? :P
Jez
Jez
no, you don't run through a beach
usually across
Oh....okay.
beaches aren't enclosed, so you don't run through them.
run through a street or a tunnel or a building
things that are enclosed in someway
Probably heard run across a road too.
13:32
yep, from one side to the other
I don't understand this example
1 - I ........... finished the exam in time yesterday
only just finished
have only just finished

Read more at http://www.usingenglish.com/quizzes/228.html#iLDrdV7oMfUpe6Py.99
only just
@Mistu4u No sooner is a bit complicated, but it contains what I call subject-verb inversion, which I think is the same as what some call subject-auxiliary inversion. The last example I would call subject-complement inversion.
@MattЭллен why not 2?
"have only just" would be something that only just stopped happening, not something that stopped happening yesterday
13:33
it is used with yestaerday
e.g. I have only just finished my lunch
@Cerberus okay.Need to study more.
@MattЭллен But I completed my test yesterday!!
@Mistu4u Apparently, there is a conflict of terminology here. The Wikipedia article was taken over by some linguists from a particular branch that clashes with conventional terminology.
and it confused me
@Mistu4u right. that's a different structure altogether
13:36
With a specific time in the past, use the simple past. When there is no specific time in the past, use the present perfect.
41
Q: How do the tenses in English correspond temporally to one another?

RobustoNon-native speakers often get confused about what the tenses in English mean. With input from some of the folk here I've put together a diagram that I hope will provide some clarity on the matter. I offer it as the first answer to this question. Consider it a living document. Input is welcome, ...

(To simplify the rule.)
Sometimes specific time is not mentioned and past simple is used
@Cerberus Yes, it does not specifically explicate the English usage.
13:39
Even though the terms are normally used for English as I described them.
@Monica Yes, no rule is absolute. But it does apply in your example.
When someone say "Run through something", is that mean he is trying to learn something by going through chapters on book?
Yes, that is possible?
What is the context?
I going to run through Web Logic books today (just made it up)
13:43
am is missing
crap
that's right
but it cannot be modified anymore
In British English after the expressions recently, lately, the first time... the last time.... it was the first time, it was the last time... you use past simple or present perfect, Matt?
e.g. I would say "It was the first time I ran the race"
so simple past
and with the rest?
the same
the first time I ate crab I was sick
so it was the first and the last time I ate crab
13:49
but after 'since' BRE speakers prefer to use present perfect, right?
maybe? I don't know. do you have an example?
Is Aussie speaking part of BRE speaking?
We have known each other since we were kids.
Or 'have been kids?'
@TemporaryNickName they are closer to BrE than AmE, I think. but their dialect is distinct.
@Monica were kids.
So past simple after all the expressions I mentioned. Thanks a lot!
13:53
no trouble!
What I understand about using simple past and present perfect is that you should understand if the result of the past action still persists or not. And of course the action should have happened in the near past. Not a long time ago. Like That was the first time, I ate a beef. But if I am vomiting presently for eating beef I would say I am vomiting because I have eaten beef
You are right
The first sentence has a tone I ate beef a long time ago.
Jez
Jez
@Mistu4u by the way, beef is a mass noun / uncountable
don't have a cow, man!
13:55
hmm, that is why I have not used a/an before beef in the second sentence, but I overlooked the mistake in the first tense. Never mind.
:)
Online tests are confusing sometimes
I use usingenglish.com tests
BDW as being a Hindu it is against our religion to eat beef.
they have language polls
that you might find interesting
13:56
@Monica I have bookmarked the site :)
Mistu
Hope you will like it
They also have list of idioms, and proverbs.
I kinda started to reckon if vocab that I'm about to use is plural or singular.
This sentence confused me a lot
The morning was cold and rainy, but since 4o'clock the weather changed and now the sun is shining brightly.
I used past simple as the situation refers to the past
but have been told that present perfect is possible too
Ohhhhh
I have to go now. Thanks everyone for your help and suggestions
See you all
14:11
@Monica *has changed
Bye!
Thanks
Bye
14:32
I know, crazy, but did you check out a thesaurus? — Mitch 2 mins ago
@Mistu4u what is 'BDW'?
Also, what the hell is up with words? they're so ... they mean so much but only after you've used them a lot. They're so... wordy.
Kit
Kit
Oooh, new feature.
Can you see the deleted comments button, or is that mod only?
Like when you learn profanity in a nother language.
@Kit ?? Link?
@Kit where would I look?
Kit
Kit
On the question you just linked to.
Oh that's sweet.
not for me
Kit
Kit
14:43
0
Q: Are there by chance any synonyms for «synonym»?

FUZxxlI was discussing with some friends about synonyms when we found, that ironically nobody of us knew any synonyms to the word «synonym» itself. Are there any?

@sim check it out ^
New feature.
or when you learn your first profanity. you use it all over the place hoping you won't get slapped. and you don't for a bit. then someone slaps you (metaphorically of course). Then that word -feels- bad.
@Kit !! yeah I deleted it. It's totally deletable.
but I beat you to it.
Kit
Kit
No, that's not what I mean.
oh.
It isn't showing up on my phone but I know what you're referring to @kit
Then you better explain yourself, young lady.
Kit
Kit
14:46
Check it. Sweeet.
That is both really subtle...
and not available to me.
so subtle we can't see it
oh and you get a 'mod' button.
Kit
Kit
Probably because I clicked on it already.
yeah I can't see it any more. My eesight is going.
as we speak.
Kit
Kit
14:47
@Mitch Yep. You could have one too.
along with my 'y's.
where is it going?
@Kit 'could' could mean different things.
Kit
Kit
@Jez Could mean I'm sexist and irrational.
Jez
Jez
why is your avatar transparent @Kit?
14:50
@Kit wtf man. stop the going back in time stuff. I"m getting temporal vertigo.
Kit
Kit
It's difficult to concentrate with all this whining going on.
@Jez why? because she's handy with transparency in gimp? Or are you looking for a metaphysical reason like why she chose that? I think it is a good representation of her inner turmoil, so open that she's inscrutable.
Kit
Kit
I'm flattered. You got it exactly right.
If by 'got it right' you mean 'make no sense at all', then yes.
I'll be impressed if you can make your avatar mirror-colored. I wanna see your gimp-fu do -that-.
Kit
Kit
I'm surprised it has caused such a ruckus.
It's hardly gimp fu to create a blank image.
14:56
If you don't know, you don't know.
can one's avatar be an avi file? so it cycles through some images? or blinks giving people fits?
Kit
Kit
I don't think so.
I've never tried it though.

« first day (824 days earlier)      last day (4397 days later) »