« first day (147 days earlier)      last day (5069 days later) » 

20:05
@psmears I noticed that too. I've had to resort to clicking on my reputation number (to get recent voting history), then from there clicking on "Responses" (to hopefully get recent comments, though I've noticed that it's often buggy/incomplete).
What ends up happening is that I often simply forget to check out the Responses tab, so the only way I find out about comments is if the Superconducting Supercollider Thingummy™ on the top left notifies me.
@Martha Yes, that's been my experience too...
It has a number of disadvantages (quite apart from the bugginess), among them that it involves opening more than one page, and that it requires remembering what I've already seen (which is harder than it should be!)
@psmears (not that you asked me, but) the envelope was always broken/old for me anyway, so i don't mourn its passing.
i always use the StackExchange dropdown for finding new goodness anyway
@Martha Do you happen to know if there's any discussion going on at Meta? I guess I should have paid more attention to the previous ones, but I got somewhat discouraged after the SE response to the original "Eeeeek" question, and its (on-topic) successors...
@JSBangs The envelope itself was pretty broken, but the page it linked to I found useful, as it neatly summarised everything that had happened since I last looked, all on one page
@JSBangs I don't think that tells you about rep change, does it?
And the other disadvantage - unless someone's going to tell me a way round it, which I'd be very happy to hear about - is that it always requires a click: there's no way to just bookmark the page, and then bring it straight up
@psmears As far as I can tell, all discussion of this topic on Meta has been ruthlessly suppressed.
@psmears This.
That's no big hardship when I'm at home (with proper computer, proper mouse and decent internet speeds) - but when I'm trying to use the site from my phone (to make use of a spare two minutes in between times), having to click on that tiny button and waiting for another page load can make the difference between being able to respond to new comments and not having time to...
@Martha I may try my own luck and attempt to raise this on Meta at some stage... but I feel I've already used up my spare SO time for today :-/
20:21
@psmears, in other news, @Kosmonaut reopened the question you've been editing.
I still am not exactly happy with it.
But I don't know if I am being too cranky about it or not.
Yay, thanks @Kosmonaut! I'm hoping that a suitable answer or two will make it all feel better...
Hey, I just noticed that the duplicate message has been changed from "Possible Duplicate" to "Exact Duplicate"! It's still formatted as a blockquote, though.
Well, it's a start.
F'x
F'x
@Martha do you mean there?
1
Q: Help on what “google-fu” means

rahul shetty Exact Duplicate: Can anyone tell me what the suffix “-fu” stands for in the following sentence? I was reading developer article on searching MSDN network when I find sentence talks about google-fu. It says, “To search for C++ delimeters and code snippets is going to take a li...

I edited this message, the "possible" annoys me much
20:35
lol
Edited by hand!
@Fx Ah, ok. (Hmph.)
Fantastic, now a user with 100% of closed questions pretends to say to the others when they posted off-topic questions.
@kiamlaluno What are you referring to?
19
Q: What does "TL;DR:" mean?

kiamlalunoI found two different sentences that were prefixed by TL;DR:. What does it mean? TL;DR: I've been here for quite some time, spent considerable time and effort in shaping the […].

See the comments from D W.
I have never known to be so important that moderators don't even close my questions.
F'x
F'x
@kiamlaluno I am sorry, I probably agree with him a bit
I don't remember, but I visited the question and clearly the second downvote it mine
but I suppose the endless stream of comments the guy generated is even worse than just having the question
20:39
@Fx If you think it's off-topic, you can vote to close it.
I think the question isn't that bad — it's not truly a dictionary question because I don't think it would be in trustworthy dictionaries.
F'x
F'x
@kiamlaluno I probably did back then; votes decay away
Also, "tl;dr" has taken on an extended use, as shown in kiamlaluno's example
F'x
F'x
and I'm not angry or anything that it wasn't closed, as other people have a different opinion
It doesn't simply mean "too long; didn't read". Now it also means "what follows is the short version for those who didn't want to read the long version".
20:41
@Fx That means that with all the users who can vote to close, there have not been 5 users who thought it was off-topic.
F'x
F'x
@kiamlaluno exactly, that's my point
20:51
This feels like a dupe, but my search-fu is not up to par:
0
Q: What's the difference between "onto" and "on to"

codeulikeWhat's the difference between "onto" and "on to" and where should they be used, etc?

Ok, I just used up my vote quota (yet again), so I'm taking that as a sign that I've wasted enough time here, and I need to go do some actual (gasp, horrors!) work. Have fun!
(I am glad here it's 11 PM, and I don't have to work.)
Here comes @Cerberus.
So I do.
So do we.
21:05
@Martha Perhaps this is what you were after?
0
Q: What's the difference between "onto" and "on to"

codeulikeWhat's the difference between "onto" and "on to" and where should they be used, etc?

Not an exact dupe, but related...
21:20
I just realized how striking the two different modes of inversion are in this sentence:
So I do.
So do I.
Apparently emphasis is on on the final word each time.
But the word "so" already induces inversion on its own in some cases... so this is probably a bit more complicated.
So it is.
Hmm why isn't "so is it" possible?
Well I suppose it is possible, just not in this context.
It's possible as a question ("So, is it?"), but that's cheating :)
No it is also possible elsewhere:
And yes it can theoretically happen elsewhere, but it's hard to come up with a non-contrived example :)
21:24
Keep that dog away from me! — You are a stinking monster, why be so unfriendly? — So is it! I don't want to stink even more than I already do!
Or some such natural example.
("My brother has a dog. He is smelly. So is it.")
2
Hmm, almost-jinx!
Okay... tell me you read my example before you made up yours?
Nope!
My God. We are weird. How can we think of people stinking like dogs at the same time, with so little context?
I actually pressed enter on mine before yours appeared - yours took a few seconds to come up, due to my connection being slow...
21:26
I know the phenomenon.
This proves that people are truly weird in this room. So is it.
Clearly EL&U makes you psychic:
1 hour ago, by Martha
Spooky. :)
Spooky is the word.
Too bad those time stamps are like "1 hour ago" now.
Have you ever posted an answer in the exact same second as someone else? I have, and it was weird.
You can hover over the timestamps to see the exact time
(a trick I only learnt today, in that same discussion in fact :) )
21:30
Hah.
Well that shows I am not alone.
Do you know what the Z means after the time?
Probably nothing, as it is in all time stamps.
Not that I've noticed... though what would be really spooky would be if the two answers were identical too (and longer than a single word of course!)
I'm assuming it means "GMT"
I think I've come across that usage before, though I can't recall where
And "z" isn't easy to search for...
Hmm...
Yes, in fact here goes:
@Cerberus It means Zulu time, a.k.a. GMT.
21:33
Coordinated Universal Time (abbreviated UTC) is the time standard by which the world regulates clocks and time. Computer servers, online services and other entities that rely on having a universally accepted time use UTC for that purpose. Coordinated Universal Time is a time standard based on International Atomic Time (TAI) with leap seconds added at irregular intervals to compensate for the Earth's slowing rotation. Leap seconds are used to allow UTC to closely track UT1, which is mean solar time at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich. Since the difference between UTC and UT1 is not all...
@Kiam: Thanks! Why Zulu?
The wikipedia article goes into that - basically because "Z" is "Zulu" in some phonetic alphabets ("A=Alpha, B=Bravo, C=Charlie etc.")
Yeah I just read it.
NATO alphabet they call it.
I'm actually not sure what I'd use for Z.
Zorro!
As alternative, I can think of zuzzurellone.
Hah yes, of course, zuzzurellone, why didn't I think of that.
21:39
It's what I say all days, before to fall asleep.
Hey, Kiam, do you know how Italian z is rendered in IPA?
Which z? :-)
Oh dear... in grazie?
I think there are two z in Italian.
Oh: cane you give two example words?
(Hey, I used an Italian accent in my English spelling, the extra e!)
21:40
I know, you will say there are no z in Italian. :-)
?
Not English z for shoa... but who cares for that!
I-t-a-l-i-a-n: see? There is no z.
? I see a z. The one near the a.
It's just really small.
I am glad you didn't ask about gn or gl.
Hmm I think I got gn. But yes I keep forgetting about gl.
Gn is like English ny, isn't it?
21:46
‹z› symbolizes /dz/ or /ts/ depending on context, with few minimal pairs. For example: zanzara /dzanˈdzaːra/ "mosquito" and nazione /natˈtsjoːne/ "nation".
I took what Wikipedia says.
The digraph ‹gn› represents /ɲ/. ‹gl› represents /ʎ/ before ‹i›, and never at the beginning of a word, except in the personal pronoun and definite article gli. An exception is the word glicerina ("glycerin"), which is pronounced with a hard <g>.
To notice that the personal pronoun is egli, not gli, as it seems reading Wikipedia.
I think we call the z in zanzara, the sweet z.
There are also two ways to say s, as in rosa.
Ah!
Thanks, very informative.
I think I know the s: that is the same in most other languages (though usually not in Dutch).
So, do you mean gli is pronounced egli, or that it is even written egli?
I think I have seen gli written as well?
I think I know the /ʎ/ pronunciation from voglio.
The personal pronoun is egli, or lui.
Oh! I don't think I've seen that before.
It is spelled so.
OK.
But the article gli does exist?
And when is the article i used?
21:57
In Italian you read a word in the same way they are written.
I know... though not entirely, as you have shown.
I know it is i solisti...
Gli gnocchi, gli zeri, gli elefanti, i somari.
Right... so what is the rule?
It is gli stronzi, though.
I think I learnt the rule for lo once, but that is different. Lo stato, but il sole.
22:00
You use i when the word starts with a consonant, except if it starts with gn, and what we call "impure s."
Oh... and what makes an s impure?
Gli is the plural of lo.
Stato, stronzo (I am sorry for the word).
Really? They are used with the exact same words?
I recall it's an s followed by a consonant.
22:01
Yes.
Okay, good to know.
Lo stato, gli stati.
Lo gnocco, gli gnocchi.
That is not valid for la. There is just la, not also gla.
I know.
22:03
La casa, la America.
You know more than I do. :-)
Heh you did know that there was no gla.
Gla-diolo. ;-)
Oh gla diolo che vivi nei prati...
(Now @Cerberus is looking for gla diolo.)
Hey I was not. We have that flower too, you know.
In fact, it is some sort of weird curse word in Dutch: achterlijke gladiool!
And I thought we had the copyright on the name!
Nevah!
It is probably Latin, sword-flower or something.
I still don't understand why we in Holland would curse with flowers. It doesn't work.
Besides, what didn't you guys steal from the Romans?
22:18
Google translates it with gladiolus.
Into Latin?
I selected English. :-)
Yes, my Latin dictionary says it is the name of several different kinds of plants in Latin, and it also means small sword.
English probably uses the Latin plant names, as it always does.
22:20
gladiolus |ˌgladɪˈəʊləs|
noun ( pl. gladioli |-lʌɪ| )
an Old World plant of the iris family, with sword-shaped leaves and spikes of brightly coloured flowers, popular in gardens and as a cut flower.
Yay, long live the Old World!
I have never thought that gladiolo would derive from gladius.
I should have thought of that thinking of Operazione Gladio.
Qu'est-ce que c'est?
C'est plus facil!
Quoi? Operazione Gladio?
22:25
It's a long story. It was the name of a NATO operation, that would not allow the communists to take power on same states.
I must stop writing English at these hours.
And I should repair the keyboard of this Mac.
Apart to be an American keyboard, its shift-keys don't work with some keys, and I had to remap it to a different key.
I see.
Oh dear, don't get me started on Apple!
When I try to press the option-key, I instead press the command-key.
Well, it's all my fault. I used something to clear the keyboard that ruined it.
I cannot even use another keyboard, as it is a MacBook.
It is my special Mac, though.
Don't get me started on laptops!
I'm sure you could get it fixed, though that would probably cost, what, € 150?
I thought to fix it last time I went to USA, but I didn't take it with me.
22:40
Broken stuff sucks.
It sucks twice when it's your own fault.
All times I think of that, I bang my head against the wall. :-)
I know the feeling!
I have messed up my computer so many times trying to get this game to work that I just bought, etc...
It helps; when your head is hurting, you don't think anymore to the other thing which was hurting you.
Like I say, see the bright side.
Uhmmm... It's midnight.
It's well past midnight by my watch... what am I doing still online?!
I didn't want to split hairs, but it is 12:48 AM, here.
(I wonder if I am feeling well, if I say I didn't want to split hairs.)
22:48
yep, same time here... well past midnight :)
nearly one o'clock in fact!
No way, it is only 12.49 am.
The night is young!
And so are we!
Speak for yourself ;-)
Long past my bedtime :-(
Wait I convince of that my arthritis.
Aww.
22:51
Oh, wait... I don't suffer of that.
Goodnight :)
@psmears Good night.
Night!
Wow Rhodri has a new picture.
The whole room is shocked!
It's actually an old picture I finally got round to fixing.
My Gimp-fu is weak :-(
It's not even my joke.
I was almost wondering "who is this new user, Rhodri?"
I like "iGlasses."
I heard that Apple is thinking of the next toy after iPad.
After iPod, and iPad, they think of calling it iPaid.
23:06
After those two, you certainly did!
Damn! I pinned it.
No, I didn't. Wheew!
Gimp-fu? I know Gimp; but fu?
@Cerberus Hi!
It's like Google-fu.
23:08
Che?
By the way, looks like Alain's starred line could use another bump...
No, non che... fu.
Che cosa e fu? Io so che e uno verbo Italiano... ma in Inglese?
That was my weak attempt at Italian.
I don't speak it.
I guess it's "had been."
I know ombra mai fu.
@Cerberus Italian is another language I can (more or less) pronounce, but I can't speak it either.
23:11
Sempre caro mi fu, quest'ermo colle.
E molto difficile!
Allora, che cosa e fu in Gimp-fu?
I guess it means "my ability of using Gimp."
Is it an acronym?
No; it's like Kung-fu.
Fu in kung fu means "master."
Oh! Got it.
I must say Photoshop is easier than Gimp.
23:18
@kiamlaluno I'm not sure whether that's an urban legend or not. The martial arts references I have translate "kung fu" as "hard work."
Of course that may be a free translation.
I don't know; I used both, and Gimp seemed easier.
@Rhodri The NOAD says "Chinese gongfu, from gong (merit) + fu (master)."
OED refuses to explain its etymology.
I'm really not sure about that derivation. On the other hand, I know next to nothing about Chinese languages
If you need to get something done, Photoshop can often do it quicker; but Gimp has a simpler interface.
Neither do I.
The main advantage to Gimp is that it's free. Otherwise, it tries to ape Photoshop a bit too much for my taste. I prefer IrFanView for simple editing (cropping and shrinking), and Paint.net for actually drawing stuff.
23:22
Hey I am looking for a word.
@Cerberus Chambers ditto.
@Martha: I use Irfan for quick edits too. I draw on paper.
Well, yeah, the actual actual drawing happens either on Pergamenata (an imitation parchment) or actual parchment. (Sheepskin, if I have a choice.)
E.g. my gravatar.
The word I am looking for is like this: an adjective that expresses that it is easy to get an overview of something quickly. "This interface is easy to to get the gist of, something like that...
Intuitive?
23:25
Easy to grasp?
@Martha: Really, you drew that yourself? Nice.
"Easy as pie"?
@Cerberus Danke schön. :)
Hmm, not far off, both... but not quite what I need. It also needs to express that it is easy to grasp because of some visual property I think.
I think intuitive is what most translators would choose for this word; but it is not quite as neat as Dutch overzichtelijk.
With sufficient context, transparent might work.
Or Hungarian áttekinthető :D
Wait, lemme look that up.
23:28
Yes, something in between transparent and intuitive would be close. But the Dutch word also summons an image of looking at a landscape from far above.
"Transpitive."
If only we could freely use Hungarian words in English!
@Kiam: Or weird amalgams!
The translating dictionary gives perspicuous
Hmm, perspicuous comes close to transparent...
You can say "cool"; you would be, well, cool.
23:30
@Martha That's an unusual enough word in English that it wouldn't be transparent itself!
Cool, right, right, I see...
Hmm. Mapping.
Mapping?
"Maps onto <something> well"?
I just can't think of a suitable something.
Looking up perspicuous in the regular dictionary in turn gives possible synonyms lucid, intelligible, plain, distinct, explicit.
23:31
Hmm I don't think any of those are as good as transparent and intuitive.
Overzichtelijk can also be used to describe the order of parts of a text.
If a text is overzichtelijk, it is easy to see what's important and what isn't.
It may be a case where you need to use both transparent and intuitive to get your point across.
That is what I fear!
I am glad English doesn't have the answer for everything.
Yeah, and you can't really construct words in English too well. áttekinthetőség = across + gaze + ability + state of being.
@Cerberus English has the answer for everything, just not always in one word ;-)
@Rhodri: Heh, well, if it does, I'm waiting!
The same for the word ontwikkeld.
23:38
I keep thinking "cool" is the right word. :-)
If someone is ontwikkeld, it means he is educated, erudite, but it is a broader word. It means he has had Bildung.
I think formation is sometimes used in a sense close to Bildung? Or perhaps not.
Hmm I don't think so.
He doesn't think so.
Is that different from "he doesn't so think"?
"He doesn't so think" sounds odd.
The order "so think" is archaic; "doesn't" is modern.
The closest (archaic) meaning would be "he doesn't think in such a manner"
i.e. "He doesn't think like that."
But yes, it sounds very odd to a modern English ear.
I've noticed that people tend to be fascinated with "e.g., i.e." questions.
They always get a lot of views.
Why? It isn't so difficult to learn.
23:44
He doth not so thinke.
I just got "Nice Answer" badge #13 for my jinx answer. Seems oddly appropriate.
@Billare: Hi! I think perhaps it is because people can't remember such obscure acronyms?
@Martha: Someone is trying to pull your leg, I'm sure.
Lordy, Yoichi is at it again.
0
Q: Is someone “can’t be talked out of it” in a trouble a quite natural expression?

Yoichi OishiI found the expression a 24-year-old pilotwho landed his plane on beach “could not be talked out of it” when he was in trouble’ in today’s New York Times article titled “A Beach Landing? Well, He’d Seen It on TV.” (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/06/nyregion/06plane.html) To me ‘could not be talk...

@Cerberus I dunno, they seem to come up pretty often in writing. Certainly anyone's who read a technical paper has read them.
I'm not sure I currently possess the intestinal fortitude to edit that into shape.
23:49
@Billare: true.
@Martha Don't look at me. It's ten to one am here, I'll only do something drastic and unhelpful.
alloo to everyone.
It's the "in a trouble" that is bending my brain at the moment.
Hi @jgbelacqua
@Rhodri Oof. Was just looking at that one.
Yes, I don't understand the title either.
Maybe he means "in trouble"?
23:56
I think so. Thanks for the edit @Billare.
I don't subscribe to NYT, so I can't check the quote. Quotes. One of them has to be wrong.
Did they put the paywall up already?
archives, I guess....
I'm just too lazy to check, and they already had a paywall up on older articles....

« first day (147 days earlier)      last day (5069 days later) »