« first day (729 days earlier)      last day (4490 days later) » 

15:01
Now simonyze I had never heard of.
Another American brand.
Why do you have so many words based on brands?
Capitalists.
@Cerberus you should google that
@Cerberus it's simonize. And "What a simonizing job" is a quote from "Death of a Salesman".
@Cerberus What else should they be named after?
@MattЭллен What?
hoovers up Cerberusizing’s sillinessi
15:05
@Cerberus you should google why, because google is a brand that people use as a synonym for web search. you see, it's a joke...
@MattЭллен Ahh you evil genius, I didn't even notice.
The following two lists of generic and genericized trademarks are: * marks which were originally legally protected trademarks, but which have subsequently lost legal protection, and * marks which are still legally protected as trademarks, at least in some jurisdictions List of former trademarks that have become generic terms The following list contains marks which were originally legally protected trademarks, but which have subsequently lost legal protection as trademarks by becoming the common name of the relevant product or service, as used both by the consuming public and commercial com...
But I would never use "Google" for anything other than, well, using the website google.*.
We already have aspirin, which is bad enough.
Thomapyrin.
15:07
@Cerberus you wouldn't. And I wouldn't use the word "simonize" to mean anything than ... whatever it means with whatever product it uses.
it's so much easier to say than acetylsalicylic acid
I used to think a formica-covered kitchen cabinet was one that drew too many ants.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Would you? "Let's google that phrase in the BNC"?
> Heroin - Trademarked by Friedrich Bayer & Co in 1898
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I must admit I use several of those.
15:09
no, but a person might say "lets google that at Bing"
@Cerberus No, I don't think I would.
Heroin I use, of course.
@MattЭллен sixth sick sheikh
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 There you go.
@Cerberus But lots of people do.
15:09
@MattЭллен Then that person is funny, but a nut.
@Cerberus the BNC isn't a web sreach, it's a search of the BNC, they're not the same thing
@MattЭллен you'll laugh but most Russians I know are good friends with ацетилсалициловая кислота and use it on a regular basis. The name, that is.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I have vaguely heard of this phenomenon but never observed it first-hand.
@MattЭллен Bleh you nitpicker!
@Cerberus well, probably
@Cerberus Well, it has happened lots of times with other trademarks
15:10
Yes.
But our generation can make a stand!
And in fact if I tell someone to "google" it I am not usually telling them to "use google"
Here's the thing.
Aug 26 '11 at 2:25, by Cerberus
@ChaosGamerΕΛΥēelū Google "Wikipedia".
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Then what are you telling him?
You can say "Google Wikipedia" and everyone understands you. Now try "Bing Cuil".
15:11
@Cerberus most people already mistake the web for the internet
@RegDwighт . . . to catch the conscience of the king
although, that's not a brand thing, per se
@MattЭллен Do they really?
I don't really use the web anyway.
@tchrist a cat may catch the conscience of the king.
@Cerberus yeah. find me someone who doesn't surf the internet from firefox
15:12
Umm.
@Cerberus you're using the web right now!
I'm afraid I don't get it.
@MattЭллен I removed the quotation marks to improve the ambiguity, yes.
Hey, @Reg, how common is it for Germans to forget the gender of nouns? I do remember a lot of articles getting slurred, swallowed, or otherwise obfuscated.
@Robusto “forget”?
(It was less funny with the quotation marks.)
15:13
@Cerberus I'm telling him to search for the information on the web.
oh, sorry, I didn't realise it is a joke :D
@Robusto In Dutch, people forget gender all the time.
Forget, as in being unable to remember or at least unsure.
@RegDwighт Hamlet was no pussy.
Meeting time. AFK for a mo.
15:14
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I don't get what your other line meant.
has been meeting for 75 minutes aleffingready
Haha no way!
@Robusto happens in speech from time to time. Usually you catch the mistake yourself and correct it immediately. Mostly, but not always, these are simple conflation errors, when you start saying one thing and then change your mind midway through the sentence, and it happens to be in front of a noun. The other scenario is words that nobody is sure the gender of, like Ketchup or Reisig (brushwood).
How about relative clauses?
@Cerberus If someone says "I don't know what all this frobnozzle is about", and I say "just google it", I am not saying "literally search for frobnozzle on Google.com". I am telling him to search for "frobnozzle" on the web using whatever high-quality search engine he prefers.
Jez
Jez
15:17
@RegDwighт bit like english ppl saying "a software", forgetting or not knowing that it's a mass noun
@tchrist no-pussies don't ask themselves pointless questions while holding skulls. QED.
@Jez Sounds like ESLlers to me.
@RegDwighт Ich sah ein Mädchen, dort im neuen Laden—du weißt doch, oben am Berg—, die ich nog nie in der Schule gesehen hatte.
@Cerberus that is a completely separate issue particular to that noun alone.
And you know that, of course.
?
I don't know.
15:19
Maidens are so 19th-century, anyway.
Everyone says "Mädchen" on their first try.
Give me another example, then we can talk. Otherwise, meh.
Just any relative clause far removed from its antecedent.
It happens a lot in Dutch, especially with abstracta.
Can happen, I guess.
The m/f pronoun is used instead of the n one.
The same can happen in English with number, although it is not “correct”. But it happens.
15:21
Yeah.
And English has this other mistake that is sadly all too frequent.
With numbers.
You can’t actually call them mistakes. Or it.
@RegDwighт Give me a neuter abstract noun.
It’s more complicated than that.
@tchrist But we can.
No, I can’t.
15:22
It's stupid.
Give me a real example.
@Cerberus good luck with that. They'll be feminine.
Worst of all, I accidentally catch myself making it. Only very rarely, of course.
Well, okay: Wissen.
And I’ll give ’em hell.
15:23
Gebirge?
How is that abstract? It's real and tangible.
Isn't it das Gebirge? But it's not abstract enough.
Well, it is a collection of things.
I gave you Wissen already.
Right, right.
But infinitives...
That's one that has long parted ways with the infinitive.
15:24
Don't you have something else?
It's a completely different word. Nobody draws the connection anymore.
Umm.
Unlike with, oh say, Gehen or Springen.
Pretty sure that no linguist can call a majority usage a mistake. Nor even a common one.
Weten is also somewhat special in Dutch.
15:25
It really is knowledge. It is not "the knowing".
@tchrist Few linguists are concerned with style, and not in a prescriptive manner. It is outside their scope. So what they think is not very relevant.
Sprong seems to be missing.
I think it’s dialectal, though.
@RegDwighт Yeah OK...but it's not exactly easy to compare.
What about sprong?
A sprong is a jump.
And the past tense of springen.
Which means to jump.
15:28
Oh, I see. Chaucer had sprong.
I hope he saw a doctor for it
@Cerberus They can be cunning.
Who doesn't?
Hello.
@MετάEd Yes, they try. It is like the surgeon writing a book about how the soul can be seen in brain scans.
Yo.
15:30
Hello.
@Mahnax ¡Hola!
Oh, so did Spenser, and much later. “With that sprong forth a naked swayne.”
so, like sprang?
Very.
How's things?
15:30
I see
@Cerberus No, it is like cunning linguists. But I know what you mean. Dualism. snort
@tchrist That's what a naked swayne should do. Sprong forth.
@Mahnax I'm 12K into nanowrimo. how are you?
I’d thought sprong were missing from spring, sprang, sprung, save for ysprongen.
@MετάEd You meant froth.
@MετάEd Ohh that. Can't believe I missed that. snortle
@MattЭллен I'm 11k in, but I've got a week off school soon, so I'll be catching up shortly.
15:32
@MattЭллен You're going to win!!
@tchrist I'll leave that to Presidential candidates.
Can’t trust people who keep brains in cans.
I'm 100k+ lines into chat.
That's lines for you, not words.
@Mahnax wow! good going.
@Cerberus well
@Cerberus I
@Cerberus can
What’s this about lions?
15:33
@Cerberus just
@Cerberus make
@MattЭллен Thanks! You too.
3...2...1...
@Cerberus it
Somebody seems to be lyin’.
@Cerberus mean
15:34
Aaaand chat lag should set in right now.
@Cerberus the
@Cerberus same
Cerb, you should collect all your chat messages ever into a bound volume
Bound whither?
@MattЭллен Now do you understand what it is like to be I, Cerberus? That lag sucks, huh?
bound in a hardcover book
15:35
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Yay!
@Cerberus yeah, but I only got it a little bit.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 I bet it would make an awesome table stand.
@MattЭллен Then you're not trying hard enough.
You could have it published on lulu.com
In a volume bound for external dissemination?
@Cerberus I've got a book to write :Þ
15:35
Not the same thing.
Heh.
so people have trouble with lay laid lain lie loo la la whatever... do they also have trouble with bind bound bounded?
And find found founded.
@Cerberus I have seen people confuse that one
I remember not understanding bounded and founded when I was young.
15:40
What I hate is the ESLlers who keep adding spurious -ed endings to verbs that are invariant in the past, like “casted” for cast.
Sitted down.
Has been casted.
I sitted down.
What's wrong with that?
I remember one of my elementary school teachers questioning my use of the word "don" in a short story: "I donned my belt". She asked me "what is that supposed to mean?"
She sat me down.
She satted me down.
@Cerberus glares
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Haha, should have fired her.
15:41
@tchrist my 2yo son says "sitted". And "runned".
Runt!
@Cerberus To this day I am not sure if she was testing me or she didn't know the word
Funny.
It could be that she didn't think you were capable of that.
So she either wanted to make sure you understood what you had written, or that it wasn't your father's work.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 So belts count as gay apparel?
You count as gay apparel.
15:43
As an American I can say that 'cash me a check' and 'cash a check for me' actually sound like 2 completely different phrases with entirely different meanings. In fact they sound so different its hard to even except that your comparing them. 'Cash a check for me' wouldn't be used without another subject in the sentance, such as "Molly is going to cash a check for me", or "Will you cash a check for me?". Where as 'cash me a check' has one subject, yourself. On top of having only one subject its also colloquial, and not acceptable for standard use. — ryan 19 hours ago
Perilous.
Okay, is this on purpose?
@tchrist I guess so? But this wasn't a gay belt. It was just a regular one.
I was about to correct it, but then I thought I got whooshed.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 Deck the halls . . . don we now our gay apparel.
15:44
@RegDwighт Haha, OMG.
@tchrist Yes, I'm familiar with it.
That is so deep.
So many layers.
Well I dunno. User has no other posts.
Weird.
2
Q: How is 'via' pronounced and where did these variations come from?

SoutaOver the years, I've heard people say 'v-ē-ə', 'v-ī-ə', and sometimes the 'uh' is an 'ah' sound. (edit- It has come to my attention that 'via' was once a 'wee-ah' from Latin, but I don't feel like this helps my question. If anything, that just makes me wonder why there is that variation in the be...

15:45
I don’t believe he is right.
It's all about the editor wars.
Cash me a check = Cash a check for me ≠ Cash myself a check
@RegDwighт Careful punctuation with impossibly bad spelling?
Highly suspect.
Attribute not to malice or conspiracy that which may be more readily accounted to ignorance, sloth, stupidity, clumsiness, or other provincialisms.
Look.
He must be serious.
15:48
Delusional then.
We have a believer here.
The deluded are frequently serious.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 but that's normal in childhood language development — over generalisation of rules.
@tchrist Is it really accounted?
Who said that again?
@Cerberus I’d liefer be free from such believers.
15:50
Ah, your sentence is a variation.
@Cerberus I didn’t want to repeat attribute. Explained by.
@tchrist Tell me about it.
Hanlon's Razor is an eponymous adage that reads: ' This particular form is attributed to Robert J. Hanlon. However, earlier utterances that convey the same basic idea are known. Origins and similar quotations The quotation first came from Robert J. Hanlon of Scranton, Pennsylvania, according to his friend Joseph Bigler, as a submission for a book compilation of various jokes related to Murphy's law published in 1980 titled Murphy's Law Book Two, More Reasons Why Things Go Wrong. The name was inspired by Occam's razor. A similar quotation appears in Robert A. Heinlein's 1941 short story ...
@RegDwighт Thanks. I sort of thought it was something like that.
Is liefer Old/Middle English?
15:51
It’s just the comparative of lief, used adverbially.
@Cerberus No, it is Modern English.
@MattЭллен It's normal ESL language development too for the same reason
Jeffrey David Liefer (born August 17, 1974 in Fontana, California) is a former Major League Baseball first baseman and outfielder. He was drafted in the first round of the Major League Baseball Draft by the Chicago White Sox. Liefer has played for the White Sox, Montreal Expos, Tampa Bay Devil Rays, Milwaukee Brewers, and the Cleveland Indians. He played for the Seibu Lions of the Japanese Pacific League during the - seasons. Liefer signed a minor league contract with the Chicago White Sox on January 12, , but retired in June. What's he known for? Liefer is probably most known for bein...
Nice picture of Jeff. He let himself go a little.
@Mr.ShinyandNew安宇 not if they're paying bloody attention (j/k)
@MattЭллен I tried to correct my son: "I runned over here so fast!" No, you ran over here. "No! When I go to the playground I run and run. I runned so fast!"
1876 Tennyson Q. Mary iii. i, ― Far liefer had I in my country hall Been reading some old book.
1898 Pall Mall Mag. June 220 ― To strip was to confess her sex, than which she would liefer have died.
1800 Coleridge Piccolom. iv. v, ― Far liever would I face about, and step Back to my Emperor.
1814 Jefferson Writ. (1830) IV. 223 ― He might spare such a force··as I would as lieve not have to encounter.
1837 Howitt Rur. Life iii. iii. (1862) 242 ― She would as lieve part with the skin off her back as with her money.
15:54
@tchrist I only know it in as lief in that function.
-2
Q: Why do people ask so many programming specific questions on Stack Overflow instead of Programmers, where they belong?

csederI've recently discovered the whole Stack Exchange ecosystem (been living under a rock), and I really like the concept! What I dislike is that Stack Overflow's main section is used for many programming specific questions, while they probably should be registered in the Programmers subsection. I...

What a crapload of crap.
Pretty sure the the 19th century does not count as Old English, nor even Middle.
Neither does Shakespeare.
Not just the delicious irony on OP's part; look at the crap answers, too.
In Dutch, of course we use liever en net zo lief.
15:55
That really illustrates rather nicely what kind of answers you can expect on SO.
Jefferson, Coleridge, and Tennyson — not to mention D.H. Lawrence — are hardly Old or Middle English, nor are they Shakespeareans.
1921 D. H. Lawrence Sea & Sardinia 121 ― They would fetch you a bang over the head as leave as look at you.
@RegDwighт I agree that it is organised in a weird way, but to tell people what to do in such a silly way, and as a total newcomer...
1935 G. Ingram ‘Stir’ Train i. 16 ― ‘I’ve got a little instrument here,’ Margot showed him a thin scalpel··, ‘and··I would as leave stick it into anyone’s belly as any surgeon.’
The spelling varies a bit, but lief is hardly restricted to Shakespeare, let alone to Chaucer or to Beowulf.
@tchrist Sounds like people who didn't understand lief?
> liever, var. liefer, compar. of lief.
For what value of "understand", I daren’t say.
15:59
Just use lief and liever like a good Dutchman and you're good to go.
I know none. All those of my acquaintance are wicked.

« first day (729 days earlier)      last day (4490 days later) »