I have heard it argued that this sort of training does more harm than good. Even the NCMEC doesn't like it: abcnews.go.com/Lifestyle/…
(I should say: they disapprove of the version most commonly taught in schools.)
> He said that the group wants to put an end to using the phrase ["stranger danger"] for three reasons, including the fact that a child is much more likely to be harmed by someone the child knows, and that many children do not fully understand the concept of a "stranger."
> Lastly, Walsh added, "Oftentimes kids are in a situation where they will need to reach out to a stranger for help, whether they're just being lost, or if there's an actual abduction."
> [...]
> Walsh asked the children what they would do if they were in a store shopping with their parents and then suddenly could not find their mother or father.
> "You couldn't find them," Walsh told the elementary school students. "And you saw some of these people [e.g. a clerk and a security guard] in the store with you. Are these some of the people you might reach out to for help?"
> One 9-year-old boy named Zac said, "They're all strangers and you would never talk to a stranger unless you know them."
Huh. I'm not sure how I feel about that interaction.
Both of them behaved...questionably. I don't think either of them was ultimately harmed by the interaction.
You shouldn't suddenly cheek-kiss someone when they're just hugging you for a selfie. You also shouldn't escalate someone's cheek-kiss into a lip-kiss.
But it doesn't seem--unless it's been reported elsewhere--that either of them actually objected to the other's behavior.
@Cerberus The big problem pointed out is, he is much older than that girl and kissed on the lips instead of on cheeks. One can easily counter it by saying who started it.
@alphabet Unless she files a complaint maybe three decades later that she was harassed.
if that explains the situation, I would like to once again express my annoyance at people who claim they can't control their own actions when they obviously can
@Vikas as with everything else, the versions that are not made with copious amounts of sugar. Same goes for yogurt, fruit juice, you name it. If it has a lot of sugar to taste appealing, well, it tastes appealing but the health risk outweighs the benefits.
Most herbal extracts in one way or another contain a lot of antioxidants, and Theobroma cacao is no exception. The only thing is chocolate is way more appealing than if you extracted nutrients from the bark.
So you have to be masochistic or snobby to want dark chocolate just for its antioxidants
Fruit tastes way better, and unless you've messed up your metabolism so bad that fructose is also bad enough for you, if you want antioxidants, just have some fruit. Pomegranate, most citrus fruits really, that's the stuff
@Vikas will it matter in a week?
@Mitch it stings your throat and numbs it to the itches that make you cough. Here we have a cough syrup, "diphenhydramine compound", meaning it has some ammonium chloride.
Yeah, not that delicious. But if I'm stranded on an island and I only brought cough syrups with me
@tchrist glycyrrhizin is also a natural fucks-up-your-metabolism. It's a mineralocorticoid. Maybe a bit of glucocorticoid activity too, can't recall. So like corticosteroids.
@Xanne Not instantaneously, no. They might in theory contact you later. But I suspect the email address is mostly for tying a response to a uniquifying credential. Sometimes Google Forms provide you with a way to see/recall or even modify your own response based on that credential via a custom link, sometimes provided by mail, but not this time.
@Mitch Maybe you call it candy or not depending on how much added sugar there is, compare Hershey dark vs. 72% Dark. The added sugar (which is the culprit) in Hershey is obscenely unhealthy.
@Cerberus Mentos is one of my favorite; chewy (gummy) peppermint.
@tchrist Yeah keeping WH- sounds pretty far southern to me. Or rather, it doesn't remind me of a southern accent but it makes my ears prick up when someone says 'hwat' andonly then do I notice they have a southern accent.
for me, the whole part of the questionnaire where he asks about ih vs eh, I didn't think he had my real answer which was 'neither 'neither' or 'both' but they're kinda closer to each other and real hard to differentiate maybe sometimes. Which is to say I couldn't land on a consistent answer.
Of -course- pen and pin are pronounced differently...except am I just reading how they're different because when I pronounce them in my head sometimes they're different, sometimes the same.
The pin/pen thing has been slowly spreading outside the South. I've been surprised to hear some people with no other trace of a Southern accent talking about the stringth of their intintions
Of course, some of them may be Southerners who've lost all other features of that accent, but I'm pretty sure you can hear it from people from other regions
@M.A.R. I had heard that, though free radicals/oxidants are an actual thing, are and so are anti-oxidants for removing/depowering those radicals, that eating foods with those anti-oxidant substances hardly has any effect on the quantity of oxidants in the body.
In other words, anti-oxidant food supplements is sort of a scam.
@alphabet If you listen to the news after a hurricane or tornado in the south, you expect to hear a lot of drawlin and g-dropping, and "ah cain't" but they sound so normal, like everyone else, GenAmE.
But then they say some crap like 'thank the lord it wudn worse' and then you know you're in the south.
OTOH, a while back I heard someone with a fairly strong Southern accent claim that nobody in the South, including him, actually has a Southern accent anymore
On some definitions of "General American," I don't speak General American. But I don't think anyone assumes I have any specific regional accent. Dunno.
@Cerberus Yes, I think it's from Italy but available worldwide for decades already (even when I was little). Here's the product info in Dutch. Very sugary though, hence it's definitely candy.
Perhaps something akin to /ˈfɪi̯ə̯ɫ/ or /ˈfɪ͡i̯ɫ/. I can't draw an arrow over three sounds in IPA. And while tautosyllabic consonant clusters comprising three sequentially articulated phones certainly exist, I'm not convinced that this can happen with three vowels in a row without the middle of the three transforming into a (semi-)consonant and splitting the sequence between two syllables.
Or this may be why yankees never understand southerners. We don't perceive syllables the same way.
John Wells has commented the even non-rhotic SSBE doesn't truly have triphthongs because they aren't in the same syllable.
Non-specialists sometimes imagine that any three vowels in a row make a triphthong, but this is not so.
Spanish, however, does have triphthongs. You can find these in words like buey (ox) and in second-person plural verbs like cambiéis, averiguáis in regions that retain the vosotros inflection.
And these are perceived by native speakers to be sequences of three vowels in a single syllable. That does not happen in English in words like wise, wows, yays because the leading glide isn't thought of as a vowel for us. Furthermore, our phonemic falling diphthongs are not as long as Spanish ones; its the glide element is much shorter for us than for them or they're stretching out the nucleus more. Not sure.
@Xanne Green and blue and yellow are all overflowing categories, but on purpose, and purple is probably the 'key' that you need to remove all the overflowing terms from the other categories?
I basically couldn't get any of the categories but purple is something commercial American that I wouldn't know about.
@Xanne Usually, the overlap is different: you see things that seem to go together, but you can only get 3. So you force yourself to abandon that. And then it turns out the real category was a different sense of the word.
But five words all fitting a category perfectly: she doesn't normally do that.
I don’t get most purples except as residuals, because they’re based on popular culture, usually. Some are a general category with a letter added or removed, though. I should try one of those.
@Xanne I found it too easy, but it seems like I may be in the minority. Odd, since usually I think I'm worse at this game than anyone else. Maybe easier for 'Muricans.
@Mitch Really? I tried Lindt 100% Cacao Dark Chocolate it's not hurting, nor too bitter, although surprisingly hardly any sugar. Maybe it's not what it appears to be?
Although, the rest of the percentage may refer to sugar, I'm not that sure what it really means.
This article may clear it up. About an example (75%), it says:
> "The other 25% of the recipe is anything that isn't chocolate. Typically, this is mostly sugar, but depending on the chocolate, it can also be powdered milk or a bit of vanilla."
@Cerberus I notice that too, but it's fair game in Connections.
@Mitch its effect, taken chronically, probably makes considerable difference regarding whether or not your diet can be called healthy. But yeah, all the goddamn supplements that claim to prevent cancer, treat cancer, prevent Alzheimer's disease, "improve" liver health, prevent "skin aging", prevent aging, help memory loss, help "treat" rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, polyarthritis, multiple sclerosis, help wound healing, and on and on and on and on . . .
They're all herbal extracts that have antioxidants, and just attribute all of these miracles to an anti-inflammatory effect.
Their claims are almost always very weak. Just because in arthrises MMPs release a crapton of oxidants, doesn't mean a bunch of -OH groups in a compound will definitely help that.
It's quite easy but the trick is that there are 6 for blue and 5 for yellow and 5 for green, which makes it a good Connections puzzle. Live and Play 🟦🟦🟦🟪 🟦🟦🟦🟪 🟩🟨🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟪🟦🟦🟦 🟦🟦🟦🟦 🟪🟨🟪🟪 🟪🟨🟪🟨 🟨🟨🟨🟪 🟨🟨🟪🟪 🟨🟪🟨🟨 🟨🟨🟨🟨 🟪🟪🟪🟪
@CowperKettle sure, about everything, and that's exactly it. The immune system is everywhere, affecting everything. And the sure mark of its work is inflammation. Inflammation could be the problem, like when a diabetic foot ulcer isn't healing. And it could be the solution. Like every other time the body patches up wounds. It's a delicate balance, and just introducing some reducing agents into the body won't affect it appropriately.
As I said, if you keep having pomegranates for a decade, you have been living healthier for that long. Doesn't mean you become immune to cancer, hepatotoxicity or dementia. You would get laser vision though
> Recently, chocolate producers pulled off a new tour de force. To create a bar with 100% cocoa, but sweetened... To achieve this, they used the sugar contained in the cocoa juice. The final product contains 75% cocoa in the traditional sense and the rest is cocoa sugar. As a result, the 100% claim is perfectly legitimate, while producing a sweeter product. Note that these are often blends, with the cocoa juice often coming from Africa and the cocoa liqueur from South America.
> These experiments are interesting and allow us to discover the gustatory variety of the fruit of the cocoa tree. However, they should not obscure the fact that the quality of the products and the experience of the producer make all the difference in a product with a high cocoa content. Personally, I prefer either the classic 100% or a dark chocolate with a lower cocoa content to this alternative with a very (too?) calibrated taste.
@jlliagre New word for me "gustatory" . Is that the best translation from French? Why not use a more common "flavor variety" rather than "gustatory variety"?
"Eye of the Beholder" (also titled "The Private World of Darkness" when initially rebroadcast in the summer of 1962) is episode 42 of the American television anthology series The Twilight Zone. It originally aired on November 11, 1960, on CBS.
== Opening narration ==
Suspended in time and space for a moment, your introduction to Miss Janet Tyler, who lives in a very private world of darkness. A universe whose dimensions are the size, thickness, length of the swath of bandages that cover her face. In a moment we will go back into this room, and also in a moment we will look under those bandages...
@Mitch Guess it's up to the better manufacturer to disclose their choice of cacao or their process for making that essential ingredient in their dark chocolate. Meaning, if they don't say anything about it, we assume the worst.
@GratefulDisciple That normally isn't five terms that tightly fit together: when you have five that loosely fit together, that usually means you're still not seeing the exact connection.
@alphabet removing wrinkles makes you look younger, younger people look hotter. Therefore younger people are sweatier. So younger people need to keep hydrated.
Did anyone mention what percentage of the Gulf of Mexico belongs to USA, and what percentage belongs to Mexico? IF if turns out that US percentage is greater, maybe there's some basis, although of course I don't support it.
In 1989 there was an initiative in North Dakota to change the state's name to simply "Dakota". Is this the first time an initiative was taken for a state to change its name after becoming a state within the Union ? Did a state ever actually change its name after admission? Is there a federal proc...
> "The Indians all want the American State of Indiana to change its name — either that, or else add some federally recognized Indian Reservations to the State."
Spacely Sprockets makes the best galactic gaskets money can buy.
Distributors pay Spacely a buck a pop, the distributors sell them for two bucks each to retailers, and customers are plenty happy to shell out five bucks plus sales tax every time they bought one. They're so out of this world that the main distributor scored a sweet contract for fifty million units at that price which Spacely duly produced and shipped off to the distributor.
How much did Spacely end up making off all this once all was said and done?
@tchrist 'Pends on the amount of surplus value that the owners of the means of production extract by alienating workers from the product of their labor, donnit?
It costs Spacely only 70 cents to make a gasket. Unfortunately these need to be packaged up safe from cosmic rays, so that runs them another dime each. Still, they'd expected to score ten million bucks off this contract once executed.
Alas this was not to be. The gaskets were impounded on the Texas border at El Paso en route from the maquiladoras to Musk's rocket factory for duties owed.
Spacely had to shell out 12.5M in sudden tariffs that hadn't existed when the contract was signed a year ago. They lost $2.5M in the "deal".
I sure hope you weren't expecting Musk to pay a penny for any of this.
Stiffers who write their own rules never get stift.